High Speed Streams & Earth’s Quadrupole Cusp: Implications for ORBE R. B. Sheldon, NASA/MSFC/NSSTC T. Fritz & J.-S. Chen, CSP/BU Manaus, Brazil Feb 10,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UAH The Spinning Terrella Experiment: Lab Analog for Earth's Magnetosphere Robert Sheldon 1, Eric Reynolds 2 1 National Space Science and Technology Center,
Advertisements

Physics definitions. Acceleration Is the rate of change in velocity of an object divided by the time taken for the change. It is measured in ms-2.
Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Single particle motion and trapped particles
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Cusp Radiation Source: A Challenge for Theory and Simulation Jiasheng Chen, Theodore A. Fritz, Katherine E. Whitaker, Forrest S. Mozer, and Robert B. Sheldon.
The Quadrupole Cusp: A Universal Accelerator, or From Radiation Belts to Cosmic Rays Robert Sheldon NSSTC Seminar, March 19, 2004.
Solar Wind Energy Coupling Through The Cusp Robert Sheldon NASA/MSFC/NSSTC/XD12 Ted Fritz, Jiasheng Chen, BU.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Storm-Time Dynamics of the Inner Magnetosphere: Observations of Sources and Transport Michelle F. Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory 27 June 2003.
CISM Radiation Belt Models CMIT Mary Hudson CISM Seminar Nov 06.
Reinisch_ Solar Terrestrial Relations (Cravens, Physics of Solar Systems Plasmas, Cambridge U.P.) Lecture 1- Space Environment –Matter in.
Lecture 3 Introduction to Magnetic Storms. An isolated substorm is caused by a brief (30-60 min) pulse of southward IMF. Magnetospheric storms are large,
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
S. Elkington, June 11, 2009 An overview of Earth’s magnetosphere and its coupling with the solar wind Scot R. Elkington LASP, University of Colorado
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
A Scaleable Model of Magnetospheric Radiation Belt Dynamics Robert Sheldon, Wheaton College TOP SIDE t=0 Double Dipole,
D. Sibeck, R. Millan, H. Spence
What role do energetic particles present in the dayside cusp play in magnetospheric processes? THEODORE A. FRITZ Center for Space Physics at Boston University.
Does Fermi Acceleration of account for variations of the fluxes of radiation belt particles observations at low altitudes during geomagnetic storms? J.
Introduction to Space Weather
Finite Gyroradius Effect in Space and Laboratory 1. Radiation belt (Ring current) 2. Auroral phenomena (Substorm current) 3. Shock acceleration and upstream.
Comparisons of Inner Radiation Belt Formation in Planetary Magnetospheres Richard B Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge Invited.
1 Origin of Ion Cyclotron Waves in the Polar Cusp: Insights from Comparative Planetology Discovery by OGO-5 Ion cyclotron waves in other planetary magnetospheres.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Radiation Belts1 The Radiation Belts A radiation belt is a population of energetic particles stably-trapped by the.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
The Magnetopause Back in 1930 Chapman and Ferraro foresaw that a planetary magnetic field could provide an effective obstacle to the solar-wind plasma.
Consequences of Cusp Trapping Rob Sheldon National Space Science & Technology Center J. Chen, T.Fritz Boston University May 28, 2002.
Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere Computer Systems Yu (Evans) Xiang Mentor: Dr. John Guillory, George Mason.
