MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
Advertisements

Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
By Dhina, Haneen, Viveka, and Natsuki Elizabeth Loftus.
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Nancy Jenkins Barbara Ostrowska Esha Patnaik IB Psychology, Pamoja TO WHAT EXTENT IS ONE COGNITIVE PROCESS RELIABLE?
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
EWT and Anxiety. How will I know if I am learning? By the end of the lesson… E Will be able to define weapon focus. C Will be able to explain how anxiety.
EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY. WHAT IS EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY? Question – write your answer on your mini-whiteboards – What is an Eyewitness Testimony? AQA Definition:
THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW Improving Eye Witness Testimony.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT AGE.
Memory and the power of suggestion
Starter On a blank piece of paper, write down any key terms relating to the COGNITIVE approach These could be related to theories, research, evaluations,
Reconstruction of Memories Elizabeth Loftus’ Research.
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
3 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE EWT 1.Anxiety 2.Age of Witness 3.Misleading Information What research/studies are associated with each of the factors below… Coxon.
Reliability of one cognitive process
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
NEY T i. Factors affecting eyewitness testimony: misleading information “Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony: misleading information.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
Evaluate, including the relative strengths and weaknesses, of Field experiments including their use in criminological psychology with regard to : Evaluate,
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
Hatredmurderhurtdestroykickingrapistfightwoundedkillingdespairtable singer businessmarkerbookriverservicehonestpathwaycopy.
You’re the psychologist You can pick either L&P, Pickel or Yarmey. You must be then and answer questions from the rest of the group for 3 minutes. Rest.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
Read the following; ‘When the man entered the kitchen, he slipped on a wet spot and dropped the delicate glass pitcher on the floor. The pitcher was very.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Research methods Designing an experiment Lesson 5.
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
How reliable is your memory? PART 2
Multiple choice questions
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
RECAP what’s the difference between state-dependent forgetting and context dependent forgetting? Outline the research to support context-dependent forgetting.
Cognitive Psychology Memory
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
Starter: how good is your memory?
Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer
The reliability of Memory
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
4.3 Classic Evidence: Loftus and Palmer (1974)
A case study of eyewitness memory of a real crime.
A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
what have we learned from past two lessons?
A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
The cognitive area.
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
Memory.
Presentation transcript:

MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety

Learning Objectives  To recap Loftus and Palmer’s study on EWT  To describe and evaluate one lab experiment which investigates the role of anxiety in accuracy of EWT  To describe and evaluate one real-life experiment which investigates the role of anxiety in accuracy of EWT  To discuss how anxiety levels can affect later recall of events

Test Yourself… 1. Which of the following was not a cue word in the experiment by Loftus and Palmer? a)Smashed b) Contacted c)Knocked d)Hit The correct answer is… c) Knocked

Test Yourself… 2. The DV in the first experiment was… a) Estimate of speed b) The verb ‘smashed’ c) The question about broken glass d) The film The correct answer is… a) Estimate of Speed

Test Yourself… 3. In Experiment 1, how many experimental conditions were there? a) 1 b) 3 c) 5 d) 7 The correct answer is… c) 5

Test Yourself… 5. In Experiment 2, participants were tested immediately and then asked to return for some more questions. How long afterwards was this? a) 1 day b) 3 days c) 1 week d) 2 weeks The correct answer is… c) 1 week

Test Yourself… 6. In Experiment 2, which group saw the most broken glass? a) The ‘smashed’ group b) The ‘collided’ group c)The ‘hit’ group d) The control group The correct answer is… a) The ‘smashed’ group

Test Yourself… 7. Which of the following is true? a) Experiment 1 and 2 were both repeated measures b) Experiment 1 and 2 were both independent measures c) Only Experiment 1 was repeated measures d) Only experiment 1 was independent measures The correct answer is… b) Experiment 1 and 2 were both independent measures

Test Yourself… 8. The participants in this study were: a) Children b) Students c) Teachers d) Adults The correct answer is… b) Students

Learning Objectives  To recap Loftus and Palmer’s study on EWT  To describe and evaluate one lab experiment which investigates the role of anxiety in accuracy of EWT  To describe and evaluate one field experiment which investigates the role of anxiety in accuracy of EWT  To discuss how anxiety levels can affect later recall of events

Task 1  A study looking at the effects of anxiety on EWT has been cut up!  It’s your task to put in into the right order  Remember: - Aim - Procedure - Results - Conclusions  Stick it into your notes in the right order

BUT…  How can we evaluate this research?

Yuille and Cutshall (1986)  Look at the hand-out provided  Outline the study in terms of its Aims, Procedure, Results and Conclusion SIX  Should be no more than SIX sentences in total vital  Imagine it is a 4 mark question in an exam – you only need the vital parts

Yuille and Cutshall (1986) real-life events  The aim of this study was to discover how eye-witness memory was influenced by anxiety experienced during the witnessing of real-life events.  13 witnesses of a shooting were interviewed 5 months after the crime was committed.  They had witnessed the owner of a gun-shop being wounded by a robber, and then in return the owner shooting and killing the robber.  Of the 13 participants, 7 were central witnesses and 6 peripheral witnesses. However, both were equally accurate.  In the police interviews 85% of the central witnesses were accurate, compared with 70% of the peripheral group. The accuracy remained similar and high for most of the witnesses even after 4 – 5 months and errors were relatively rare.  Anxiety can enhance the accuracy of an eye witness testimony.

Task 2  Complete the section on Yuille and Cutshall in your booklet.  What do their results tell us about anxiety and accuracy of testimony?

Strengths  Field study looking at a real incident with real witnesses. Has validity which was lacking in lab experiments.  Researchers took great care with counting details from real incident to make sure that witness testimonies did not alter what ‘really’ happened. This makes finding ‘reliable’.

Weaknesses  Unique case of only 13 witnesses – can it be generalised to other instances?  Problems with the scoring (previously discussed). However, as the accounts were found to be largely accurate, emphasising inaccuracies would not have affected the findings in this case. Turning qualitative into quantitative data can always lead to bias and inaccuracy.

How can this be interpreted in terms of EWT?

Exam Conditions!  Outline one study that has investigated the effect of anxiety on eyewitness testimony (4 marks)  You need: - Aim - Procedure - Results - Conclusion ( 1 mark for each )