Chapter 2 Modeling Approaches  Physical/chemical (fundamental, global) Model structure by theoretical analysis  Material/energy balances  Heat, mass,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distillation Modeling and Dynamics Distillation Part 2.
Advertisements

Modelling & Simulation of Chemical Engineering Systems
Ratio Control Chapter 15.
First Law of Thermodynamics - Open Systems
Chapter 4 Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes (Open Systems)
Chapter 3 Dynamic Modeling.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 15.
The structure and evolution of stars
Mathematical Modeling of Chemical Processes. Mathematical Model “a representation of the essential aspects of an existing system (or a system to be constructed)
Development of Dynamic Models Illustrative Example: A Blending Process
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Development of Dynamic Models Illustrative Example: A Blending Process
Chapter Summer 2. Comparator 3. Block Blocks in Series
Development of Empirical Models From Process Data
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Chapter 11 1 Closed-Loop Responses of Simple Control Systems In this section we consider the dynamic behavior of several elementary control problems for.
Chapter 4 Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer, and Mass Transfer:
Mathematical Modeling of Chemical Processes
Introduction to Process Control
Introduction to API Process Simulation
THEORETICAL MODELS OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES
CHAPTER II PROCESS DYNAMICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING
Chapter 11: Heat Exchangers
ERT 210/4 Process Control & Dynamics
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
Basic Probability (Chapter 2, W.J.Decoursey, 2003) Objectives: -Define probability and its relationship to relative frequency of an event. -Learn the basic.
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS
Chapter 2 Mathematical Modeling of Chemical Processes Mathematical Model (Eykhoff, 1974) “a representation of the essential aspects of an existing system.
Computational Method in Chemical Engineering (TKK-2109)
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 26.
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
CHAPTER 11 BALANCES ON TRANSIENT PROCESSES
1. (1.3) (1.8) (1.11) (1.14) Fundamental equations for homogeneous closed system consisting of 1 mole:
Interacting vs. Noninteracting Systems
Chapter 8: The Thermodynamics of Multicomponent Mixtures
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
1 DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES : Development of Empirical Models from Process Data ERT 210 Process Control & Dynamics.
Energy Balance on Reactive Processes
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Ch 8 : Conservation of Linear Momentum 1.Linear momentum and conservation 2.Kinetic Energy 3.Collision 1 dim inelastic and elastic nut for 2 dim only inellastic.
Entropy Rate Balance for Closed Systems
1 Property Relationships Chapter 6. 2 Apply the differential form of the first law for a closed stationary system for an internally reversible process.
PROCESS MODELLING AND MODEL ANALYSIS © CAPE Centre, The University of Queensland Hungarian Academy of Sciences Modelling Lumped Parameter Systems C5A.
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
ERT 210/4 Process Control & Dynamics DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF PROCESSES :
Chapter 7: Equilibrium and Stability in One-Component Systems
TRANSFER FUNCTION Prepared by Mrs. AZDUWIN KHASRI.
President UniversityErwin SitompulSMI 1/1 Dr.-Ing. Erwin Sitompul President University Lecture 1 System Modeling and Identification
ChemE 260 Transient Mass and Energy Balances April 20, 2005 Dr. William Baratuci Senior Lecturer Chemical Engineering Department University of Washington.
Chapter 2 Development of Dynamic Models 1. Chapter 2 The Rationale for Dynamic Process Models The dynamic model of a process can be used to 1.Improve.
Lecture 2: Mathematical Modeling Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013 The copyright holder provides a royalty-free license for use of this material at non-profit.
1 Development of Empirical Models From Process Data In some situations it is not feasible to develop a theoretical (physically-based model) due to: 1.
Gas Bottle Blow-Down Analysis. Introduction This lesson provides the means to estimate the gas state in a pressure vessel during or after depressurization.
CHAPTER 2 MASS BALANCE and APPLICATION
Chapter 5 Part 2 Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes Study Guide in PowerPoint to accompany Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 8th edition.
공정 열역학 Chapter 2. The First Law and Other Basic Concepts 고려대학교 화공생명공학과 강정원.
Mathematical Modeling of Chemical Processes
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Dynamic modelling of a Hex with phase change
Transfer Functions Chapter 4
Mass and Energy Analysis of Control Volumes
CHAPTER VI BLOCK DIAGRAMS AND LINEARIZATION
Chapter 5 Energy Balances with reaction.
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation
Important Properties of Laplace Transforms
Chapter Four: Energy transfer by Heat, Work and Mass
Modeling Approaches Chapter 2 Physical/chemical (fundamental, global)
Interacting vs. Noninteracting Systems
G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 2 Modeling Approaches  Physical/chemical (fundamental, global) Model structure by theoretical analysis  Material/energy balances  Heat, mass, and momentum transfer  Thermodynamics, chemical kinetics  Physical property relationships Model complexity must be determined (assumptions) Can be computationally expensive (not real- time) May be expensive/time-consuming to obtain Good for extrapolation, scale-up Does not require experimental data to obtain (data required for validation and fitting)

