This year’s PSSA results show that Pennsylvania is on track to move all students to proficiency by 2014 as required by the federal No Child Left Behind.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How are we doing? Closing the gap with non-abbotts in Fourth grade Presentation by Gordon MacInnes, Assistant Commissioner of Education, Division of Abbott.
Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Student achievement in the Hazleton Area SD has increased substantially since Celebrate Success! Hazleton Area SD.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Upper Darby School District Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 2010 Performance.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Lansing School District Protocols of ENI Progress Julie Lemond Chief Academic Officer Lansing, Michigan Susie Meyer Director of Implementation,
Science Achievement and Student Diversity Okhee Lee School of Education University of Miami National Science Foundation (Grant No. REC )
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Continued assessment of high impact options Presented by Public Financial Management to the Act 141 Advisory Committee Davis School March 27, 2013.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
DLT September 28, State Indicators and Rating for OFCS (have) Key Factors and Points to Keep in Mind (have) This power point presentation (will.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC | T | F | Empowering Males of.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Annual Student Performance Report September
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Mark Roosevelt - Superintendent of Schools A Four-Year Comprehensive Framework for Improvement  Presented May 12,
Governor Edward G. Rendell GERALD L. ZAHORCHAK, D.ED., ACTING SECRETARY PSSA and AYP Results STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
Reaching New Heights: Celebrating Student Success (Insert School District Name and Presenter) October 2010.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
Conexión Américas Education Summit Dr. Candice McQueen, Commissioner of Education Equity and Excellence in Tennessee.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Brassfield 5th & 6th Grade Center Bixby Public Schools
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
HISD Dropout Rates Decrease Across the District
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
The data-driven conclusion: High-stakes testing has failed.
Education and Accountability
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

This year’s PSSA results show that Pennsylvania is on track to move all students to proficiency by 2014 as required by the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of This year’s results confirm that last year’s results were real. This year’s results very much mirror last year’s--a great indicator that Pennsylvania is on the right path. We must be realistic when assessing student performance year to year – this is a marathon and not a sprint. The finish line is 2014 when every student must cross it at 100% proficiency in math and reading. Math rd Graders *** th Graders **** th Graders th Graders **** th Graders **** th Graders th Graders Reading rd Graders *** th Graders **** th Graders th Graders **** th Graders **** th Graders th Graders Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) Results

 62% of all 8th grade students were either proficient or advanced in math, up from 52% in  71% of all 8th grade students were either proficient or advanced in reading, up from 59% in Since 2002, achievement has improved in math and reading across all grade levels. More specifically: 67% of all 5th grade students were either proficient or advanced in math, up from 53% in % of all 5th grade students were either proficient or advanced in reading, up from 57% in

 52% of all 11th grade students were either proficient or advanced in math, up from 50% in  65% of all 11th grade students were either proficient or advanced in reading, up from 59% in Achievement across all student subgroups has improved since In the past four years the rates of students proficient or advanced in math and reading across all levels, subjects and demographic groups have increased by DOUBLE DIGITS since For example:  African American 5th graders have improved in math (40%, up from 18%) and reading (34%, up from 22%);  African American 8 th graders have improved in math (33%, up from 16%) and reading (44%, up from 24%); and  African American 11 th graders have improved in math (22%, up from 17%) and reading (35%, up from 26%).

 Latino 5 th graders have improved in math (47%, up from 29%) and reading (36%, up from 29%);  Latino 8 th graders have improved in math (39%, up from 24%) and reading (45%, up from 30%); and  Latino 11 th graders have improved in math (25%, up from 21%) and reading (35%, up from 29%).

 IEP 5 th graders have improved in math (33%, up from 17%) and reading (24%, up from 15%);  IEP 8 th graders have improved in math (20%, up from 10%) and reading (27%, up from 13%); and  IEP 11 th graders have improved in math (11%, up from 10%) and reading (19%, up from 14%).

 Economically disadvantaged 5 th graders have improved in math (49%, up from 29%) and reading (40%, up from 32%);  Economically disadvantaged 8 th graders have improved in math (42%, up from 25%) and reading (50%, up from 31%); and  Economically disadvantaged 11 th graders have improved in math (29%, up from 22%) and reading (41%, up from 29%).