IMSR07: Radiation Belt contributions from the Heliospheric “Cusps” Robert Sheldon June 27, 2005 National Space Science & Technology Center.
The Sun.
1 The Inner Magnetosphere Nathaniel Stickley George Mason University.
Dynamics of the Radiation Belts & the Ring Current Ioannis A. Daglis Institute for Space Applications Athens.
Drift Resonant Interactions of Radiation Belt Electrons with ULF waves. L. G. Ozeke, I. R. Mann, A. Degeling, V. Amalraj, and I. J. Rae University of Alberta.
1 The Spinning Magnet Accelerator Cosmic CERNs and SLACs Robert Sheldon April 12, 2001.
Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Universal Processes in Neutral Media Roger Smith Chapman Meeting on Universal Processes Savannah, Georgia November 2008.
A High Latitude Source for Radiation Belt Particles? Robert Sheldon, NSSTC October 19, 2004 Huntsville Modelling Workshop.
Pre-accelerated seed populations of energetic particles in the heliosphere N. A. Schwadron* and M. Desai Southwest Research Institute *Also, Boston University.
PARTICLES IN THE MAGNETOSPHERE
WG2 Summary Broke into ring current/plasmasphere and radiation-belt subgroups RING CURRENT Identified events for addressing science questions What is the.
Earth’s Quadrupole Cusp: Implications for ORBE R. B. Sheldon, NASA/MSFC/NSSTC/USRA T. Fritz & J.-S. Chen, CSP/BU GEM 2005, Santa Fe July1, 2005.
Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.
The Quadrupole Cusp: The Most Efficient Accelerator of MeV Electrons Robert Sheldon GEM Snowmass, June 22, 2004.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
A shock is a discontinuity separating two different regimes in a continuous media. –Shocks form when velocities exceed the signal speed in the medium.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
The Geomagnetic Cusps: Magnetic Topology and Physical Processes Antonius Otto Thanks to: Eric Adamson, Katariina Nykyri, Julia Pilchowski, Jason McDonald.
Magnetospheric Current System During Disturbed Times.
Storm-dependent Radiation Belt Dynamics Mei-Ching Fok NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Richard Horne, Nigel Meredith, Sarah Glauert British Antarctic.
Particle energization at Saturn C. Paranicas 1, E. Roussos 2, P. Kollmann 2, N. Krupp 2, J. F. Carbary 1, D. G. Mitchell 1, S. M. Krimigis 1, B. H. Mauk.
Magnetically Self-Consistent Simulations of Ring Current with Implications for Diffuse Aurora and PIXIE Data Interpretation Margaret W. Chen 1 and Michael.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
Lecture 15 Modeling the Inner Magnetosphere. The Inner Magnetosphere The inner magnetosphere includes the ring current made up of electrons and ions in.
Introduction to Plasma Physics and Plasma-based Acceleration
What is the Origin of the Frequently Observed v -5 Suprathermal Charged-Particle Spectrum? J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at SHINE, Zermatt,
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Modelling Electron Radiation Belt Variations During Geomagnetic Storms with the new BAS Global Radiation Belt Model Richard B. Horne Sarah A. Glauert Nigel.
The Magnetosphere Feifei Jiang, UCLA
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Single particle motion and trapped particles
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Introduction to Space Weather
Principles of Global Modeling
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Richard B. Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
Presentation transcript:

High Speed Streams & Earth’s Quadrupole Cusp: Implications for ORBE R. B. Sheldon, NASA/MSFC/NSSTC T. Fritz & J.-S. Chen, CSP/BU Manaus, Brazil Feb 10, 2005

The Oldest Physics Problem How does point A influence point B? –Aristotle: mind, “spooky action at a distance” –Democritus to Descartes: particles –Newton: gravity (e.g. tides) –Huygens: waves –Faraday: fields How does the Sun transfer energy to Earth? 1.Photons & protons (DC equilibrium): pressure, heat 2.Waves & impulsive events (AC mechanical): Alfvenic, compressional, shocks 3.Electric & Magnetic fields (AC/DC): currents

Sun-Earth Transducers Proton pressure  Bow shock, hot plasma (100eV electron, 1 kev/nuc ion), thermalized ram energy “Frictional” or “viscous” (  V 5/2 ) Impulsive  SSC, shock acceleration, Fermi, radial diffusion, Kp, “mechanical” (  V 2 ) Fields  Polar cap potential, convection, ring current, Dst, AE, “electrical” (V*Bz) [ICME] What transducer is CIR  ORBE? Poor correlation of ORBE with all of the above! Best with Vsw.

Springs & Shock Absorbers Why does a car have BOTH springs & shocks? –Springs are “reversible”, adiabatic, they “bounce back” (and ruin the tire tread). –Shock absorbers are “irreversible”, non-adiabatic, they convert the energy to heat. –Ex: manual dynamo with lightbulb or with 1F capacitor. Vsw energy transducer must be irreversible. –Cannot be too “stiff”, ideally it is “critically damped” Magnetic fields are “springy”, what are “shocks”? –Something responding to Vsw, yet not stiff…

The Quadrupole Cusp -- Static Equilibrium

The Dipole Trap Great Trap Poor accelerator ENA of E >1 keV particles outside trap.

Quadrupole Trap in the Laboratory ( Two 1-T magnets, -400V, 50mTorr)

Maxwell 1880 Chapman 1930

Quadrupolar T87 Magnetosphere All modern B-models have high latitude cusps. Since Chapman & Ferraro 1937, we’ve known the magnetosphere is a quadrupole, yet all the trapping models to the present have assumed a dipole.

Cusp Equator B-field lines |B| C=2 C=1 C=1.5

The Simulated T96 Quadrupole Trap Lousy Trap Great Accelerator Can be made to trap better though.

Chaotic, nearly trapped

H+ Trapping in T96 Cusp

e- Trapping of T96 Cusp

Cusp Provisional Invariants Minimum energy, Emin, is defined by “separatrix” energy (ExB =  B) ~ 30 keV Max energy, Emax, defined by rigidity.~ 3 MeV e - Mapping cusp Energy limits to the rad belts, give ~ keV for protons, and 1-5 MeV for electrons. Mapping C-shell limits to the dipole give ~4<L<∞.  very close to the PSD “bump” Mapping pitchangles  50 o <  < 90 o at dipole eq. Cusp particles have all the right properties  ORBE

The Outer Radiation Belt Electrons (ORBE)

McIlwain, 1966

ORBE (McIlwain 1966)

McIlwain 1966

Empirical Prediction McIlwain 1966: Geo MeV e increases Paulikas & Blake 1979: Vsw best external Nagai 1988: Kp best internal predictor Baker 90 LPF, Koons&Gorney 90 NN Dmitriev&Chao03 Log-Linear Ukhorskiy et al., 04 NonLinear

Correlations Highest SW correlation for energetic particles in the radiation belts is: velocity. R=.7-.8 during high- speed streams) V is NOT an energy. Not a density. Nor a Force(mv) Multiplying by density  ram or mechanical energy, makes the correlation worse. Multiplying by Bz  Electrical energy, makes the correlation worse. Whatever the mechanism, it is not energy-starved (2 nd moment) or density starved (0 th moment).

1996

The Discovery of Cusp MeV Electrons

POLAR: Oct 12-16, 1996

Sheldon et al., GRL 1998 POLAR/ CAMMICE data 1 MeV electron PSD in outer cusp

POLAR 4/1/97 Cusp Traversal

Accelerator Efficiency Why would the cusp accelerate at all? Why not just use standard well- known accelerators?

The Dipole Trap “Accelerator” The dipole trap has a positive B-gradient that causes particles to trap, by  B-drift in the equatorial plane. Three symmetries to the Dipole each with its own “constant of the motion” 1)Gyromotion around B-field  Magnetic moment, “  ”; 2) Reflection symmetry about equator  Bounce invariant “J”; 3) Cylindrical symmetry about z-axis  Drift invariant “L” Betatron acceleration by E ┴ compression, violation of 3 rd invariant, L-shell

The 1-D Fermi-Trap Accelerator Waves convecting with the solar wind, compress trapped ions between the local |B| enhancement and the planetary bow shock, resulting in 1-D compression, or E // enhancement. Pitchangle diffusion keeps it in.

