Significant Cognitive Disability Criteria and the SCD Determination Guidance Document Webinar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
TCAP-Alternate Portfolio TCAP-Alt PA
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
IEP Team Decision-Making Eligibility Tool
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
ALTERNATE ACCESS for ELLs 1 Alternate ACCESS for ELLs ™ Participation Criteria The Alternate ACCESS for ELLs was initially developed by a team led by Craig.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Eligibility ARC Chairperson Training 1. Special Education Cycle Interventions EligibilityIEPPlacementInstruction Annual Review InterventionsReferralEvaluation.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
TAKS-Alt ReportingInformation for Parents Copyright © 2007, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Special Considerations: Assistive Technology and Communication Office of Special Education Division of District Support.
Transition Planning: From Age-Appropriate Assessments to Transition Services.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Office of Federal Programs Marcus E. Cheeks, Bureau Director.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Speech-Language Dismissal. This event is being funded with State and/or Federal funds and is being provided for employees of school districts, employees.
Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Specific Components of the IEP Checklist
American Institutes for Research
Office of Special Education Updates
Assessment.
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
WA-AIM 1% Participation Cap
A Child with Multiple Disabilities and Eligibility Criteria
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
How Will My Child Participate in State Testing?
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Significant Cognitive Disability Criteria and the SCD Determination Guidance Document Webinar

This event is being funded with State and/or Federal funds and is being provided for employees of school districts, employees of the Mississippi Department of Education and Department contractors. Miss. Const. Art. 4, Section 6 prohibits governing authorities from making donations. According to the Mississippi Attorney General, once the Federal funds are turned over to the State, the rules for the expenditure of State funds apply. Based on Mississippi law, this event is not being provided for third party vendors or external providers ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

Vision _________________________________ To create a world-class educational system that gives students the knowledge and skills to be successful in college and the workforce, and to flourish as parents and citizens Mission _______________________________ To provide leadership through the development of policy and accountability systems so that all students are prepared to compete in the global community ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

All Proficient and Showing Growth in All Assessed Areas Every Student Graduates High School and is Ready for College and Career Every Child Has Access to a High-Quality Early Childhood Program Every School Has Effective Teachers and Leaders Every Community Effectively Using a World-Class Data System to Improve Student Outcomes ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

The Office of Special Education (OSE) has a teacher listserv available for special education teachers. The purpose of the listserv will be to inform special education teachers of upcoming trainings, upcoming webinars, and other resources provided by MDE ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

This training is designed to provide guidance for determining if a student meets the criteria for a significant cognitive disability, and how that determination will affect student instruction and assessment. The use of these strategies are aligned to the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) Strategic Plan ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

In order to be considered SCD, the child must meet all three of the standards listed on the IEP. If a student meets the criteria for having a Significant Cognitive Disability, the student’s instruction will be based on the Alternate Academic Achievement Standards (AAAS) and the student should participate in the Mississippi Assessment Program – Alternate (MAP-A) ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

PARTICIPATION IN STATE-WIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM  This student is not required to participate in State-wide assessments as she or he is over 18 years of age.  This student meets the criteria for SCD and is under 8 years of age. Significant Cognitive Disability (SCD) Determination To be classified as a student having a significant cognitive disability, ALL of the criteria below must be true.  Yes  No The student demonstrates significant cognitive deficits and poor adaptive skill levels (as determined by that student’s comprehensive evaluation) that prevent participation in the standard academic curriculum or achievement of the academic content standards, even with accommodations and modifications.  Yes  No The student requires extensive direct instruction in both academic and functional skills in multiple settings to accomplish the application and transfer of those skills.  Yes  No The student’s inability to complete the standard academic curriculum is neither the result of excessive or extended absences nor is primarily the result of visual, auditory, or physical disabilities, emotional-behavioral disabilities, specific learning disabilities or social, cultural, or economic differences.  The student MEETS the criteria for having a significant cognitive disability.  The student DOES NOT MEET the criteria for having a significant cognitive disability. For students classified as having an SCD, indicate the standards in which the student is instructed.  This student meets the criteria for SCD and receives all instruction on alternate academic achievement standards.  This student meets the criteria for SCD and receives instruction on grade-level standards in the following content area(s): ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

The student has an IQ score or developmental level two or more standard deviations below the mean. TrueFalse The student is not able to exhibit adaptive skills that would allow him/her to function independently and safely in daily life. TrueFalse With accommodations/modifications in place, the student is not able to participate in and make progress in the standard academic curriculum. TrueFalse The student meets the criteria for SCD Standard 1 (must mark True to all three statements in order to mark Yes). YesNo SCD Standard 1: The student demonstrates significant cognitive deficits and poor adaptive skill levels (as determined by that student ’ s comprehensive evaluation) that prevent participation in the standard academic curriculum or achievement of the academic content standards, even with accommodations and modifications ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

The student consistently requires extensive repeated, individualized instruction and support that is not of a temporary or a transient nature, in both academic and functional skills in order to gain educational benefit. TrueFalse The student uses substantially adapted materials and individualized methods of accessing information in alternative ways to acquire, maintain, generalize, demonstrate, and transfer skills across multiple settings. TrueFalse The student meets the criteria for SCD Standard 2 (must mark True to both statements in order to mark Yes). YesNo SCD Standard 2: The student consistently requires extensive direct instruction in both academic and functional skills in multiple settings to accomplish the application and transfer of those skills ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

