SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Making Activity-Based Travel Demand Models Play Nice With Trip Rates Elizabeth Sall, Daniel Wu, Billy Charlton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Examining Potential Demand of Public Transit for Commuting Trips Xiaobai Yao Department of Geography University of Georgia, USA 5 July 2006.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Trip Generation Modeling—Cross-Classification
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Trip Generation Modeling
1 BASSTEGG - Sketch Planning Charrette/GIS Models for Predicting Household Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and Greenhouse Gas (CO 2 ) Emissions Chuck Purvis.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Congestion Mitigation Fee Program Nexus Study GIS Based.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Sketch Model to Forecast Heavy-Rail Ridership Len Usvyat 1, Linda Meckel 1, Mary DiCarlantonio 2, Clayton Lane 1 – PB Americas, Inc. 2 – Jeffrey Parker.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
The Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission The 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9,
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Using Parcel Level Data for an Activity-Based Tour Model TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Tour-Based Model for a Small Area Presented at 11 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, NV May 2011 William G. Allen, Jr., PE Consultant.
Comparisons of Synthetic Populations Generated From Census 2000 and American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) 13 th TRB Application.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transit Service Quality and Transit Use: TBOT, Task 5.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Measuring Route-Level Accessibility: Applications to San Francisco Network Jennifer Ziebarth, Neema Nasir,
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
Transit Quality of Service Applications Comprehensive Planning November 2, 2007 Florida Department of Transportation Public Transit Office.
Modeling and Forecasting Household and Person Level Control Input Data for Advance Travel Demand Modeling Presentation at 14 th TRB Planning Applications.
A Simple Methodology to Evaluate the Disproportionate Impacts of Fare and Service Changes on Protected Populations in a Fixed Guide-way System By Vijay.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Easy Breezy Beautiful DTA: Modeling of the Geary Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project Elizabeth Sall, Michalis.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Trip Generation CE 451/551 Grad students … need to discuss “projects” at end of class.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
Student Travel: Evidence from 13 Diverse Metro Regions of the United States Guang Tian and Reid Ewing Department of City & Metropolitan.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Suzanne Childress Erik Sabina Robert Spotts Denver Regional Council of Governments Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno May 2011.
Estimating the Traffic Flow Impact of Pedestrians With Limited Data
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Implementing VMT as the LOS Replacement Metric in San Francisco
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Steps Closer to ABM: Example from Jerusalem
Using Google’s Aggregated and Anonymized Trip Data to Estimate Dynamic Origin-Destination Matrices for San Francisco TRB Applications Conference 2017 Bhargava.
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Transportation Demand Analysis
Travel Demand and Traffic Forecasting
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Presentation transcript:

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Making Activity-Based Travel Demand Models Play Nice With Trip Rates Elizabeth Sall, Daniel Wu, Billy Charlton TRB Planning Applications Conference – Reno, NV May 2011

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY2 Objective Develop a lookup table for auto vehicle trip ends by land use square footage that accounts for accessibility.

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY3 Possibilities ? SF Observed Data SF-CHAMP pow poof! Validated Uniqueness of SF “The Ds” and transit system Currently on the ground Future changes to “the Ds” and transit system Easy to get trip rates by specific Land Use Category meh

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY4 Are they a worker? Are they a student? How many jobs? Are they part time? What is their income? How old are they? Do they have a car? Do they have a license? Do they have kids? Are they a woman? How many workers are in the household? How many cars per worker? What is their accessibility to all destinations from home considering the cars per worker in their household? What is their accessibility to work or school considering the cars per worker in their household? Trip Rates!?!?…but there’s so much that goes into determining if a trip is made!!!

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY5 Can’t distinguish which job actually pulled that trip into the TAZ – all part of a size term. Different size terms for:  Trip purpose  Primary destinations versus intermediate stops By Land Use Category!?!?

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY6 Multiple linear regression on model results:  Vehicle Trip Ends for zone z = B * Households + B * Cultural/Institutional Employees + B * Medical Employees + B * Office Employees + B * PDR Employees + B * Visitor/Hotel Employees + B * Retail Employees Segment regressions based on simple accessibility groupings. Reverse-Engineering the AB Model to ‘make it simple’

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY7 Accessibility Variables Requirements: Encourage development consistent with San Francisco’s “transit first” policy Simple to calculate or look up on a map Account for wide variations in vehicle trip rates across the city

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY8 Accessibility Variables Considered Transit Intensity (combined headways) Employment Density Household Density

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY9 “Accessibility Zone” Map

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY10 Final Auto Vehicle Trip Rates BASE/LOWMEDIUMHIGH HHLDS CIE MED4.7 RET10.5 VIS7.9 PDR6.0 MIPS1.9 Accessibility Adjustments

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Questions? Special Thanks: Viktoriya Wise, Stephen Newhouse, Dan Wu & Rachel Hiatt

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AUTO TRIP MITIGATION FEE // MAPS & CORR ZONE 1: Within ½ mi of Rapid Transit* ZONE 2: Within ½ mi of Other Transit** ZONE 3: All Else ZONE 1: Within ¼ mi of Rapid Transit ZONE 2: Within ¼ mi of Other Transit ZONE 3: All Else ZONE 1: Within ½ mi of Rapid Transit ZONE 2: Within ¼ mi of Other Transit ZONE 3: All Else A B C * Rapid Transit includes BART and the “Rapid Network” as defined by MUNI (All rail plus major bus routes) ** Other Transit includes any other transit stop Scenarios

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AUTO TRIP MITIGATION FEE // MAPS & CORR ZONE 1: Within ½ mi of Rail (BART or MUNI) ZONE 2: Within ½ mi of Other Transit ZONE 3: All Else ZONE 1: Within ¼ mi of Rail ZONE 2: Within ¼ mi of Other Transit ZONE 3: All Else ZONE 1: Within ½ mi of Rail ZONE 2: Within ¼ mi of Other Transit ZONE 3: All Else E F G Scenarios

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY14 Transit Intensity Calculation

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY15 Thresholds Used HIGHLOW TRANSIT Combined Headway of all routes with stops within ¼ mi <=1 min Combined Headway of all routes with stops within ¼ mi >1 min EMPLOYMENT>= 50 jobs/acre< 50 jobs/acre

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

TRANSIT INTENSITY (Detail)

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY EMPLOYMENT DENSITY (Detail)

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY HOUSEHOLD DENSITY (Detail)

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ZONE MAP Combines transit intensity, employment density, and household density into eight zones.

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ZONE MAP (Detail)