The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference New Orleans September 9, 2014 Building Financial Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Targeted Case Management
Advertisements

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems The Power and Challenges of Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems: Implications for Researchers Kathleen.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Needs Assessments to Identify and Evaluate Technical Assistance: Results of a National Survey about.
NECTAC in collaboration with ITCA
FISCAL REPORTS TRAINING January 31, GOAL To ensure that the Network is receiving reimbursement from the state that reflects anticipated costs.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Food Stamp Employment and Training – Community Organizations CREATING A POSSIBLE REVENUE STREAM OPTION FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems 2014 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference September 9, 2014 Developing or Enhancing Business.
+ Cohort I Finance Survey Results Public Insurance Webinar.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Kathleen Hebbeler Lauren Barton Suzanne Raber The DaSy Center at SRI International The Power and Challenges.
The Early Learning Challenge Fund: Metrics and Data Danielle Ewen February 22, 2010.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
Lead Agency Department of Health & Senior Services Cumulative Enrollment SFY ,829 NJEIS Budget SFY $69,000,000 Average Cum Cost Per Child.
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) & Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) Overview.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Operational Adjustment Grants.
Rate Reform Research and Communications Committee April 7, 2011.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference New Orleans September 9, 2014 Building Financial Systems.
Federal Financial Participation (FFP) Overview Office of Family Planning Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood: The Case of Early Intervention and Early.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
Arizona Early Intervention Program (AzEIP) Team-Based Early Intervention Services Overview for Administrators ADMINISTRATIVE.
Private Insurance Reimbursement in the New York State – Early Intervention Program Brad Hutton, M.P.H., Part C Coordinator New York State Dept. of Health.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 7, :00-12:30 “To Fee or Not to Fee: That is the Question” NEW JERSEY.
State of Ohio Early Intervention Fiscal Initiative Cohort I State Application Presentation.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Answering Critical Questions Using Data: Tools to Support Development and Data Element Identification.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems DaSy Data System Framework: A Tool for Building High-Quality State Part C and Section 619 Data Systems.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems How Alaska Connected Child Welfare Data to Automate Referrals of Maltreated Children Lisa Balivet: AK.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Why Should EI/ECSE Participate in Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems (ECIDs)? Missy Cochenour (DaSy.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems DaSy Conference Monday, September 8 Answering Critical Questions Using Data: Tools to Support Development.
Expanding the National Toolbox for Measuring Part C Participation Rates: Feasibility and Utility of Birth Cohort Methodology Donna Noyes, Ph.D., New York.
Special Education Overview of Tuition Billing Michelle Jones Division of School Finance February 23, 2016 “Leading for educational excellence and equity.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
Key Fiscal Tools and Indicators to Include in Early Childhood Data Collections RON BENHAM MAUREEN GREER JAMIE KILPATRICK DaSy Improving Data, Improving.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Stockholm Sweden, June 2016 Missy Coffey Cochenour, M.A. Kathleen Hebbeler, Ph.D Abby Schachner, Ph.D.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems The Importance of Personnel Data Donna Spiker Co-Director, DaSy Center OSEP 2016 Virtual leadership Conference.
Child Outcomes Measurement and Data Quality Abby Winer Schachner & Kathleen Hebbeler International Society on Early Intervention Conference Stockholm,
Lamoille Valley Children’s Integrated Services
Performance Based Contracting
Child Outcomes Data Collection: Results of the ITCA National Survey and Discussion of Policies and Considerations Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/DaSy Cornelia.
MENTAL HEALTH MEDI-CAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES
Status of Part B 619 State Data Systems
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Aug , 2016
National, State and Local Educational Environments Data:
Using Data to Reduce Suspension and Expulsion of Young Children
Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development Subcomponent Taletha Derrington and Kathleen.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014
DaSy Conference Monday, September 8
Data System Features that Enhance General Supervision
Early Childhood Conference: Improving Data, Improving Outcomes
DaSy Conference Monday, September 8
Where to Start: Planning for a New Data System or System Enhancement
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Oh, the Places You’ll Go …with Data on Personnel
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Utah’s Finance System Planning
IDEA Part B Annual Personnel Data Reporting
Presentation transcript:

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference New Orleans September 9, 2014 Building Financial Systems Around Data: When and How to Use Fiscal Data Elements Maureen Greer (DaSy), Jamie Kilpatrick (DaSy), Lynne MacLeod (UT), Robin Nelson (DaSy), Susan Ord (UT)

