Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS and BIM Integration: Business Level Framework
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
PRIME 2 Shortest Path Routing Simon McCabe Chief Technology Officer IMGS.
NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
Spatial Decisions INNOVATING GEOSPATIAL INTELLIGENCE PLENARY II 17 September GIS Asia. Hanoi Kapil Chaudhery Spatial Decisions.
® ® Global Advisory Council (GAC) Outreach overview, Jan 2011 Mark Reichardt, President and CEO Open Geospatial Consortium © 2011 Open Geospatial Consortium.
Internet Management Consultants and Solution Providers Outstanding CMS Projects Lessons from the Front Line.
! Copyright © Insight Test Services 2008 Top 10 Tips Preparing a business case/plan for investment in Test.
Establishing a service oriented composite applications development process for supporting work- based learning and competency progression management Hilary.
IT Governance Navigating for Value Michael Vitale 6 May 2003 CIO Conference Steering the Enterprise Through Stormy Seas Image source: Access2000.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
Information and Communication Technology Research Initiative Supporting the self management of obesity: The role of ICTs University.
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) in SW design
MDR Implementation: Drivers & Challenges Julie Smiley Director, Product Management for BioPharma Akana PhUSE SDE - May 14, 2015 Introductions.
Shaping change through collaboration The value of authoritative data.
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
The BIM Project Execution Planning Procedure
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Facilities Management Category Management Plan Synopsis Version 1.1 (March 2015)
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
Information Security Governance 25 th June 2007 Gordon Micallef Vice President – ISACA MALTA CHAPTER.
Information Integration in Construction. Construction information In construction, architects, engineers, planners, contractors, facility managers....
NHS Interoperability Programme Workshop Overview Indi Singh 16 th December 2014.
Strategic Commissioning
Best Practices: Aligning Process, Culture and Tools Michael Jordan Senior Project Manager - Microsoft Consulting Services
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Integrated e-Infrastructure for Scientific Facilities Kerstin Kleese van Dam STFC- e-Science Centre Daresbury Laboratory
Adopting a Whole-of-Nation Approach to a Sustainable, Multi-GNSS Enabled National Positioning Infrastructure John Dawson and Gary Johnston.
Nationally Significant Databases and Collections Providers’ Group Emma Kelly Environmental Information Advisor Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Team.
NIEM Domain Awareness June 2011 Establishing a Domain within NIEM.
Cliquez et modifiez le titre Philippe GAUTREAU Souheil KARAM October 26th 2012 MONTREAL 1 Key Success Factors and Strategic Planning.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
AREVA T&D Security Focus Group - 09/14/091 Security Focus Group A Vendor & Customer Collaboration EMS Users Conference September 14, 2009 Rich White AREVA.
Business Process Change and Discrete-Event Simulation: Bridging the Gap Vlatka Hlupic Brunel University Centre for Re-engineering Business Processes (REBUS)
Supporting Industry Change Planning: Risk & Milestone Assessment Process & Tools 07/07/2014.
1 © Mahindra Satyam 2009 Mahindra Satyam Confidential Welcome To CMMI Introduction.
IS Methodologies. Systems Development Life Cycle - SDLC Planning Planning define the system to be developed define the system to be developed Set the.
ISO9004:2000 Introduction workshop ISO9004:2000 Introduction Workshop Version GC.10.1-UK Oct 03  The High Performance Organisation Ltd.
Subcommittee on Design New Strategies for Cost Estimating Research on Cost Estimating and Management NCHRP Project 8-49 Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida.
GeoPlannerSM for ArcGIS®: An Introduction
Document Number: Version: 1v0 © Outperform UK Ltd 1 Assessing the change capability of an organisation Jennifer Stapleton.
ERP Implementation Fundamentals Richard Byrom Oracle Consultant, Speaker and Author
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Requirements Development in CMMI
SMC Evaluation Project The View From Industry Martin Coombes Government Affairs Manager, AstraZeneca ABPI Representative SMC Evaluation Reference Group.
The technology and techniques driving effective highway management LandScope Engineering Ltd Sarah Jones GI Manager.
1 VGIN’s GIS Strategic Plan Dan Widner VGIN Advisory Board Meeting January 6,
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Cutover & Implementation Aggregated Programme RAG
Continual Service Improvement Methods & Techniques.
I © 2015 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Andrew Smith, Feb 2016 How BIM can positively influence rail O&M.
Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each) Key challenges What will you do to address the challenges?Brief overview of the barriers and gaps.
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
Geosystems Martin Nix Martin Nix and Dr Craig D. Hill Leica Geosystems AG Heerbrugg Switzerland Rapid Accurate GIS updates with improved links to survey.
1 P-CMM ® INITIATIVE Overview. 2 B A D C Improving Organisation Organisational Capability Technology ProcessPeople.
Developing an IDM Information Delivery Manual Part 1. Industry Workgroup Training, Creating IDMs Alliance NA 2010 Dianne Davis, NA-IDM Coordinator Jan.
© 2012 Autodesk Energize Utilities with Design Data UT2603-R-P Roundtable discussion.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Certification: CMMI Emerson Murphy-Hill. Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Creation of the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie.
® OGP/IPIECA Oil Spill Response Common Operating Picture Project RFI Clarification Telecon 30 September 2013.
Denise McKenzie Executive Director 23 May 2017
Integrating Geospatial Elements into the ABS Information Model
Asset Governance – Integrated Strategic Asset Management
Scotland’s Digital Health and Care Strategy
MSDI training courses feedback MSDIWG10 March 2019 Busan
Requirements Development in CMMI
Presentation transcript:

