NSPE EBOK Competency Model Where Does It Fit? What Does It Take to Be an Engineer Paul Schmidt, P.E., F.NSPE Chair NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Educating for a Sustainable Future – Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge The EE BOK Working Group Debbie Reinhart, PhD, PE, BCEE University of.
1 First Saudi Engineering Forum Preparing THE Engineer of the Future Jeffrey S. Russell, Ph.D., P.E. (Chair, CAP^3)
National Academic Reference Standards
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
Jeffrey S. Russell, P.E., Ph.D., F.ASCE Chair, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison Preparing the Professional.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes Required for Practice as a Professional Engineer First Edition Craig N. Musselman, P.E.,
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
Employability Skills.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Introduction to Engineering and Urban Planning How to be a Successful Engineer.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
OBE Briefing.
Intro Module11 Project-related course (PE): Problem Based and Project Based Learning Xiangyun Du Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Engineering Education - Skills & competences for the (global) labour market Anette Kolmos Professor, Aalborg University UNESCO Chair in Problem Based Learning.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
The Engineering Body of Knowledge Joint Engineers Conference 07 November 2014 Helena, MT Robert A. Green, P.E., F. NSPE President National Society.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant NSPE’s Pan – Engineering Body of Knowledge ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Indianapolis,
Common features for the subject area report Business and Management LEFIS Continuing education Malta, 8th April 2006.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
FITNES The Future of IndonesianTeachers in National Education System A COLLECTION OF DREAMS Of TEACHER EDUCATION As WORK-BASED EDUCATION.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
EPMS (Employee Performance Management System) Training FOR NON-SUPERVISORS FACILITATOR: ADRIAN WILSON NOVEMBER 17 AND 19.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
/ASEEBOK Stuart G. Walesh, PhD, PE, Consultant Engineering Body of Knowledge: Tomorrow’s Engineer Indiana Society of Professional.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Generic competencesDescription of the Competence Learning Competence The student  possesses the capability to evaluate and develop one’s own competences.
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
Presenters Only: Presentation Overview and Goals The following presentation provides sample slides and talking points for individuals to use as a guide.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 Engineering in the modern society  Professional profile of a modern engineer  Engineer as a key personality in the technological and social progress.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

NSPE EBOK Competency Model Where Does It Fit? What Does It Take to Be an Engineer Paul Schmidt, P.E., F.NSPE Chair NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for Practice Committee 2013/2015 NSPE Annual Meeting July 16, 2015 Seattle, WA

Competency Models What Does it Take to Be An Engineer? All Engineering Disciplines NSPE Engineering Body of Knowledge US DOL Engineering Competency Model Finalized this week; NSPE Contributed to Development Discipline Specific ASCE Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge AAEES Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge IEEE Software Engineering Body of Knowledge BKCASE System Engineering Body of Knowledge

The Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes required for the practice of engineering in responsible charge of engineering activities as a Professional Engineer Applicable to Professional Engineers of all disciplines and in all employment sectors

Identifies the Knowledge, Skills and Abilities needed for workers to perform successfully in the field of engineering. Includes industry specific competencies

US Department of Labor Engineering Competency Model Pyramid Structure - Common for all DOL Models Pyramid NOT Hierarchical Skills Pyramid represents increasing specialization and specificity Blocks represent competency areas (i.e. groups of knowledge, skills, and abilities

US Department of Labor Engineering Competency Model Foundational Competencies Tier 1 - Personal Effectiveness Competencies - soft skills Tier 2 - Academic Competencies - learned in school setting Tier 3 - Workplace Competencies - motives, traits, management styles Industry-Specific Competencies Tier 4 - Industry-Wide competencies Tier 5 - Industry-Sector Competencies - none in current model

Respond to NAE “take charge” challenge to the engineering profession Support NSPE’s mission, vision, and values Build on discipline- specific BOK efforts Need for a pan-engineering BOK Why develop an EBOK?

Preparation of the Engineering Body of Knowledge NSPE Licensure and Qualifications for Practice Committee –27 Members –8 Disciplines Represented –Licensure Oriented –Predominantly Engineering Practitioners –Two Year Intensive Process Review and Detailed Input from Partner Society Teams of Engineers: –IEEE –AIChE –ASCE –ASABE –Japan Society of Professional Engineers

Guiding Principles - NAE  Technological innovation accelerating.  Technology deployment globally interconnected.  Technology in our everyday lives - more significant than ever.  Individuals increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary.  Social, cultural, political, and economic forces will shape technological innovation. Above From National Academy of Engineering

Additional Guiding Principles - NSPE  Broad body of knowledge increasingly required  Higher value-added, leading-edge services and products from the U.S. needed  Communication, management, leadership, ethical practice skills increasingly critical  Engineering in a sustainable, global context  Lifelong Learning need is accelerating

Key Attributes of the Professional Engineer Analytical, practical; Thorough, detail- oriented; Creative, innovative; Communicative; Knowledgeable about sciences and mathematics; Knowledgeable in a selected field and conversant in related fields; Skillful in business and management;

Key Attributes of the Professional Engineer Able to provide leadership Professional and positive in attitude; Aware of societal considerations in global context; Aware of relevant laws, regulations, standards, and codes; Knowledgeable about engineering ethics and codes of conduct; and Dedicated to lifelong learning.

Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes Knowledge - consists of comprehending theories, principles, and fundamentals; Skills - the abilities to perform tasks and apply knowledge; and Attitudes - the ways in which one thinks and feels in response to a fact or situation.

Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes Expressed in the EBOK as 30 Capabilities –Capabilities 3 Basic or Foundational 16 Technical 11 Professional Practice –Each Capability Description Example Ability Engineer Should Have

Basic or foundational 1. Mathematics 2. Natural Sciences 3. Humanities and Social Sciences Technical 4. Manuf./Const.12. Risk, Reliab., Uncert. 5. Design13. Safety 6. Engr. Econ.14. Societal Impact 7. Engr. Science15. Systems Engr. 8. Engr. Tools16. Oper. & Maint. 9. Experiments17. Sustain. & Environ. Impact 10. Prob. Recog. & Solving18. Tech. Breadth 11. QCQA19. Tech. Depth See Attachment for Descriptions

Professional practice 20. Business Aspect of Engr. 21. Communication 22. Ethical Responsibility 23. Global Knowledge & Awareness 24. Leadership 25. Legal Aspects of Engr. 26. Lifelong Learning 27. Professional Attitudes 28. Project Management 29. Public Policy & Engr. 30. Teamwork

Example abilities As examples of design capability, an engineer entering practice at the professional level should be able to: Identify, or work collaboratively to identify, the pertinent technical, environmental, economic, regulatory, and other project requirements and constraints; Contribute to the development of alternatives and prepare design details for complex projects; Analyze the pros and cons of some alternative design options and assist in the selection of an optimized design alternative; Etc.

Session Exercise #1 Exercise #1 30 Capabilities Yes or No? - Do you use this capability regularly in your current practice of engineering Optional Address - for poll results

Prospective engineering students Parents Teachers/ advisors General public Engineering Educators Current engineering students Accreditation leaders Employers Engineer interns Mentors and supervisors Licensing boards Certification boards Engineering society members EBOK

Stakeholders Prospective engineering students, parents, teachers, advisors, general public Possible Uses Understand importance of engineering Appreciate range of knowledge, skills, and attitudes Engineering and other faculty and administrators Design curricula/programs Create/improve courses

Current engineering students Provide context for their education Accreditation leadersRevise criteria EmployersPartner with personnel Engineer InternsDirect their experience Mentors and supervisorsAssist interns

Licensing boardsSet expectations for licensure Certification boardsDefine desired mastery level Engineering society members Use as resource for committee, subcommittee, and task force work

Uses of EBOK 1. Employers/Employees Performance Review for Engineering Interns and PE Use EBOK as basis for evaluation tailored to situation Positive feedback from successful use Available on NSPE website on Licensure Blog

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION KEY: E = ExperiencedD = Developing Capability DevelopmentN = Not Applicable to Date CapabilityExperiencePlanned Professional Development Goals (Internal and External) a. Design – Project Type b. Technical Depth c. Technical Breadth d. Software Applications e. Cost Estimating f.Construction 1. Field Coordination 2. Resident Inspection 3. Constr. Administration g. Safety h. Sustainability/Env. Impact i.Communication 1. Written – Correspondenc e 2. Written – Reports 3. Public Speaking j.Project Management 1. Time Management

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 2. Project Planning 3. Project Monitoring 4. Team Management k. Risk Management 1. Project Risk Assessmen t 2. Technical QA/QC 3. Internal QA/QC Review l.Business Aspects 1. Project Cost Control 2. Proposal Preparati on 3. Business Developme nt m. Legal Aspects 1. Contract Documents 2. Construction Interpretatio n 3. Engineeri ng Contracts 4. Codes, Regulations, Laws

Uses of EBOK 2. Engineering Education Assignment in Freshman Engineering Course Have freshman engineering students review EBOK –to better understand what engineering is about –What they will need to learn for their careers Successfully used at New Mexico State University Planned other universities

Uses of EBOK Freshmen-New Mexico State University, Feb 2015 What Capabilities Surprised You? Engineering Economics Sustainability and Env. Impact Business Aspects of Engineering Legal Aspects Ethics Technical Breadth

Session Exercise #2 Group #1 Complete Exercise #2 - Handout 30 Capabilities Rank Today Capability is Currently Attained Through: –Baccalaureate Education –Graduate Education –Professional Development –Experience

Session Exercise #2 Group #2 - What Should NSPE do to Promote EBOK? Group #3 - What Capability is Missing? Should any be Deleted? Group #4 - How Else Could the EBOK be Used by Stakeholders?

Additional Info – Free Download, Summaries, Uses Department of Labor Website Comments, Questions: NSPE: Arthur Schwartz, Esq Thank You Paul Schmidt, P.E., F. NSPE