Success with Struggling Districts Students in the lowest-performing school districts have made significant progress in reading and math proficiency since the school year. Looking at districts where less than 50% of students were proficient or advanced in 2002, we see that students in all grades and demographic groups are achieving at higher levels. Since the year:  Fifth graders scoring proficient or advanced overall improved by 21.3 percentage points in math and 9.3 percentage points in reading;  Eighth graders scoring proficient or advanced overall went up by 16.9 percentage points in math and 17.4 percentage points in reading; and  Eleventh graders scoring proficient or advanced increased overall by 5.6 percentage points in math and 9.4 points in reading.

These gains have also narrowed the achievement gap: Fifth grade subgroups scoring proficient or advanced showed double-digit progress in math. White students improved by 19.8 percentage points, African American students by 23.4 percentage points, and Latino/Hispanic students progressed by 19.6 percentage points. White students improved by 7 percentage points, African American students by 12.5 percentage points, and Latino/Hispanic students progressed by 8.1 percentage points in reading.

 Eighth grade subgroups - again, all of the largest subgroups showed double-digit improvement in math and reading. Math scores for white students advanced by 17.8 percentage points, 18.4 percentage points for African American students, and 19.4 percentage points in Latino/Hispanic students. Reading scores went up by 17.6 percentage points for white students, 20.4 percentage points for black students, and 16.6 percentage points for Latino/Hispanic students.

· Eleventh grade subgroups scoring proficient or advanced increased showed strong improvement - White students by 9.2 percentage points, African American students by 5.6 percentage points and Latino/Hispanic students by 5.4 percentage points in math, while reading scores improved by 13.7 percentage points for white students, 9 percentage points for black students and 8.7 percentage points for Latino/Hispanic students.

Of the 724 low-performing schools, in 2002 only 24% of their students were proficient or advanced in math, while 30% of their students were proficient or advanced in reading. However, in 2006 in these same exact schools, 40% of students are now proficient or advanced in math while 44% of students are proficient or advanced in reading.

Progress In Every Cohort Over Three Years  Today’s 8 th graders are performing higher than as 5 th graders three years ago in every student subgroup. The percentage of this year’s 8 th graders scoring proficient or advanced in math improved by 5.9 percentage points and 12.6 percentage points in reading since they were 5 th graders in White, African American, and Latino/Hispanic subgroups each showed double-digit improvement in reading, while math score increases ranged from 5 to 7 points. 8 th graders ( ) made gains in reading & math since they took the 5 th grade PSSA in · White and African American subgroups each showed double-digit improvement in reading. 8 th grade subgroups ( ) made gains in reading & math since they took the 5 th grade PSSA in

11 th graders ( ) made gains in reading & math since they took the 8 th grade PSSA in th grade subgroups ( ) maintained levels in reading & math since taking the 8 th grade PSSA in  National trends show that student performance worsens between 8 th to 11 th grades. Pennsylvania is defying that trend. We have maintained gains overall and across all subgroups in today’s 11 th graders compared to when they were 8 th graders. To truly improve our secondary schools, we need to continue the expansion of Governor Rendell’s high school reform initiatives, which included Project 720 and Dual Enrollment. Additionally, the need to enhance supplemental student assistance through tutoring initiatives provided through the Governor’s Accountability Block Grants and Educational Assistance Program can help increase these proficiency marks.

Even More Encouraging Signs Our targeted interventions are producing great results - schools and districts where we have provided heavy amounts of technical and financial support are showing impressive progress since While it is too early to draw firm conclusions, this year’s test scores show that we are on the right track: Educational Assistance Program – Governor Rendell launched the Educational Assistance Program (EAP) in with $38 million to provide extra tutoring support in 81 school districts. That group of schools shows significant improvement since we implemented tutoring intervention and support services. From those 81 school districts in EAP in , the improvement between the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced between and is as follows: Fifth graders showed 14 percentage points improvement in math and 5 percentage points increase in reading. Every major student subgroup improved by double-digits in math - The white students improved by 11 percentage points, African American students by 16 percentage points, and Hispanic/Latinos by 14 percentage points in math, while reading scores went up by 2 percentage points, 6 percentage points, and 6 percentage points respectively. Math Reading African-American Latino/Hispanic White

Eighth graders improved by 14 percentage points in math and 9 percentage points in reading. Again student subgroup scores in math showed double-digit improvement in math and most in reading. Math scores increased by 13 percentage points in whites, 15 percentage points in African Americans, and 17 percentage points in Latino/Hispanics and Reading by 8 percentage points, 12 percentage points, and 12 percentage points, respectively. (High schools were not included in EAP until the following year.) African-American Latino/Hispanic White Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math