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy BIM Level 0 Meta-data Interoperability Level of Detail Generalisation BIM Level 2 Geo Enabled RISK COST CLASH REWORK BIM Level 1 Quantitatively Managed Defined Managed DELAY

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy - Andrew Evans Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy - Overview Andrew Evans Topcon Key Issues / considerations / challenges Accuracy underpins traceability of BIM process and decisions Accuracy is understood by surveyors but it needs to be communicated to People and Systems in BIM

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy – Maturity Effort needed to support BIM Level 2 Stage 1 Initial Stage 2 Managed Stage 3 Defined Stage 4 Quantitatively Managed Stage 5 Optimising Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes characterised for projects and is often reactive Processes characterised for the organisation and is proactive Processes measured and controlled Processes measured and controlled Optimisation UK BIM Here Geo Enabled

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy – Road Map Required here Backlog “BIM Maturity Model”, Mark Bew and Mervyn Richards © What are the Challenges ?

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy – Actions Headline Action OpportunityRequiredEngagement Carry out a controlled test Internal Carry out a surveyInternal Collate existing forum/group activityInternal Collate existing standardsInternal Create internal workgroup solution / proposalInternal Join and influence existing forum/ groupExternal Produce case studyInternal Produce guidanceInternal Set challenge for software houseExternal Develop a detailed Road Map Internal Yes

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Accuracy – Action Who/What first ? Priorities for call to action 1.Establish internal group to define best standard for consistent accuracy unit 2.Work with OGC to establish common approach to accuracy meta-data and attribution

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data – Mark King Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data - Overview Mark King Leica Key Issues / considerations / challenges Lack of understanding and use of metadata standards within the BIM industry Current metadata standards, such as Gemini v2.2, may not be suitable / enabled for use with survey and Survey4BIM

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data – Maturity Effort needed to support BIM Level 2 Stage 1 Initial Stage 2 Managed Stage 3 Defined Stage 4 Quantitatively Managed Stage 5 Optimising Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes characterised for projects and is often reactive Processes characterised for the organisation and is proactive Processes measured and controlled Processes measured and controlled Optimisation UK BIM Here Geo Enabled

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data – Road Map Required here Backlog “BIM Maturity Model”, Mark Bew and Mervyn Richards © What are the Challenges ?

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data – Actions Headline Action OpportunityRequiredEngagement Carry out a controlled test Internal Carry out a surveyInternal Collate existing forum/group activityInternal Collate existing standardsInternal Create internal workgroup solution / proposalInternal Join and influence existing forum/ groupExternal Produce case studyInternal Produce guidanceInternal Set challenge for software houseExternal Develop a detailed Road Map Internal Yes

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Meta Data – Actions Priorities for call to action 1.Assess the details, feasibility and suitability of Gemini as a common standard as well as gap analsysis to upgrade if appropriate 2.Become involved with the BSI IST36 Standards Committee which is about to begin an assessment of the Gemini standard for a planned release of v2.3 in early 2016

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability – Mark Lawton Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability - Overview Mark Lawton Skanska Key Issues / considerations / challenges Different file formats exchange capability Degradation of data and inability to add data. Different coordinate system translation The technology of the capture device as evolved faster than the knowledge of the user.

