Comments and Suggested Changes to the Construction Stormwater General Permit June 4 th 2008 Presented by the Active Treatment Systems Workgroup.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TAPE Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies.
Advertisements

Storm Water Blue Ribbon Panel Recommendations to the California State Water Resources Control Board The Feasibility of Numeric Effluent Limits Applicable.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Final Construction Stormwater General Permit Issued November 16, 2005 Jeff Killelea Department of Ecology.
Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors.
Proposed Regulatory Framework for Wastewater Presented by Claude Fortin Winnipeg, Manitoba December 6, 2007.
Britannia Mine: Environmental Impact Study of Treated Effluent Discharge Lee Nikl.
EPA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES Tim Ryan, P.E. Water Resources Engineer Water Resources Engineer Wisconsin Department of.
Proposed Effluent Guidelines For the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category by Janet Goodwin.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
BEFORE AFTER. New Effluent Limitation Guidelines On November 28th, 2008, the EPA issued a proposed regulation which strengthened the existing National.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
1 PARTIAL REUSE IDAHO March 2010 Presented by: Genny West LSRCP Production Meeting 2010 Boise, Idaho Advancing Sustainable Aquaculture.
Storm Water Regulation: What’s Next? Presented to: September 30, 2014.
Stormwater 101: How to stay out of trouble with TDEC.
10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan O. Martin, Human Factors Engineer Office of Nuclear Reactor.
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
Surface Water Treatment Rule Bob Clement Drinking Water Program U.S. EPA Region 8.
Drainage District #7 Pump Station Retrofits for Safe Fish Passage Ryan Bartelheimer, P.E. Snohomish Conservation District.
Draft Phase II Small MS4 General Permit Water Quality Monitoring & Assessment Jonathan Bishop Chief Deputy Director Director State Water Resources Control.
Spokane River Forum 23 May 2011
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
Stormwater Master Plan University of North Carolina Peter A. Reinhardt Sharon Myers, L.G. Department of Environment, Health and Safety.
 NEW PRODUCT –The Dual Polymer System  Why Treat?  EPA’s (ELG)  Active Treatment  Semi-Active Treatment  Passive Treatment.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Module 7: Construction Phase
1. DWS NPDES Permit Enrollment   Who is required to enroll Water Purveyors that are Community Drinking Water Systems (CDWS) with 1000 connections or.
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
Introduction to Construction General Permit Inspections Pre-Inspection Preparation.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
FLOW THROUGH WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM USING ALUM & PAM REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.
Sonoma Ecology Center TMDL Implementation Project Update November 4, 2011 Funded by EPA, Managed by SFEP, Administered by MMWD, and north bay partnership.
Civil Engineers: Environmental Engineering Erik R. Coats, PE, Ph.D. CE 115 November 10, 2005.
State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality Industrial/Construction Storm Water Unit.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
Stormwater Control & Design
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Flow Through Turbidity Treatment Using Alum & Pam At The Orlando International Airport Project.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
1 1 Reasonably Foreseeable Compliance Measures Sandi Potter Engineering Geologist.
Module 8: Post-Construction Phase Post-Construction Phase BMP Monitoring BMP Maintenance Temporary BMP Removal After Stabilization BMP Reporting and Record.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
1. DWS NPDES Permit Enrollment   Who is required to enroll Water Purveyors that are Community Drinking Water Systems (CDWS) with 1000 connections or.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
New Hampshire State fish hatchery effluent discharge and EPA/NPDES permit story.
Update: Where We Are and Feedback Lake George Stream Corridor Management Stake Holder Meeting June 25, 2008.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
Mercury and Suction Dredging Analysis of Data 10 May 2010 Eric Maksymyk.
Storm Water Permit Program Authority to regulate storm water discharges derives from 40 CFR Illinois EPA is delegated authority to administer this.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Improved Erosion Control BMPs for Road Construction Projects in the North Carolina Mountains Results To determine whether if practical, alternative Best.
(Your high resolution photo will go here.) Arthur Hirsch Principal Owner-TerraLogic–Boulder Colorado Colorado-ASCE Member ENVISION- Management Utilization.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Sustainable Vineyard Practices Replanting Strategies & Economics December 13, 2012 Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements Vineyards in Napa.
Changes in Production of one and two year old Steelhead Trout Smolts during Drought Conditions in a Northern California Stream Michael D. Sparkman (CDFW)
Research Title Sustainable Approach Of Recycling Palm Oil Mill Effluent Using Integrated Biofilm Membrane Filtration System For Internal Plant Usage By.
Stream and sediment monitoring
Enhancing Rapid Sand Filtration by Backwashing with Alum
California’s Plan to Deal With Once-Through Cooling At
Industrial Effluent Discharge and Pollution Renaldo du Toit
Dual Floc Tube Water Treatment System
Pre-Submittal Meeting As Needed Environmental Services RFQ
Presentation transcript:

Comments and Suggested Changes to the Construction Stormwater General Permit June 4 th 2008 Presented by the Active Treatment Systems Workgroup

ATS Workgroup Applauds the SWRCB for this process.