Chapter 2  Black box (empirical) Large number of unknown parameters Can be obtained quickly (e.g., linear regression) Model structure is subjective Dangerous to extrapolate  Semi-empirical Compromise of first two approaches Model structure may be simpler Typically 2 to 10 physical parameters estimated (nonlinear regression) Good versatility, can be extrapolated Can be run in real-time

Conservation Laws Theoretical models of chemical processes are based on conservation laws. Conservation of Mass Conservation of Component i Chapter 2

Conservation of Energy The general law of energy conservation is also called the First Law of Thermodynamics. It can be expressed as: The total energy of a thermodynamic system, U tot, is the sum of its internal energy, kinetic energy, and potential energy: Chapter 2

Development of Dynamic Models Illustrative Example: A Blending Process An unsteady-state mass balance for the blending system: Chapter 2

The unsteady-state component balance is: The corresponding steady-state model was derived in Ch. 1 (cf. Eqs. 1-1 and 1-2). or where w 1, w 2, and w are mass flow rates. Chapter 2

The Blending Process Revisited For constant, Eqs. 2-2 and 2-3 become: Chapter 2

Equation 2-13 can be simplified by expanding the accumulation term using the “chain rule” for differentiation of a product: Substitution of (2-14) into (2-13) gives: Substitution of the mass balance in (2-12) for in (2-15) gives: After canceling common terms and rearranging (2-12) and (2-16), a more convenient model form is obtained: Chapter 2

Stirred-Tank Heating Process Figure 2.3 Stirred-tank heating process with constant holdup, V. Chapter 2

Stirred-Tank Heating Process (cont’d.) Assumptions: 1.Perfect mixing; thus, the exit temperature T is also the temperature of the tank contents. 2.The liquid holdup V is constant because the inlet and outlet flow rates are equal. 3.The density and heat capacity C of the liquid are assumed to be constant. Thus, their temperature dependence is neglected. 4.Heat losses are negligible. Chapter 2

For the processes and examples considered in this book, it is appropriate to make two assumptions: 1.Changes in potential energy and kinetic energy can be neglected because they are small in comparison with changes in internal energy. 2.The net rate of work can be neglected because it is small compared to the rates of heat transfer and convection. For these reasonable assumptions, the energy balance in Eq. 2-8 can be written as Chapter 2

For a pure liquid at low or moderate pressures, the internal energy is approximately equal to the enthalpy, U int, and H depends only on temperature. Consequently, in the subsequent development, we assume that U int = H and where the caret (^) means per unit mass. As shown in Appendix B, a differential change in temperature, dT, produces a corresponding change in the internal energy per unit mass, where C is the constant pressure heat capacity (assumed to be constant). The total internal energy of the liquid in the tank is: Model Development - I Chapter 2

An expression for the rate of internal energy accumulation can be derived from Eqs. (2-29) and (2-30): Note that this term appears in the general energy balance of Eq Suppose that the liquid in the tank is at a temperature T and has an enthalpy,. Integrating Eq from a reference temperature T ref to T gives, where is the value of at T ref. Without loss of generality, we assume that (see Appendix B). Thus, (2-32) can be written as: Model Development - II Chapter 2

Substituting (2-33) and (2-34) into the convection term of (2-10) gives: Finally, substitution of (2-31) and (2-35) into (2-10) Model Development - III For the inlet stream Chapter 2

Define deviation variables (from set point)

Chapter 2

Table 2.2. Degrees of Freedom Analysis 1.List all quantities in the model that are known constants (or parameters that can be specified) on the basis of equipment dimensions, known physical properties, etc. 2.Determine the number of equations N E and the number of process variables, N V. Note that time t is not considered to be a process variable because it is neither a process input nor a process output. 3.Calculate the number of degrees of freedom, N F = N V - N E. 4.Identify the N E output variables that will be obtained by solving the process model. 5.Identify the N F input variables that must be specified as either disturbance variables or manipulated variables, in order to utilize the N F degrees of freedom. Chapter 2

Thus the degrees of freedom are N F = 4 – 1 = 3. The process variables are classified as: 1 output variable:T 3 input variables:T i, w, Q For temperature control purposes, it is reasonable to classify the three inputs as: 2 disturbance variables:T i, w 1 manipulated variable:Q Degrees of Freedom Analysis for the Stirred-Tank Model: 3 parameters: 4 variables: 1 equation:Eq Chapter 2

Thus the degrees of freedom are N F = 4 – 1 = 3. The process variables are classified as: 1 output variable:T 3 input variables:T i, w, Q For temperature control purposes, it is reasonable to classify the three inputs as: 2 disturbance variables:T i, w 1 manipulated variable:Q Degrees of Freedom Analysis for the Stirred-Tank Model: 3 parameters: 4 variables: 1 equation:Eq. 2-36