Participants will: –Understand the importance of fiscal data for program management; –Identify fiscal data elements that need to be incorporated into state data systems; –Learn how to address the policy questions that impact the Part C system; and –Learn how one state utilized data to answer policy questions in designing their cost study. Session Outcomes 2

2014 ITCA Finance Survey (47 respondents): –15 states can identify revenue generated by all fund sources accessed; –13 states can identify revenue generated for 80% -90% ITCA Tipping Points Survey (49 respondents): –22 states could provided authorized and delivered service hours per child, per month; and –31 states could provide the average number of months of enrollment in Part C Current System Capacity 3

Powerful information for: –Decision-making; –Policy Development; and –Program Management Audiences: –State Agencies –Families –Advocates –Legislature Why Fiscal Data is Important 4

Revenue: –Federal –State –Local Expenditure –Direct Service –Support and Administration Child/Family Demographics General Fiscal Data Categories 5

Data CategoryData ElementsData Location Child & Family Demographics Child Name Diagnosis (ICD9/10) Program Eligibilities Family Income Primary Home Language Child Record Service Data Frequency/Intensity of Services Authorized Frequency/Intensity of Services Delivered Type of Service Individualized Family Service Plan Clinical/Billing Records Program Data Charges by Service Billed Revenue (Reimbursement) Received by Source Local Provider Agency Fiscal records Lead Agency Data Staff Administrative Costs Infrastructure Obligations and Payments State Lead Agency Fiscal Records Essential Data Elements 6

What is the financial obligation for my system? Which fund sources are being used? What is the amount and percentage of funding by fund source? What does the percentage of revenue from each program source look like compared to percentage of children eligible for that program? What is the average cost per child? Policy Questions 7

Data elements needed for analysis: Child Data –Program Eligibility Planned Service Data—For Fee-for-Service Structures –Units of Service Authorized and Service Rates Units of Service Delivered by Service Type Grant/Contracts amounts and payments rendered—for Grants/Contract Payment Structures Administrative Costs Data –Fiscal obligations not connected to direct service and Lead Agency obligations Policy Question: What is the Financial Obligation for my system? 8

Scenario One: Fee-for-Service Payment Structures There are two data fronts the Lead Agency must tackle in order two answer this question –Capturing the amount of service units authorized along with service rates for obligated agencies –Detailing fiscal obligations not connected to direct service Policy Question: What is the Financial Obligation for my system? 9

Considerations for Scenario One The Lead Agency should utilize a data collection system that can capture service units authorized Note that authorized units are the “upper limit,” no system experiences 100% delivery; however, the authorized units represent system obligation Service rates should also be captured in this system Multi-year analyses are vital in budgeting Need of coupling direct service cost obligations with non-direct service cost obligations Policy Question: What is the Financial Obligation for my system? 10

Scenario Two: Grants/Contract Payment Structures Again, there are two major data fronts for the Lead Agency to address this issue: –Capturing (at any point in the fiscal year) the amount of remaining contract payments due to service providers via grants and contracts –Detailing fiscal obligations not connected to direct service Policy Question: What is the Financial Obligation for my system? 11

Considerations for Scenario Two The Lead Agency should use a data collection system that will allow the capture of grant/contracts obligations and payments rendered Direct service cost obligations must be coupled with all other fiscal obligations, such as: –Personnel Development Contracts/Obligations –Monitoring –Other Lead Agency “non-service” costs Policy Question: What is the Financial Obligation for my system? 12

Data elements needed for analysis: Child Data –Enrollment status, e.g., IFSP Date or Enrollment Date Services Data –Units/Amount of Service Delivered by Type and Date –Service Rates by Service Type Program Data –Grant/Contracts amounts and payments rendered—for Grants/Contract Payment Structures Administrative Costs Data –Fiscal expenditures not connected to direct service and Lead Agency expenditures Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 13

Analysis Recommendations and Considerations: Determine total number of children served during the reporting period Determine total expenditures during the reporting period –Will be determined differently depending on reimbursement methodology: Fee-for-Service (FFS) vs. Grants/Contracts (G/C). Divide the total expenditures by the number of children served to get average cost per child Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 14

Scenario One: Fee-for-Service Payment Structures: Determine total number of service units, by type Determine the total reimbursement for services (number of units X reimbursement, for each type) Determine all other expenditures for services not reimbursed on a FFS basis Determine program expenditures not related to direct services, including those for Lead Agency Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 15

Scenario Two: Grants/Contract Payment Structures: Determine the amount of payments made to local programs/entities via grants and contracts Determine other program expenditures not related to direct services, including those for Lead Agency Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 16