The 2-D Quadrupole Trap A quadrupole is simply the sum of two dipoles. Quadrupoles have “null-points” which stably trap charged particles (eg. Paul trap) Motion of the dipoles results in a 2D constriction of the volume. This is just a generalization of 1D Fermi-acceleration to 2D. 1D Fermi acceleration increases E //, violating the 2 nd invariant. 2D betatron acceleration increases E ┴, violating the 1 st & 3 rd invariants

PROPERTYDIPOLEFERMI QUADRUPOLE Stochasticity.001:1:1000 s.001:>10 3 :>10 4 s0.1:1:10 s Process Flow rim>ctr>blockedend>side>diffusctr>rim>open Wave Coupling hi E weakall E samehi E best Accel. in trap TrapsDetrapsTrap/Release Diffusion EssentialHelpfulNeutral Adiabatic Heat 2D pancake1D cigar2D pancake Energy Source SW compressSW AlfvenSW+internal e - Max Energy e - Min Energy 45 keV2.5 keV30 keV Trap Volume m m m 3 Trap Lifetime > s10 4 s10 9 :10 5 s Accel. Time > 300,000s8,000s25,000s Trap Power < 5x10 8 W10 6 W5x10 7 W

Model 1.Fast solar wind is trapped in the cusp –27 day recurrence, non-linear with Vsw 2.High Alfvenic turbulence of fast SW heats the trap –Low Q-value,  compressional, BEN 3.2 nd Order “Fermi” accelerates electrons –Low energy appear first, then high w/rigidity cutoff. 4.Trap empties into rad belts simultaneous L=4-10 –“gentle” evaporation, or “rapid” topology change –Initially “butterfly” around 70-deg equatorial

1. Non-Linear Vsw Dependence E Flux E 30keV 100eV 1keV 10keV Vsw seedtrap seedtrap The Reason that Vsw interacts non-linearly is that it does several things at once. It heats the seed population, while also making the trap deeper.

Kolmogorov, Arnol’d, Moser (applied to Jupiter perturbation of Earth)……… Earth orbit as Perturbed by Jupiter. Earth orbit if Jupiter were 50k Earth masses. Poincar é slice x vs. v X taken along the E-J line.

T96 Cusp Topology Solstice 16UT Solstice 4UT Equinox 16UT Equinox 16UT,-Bz

Cusp Feedback But the cusp is turbulent! How can the REAL cusp trap anything for 2 days!? It doesn’t. Usually.

Cusp Diamagnetic Cavities a.k.a Magnetic Bubbles

Diamagnetic Effect of Cold Plasma

An Interplanetary Test

Cusp Scaling Laws Maximum energy from rigidity cutoffs, scaled by distance of planetary cusp to surface of planet. Assuming: –B rad ~ B surface = B 0 –B cusp ~ B 0 /R stag 3 –E rad = 5 MeV for Earth –E cusp ~ v 2 perp ~ (B cusp  ) 2 ~ [(B 0 /R stag 3 )R stag ]  E/B is constant E rad-planet ~(R stag-Earth /R stag-planet )(B 0-planet /B 0-Earth ) 2 E rad-Earth

Scaled Planetary ORBE Planet Mercury Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune E RAD 4 keV 5 MeV < 1.5 eV 150 MeV 1.2 MeV 1.4 MeV 0.42 MeV R STAG B 0 (nT) ,000 < 6 430,000 21,000 23,000 14,000

Conclusions The quadrupole is a nearly universal trap and cosmic accelerator more efficient than Fermi (and shocks). The quadrupole cusp has ideal properties to couple AC mechanical energy from SW into the magnetosphere. The peculiar correlations of ORBE with SW can be explained by requiring an intermediate stage of the non-linear cusp. A test of the mechanism using comparative magnetospheres shows the correct energy scaling. Soli Deo Gloria