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability – Maturity Effort needed to support BIM Level 2 Stage 1 Initial Stage 2 Managed Stage 3 Defined Stage 4 Quantitatively Managed Stage 5 Optimising Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes characterised for projects and is often reactive Processes characterised for the organisation and is proactive Processes measured and controlled Processes measured and controlled Optimisation UK BIM Here Geo Enabled

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability – Road Map Required here Backlog “BIM Maturity Model”, Mark Bew and Mervyn Richards © What are the Challenges ?

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability – Actions Headline Action OpportunityRequiredEngagement Carry out a controlled test Internal Carry out a surveyInternal Collate existing forum/group activityInternal Collate existing standardsInternal Create internal workgroup solution / proposalInternal Join and influence existing forum/ groupExternal Produce case studyInternal Produce guidanceInternal Set challenge for software houseExternal Develop a detailed Road Map Internal Yes

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Interoperability – Action Who/What first ? Priorities for call to action 1.Set a challenge to the software houses 2.Produce self driven case study with impact assessment (i.e. rail alignment) on the same challenge

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail – Martin Penney Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail - Overview Martin Penney Technics Key Issues / considerations / challenges Variance in Definitions Graphical representation of as-built data is not the same as design representation

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail – Maturity Effort needed to support BIM Level 2 Stage 1 Initial Stage 2 Managed Stage 3 Defined Stage 4 Quantitatively Managed Stage 5 Optimising Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes characterised for projects and is often reactive Processes characterised for the organisation and is proactive Processes measured and controlled Processes measured and controlled Optimisation UK BIM Here Geo Enabled

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail – Road Map “BIM Maturity Model”, Mark Bew and Mervyn Richards © What are the Challenges ? Required here

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail – Actions Headline Action OpportunityRequiredEngagement Carry out a controlled test Internal Carry out a surveyInternal Collate existing forum/group activityInternal Collate existing standardsInternal Create internal workgroup solution / proposalInternal Join and influence existing forum/ groupExternal Produce case studyInternal Produce guidanceInternal Set challenge for software houseExternal Develop a detailed Road Map Internal Yes

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Level of Detail – Action Who/What first ? Priorities for call to action 1.Identify which Industry groups & forums lead this development & current standards 2.Setup a workgroup within the survey community to address the geospatial concerns impacted by variances of LoD definition

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalization – Simon Navin Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalisation - Overview Simon Navin Ordnance Survey Key Issues / considerations / challenges The representation of 2D/3D data while maintaining geometric integrity and recognisable context The capability of the user to recognise and interpret generalised data and utilise it accordingly

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalisation – Maturity Effort needed to support BIM Level 2 Stage 1 Initial Stage 2 Managed Stage 3 Defined Stage 4 Quantitatively Managed Stage 5 Optimising Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes unpredictable, Poorly controlled and reactive Processes characterised for projects and is often reactive Processes characterised for the organisation and is proactive Processes measured and controlled Processes measured and controlled Optimisation CAD Here GIS Here CGI Here

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalisation – Road Map “BIM Maturity Model”, Mark Bew and Mervyn Richards © Required here What are the Challenges ?

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalisation – Actions Headline Action OpportunityRequiredEngagement Carry out a controlled test Internal Carry out a surveyInternal Collate existing forum/group activityInternal Collate existing standardsInternal Create internal workgroup solution / proposalInternal Join and influence existing forum/ groupExternal Produce case studyInternal Produce guidanceInternal Set challenge for software houseExternal Develop a detailed Road Map Internal Yes

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Generalisation – Action Who/What first ? Priorities for call to action 1.Collate available standards from Industry and Professional organisations and BIM software vendors on how they currently support generalisation 2.Identify and engage 3D specialists outside of the direct construction community who specialise in generalising data for visualisation, gaming etc…… 3.Determine use cases and examples of outputs generalized for user benefit – and end user services – (interpretable, safe decisions, good service- branding of generalised services (which may be products but may be broader)

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Next Steps – What do you think Geo Enabling BIM Level 2

Big5 Geospatial Challenges to Geo Enable BIM Level 2 Actions – Summary – What next / first