Country Programming Framework (CPF): some lessons from RLC Salomón Salcedo Senior Policy Officer, RLC ECP Workshop Ankara, September 25-29, 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Background of RCC MDRD Program

Advertisements

Angola MDG-Based planning workshop Dar Es Salaam Feb. 27 – Mar. 03.

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.

Establishing a National Working Group on Trade Facilitation Challenges and Lessons Learned Presented by Elizabeth Tamale Ministry of Tourism, Trade and.

World Bank and SPS With special emphasis on the recently established multi-donor Standards and Trade Facility Cees de Haan Agriculture and Rural Department,

International Telecommunication Union Capacity Building and ICT Policy, Regulatory and Legislative Frameworks Support for Pacific Island States Sandro.

UNDAF Challenges and Regional Support 1. 2  Government/National Authorities  United Nations System (Resident Coordinators, UN Country Teams, Regional.

Progress in PRS Implementation: The Republic of Serbia Presented by Ivana Aleksić, Team Manager Poverty Reduction Strategy Implementation Focal Point Deputy.

The Gambia SE4ALL Action Agenda

1 UN Reform Implications for UN’s work at field level JPO workshop, Havana - Cuba, April 2005.

Meeting of the AGNA on the Implementation of the 2008 System of National Accounts, in Addis Ababa African Development Bank Capacity Building for National.

Sub-regional Workshop for the Gulf Countries to Launch the Education for All National Assessments Sharjah, June, 2013 National EFA 2015 Review Concept.

The TNA Process in Costa Rica Experiences and lessons learned Francisco Sancho Advisor TNA

INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING OUTLINE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TO IMPLEMENT CDM IN VIETNAM Dr. Bui Huy Phung National Centre for Natural Science & Technology Mr.

Fighting the Crime of Trafficking in Persons, especially Women, Adolescents and Children in the Americas OAS/CIM Report of Activities July 2004 – April.

ECP Workshop, Ankara, September 2012 Development of CPF Dinara Rakhmanova Assistant FAO Representative Kyrgyz Republic Priority areas for FAO assistance.

CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.

Identify the institutions which have a stake in the

IPC Global Strategic Programme ( ) IPC Global Partners: IPC REGIONAL Strategic Programme IPC Regional Steering Committee Meeting – March.

Module 10 Session 10.4 Visual 1 Module 10 Organizing Procurement Session 10.4 Procurement of Services: Use of Consultants and Developing Terms of Reference.

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

Day 3: Session 2. Strategically Mobilizing Resources.

December To share best practices from the experience of 100 NSDS implemented over the last years. To take into account international community.

4 ème réunion annuelle de l’AfCoP Accountability / partnership ranks first among MfDR pillars, followed by leadership, monitoring-evaluation, planning.

SESSION 1: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.

Global Task Team: Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors Briefing for Theme Group on HIV/AIDS 1 November.

Statistics and cooperation: Rome, 24 November 2005 Statistics to Inform Development Policy: the Role of PARIS21 Presentation by Antoine Simonpietri, PARIS21.

Regional Capacity Building Activities in the Caribbean UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity- building in Developing Countries Carlos.

Processus de Rabat / Rabat Process AURÉLIE SGRO PROJECT OFFICER ICMPD BRUSSELS MEETING ON “STRENGTHENING EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY MAKING IN THE FIELD OF MIGRATION”

Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.

WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.

SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.

Screen 1 of 29 Unit: Food Security Information Systems and Networks Lesson 3: Improving Food Security Information Systems LEARNING OBJECTIVES At the end.

Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.

UNDAF for Beginners. 2 2 Strategic programme framework Describes the collective response and support of the UN System to national development priorities.

International Health Policy Program -Thailand Reflection on experience in using JANS with sector strategy Phusit Prakongsai, MD. Ph.D. International Health.

CPF – QA and R&R. CPF Cycle UNDAF Road Map UNDAF Country Analysis UNDAF Strategic prioritization UNDAF M&E UNDAF results matrix CPF CYCLECPF CYCLE.

SESSION 2: SETTING PRIORITIES – SITUATION ANALYSIS.

Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.

Outcomes from the Regional Workshop on Forest and Climate Change: Phnom Penh, Cambodia May 2009 REDD Consultation Support to ASEAN Senior Officers.

Strategically Mobilizing Resources. What is Resource Mobilization?

1 Safe Use of Wastewater In Agriculture 1st Regional Workshop for Francophone Africa February 2012 Palais de Congr‘es, Room „Fez“ UN-Water Project.

Aysegul Akin Assistant FAO Representative September 2012, Ankara.