The student’s absences may be excessive and/or extended, but are not the primary reason the student cannot complete the standard academic curriculum. TrueFalse The student’s inability to complete the standard academic curriculum is not primarily due to one of the following: Specific Learning Disability, Emotional Disability, Language/Speech Impairment, Visual Impairment, Hearing Impairment, Orthopedic Impairment and/or *Other Health Impairment. TrueFalse The student meets the criteria for SCD Standard 3 (must mark True to both statements in order to mark Yes). YesNo SCD Standard 3: The student ’ s inability to complete the standard academic curriculum is neither the result of excessive or extended absences nor is primarily the result of visual, auditory, or physical disabilities, emotional-behavioral disabilities, specific learning disabilities, or social, cultural, or economic differences ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

Does a student with Autism have to meet the criteria for all three standards in order to be considered SCD? Yes. All students must meet the criteria for all three standards in order to be considered SCD. What about students with EmD eligibilities? Standard three specifically says that a student’s inability to complete the standard academic curriculum cannot be due to an emotional- behavioral disability. If you have a student with a primary eligibility of EmD who is considered SCD, it is the district’s responsibility to provide evidence that the reason the student cannot complete the curriculum is NOT due to the behaviors associated with his/her emotional-behavioral disability along with evidence that indicates the student meets the criteria for SCD standards 1 and ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

What if a student is in high school and has always taken the alternate assessment? If the student meets the criteria for having a significant cognitive disability, then the student may participate in the MAP-A. If the student does not meet the criteria for all three SCD standards, the student cannot participate in the MAP-A and must be instructed on the MS College and Career Ready Standards. According to the U.S. Department of Education regulations regarding the assessment of students under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), the only students who should be assessed using alternate academic achievement standards are students who fall under the state's definition of Significantly Cognitively Disabled (SCD). All other students should be assessed on grade level standards using the general state assessments with any necessary, allowable accommodations ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

What will happen if a student with a questionable eligibility is considered SCD and participates in the MAP-A? It is the district’s responsibility to provide evidence (IQ scores, adaptive behavior scales, measurable annual goals, etc.) to the IEP Committee that would drive the committee’s decision to determine whether or not the student is SCD. In the event of an audit through either the Office of Student Assessment or the Office of Special Education, the district will need to provide evidence to the Office of Special Education. If the evidence is insufficient or unavailable, the student’s test scores will be invalidated and count as not tested ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support17

What should I do if I have a student that I think is SCD but his primary eligibility is one of the 7 questionable eligibilities? You have several options: If you currently have students with a primary eligibility of SLD, EmD, OHI, L/S, HI, OI, or VI, you need to verify that the student meets the criteria for SCD based on the SCD Guidance Document and be able to provide documentation. An IEP meeting must be convened to discuss whether or not the student meets the criteria for SCD and make any necessary revisions. Consider conducting a re-evaluation to verify that the student has the most appropriate primary eligibility ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

The students with significant cognitive disabilities (SCD) o grades 3, 4, 6, & 7 (ELA and math) o grades 5 & 8 (ELA, math, and science) o high school (ELA, math, and science) Refer to slide 20. Decision is made by the student’s IEP Committee. Documentation of how student will be assessed is required on the student’s IEP. Mississippi Assessment Program – Alternate (MAP-A) ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

SCD & MAP-A Mississippi Assessment Program – Alternate for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Grade/Peer Age Subject/Content Area 3 / or non-graded & age 8ELA & Math 4 / or non-graded & age 9ELA & Math 5 / or non-graded & age 10ELA, Math, & Science 6 / or non-graded & age 11ELA & Math 7 / or non-graded & age 12ELA & Math 8 / or non-graded & age 13ELA, Math, & Science 9 / or non-graded & age 14Math ONLY 10 / or non-graded & age 15ELA & Math (if not previously assessed) 11 / or non-graded & age 16ELA, Math, and Science (if not previously assessed) 12 / or non-graded & age 17 or 18ELA, Math, & Science (if not previously assessed) ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

Teachers should continue to teach and progress monitor as they normally do using the alternate academic achievement standards. OSE and OSA will be providing professional development on the alternate academic achievement standards. SBE approved One system/platform for all content areas Aligned to the Mississippi Alternate Academic Achievement Standards (ELA, Mathematics, and Science)Mississippi Alternate Academic Achievement Standards SCD & MAP-A ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

22 The Alternate Academic Achievement Standards (AAAS) are specific statements of the knowledge and skills that are linked to the MS College and Career Ready Standards grade-level specific expectations for students with significant cognitive disabilities ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

23 All students should have access to challenging grade-level content. Alternate assessments are designed to allow students with SCD to show what they know in ways that traditional multiple choice tests do not allow. AAAS differentiate knowledge and skills by grade level and show forward progression across grades and years ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

24 Students with SCD can achieve academically when they receive instruction that engages them actively in learning. Teachers must employ a wide array of instructional strategies to engage students. Universal Design for Learning (UDL) allows all students to access instruction and express understanding in multiple ways. Alternate Achievement Standards are not a replacement for functional skills instruction ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support

Sharon Strong Coon, Autism Instructional Specialist Office of Special Education Bobby Richardson, Educator in Residence Office of Student Assessment April Rice, Office Director Tanya Bradley, Bureau Director Office of Special Education Office of Special Education Office of Special Education Bureau of Instructional Support (601) MDE Contact ©MDE-Bureau of Instructional Support