Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
1 Acceptance & Scraping Chris Rogers Analysis PC
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Parameter List Edda Gschwendtner Introduction Parameter list for sub-systems of MICE.
Cooling Channel Count Recap Cooling channel components # Engineering? Absorber: temperature 8*3 yes pressure 2*3 yes He temp 2*3 level 8*3 yes length (optical)
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
MICE the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Emilio Radicioni, INFN EPS-HEP Aachen 2003.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Wrap Up o Control and Monitoring o DDAQ o Interface between DDAQ and MCM o Infrastructure Jean-Sebastien.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
Paul drumm daq&c-ws august/september Cooling Channel.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
KEK Beam Test Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting Koji YOSHIMURA KEK MICE Collaboration Meeting
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Slow controls and instrumentation of MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.How the state of the cooling channel gets defined 3.Engineering for the signal readout.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.
Control, Monitoring and DAQ Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 28, 2005.
Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.
MICE analysis meeting Alain Blondel 5 August MICE -- what running strategy? disclaimer: of course we will evolve the running strategy as problems.
Goal of MICE:   out /  in of   Assuming a standard (or agreed to) definition of 6-D cooling.  We can also assume that the tracker can give.
MICE Experiments Introduction Introduction Disclaimers Disclaimers Assumptions Assumptions Baseline programme Baseline programme Full programme Full programme.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
ANALYSIS FORUM: Status & Outstanding Issues Yagmur Torun MICE Collaboration Meeting Oct 10, RAL ˘
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Goals and Status of MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment J.S. Graulich.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
MICE CM at OSAKA Alain Blondel, August MICE collaboration meeting at OSAKA (thanks to Mike Zisman, Makoto Yoshida, and Koji Yoshimura)Mike ZismanMakoto.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
MICE RF Workshop Alain Blondel MICE = critical R&D for neutrino factory and muon collider 1 neutrino factory: accelerate muons and store to produce.
KEK beam test in May 2005 Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE Frascati June 27 th, 2005.
MICE: The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment MOPLT106 Abstract The provision of intense stored muon beams would allow the properties of neutrinos.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
Controls and monitoring in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Data record M. A. Cummings April 2004 CERN.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
(one of the) Request from MPB
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
1May, IPPP- Imperial College, London1 NF activities at IC (part II) m. apollonio.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Spokesman's update.
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
MICE: First Beam Emittance Results w/Particle Detectors
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Presentation transcript:

Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May

  Stated Goal  out /  in of  10 –3  Assume there will be a standard (or agreed to) definition of 6-D cooling.  Assume that the tracker can give us precision particle position and momemtum that this won’t contribute significantly to the error.  Assume particle ID < 1% error  The main sources of systematic errors are in the COOLING CHANNEL and detector solenoids, which will need to be under control to a level such that up to 10 independent sources of systematics will be <  Suggested goal to keep each source of error <3*10 -4 level if at all possible.  What are the beam diagnostics concerns in a single particle experiment? How is beam diffusion controlled? Backgrounds? Systematics: assumptions and questions

MICE Experiments and Systematics  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”.  Event trigger = accelerator clock (or something very close)  Will be running with different configurations of the cooling channel components and the beam for calibration runs:  Need to understand the tolerances on detectors and cooling channel elements necessary for cooling measurement  Want to record controls data as part of each data event  “Slow controls” are not equivalent to “monitoring” signals

  Areas: 1.Beam shape and content 2.Trackers and detectors 3.Cooling channel  Systematic handles: 1.Using the beam itself: calibration runs 2.Experiment staging and component combinatorics 3.Defining tolerances 4.Determining controls/monitoring readout onto the event record  Controls: 1.Enviromental and backgrounds 2.Particle tracking and ID (determining samples and emittances) 3.Systematics on the cooling channel Systematics readout

 Start-up systematics chart Quantity MICE organs ToleranceMonitorBeam measurement (suggested)Responsible Channel count Beam ISIS beam target magnets Collimators Diffuser… TBD Alignment with expt? Settings Beam instrumentation (profile & halo monitors ?) others Measure beam averages and correlations, composition and emittance With/without diffuser Drumm/Tilley Beam detectors TOF Cherenkov TBD Volts, currents Occupancies, Dead channels others Measure TOF vs nominal beam momentum Calibrate in configuration with electrons in beam ? Palladino/ Bonesini Summers Emittance tracker <<10 -3 TBDCompare one tracker to the other with empty abs and no RF Bross/ Long PID TBD Palladino/ Bonesini Gregoire Tortora DE/dX Hydrogen absorber A few Temperature Pressure thickness Others Measure energy difference in configuration without RF and with full absorber(s) Zisman Wing Lau MACC Ishimoto EE RF systemA few Volts Phases Temps Measure energy of outgoing muons vs phase or with/without RF Zisman Derun Li optics positions of coils internal survey some mmISIS alignement system position monitors? transfer matrix: (pt, pL, phi, x0, y0) in (pt, pL, phi, x0, y0) out measure with no RF and empty absorbers each time one changes the magnetic set-up. Green /Black currentsfew amp-meter Zisman / Green mag field some ~ mag probes temp probes Zisman/Green / Linde

MACC’s experimental controls channel list what info source how many channels who determines Beam diagnostics ~ 40Tilley/Drumm Beam particle detectors ~20Gregoire Tracker/ particle IDYOUR INPUT HERE!Bross/Bonesini Magnetic Fields12*( )Rey/Guyot/Green AlignmentA few – ISIS alignment system Black/Linde Cryo controls -Baynham RF (V, phase, temp)2*4*2 + 8D. Li Magnets (temps) currents 3*10 3*2 Green Absorbers (temps, level, pressure) 20 *3Cummings/Ishimoto

Beamline Static = not expected to change with time (but may drift) Dynamic = changing with time ISIS proton beam trigger (pulse) and intensity (voltage level) (dynamic) ISIS proton beam loss monitors - ×few - voltage level, 20 ms cycles (dynamic) Target position (static) Target drive amplitude (dynamic) Target drive trigger (pulse) Beam Diagnostics: yet to be determined -Glasgow are looking at scintillators - X,Y beam profiles (N channels - dynamic) Settings of magnets (V, I) × 12 elements (static) = 9 quads, 2 dipoles, 1 sc- solenoid Beam Line Vacuum (e.g. penning & pirani) Diffuser in place Vacuum state: = rough pump on/off = turbo pump on/off = valves open/closed (×2)

Particle ID – ex: Cherenkov (2) - 8 analog channels for monitoring the (positive) HV's. - 8 analog channels for monitoring the analog responses of PM's to light pulses. - 1 digital output channel for triggering the light pulser - 8 TDC outputs (probably not important? depends on the noise levels). - 1 analog channel for a temperature probe - 1 analog channel for the He pressure inside the Cherenkov vessel. - 1 analog channel for monitoring the humidity inside the vessel.

Needed for particle I.D./tracking  Anything that pertains to emittance definition and sample selection  Right now need a list while we can still accommodate changes to the experiment’s design  Subset of normal data record  Responsibility for determining tolerances =>  (  out /  in ) should be within the various detector groups  To be determined by the experimental group ¤Calibration runs ¤Staging ¤Run physics configurations ¤Run durations ¤Event record (including controls)