Who, What, Why Who makes up the ATS Workgroup ProTech General Contracting Services Clear Creek Systems Clear Water Compliance Services HaloSource What we are presenting Why ATS is beneficial on construction sites

What we are presenting History of ATS Regulation CA CVRWQCB Guidance Document WA DOE Technical Review Committee Final Draft GCP guidelines - positive Safeguarding with automated monitoring Trained and certified operators Residual testing for chemical additives

What we are presenting continued ATS Feasibility – Influent/Effluent Data with Percent Reduction – Economic Feasibility ATS Capabilities Recommendations

Influent/Effluent/Percent Reduction Typical Projects Utilizing ATS Project LocationAverage Background System Size (GPM) CoagulantAverage Influent Turb. (NTU) Average Effluent Turb. (NTU) Percent Reduction Kammerer lane Chitosan % Pleasant Grove Creek Chitosan % North Slough Creek Chitosan % Rancho Cordova, CA Chitosan % Oceanside, CA Chitosan % Roseville CA Chitosan %

Economic Feasibility Typical Projects Utilizing ATS Project LocationProject Size (AC) System Size (GPM) CoagulantRange Influent Turb. (NTU) Effluent Turb. (NTU) Cost/Acre Kammerer lane Chitosan $3, Pleasant Grove Creek Chitosan $6, Lincoln CA PAC $2, Roseville CA Dadmac $ Oceanside, CA 8 200Chitosan $3, Roseville CA Chitosan $1,758.00

Capabilities

Aquatic Impacts of Turbidity Source:

Mortality, Reproduction and Behavioral and the Impact of Suspended Solids Lethal Effects - Mortality Rainbow Trout – (Acute) 200 mg/L for 24 hr leads to 5% mortality in fry Rainbow Trout – (Chronic) 21 mg/L for 48 days leads to 62% reduction in egg-to-fry survival Chinook Salmon – (Acute) 82k mg/L for 6 hr leads to 60% mortality of juveniles Chinook Salmon – (Chronic) 488 mg/L for 8 days leads to 50% mortality of smolts Sublethal Effects - Reproduction CutthroatTrout – 35 mg/L for 2 hr leads to feeding ceased, cover sought Coho Salmon – 300 mg/L for 1 hr leads to feeding ceased Behavioral Effects – Modified Behaviors Whitefish – 0.7 mg/L for 1 hr leads to overhead cover abandoned Arctic Greyling – 100 mg/L for 1 hr leads to avoidance response C.P. Newcombe,. and D.D. MacDonald Effects of Suspended Sediments on Aquatic Ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:

Aquatic Impacts of Turbidity Turbidity Levels at or above which Adverse Effects are estimated to occur to Clear Water Fish (NTUs) DurationSlight impairment [behavioral effects] Significant effects [to growth and habitat] Severe impairment [habitat alienation] 1 hour hours hours hours hours days weeks >10 months Source: Newcombe, 2003, in OR DEQ 2005

Recommendations 1000 NTU NEL should be reduced – Example: – Consider a 500 gpm flow at 1000 NTU, 8 hours a day for a 5 day week. Assume 1000 NTU = 1000 mg/L TSS (this is a conservative assumption). – 500 gpm x 60 min x 8 hrs x 5 days = 1.2 Million gal per week – 1000 mg/L x 3.8 L/gal = 3800 mg/gal – 1.2 M gal x 3800 mg/gal = 4560 kg or about 10,000 lbs – Assume a sediment density of 60 lbs/ft3 – 10,000 lbs/60 lbs/ft3 = 167 ft3 – This equals around 2 Cubic Yards of sediment/week or a standard dump truck per month.

Recommendations Attachment J should be removed Attachment E, page 1, 3.a Current: “Active Treatment Systems will be designed and approved by qualified personnel: CPESC, CPSWQ, registered civil or other professional engineers with a minimum of 10 years demonstrated construction stormwater treatment system design experience. ” Recommendation: …”CPESC, CPSWQ, registered civil engineer, professional engineer, or others with a minimum”…

Recommendations Attachment E, page 1.3.d Current: “The discharger shall install and operate their ATS using personnel with either a minimum of five years construction storm water experience or are licensed contractors specifically holding a California Class A Contractors license.” Recommendation: “The ATS installation and operation firm shall have five years construction storm water experience or be licensed contractors specifically holding a class A contractors license and all operational personnel must meet minimum training criteria listed herein.”

Why ATS beneficial on construction sites Turbidity Reduction – And other contaminants associated – Dirty Water vs. Watery Dirt ATS is in addition to traditional BMP measures Allows year round construction Aquatic Life Going Forward – New and Innovative Technologies

Thank You!