Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defense Trade Advisory Group - DTAG Plenary Session Working Group #2 Report July 7, 2010.
Advertisements

DTAG 28 November 2012 Plenary OEM Working Group Plenary Session November 28, 2012.
Export Control Overview John R. Murphy Business Development Manager Sartomer Company October 4, 2004 Boston, MA.
Regulatory Environment
Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG)
EXPORT CONTROLS. Export Controls are established to implement treaties and national security laws, generally protect national security and to combat terrorism.
POLICY Space Export Controls Update Since Delivering the 1248 Report to Congress - April 2012 −Congress added language into the FY13 National Defense Authorization.
Defense Trade Advisory Group Technical Data Harmonization Plenary Session May 9 th, 2013.
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Yolanda Gantlin.
Where Dual-Use and Military Items Coincide – Proper Classification C5 – 4th Forum on Export Controls 8 February Brussels Anita C. Esslinger, Partner.
Implications of “QRS-11” Cases
Page 1 Brokering Part 129 Working Group Comments to DDTC Proposed Rule (December 4, 2009) Defense Trade Advisory Group.
© Goulston & Storrs All rights reserved. Export Control Reform December 10, 2013 Ian H. Moss.
A PPLICABILITY OF U.S. D EFENSE T RADE C ONTROLS TO P RINTED B OARDS D ECEMBER 12, 2012 Peter Lichtenbaum (202)
Brokering Requirements for the Firearms Industry July Export Control Services.
EXPORT ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS (EAR) Research and Economic Development MAY 28, 2013 John Jacobs.
COMSTAC: EXPORT CONTROLS WORKING GROUP COMSTAC: EXPORT CONTROLS WORKING GROUP May 11, 2012.
How to Determine If You Need a Commerce Export License Relatively small percentage of total U.S. exports require a Validated License Most products are.
1-129 Form Deemed Export Attestation UTHSC May 16, 2011.
Do You Need an Export License? Purpose of Export Controls To serve the national security, foreign policy, nonproliferation, and short.
Defense Trade Advisory Group Review of the Draft Brokering Rule Plenary Session November 28, 2012.
Complying with U.S. Export Controls
Winter Education Conference Contracting March 6, 2008 National Contract Management Association The Cape Canaveral Chapter.
UCAR/NCAR/UCP Export Compliance EOL MAC FL
Export Control Reform Spacecraft/Satellites Note: This presentation is merely a summary of official statements and final rules published by the Departments.
ROSEMARY RUFF APRIL 2, 2012 Export Controls 101: The Basics.
Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG) Plenary Session 07 July 2010.
EXPORT CONTROL BEST PRACTICES HONEYWELL OVERVIEW OF HONEYWELL - BUSINESS UNITS AND PRODUCTS HONEYWELL CORPORATE EXPORT CONTROL ORGANIZATION LICENSE STATISTICS.
Company Confidential 1 Surviving US Export Control regulations: The ITAR and EAR Don Buehler - SAE April 16, 2010 IAQG Workshop: Washington DC General.
Modernizing Export Controls ABA International Law Section Matthew S. Borman Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration Bureau of Industry and.
Export Controls: General Overview
Export Control Presented by Research and Graduate Studies Elizabeth Peloso.
PAMS Export Control Page UTHSC Campus –Wide Business Managers Meeting May 17, 2012.
Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG) Tasking Overview Plenary Session October 20, 2010.
Overview of U.S. Export Controls & Regulations Presented by Robert Stackpole International Trade Specialist.
Le Bourget June 17, 2009 U.S. Dual-Use Export Controls for the Aerospace Industry Gene Christiansen Kelly Gardner U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of.
Export Controls Marci Copeland Office of Research Export Control Administrator.
Export Control Reform ECCO Conference April 26, 2012 Michael Hoffman Director, Western Regional Office Bureau of Industry and Security.
REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV) DEVELOPMENT WORKING GROUPEXPORTS 30 MAY 2000.
ITAR/EAR The Short Overview The Security Summit Bob Ketts 22 March 2011.
FISWG Export Control Conference August 4, 2011 Trade Compliance: Changing the Way You Do Business.
Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security “EAR Regulatory Update” Arlington, Virginia June 10, 2008 Timothy Mooney Export.
Status Report on Export Control Reform Tony Dearth Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Licensing, Bureau of Political Military Affairs, Department.
Bureau of Industry and Security Deemed Exports “Use” Sequence of Analysis Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division.
EXPORT CONTROLS License Exclusions Eileen Nielsen Director of Sponsored Projects Compliance Office of Financial Services Harvard School of Public Health.
1 September 18, 2006 Commercial Space Launch Vehicles Lessons Learned Needs Workshop Ken Hodgdon Export Control and Interagency Liaison Division Office.
High Risk Property at Los Alamos National Laboratory Sarah Maynard, Customs Team (505) ,
Transition Planning Under Export Control Reform December 2013 AEROSPACE & DEFENSE 1 Avionics Rotron Mil Aero Air Technology Sensors.
 U.S. laws and their implemented regulations that prohibit the unauthorized “export” of certain controlled ITEMS, INFORMATION OR SOFTWARE to foreign.
Best Practices for CCATS & CJs October 25, 2012 Cindy Hollohan Sr. Manager, Empowered Official Corporate Trade Compliance.
COMSTAC: EXPORT CONTROLS WORKING GROUP COMSTAC: EXPORT CONTROLS WORKING GROUP October 2010.
AES Seminar Compliance with the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in AES EEI Filings.
Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce: Dual Use Licensing Policy Issues and Regulatory Update Presented by: Steve Clagett Director,
EXPORT ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS (EAR) CLASSIFICATION PROCESS
1 Satellite Export Control Policy: Current Status and Prospects for Reform Patricia Cooper President, Satellite Industry Association.
Defense Trade Advisory Group ITAR DEFINITIONS WORKING GROUP REPORT.
University of Pennsylvania 1 1 Complying with U.S. Export Control Regulations: a University Perspective Elizabeth Peloso Associate Vice Provost/ Associate.
Export Control Reform Implementation: Status and Non-U.S. Party Considerations 1.
KUMC EXPORT CONTROLS The Challenge: Balancing National Security and Openness in Research, Education and Public Service.
Pattison, Sampson, Ginsberg & Griffin, P.C.
Classification of Items on the Commerce Control List
EXPORT CONTROLS.
Pattison, Sampson, Ginsberg & Griffin, P.C.
FAQ’S EXPORT CONTROLS. FAQ’S EXPORT CONTROLS What are Export Controls The term “Export Controls” refers collectively to the body of U.S. laws and regulations.
U.S. Export Controls EAR / ITAR INTRODUCTION Back to Basics
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)
Decision Tree for Application of Export Control Regulations
Export Controls Update
Defense Trade Advisory Group
Presentation transcript:

Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG) Plenary Session Working Group No. 3 Report July 7, 2010

Working Group No. 3 Members Byron Angvall - Boeing Dave Bowman - ArvinMeritor Dennis Burnett – EADS North America Rebecca Conover - Intel Corporation Andrea Dynes, Andrea - General Dynamics Peter S. Jordan - United Technologies Corporation Krista Larsen - FLIR Roger T. Mustian - Remington Dale Rill – Honeywell Joy Speicher - Space Systems Loral  

Why is a new §126.20 being proposed? To avoid another QRS11!

QRS11 The QRS11 is a Quartz MEMS solid-state gyroscope. The QRS11 was originally designed for missile applications and is used in aircraft, missile and space systems. The QRS-11 is a Quartz Rate Sensor that was first developed for use in the navigation system of missiles. It was manufactured by a US company in the US. Clearly it is a US defense article. QRS11

QRS11 was a Defense Article in the Civil Supply Chain Passenger Aircraft In Integrated Stand-by Instrument System (ISIS) QRS11

ITAR Solution Category VIII – Aircraft and Associated Equipment. Note: (1) Category XII(d) or Category VIII(e) does not include quartz rate sensors if such items: (i) Are integrated into and included as an integral part of a commercial primary or commercial standby instrument system for use on civil aircraft prior to export or exported solely for integration into such a commercial primary or standby instrument system, and (ii) When the exporter has been informed in writing by the Department of State that a specific quartz rate sensor integrated into a commercial primary or standby instrument system has been determined to be subject to the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce in accordance with this section. (2) For controls in these circumstances, see the Commerce Control List. In all other circumstances, quartz rate sensors remain under the licensing jurisdiction of the Department of State under Category XII(d) or Category VIII(e) of the U.S. Munitions List and subject to the controls of the ITAR.

EAR Solution 7A994 Other navigation direction finding equipment, airborne communication equipment, all aircraft inertial navigation systems not controlled under 7A003 or 7A103, and other avionic equipment, including parts and components, n.e.s. License Requirement Notes: There is no de minimis level for foreign-made commercial primary or standby instrument systems that integrate QRS11-00100-100/101 or commercial automatic flight control systems that integrate QRS11-00050-443/569 Micromachined Angular Rate Sensors (see §734.4(a) of the EAR). Micromachined Angular Rate Sensors are subject to the export licensing jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, unless the QRS11-00100-100/101 is integrated into and included as an integral part of a commercial primary or standby instrument system of the type described in ECCN 7A994, or aircraft of the type described in ECCN 9A991 that incorporates such systems, or is exported solely for integration into such a system; or the QRS11-00050-443/569 is integrated into an automatic flight control system of the type described in ECCN 7A994, or aircraft of the type described in ECCN 9A991 that incorporates such systems, or are exported solely for integration into such a system.

