OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT-2004-516230 www.osh-project.org Oil Sea Harvester Project OSH design : Hydrodynamics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Advertisements

SHIP CONSTRUCTION Group C Basujit Chakravarty Harsh Thakkar
AFT END ARRANGEMENT By Group 1.
Automated Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Method for Multi-hull Vessels Kay Gemba College of Engineering.
Adelija Čulić-Viskota
MARINTEK Efficient prediction of extreme ship responses by MingKang Wu Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures, NTNU Norwegian Marine Technology Research.
Chapter II. Definition & Regulation
Nomenclature & Principal Views Lines & Offsets Coefficients of Form
Hull Girder Response - Quasi-Static Analysis
Univerity of Genova Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies University of Genova,
4.9 Stability at Large Angles of Inclination
11/04/2002Container Ships1/43 LECTURE LAYOUT Definition Developments of container ship concept Aspects of container ship design Main dimensions: length,
Ship Design.
EN400 – Principles of Ship Performance
Overview Chapter 3 - Buoyancy versus gravity = stability
What is a wave? Speed, wave length and frequency.
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MARINE POLLUTION CONTROL 8 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT ww.osh-project.org THE OIL SEA HARVESTER.
Science Physics Definition Test. What is the definition of 1.Scalar 2.Vector 3.Uniform acceleration 4.Velocity 5.Mass 6.Weight 7.Gravitational field 8.Gravitational.
Boating Vocabulary Aft – towards the back of the boat.
Paris, March 2011 Probabilistic Damage Stability Rules for cargo ships and SPS (Part B – SOLAS 2009) Marine Technical Department Stability Section (DT5)
Terms you need to know on the water!
One Dimensional Motion
Slamming Impact Loads on Large High-Speed Naval Craft ASNE 2008
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
© 2006 EU-MOP Consortium Integrated EU-MOP Design System Athens, Greece 09 June 2006 Nikos Kakalis & Yiannis Ventikos University of Oxford.
Analysis of the suction wing propeller as auxiliary wind propulsion for cargo ships Philippe PALLU DE LA BARRIÈRE Jérôme VÉDRENNE NATURAL PROPULSION SEMINAR.
NDIA – Expeditionary Warfare Conference
YACHT DESIGN– MONOHULL – CATAMARAN
KinematicsRotationEnergyWaves Electricity Dynamics.
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MARINE POLLUTION CONTROL 8 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT ww.osh-project.org Introduction to.
Part 2 Graphs of Motion. Part 2 Graphs of Motion.
Numerical Prediction of Steady Flow Around High Speed Vessels with Transom Sterns S.X. Du 1,2, D.A. Hudson 2, W.G. Price 2, P. Temarel 2 and Y.S. Wu 1.
Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 9b Station Keeping.
© 2008 EU-MOP Consortium Integrated EU-MOP System Design Madrid, Spain 24 January 2008 Yiannis Ventikos Dept. of Engineering Science University of Oxford.
1 Chapter 6: Motion in a Plane. 2 Position and Velocity in 2-D Displacement Velocity Average velocity Instantaneous velocity Instantaneous acceleration.
Edexcel AS Physics Unit 1 : Chapter 3: Rectilinear Motion Prepared By: Shakil Raiman.
Focus on “conventional” fast vessels
For all problems, ignore friction and air resistance [1] How long will it take a 14. n object to free fall from a height of 50 meters? Does the fact that.
Overview (Welcome Parents!) Chapter 3 - Buoyancy versus gravity = stability (see Chapter Objectives in text) Builds on Chapters 1 and 2 6-week exam is.
INTERACTION AND COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PROPULSIVE PLANT AND ENGINE ROOM / DOUBLE BOTTOM STEELWORK.
Ballast-Free Ship Design GLMRI Affiliates 9/23/10 1 Refinement of the Ballast-Free Ship Concept PI: Michael G. Parsons, Arthur F. Thurnau Professor Emeritus,
SYSTEM-OF-SYSTEMS THAT ACT LOCALLY FOR OPTIMIZING GLOBALLY EU FP7 - SMALL/MEDIUM-SCALE FOCUSED RESEARCH PROJECT (STREP) FP7-ICT : ADVANCED COMPUTING,
Dead reckoning, piloting
Max speed of sail boats? Thrust v friction. Forces on a boat Key to making a boat go faster is to increase the thrust and reduce the drag.
ΕΥΣΤΑΘΕΙΑ ΒΑΣΙΚΕΣ ΑΡΧΕΣ. STABILITY STABILITY GEOMETRICAL MANUALS WEIGHT MANUALS STATICAL OR DYNAMIC DAMAGEINTACT LONGITUDINALTRANSVERSE LIST < 10 O LIST.
M. Fairbanks Named after chairman of the insurance company that owned her.
Resolve the vector into x & y components 40.0 m/s at 45 o SoW.
A repeating disturbance or movement that transfers energy through matter or space Example: Ocean Light sound What Are Waves?
KM3NeT WPF/L NIKHEF- MECABAR 1 A.Cosquer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium MECABAR PROJECT PLAN 1- Context 2- 3D views and responsibilities 3-
EXAMPLE: Graph 1 shows the variation with time t of the displacement d of a traveling wave. Graph 2 shows the variation with distance x along the same.
EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL STUDIES ON TRIM EFFECTS George Tzabiras
SHIP LOADS AND STRESSES
Lesson IV: How a Sailboat Works: Hull Type
ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms
Diploma in International Shipping & Logistics
Head of Hydrodynamic department
THE OIL SEA HARVESTER SYSTEM :
ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms
ADAM4EVE workshop on Adaptive Ship Hull Forms
Waves Vocab.
Graphing Motion Walk Around
Lesson IV: How a Sailboat Works: Hull Type
Developments of container ship concept
TMR4225 Marine Operations, UUV/AUV definitions
Waves.
 More Fluids  November 30,  More Fluids  November 30, 2010.
Do Now Heading: The Numbers of Motion
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Final Review part Two.
Nomenclature & Principal Views Lines & Offsets Coefficients of Form
Presentation transcript:

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Oil Sea Harvester Project OSH design : Hydrodynamics and Optimisation Partners involved : CAT Shipyard (FR) : Design BEC hydrodynamic laboratory (FR) : Numerical optimisation CEHIPAR hydrodynamic laboratory (SP) : Test campaigns

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT General Objective : Optimisation of the operational performances of the OSH concept Transit phase –Powering performances : relatively high transit speed –Sea-keeping behaviour : low dynamic responses Oil recovery Phase –Sea-keeping behaviour for oil recovery operations up to sea state 6/7

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Transit phase : powering optimisation Objective : –Light displacement (8000 t) –Minimise the ship resistance at 25 knots –Minimise all hydrodynamic interactions at medium speeds Constraints : –Pods integration (immersion of the transom stern) – central cylindrical part of the main hull not modified –Lateral distance between the side hull and the main hull not modified (toll carriage and oil recovery tool integration) Design parameters : –Main hull –Side hull

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Powering optimisation : Main hull modifications Bow sections : thinner waterline Buttock line and transom immersion Bulbous bow Initial Final Optimal InitialFinal Initial Final Initial form

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Powering optimisation : Side hull modifications Best length : 101m (initial) Best longitudinal location : fore 80 m 101 m 138 m 120 m Main hull Side hull Initial side hull APFP Best compromise between bow wave interactions and stern wave interactions 19 knots25 knots Fore Aft

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Sea-keeping optimisation Objective : sea-keeping performances –Transit phase : V ≈20 knots -  = t Tool carriage in folded position –Oil recovery operations : V : low speed  = t Tool carriage deployed Constraints : –Pods integration –cylindrical part of the main hull not modified –distance between the side hull and the main hull not modified (tool carriage integration) Design parameters : –Side hull –Tool carriage

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Seakeeping optimisation for oil recovery operations (Transit phase not critical) Increase of the side hull diameter : 3.5m (instead of 3m) No influence of the longitudinal position of the side hulls Optimal length of the tool carriage : 11.5m Optimal location of the tool carriage : middle of the side hull Example of results : Influence of the length of the tool carriage on the oil recovery performances Operability diagram for 4 lengths : operability index (0-100%) versus wave heading

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Optimal design Thinner bow sections Maximum transom immersion (Bulbous bow) Side hulls of length 101m at extreme fore location Tool carriage of length 11.5m located in the middle of the side hull

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Tank tests in progress (task 5.3) - assessment of the design optimised numerically - calibration of the numerical tools (re-used for the final design stage) Resistance tests almost completed –Great importance of the static trim (transom immersion) –Optimal location of the side hull : fore Influence of the static trim Influence of the longitudinal Side hull location Seakeeping tests carried out from June to September 06

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Thank you for your attention

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Seakeeping optimisation Definition of the operability value Transit phase –Roll < 12° –Pitch < 4.5° –Vertical acceleration < 3m/s² Oil recovery operations –Wave elevation < 1m –Relative heave < 3m –Vertical acceleration < 3m/s² Maximum significant height Operability diagramm Statistiques du Golfe de Gascogne 71.8% Quantity of oil spilled (tonnes) : 50 to to >

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Seakeeping optimisation Transit phase Better performances than in oil recovery operations No need to optimise

OSH PMC MEETING N°7 9 th June 2006, Athens (GR) OIL SEA HARVESTER TST4-CT Seakeeping optimisation Oil recovery operations Increase of the side hull diameter :3.5m No influence of the longitudinal position of the side hulls Optimal length of the tool carriage : 11.5m Optimal location of the tool carriage : middle if the side hull Lngitudinal location of the side hullsLength of the tool carriage