Average CPC = $Expenditures$/Number of Children Expenditures = Direct Services $ and Non-Direct $ Number of children –Average monthly enrollment (1-day count) –Average monthly served (monthly cumulative) –Total served in the year (annual cumulative) Frequency of collection, calculation, reporting Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 17

Numerical examples based on different denominators: Total $ = 120,000,000 Average monthly served = 20,000 –Average CPC per month = $500 Average monthly enrollment = 18,000 –Average CPC per month = $556 Total served in the year = 36,000 –Average CPC = $3,333 What is the Average Cost per Child? 18

Overall Considerations:  If expenditures by general revenue source (Fed/State/Local) or specific (e.g., Title XIX/Medicaid), could calculate separate CPCs  If expenditures by local program, could calculate separate CPCs; compare to service levels and characteristics of children/families  Note assumptions behind average CPC, what’s included, e.g., children not eligible for services Policy Question: What is the Average Cost per Child? 19

Reasons for Doing Cost Study NOW 1.Provide rationale to request additional funds from Utah legislature a. Previous requests based on child count & COLA 2.Need to know costs of individual services a. Inform planning for possible insurance billing program b. Need adjustment to funding allocation methodology 3.State database more capable of providing critical information UTAH COST STUDY 20

What are the total, average (mean), minimum and maximum costs per child and family? Direct services; Activities associated with services; Part C “required components”; and Local and state administration costs. Compare differences in costs across the 15 programs Type of administering agency; Program location – urban, rural, frontier; Size – small, medium, large OVERARCHING QUESTIONS 21

Phase 1: Introduce Cost Study to Stakeholders Phase 2: Existing Data Analysis Phase 3: On site visit to each local EI program Phase 4: Implement Time Study Phase 5: Review and analyze Data Phase 6: Integrate budget analysis, interviews and Time Study Phase 7: Compilation of findings and final report Cost Study Timeline – December December 2014 Cost Study Phases 22

$ Utah Part C Costs $ Direct Service Provision $ Other Required Components $ Associated Activities Preparation $ Travel - provider $ Consultation w staff/families Make/confirm appointments Paperwork Data Entry $ No Shows $ Paraprofessional supervision $ Direct Services $ Assistive Technology $ Nurse $ PT $ SLP $ Family Training $ Health Services $ Nutrition $ Psychological $ Service Coordination $ Social Work $ Special Instruction $ OT $ Audiology Child find Outreach Referral $ Eligibility Determination (Intake & Assessment) $ Parent Fee Determination Transition $Professional Development Language Interpreters $ Associated Activities Preparation $ Travel - parent $ Consultation with staff/families Make/confirm appointments Paperwork Data Entry $ No Shows $ Administrative $ State $ Family fee determination $ Local Program $Family fee determination $Denotes activities, services or components that will have a separate cost estimate because It is necessary to answer a research question for the study

1)Cost spent on state administration and required state support services; 2)Resources that are used for Part C services that are difficult to measure or value; 3)Type and value of in-kind supports used by local programs to support the delivery of services, including required and non-required yet enriching and beneficial services and activities; and 4)Cost of Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind early intervention services and administration. OTHER STUDY QUESTIONS 24

DATA SOURCES 25 Cost Study Individual Program Surveys Time Study State Database Queries Individual Program Budgets

Sources of funding; Enrollment and services; Staff turnover/vacancies; Working conditions and non-wage benefits; Professional development costs; Administrative time description; Overhead and facilities costs 26 INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM SURVEYS

All programs All staff who have a caseload of any size Every work day Five consecutive weeks – May 2014 Capture activity in time increments of 30 minutes Coded to list of activities Entered in Excel or Google doc 27 TIME STUDY

Individual EI program budgets and expenditures by line item Employee information; i.e., name; position; FTE, hire date; field of study; degree; license, if applicable State database (BTOTS) query examples –Number of children in various stages of the program; referral, eligibility determination, enrolled, and tracking and monitoring; –Number of IFSP services planned vs. number of services delivered. BABY WATCH DATA BASE (BTOTS) 28

Legislative Funding Requests –Average cost per child; –Total cost of providing all required services; –Costs of early intervention program operation; and –Costs of state administration Funding Allocation Methodology –Service planned vs. delivered; –Base amount Move to Insurance Billing –Cost per service 29 EXAMPLES OF HOW WE WILL USE COST STUDY RESULTS

Visit the DaSy website at: Like us on Facebook: Follow us For More on DaSy 30

The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, #H373Z However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officers, Meredith Miceli and Richelle Davis. 31