Case One of Four Cases Export Subject To EAR 1. QRS11 incorporated into US manufactured commercial instrument or automated flight system, which is incorporated into US manufactured aircraft; - aircraft export is first export of QRS11. Export Subject To EAR

Re-Export or Retransfer Case Two of Four Cases 2. QRS11 incorporated into US manufactured commercial instrument or automated flight system, which is exported for foreign aircraft manufacturer for incorporation into aircraft; - export of instrument or flight system is first export of QRS11; - transfer or export of aircraft is retransfer or reexport of QRS11. Export Subject To EAR Re-Export or Retransfer Subject to EAR

Case Three of Four Cases 3. QRS11 incorporated into foreign manufactured commercial instrument or automated flight system, which is exported to US aircraft manufacturer; which is exported in the aircraft - export of QRS11 to instrument manufacturer is first export. - export or transfer to aircraft manufacturer is first retransfer or reexport - export or transfer to aircraft operator is second retransfer or reexport. Export Re-Export or Retransfer Reexport All Subject to EAR

Four of Four Cases Export Reexport Reexport All Subject to EAR 3. QRS11 incorporated into foreign manufactured commercial instrument or automated flight system, which is incorporated into foreign manufactured aircraft; - export of QRS11 to instrument manufacturer is first export. - export or transfer to aircraft manufacturer is first retransfer or reexport - export or transfer to aircraft operator is second retransfer or reexport. Export Reexport Reexport All Subject to EAR

Proposed §126.20

§ 126.20 Policy on the export and re-export of defense articles incorporated into commodities “Subject to the EAR” (a) A license or other approval from the Department of State is not required for the export, re-transfer or re-export of a defense article(s) that is incorporated into an end item under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, when all of the following conditions are met: (1) The end item would be rendered inoperable by the removal of the defense article(s); and (2) Technical data (as defined by § 120.10) about the defense article(s) incorporated into the end item is not provided in EAR controlled “technology” for the “production” and “use” of the end item; and (3) Incorporation of the defense article(s) does not provide, nor is it related to, a military application. (b) A license or other approval from the Department of State is not required for the export, retransfer or re-export of a defense article(s) that is embedded and incorporated into a spare part or component under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security when the defense article(s) would be destroyed (useless beyond the possibility of restoration) by its removal from the spare part or component. (c) A license or other approval from the Department of State is required for the export, re-transfer or re-export of the defense article(s) exported as spare or replacement parts for an end item under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security and such defense article(s) is not embedded and incorporated into a spare part or component under the regulatory jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security.

126.20 Exemption Process Go to 126.20(b) Process Is article to be exported, retransferred or reexported an end-item? 126.20 Exemption Process Go to 126.20(b) Process Exemption Applies: Export pursuant to EAR NO NO YES Removal of DA renders End-Item Inoperable? Is incorporation of DA for a military application? Is End-Item subject to the EAR? YES YES YES Does End-Item incorporate a DA? Does export involve Technical Data related to Defense Article? NO NO NO YES NO YES Not Subject to 126.20 Exemption

126.20 Exemption Process 126.20(b) From 126.20(a) Exemption Applies: Export pursuant to EAR Does component incorporate and embed a Defense Article? Is article to be exported a component? YES YES Is the component subject to the EAR? Removal of Defense Article destroys the component? YES NO YES NO NO NO Not Subject to 126.20 Exemption

How would it apply to QRS11? = USML End Item = CCL End Item = CCL End Item

Case One of Four QRS11 Cases Under Proposed § 126.20 Export Subject To the EAR

Case Two of Four QRS11 Cases Under Proposed § 126.20 Export Re-Export or Retransfer All Subject to EAR

Case Three of Four QRS11 Cases Under Proposed § 126.20 Re-Export or Retransfer Export Reexport All Subject to the ITAR

Case Four of Four QRS11 Cases Under Proposed § 120.6 Export Re-Export or Retransfer All Subject to the ITAR

How would it apply to a truck drive axel? Truck Drive Axel – CCL (not end item) Oil Seal– USML Removal of the oil seal renders the axel inoperable but does not destroy the oil seal.

Under Proposed § 126.20 Export All Subject to the ITAR Export

How would it apply to an inspection tool incorporating a focal plane array? Inspection tool – end item – CCL Camera – end item – CCL Focal Plane – Component – USML (SME). Cannot be removed w/o destroying. Removal of the camera renders the inspection tool inoperable but does not destroy the camera. Removal of the focal plane array renders the camera inoperable and destroys the focal plane.

Export Subject To EAR Export Subject To EAR Export Subject to ITAR Under Proposed § 126.20 Inspection tool Export Subject To EAR Camera Export Subject To EAR Focal Plane Array Export Subject to ITAR

Editorial Suggestions – No Substantive Changes

Alternate 1 – Additional Section for Export of Parts to be Incorporated into Civil Items Abroad

Alternate 2 – Modeled after QRS11 Provisions

Other Considerations de minimis RS Commercial DIRCM Repairs

Questions?