December 9, 2015 UNAIDS How can the UN position itself better in a changing world? Update on UN Reform.

Institutional Arrangements and Collaboration for Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture in Latin America and the Caribbean Manzoor Qadir UNU-INWEH Fourth.

The implementation programme for the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics UNECE special session on National Accounts for economies in transition Geneva,

Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.

‘ By Abdou Karim LO Minister of State for Reform and Technical Assistance AfCoP/MfDR Co-Chair.

Integrating Innovation and Creativity into National Policies and Strategies: The International Perspectives By Getachew Mengistie, Intellectual property.

GENDER IN COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP STRATEGIES - THE VIETNAM EXPERIENCE FEBRUARY 22, 2012 Mette Frost Bertelsen, CPS Co-TTL and Gender Focal Point.

SESSION 3: SETTING PRIORITIES – COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE AND OPTIONS ANALYSIS.

27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

A D A P T A T I O N STAP Could contribute to the clarification of the scientific and technical issues underpinning the debate Brainstorming on Social Issues.

NMTPF for Azerbaijan NMTPF development process The NMTPF in Azerbaijan was formulated in 2009 with the request of the Government of Azerbaijan,

Programme Planning under FTFP & FTPP II December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Bishkek, 16 December 2015.

Results Matrix (LFM) and Results-Based Budget (RBB) Mariangela Bagnardi.

System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Sokol Vako United Nations Statistics Division Training for the worldwide implementation of the System of Environmental.

MAZOWSZE 2007 – 2013 Operational Program Human Capital Regional Component Ministry of Regional Development.

Evaluation Capacity Building at Country Level: GEF Focal Points 1 Osvaldo Néstor Feinstein AEA 2011 Conference GEF Evaluation Office Panel.

Session 2: Prioritization criteria – group activity

Criminal Matters Network

INTOSAI WGEA – Steering Committee Meeting Morocco, March 2011

Radiation & Nuclear Safety and Security Aspects in Lao PDR

Monitoring and Evaluation using the

Report of the Previous Meeting (is the overture of this meeting) The Third General Meeting of CARD – Agenda 1 18 May 2010.

Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO

REGIONAL COORDINATION OFFICERS’ WORKSHOP 5 to 9 September, 2016

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

ECO-RCC Steering Committee Meeting 16 February 2017, Ankara

Presentation transcript:

Country Programming Framework (CPF): some lessons from RLC Salomón Salcedo Senior Policy Officer, RLC ECP Workshop Ankara, September 25-29, 2012

Lesson 1: Not an easy exercise… FAO’s mandate deals with more than one Ministry A single Ministry will present a shopping list of “priorities” for FAO’s technical assistance How to prioritize? How can we make sure that the government will co-lead the exercise? What do we do when government officials change constantly? CPF preparation requires knowledge on Results-Based Management; not much expertise in FAO.

Lesson 2: adjust to specific country situation FAO Can it be done just with the help of a consultant? Belize, St Kitts & Nevis (National correspondants) A programming mission required? Peru, Haiti, Mexico FAO Country office does everything with RLC’s follow up by “Skype” Brasil, El Salvador Government Ministry of Agriculture or Ministry of Foreign Affairs?

Lesson 3: Be specific in TORs / end product

What should a CPF look like? I. Preamble (1 pp) II. Introduction (1-2 pp) III. Situation analysis (2-3 pp) IV. FAO’s comparative advantages and priority areas (3-5 pp) V. Programming for results (4-6 pp) VI. Implementation arrangements and M&E (2-3 pp) Compulsory annexes CPF Priority Matrix CPF Results Matrix (A &B) CPF M&E Plan Review of the history of FAO presence in the country (past and ongoing activities) Review of major programs, laws and policies in FAO-mandated areas Detailed analysis of country-level comp. advantages of FAO and other development partners CPF Resource Mobilization Strategy / Action Plan

Lesson 4: Govt’s will take more time than expected But that’s OK. Their participation is what matters

Lesson 5: Prioritizing, one of the two most difficult exercises Possible prioritization criteria: 1.FAO’s capacities and comparative advantage in the country 2.Alignment with key government programs 3.Contributes to Organizational Results (and to OOs) 4.Probability to mobilize resources 5.Favorable national / regional context 6.Scope of impact (national level?) / direct relation to the MDGs 7.Time to perceive impacts

Can do it easily in Excel

Lesson 6: Programming for results, the other most difficult exercise Need a RBM expert And technical officers’ knowledge High quality results matrices can only be prepared by teams: government technical focal points, country office, technical officers, and RBM specialist.

Lesson 7: FAOR / Assistant FAOR’s commitment... the most important factor