WBS 1.6 Software 1.6.1 Online 1.6.2 Reconstruction Hit reconstruction, Tracking, Event Vertex finder, secondary decay vertex finder 1.6.3 Calibration and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ALICE TOF FESTIVAL Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector A. De Caro (University of Salerno and INFN) CERN – Bdg.29, October 20 th.

Advertisements

March 24-28, 2003Computing for High-Energy Physics Configuration Database for BaBar On-line Rainer Bartoldus, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Yury Kolomensky,

1Malcolm Ellis - Tracker Meeting - 18th May 2006 Reconstruction Plans  Staged process of building up Reconstruction over the rest of this year  Will.

Emulsion scanning: present status and plans for the coming run Giovanni De Lellis.

MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.

Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,

Databases Chapter 11.

1 Software Applications in High Energy Physics Experiments Lecture number 4, prepared by Paweł Staszel.

Lucia Silvestris, INFN Bari and CERN/CMC Status Report on CPT Project 23 March 2001, CERN Meeting del Consorzio INFN Status Reports on CPT Project, on.

X.Dong, USTC/LBNL Feb. 20th, 04, STAR Collaboration Meeting 1 TOF Software Progress Xin Dong, for TOF Group  TOF detectors in Run IV  Online software.

August 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Software Workshop Ann Arbor ATLAS Computing Planning ATLAS Software Workshop August 1998 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also.

7/22/99J. Shank US ATLAS Meeting BNL1 Tier 2 Regional Centers Goals Short-Term: Code development centers Simulation centers Data repository Medium-term.

7/19/2004FTPC Review - J. Seyboth1 FTPC Review - Software Janet Seyboth for the FTPC group DAQ Online Calibration Databases Offline Documentation FTPC.

Project Overview Flemming Videbaek Brookhaven National Laboratory.

L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.

CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.

SVX Software Overview Sasha Lebedev VTX meeting 09/07/ SVX Software web page:

Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.

CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.

9/26/11HFT soft meeting, BNL1 Chain analysis fz file MuDst.root minimc.root geant.root event.root McEvent.root StMiniMcMaker StAssociationMaker : STAR.

26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.

Event Data Model in ATLAS Edward Moyse (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration CHEP 2004, Interlaken.

Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:

ATLAS, U.S. ATLAS, and Databases David Malon Argonne National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.

DOE Rev of Run IIb Sep 24-26, 2002  Silicon software and simulation Scope:  Design and/or modify software tools for Run IIb silicon tracker simulation.

1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.

Datasets on the GRID David Adams PPDG All Hands Meeting Catalogs and Datasets session June 11, 2003 BNL.

CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.

19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,

19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:

Questions for ATLAS  How can the US ATLAS costs per SW FTE be lowered?  Is the scope of the T1 facility matched to the foreseen physics requirements.

U.S. ATLAS Software WBS 2.2 S. Rajagopalan July 8, 2004 DOE-NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS Computing.

November 2013 Review Talks Morning Plenary Talk – CLAS12 Software Overview and Progress ( ) Current Status with Emphasis on Past Year’s Progress:

Introduction CMS database workshop 23 rd to 25 th of February 2004 Frank Glege.

Databases in CMS Conditions DB workshop 8 th /9 th December 2003 Frank Glege.

STAR Operations Workshop 2007 H. Matis1 SSD Operations August 20, 2007 H. Matis for the SSD group.

David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.

LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.

Atlas Computing Planning Helge Meinhard / CERN-EP Atlas Software Workshop Berkeley, 11 May 2000.

NEUTRAL MESON PRODUCTION IN PP AND PB-PB COLLISIONS AT LHC Dmitry Blau, for the ALICE collaboration NRC “Kurchatov Institute” LHC on the March

CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.

Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.

CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.

GLAST LAT ProjectSAS PDR, Aug. 17, 2001 R.Dubois1 Schedule Balloon Science Tools, Analysis Platforms Calibrations Performance Tuning, Tracking Data Production.

Overview of US Work on Simulation and Reconstruction Frederick Luehring August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting at BNL.

O 2 Project Roadmap P. VANDE VYVRE 1. O2 Project: What’s Next ? 2 O2 Plenary | 11 March 2015 | P. Vande Vyvre TDR close to its final state and its submission.

STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Overview Talk Content Break-out Sessions Planning 12 GeV Upgrade Software Review Jefferson Lab November.

Introduction S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting.

FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.

CWG13: Ideas and discussion about the online part of the prototype P. Hristov, 11/04/2014.

SIlicon VErtex TrAcker Rather than fixed common geometry the common analysis and simulation tools are needed. Such software package should provide : 

5 March 2016 STAR Trackers Review Yuri Fisyak, Production chain timing & CPU usage Y.Fisyak.

STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.

Big picture: What’re the sub-topics of the software framework? What’s the relationship of them? How to arrange data pipe? 1.

BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.

1 SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Ties Behnke Mokka and LCDG4 Ties Behnke, DESY and SLAC MOKKA: european (france) developed GEANT4 based simulation.

1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.

Software Overview S. Margetis Kent State University HFT CD0 Review.

MICE Collaboration Meeting Saturday 22nd October 2005 Malcolm Ellis

S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting

Software for Active Learning

Overview of CLAS12 Calibration

Number Talks Second Grade.

Linear Collider Simulation Tools

Year 1 Number – number and place value

Mark McKinnon EVLA Project Manager

Year 2 Number – number and place value

V.Fine, P.Nevski, BNL GSTAR framework OO geometry model event access

BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )

Presentation transcript:

WBS 1.6 Software Online Reconstruction Hit reconstruction, Tracking, Event Vertex finder, secondary decay vertex finder Calibration and alignment Simulation Geometry, response, simulator, embedding Physics analysis

The task high level WBS are described in the WBS dictionary. Further description of tasks in CDR chapter Distributions of task are in the CDR and is also a subset of the Research Management Plan. The associated scientist FTE including students and post docs and associated task taken from RMP.

FTE distribution The work associated with the WBS is described in the software chapter in the CDR Division on FTE in different Categories per FY DesriptionWBS reconstruction Databases calibrations Simulations Physics Analysis Framework

Distribution on Institutions Total FTE InstitutionTotal FTE BNL2.3 UCLA2.8 KSU10.2 NPI2.5 MIT4.4 LBNL11.0 Purdue6.0 IPHC2.0 USTC4.5

More details on Scientist etc. WBS only InstScientistEngTechEng redirectTech redir. BNL KSU2.50 LBNL MIT UTA UICF0.25 Taken from the spreadsheet corresponding to each sub-system, and discussed in talk The FTE for WBS 1.6 given above.