Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 30 Early Intervention Overview Rationale for early intervention services Principles of early intervention Services and supports available for early.
Advertisements

Early Education and Care Assessment Systems – Panel Discussion
High Stakes Testing and Assessment: Quality and Children’s Outcomes Kentucky’s Approach to Measuring Child Progress Beth Rous, University of Kentucky.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What is the COSF Using the Child Outcomes Summary From Part II: What.
Promoting Quality Child Outcomes Data Donna Spiker, Lauren Barton, Cornelia Taylor, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center at SRI International Presented at: International.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
REGIONAL WEBINARS OCTOBER & NOVEMBER, 2013 What If…? Understanding Part C Eligibility Determination, Assessment and Transition Requirements Through Scenarios.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
The Maryland Model for School Readiness for Preschool
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Early Childhood Intervention and Education Branch, November 2011
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
Wisconsin Departments of Health and Family Services (DHFS) And Public Instruction (DPI) OSEP Child Outcomes.
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System (POMS) Design and Implementation.
Early Childhood Special Education RESOURCES.  Early Childhood Special Education Early Childhood Special Education Wisconsin Early Childhood Indicators.
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
1 Birth to 3 Child Outcomes Maryland’s Approach to Converting Assessment Data to OSEP Outcome Categories August 28, 2007 Deborah Metzger
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Aligning Child Outcome Measurement to Early Learning Standards NECTAC Outcomes Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Approaches to Measuring Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Prepared for the NECTAC National Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes,
Building Outcome Data into a State On-Line Data System A birth through five project in Kansas Margy Hornback, Ed.D., Kansas Part B 619 Coordinator Kansas.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Experiences and Lessons Learned Using Publishers’ Online Assessment Systems for OSEP Reporting Presenters: Barbara Jackson – Munroe-Meyer Institute, UNMC.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Dale.
Introduction Gathering Information Observation Interviewing Norm Referenced Tools Authentic Assessment Characteristics of Authentic Assessment – 7M’s Validity.
Measuring Child Progress: Two State’s Journeys Barbara Jackson, NE Beppie Shapiro, HI Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Albuquerque, NM April 25, 2006.
Children Learn through Incredible Amounts of Practice! The amount of a toddler’s experience with walking is the only predictor of improved proficiency.
Chapter 16 Early Childhood Assessment. Assessment of Young Children Establish family priorities Familiar environments Assessments should Provide information.
2005 B. Mullins, D. Scheler 1 Movin’ On Up Effective Transition from Early Intervention into Preschool (Revised May 2005)
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Session 2: Overview of the COS Process Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module.
Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five 1 Maryland State Department of Education, Division.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Maryland IDEA Scorecard Data Driven Decision Making Nancy.
1 Collaboration Across Part C and 619 on Child Outcomes Measuring Child and Family Outcomes.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
F irst C onnections home and community-based early intervention for families of infants and toddlers birth to the third birthday DDS-Children’s Services.
Chapter 15 Early Childhood Assessment
Moving Maryland Forward: Service Coordinator Resource Group
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC and ECO at FPG
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Using Formative Assessment
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Early Childhood Intervention and Education Branch, November 2011
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Presented by: Marcella Franczkowski, Assistant State Superintendent
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Special Education System of Services Birth through Five

Assessment Think Tank Purpose Create a Comprehensive, Coordinated, High Quality Assessment System to Support the Building of a Birth through Five System of Services

Maryland's Assessment Think Tank Members National OSEP State Contact TA specialists - NECTAC and MSRRC Educational Consultants State Representatives from the Early Childhood Intervention & Education Branch (Part C & B), in the Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services at the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) Asst. State Superintendent and other representatives from the Division of Early Childhood Development, at the MSDE Local Local Directors/Coordinators of Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education programs Local evaluation/assessment practitioners

 Review commonly used, current, national, and State practices  Identify critical components of an assessment system/tool through research and best practices  Design assessment matrix to analyze tools  Review selected assessment tools through publisher and user presentations  Evaluate critical components for each tool Assessment Think Tank Process 4

Maryland’s Assessment Think Tank Products  Define the ECIE Assessment System  Recommend “Assessment Tool Box”  Define statewide evaluation/assessment process 5

Vision for Maryland’s Birth through Five Assessment System Maryland’s Early Childhood Intervention and Education (ECIE) Assessment System provides a reliable, valid, and coordinated approach to support families and build capacity for early care and education programs. This approach promotes positive developmental and educational outcomes through full access, participation, and supports in home and community life, for young children with disabilities and their families. 6

Purpose-Driven Assessment 1.Determining child eligibility 2.Decision-making for individual child and family results 3.Meeting federal, state, and local accountability requirements 7

Recommended Assessment Tool Box Overview of the Assessment Analysis Matrix 8 Assessment Components Assessment Tools Eligibility Federal Accountab ility Writing IFSP/IEP Outcomes /Goals Developm ental Progress Interventi on/ Instruction al Planning Identify Family CPR Screening Reliable and Valid Assessmen t used for multiple purposes Observatio n in natural settings Implement ed by multiple disciplines Family input or interview is part of the assessmen t Norm- referenced Criterion- referenced non- curriculum Criterion- referenced curriculum Multilingu al On-line Data Collection Generates Electronic OSEP Report Who administer s Time Frame The Ounce Scale (All children birth-3) √-√- √√√ √+√+ √-√- √ Birth – 42 months New report - emergin g √ √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ NOYESNOSpanishYES EI/ECE professionals/Ch ild care providers/ family Ongoing observation summarize periodically Teaching Strategies GOLD (All children birth – 3) √-√- √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √-√- √-√- Birth to 3 In process 2010 √√ √+√+ √-√- NO YESSpanishYES EI/ECE professionals In process The Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System (AEPS) (All children Birth – 2; 3-5) 2 nd source /partial /not % delay √ + ECO Cross- walk √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √-√- √ Birth to 3 Ages √+√+ √ √+√+ √+√+ √ NO YES SpanishF renchKor ean YES EI/ECE professionals/Ch ild care providers 30 – 120 minutes The Curriculum (Children w/disability;) Birth – 2; 3-5) √-√- √ + ECO Cross- walk √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √-√- √- Birth to 3 Ages √√ √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ NO YESSpanishNO EI/ECE professionals/Ch ild care provider 60 – 90 minutes Routines Based Interview (RBI) (Child w/disability birth - 5) √-√- √-√- √√-√- √ √+√+ √-√- Birth - 5 -no but evidenc ed based √√ √+√+ √+√+ NO N/ANO EI/ECE professionals Training Required (4 certified trainers in MD) Interview length varies per family Early Learning Accomplishment Profile (ELAP) (All children birth – 2) √ √ + ECO Cross- walk √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √-√- √-√- Birth to 3 √+√+ √ √ √+√+ √+√+ NOYESNOSpanishYESNO EI/ECE professionals minutes Learning Accomplishment Profile (LAP-D) (All children 3 – 6) √ √ + ECO Cross- walk √+√+ √+√+ √+√+ √-√- √ √+√+ √ √ √+√+ √-√-NOYESNO Spanish YESNO EI/ECE professionals/ Paraprofes- sional familiar with child development minutes

Maryland’s Recommended Assessment Process 9 Options for eligibility Options for child and family results Requirements for measuring child outcomes Assessment timelines

Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI-2) Brigance Inventory of Early Development II Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC) Early Learning Accomplishments Profile (E-LAP)* Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment (TPBA 2)* As Appropriate Targeted Specialized Assessments Medical Reports Informed Clinical Opinion * Not as a sole tool for determining eligibility using the 25% delay criteria Maryland’s Recommended Tool Box Eligibility (Birth to 3) 10

Child Development Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System (AEPS) Brigance Inventory of Early Development Carolina Curriculum Early Learning Accomplishments Profile (E-LAP) *Hawaii Early Learning Profile (HELP) *The Ounce Scale Teaching Strategies GOLD *Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment and Intervention (TPBA/I 2) Maryland’s Recommended Tool Box Decision-Making for Individual Child and Family Results 11 * Includes robust family report component

Child Development through Family Report Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ-3) Routines Based Interview (RBI) Transdisciplinary Play-Based Assessment (TPBA-2) Family Assessment (Concerns, Priorities and Resources) Family Interview Tool (locally developed) Routines Based Interview (RBI) Maryland’s Recommended Tool Box Decision-Making for Individual Child and Family Results 12

Children Birth to 3 Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) – Use at least one recommended assessment tool crosswalked to the COSF and all available sources of information Children 3 to Kindergarten Age Work Sampling System (WSS) and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) for all children with extended IFSPs. Work Sampling System (WSS) and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) for all children with IEPs. Kindergarten Age Work Sampling System (WSS) Required Child Outcome/Accountability Measures

NEXT STEPS -Timeline Leadership Conference presentation Local jurisdiction decision-making on local assessment tool box Focused training on assessment tools of choice Statewide implementation of Maryland’s ECIE Evaluation/Assessment System practices July 1, 2011September 2010 Assessment Tool Box Statewide Open House October 26, 2010 WSS required for all children receiving services through an Extended IFSP Winter/Spring 2011February 1, 2011January 1, 2011