Quality of Life and Influencing Factors in Ostomates Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery Thom Nichols Principal Clinical Research Statistician Hollister Incorporated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Healthy Decisions
Advertisements

1 LIVE, LOVE and CELEBRATE MARRIAGE (& Relationships) After Brain Injury This presentation is based on TBI Model Systems research and was developed with.
Relationships and Dating
How are our patients doing? Beverley Colton Member of the Ostomy Forum group.
“Patient attendance and no-show behavior in the Primary Care setting”
The Effects of Body Esteem and Self-Consciousness on Frequency of Sexual Behavior Holly Heindselman Rachel Yates Hanover College 2008.
The relationship between level of religious devotion and marital satisfaction Amanda Caddell Kevin Utt.
Setting dating limits and practicing abstinence will benefit all three sides of your health triangle.
Dr. Annette E. Brissett Clinical Psychologist Director, Houston Psychology Consultants October 11, 2014 RECLAIMING SEX & INTIMACY AFTER BREAST CANCER:
SHORT-TERM PATIENT REPORTED QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY USING THE CONVALESCENCE AND RECOVERY EVALUATION (CARE) Abid Hussain.
Wellbeing Watch: a monitor of health, wealth and happiness in the Hunter Shanthi Ramanathan.
Yeong-Yuh Juang M.D. Consultation-Liaison Psychiatric Service Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou 12.Nov th RRI Conference.
The Comparison of Friendships of Adult Children of Divorce and Adult Children of Intact Families Meghan M. Tweed Jennifer L. Crum Hanover College.
1. What is your greatest achievement? Draw a symbol of it…. 2. What are three things you are good at? Illustrate them… 3. What is one challenge you would.
Teen Health Perspective Results “Honestly, most issues are mental like anxiety, stress, worry, and over thinking. They do all not need to be treated with.
Consequences of Treatment for Rectal Cancer Gillian Knowles, Rachel Haigh, Catriona McLean, Hamish Phillips, Malcolm Dunlop, Farhat Din.
《 Promotion of Capability and Effectiveness for Tobacco Control Program among Rural Residents* 》 --Report On The Baseline Survey (Tobacco use status among.
Body image and eating disorders. Today we will… Discuss a variety of different eating disorders Review body image and what it means to us Examine how.
1 Efficacy of Testosterone Transdermal System (TTS) for Treatment of HSDD in Surgically Menopausal Women on Concomitant Estrogen Daniel Davis, MD, MPH.
Depression, Partnership Quality and Partnership Breakdown An analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study Anna Garriga Kathleen Kiernan University of York.
Chapter 43 Self-Concept.
Jan Weiss, PT, DHS, CLT-LANA
By Sanjay Kumar, Ph.D National Programme Officer (M&E), UNFPA – India
Survivorship after Breast Cancer Michelle Derbyshire Macmillan Breast Care Nurse Sunderland Royal Hospital February 2012.
A Survey of Quality of Life Following Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Reflects the patients’ commitment to Learning about the Disease D A Raffle,
Chapter 43 Self-Concept.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Referral for information & support as part of routine cancer management D Hill, P Livingston, V White, D Akkerman.
Consumer Perception of Culturally Competent Outpatient Services & Hospital Use Carol Carstens, PhD, LISW-S Meeting of the Ohio Community Support Planning.
1 1 The Construction of Youth Happiness Index in Korea Shinyoung Kim(Ph.D in sociology) National Youth Policy Institute June
1 Emotional Distress: The Sixth Vital Sign Presented by: Lucy Kukac April 27, 2011 Central Hospice Palliative Care Network Networking Day.
SINGLE SOLDIER READJUSTMENT Family (Your definition) Social Environment Occupation.
16 th RRI international Breast Cancer Support Conference. Taipei.Taiwan. 10 th -12 th November 2011 Plenary 4B.Adjusting to a breast cancer diagnosis 2.Role.
A Prospective Study of the Impact of Bladder Incontinence Surgery on Sexual Satisfaction K. Witzke, DO, Gregory McIntosh, DO, FACOS, Jeffrey Schock, DO,
Mental Health By: Mr. Lopez and Mr. Guzzarde. Video Clip Jonah Mowry’s Story.
The Cancer Nutrition Network for Texans presents: Creating Cancer Care Teams: A workshop for Cancer Patients and their Family Caregivers The CNNT is funded.
Susan Quisenberry Allen, MDiv, BCC Baptist Health Lexington.
Chapter 19 Self-Concept Fundamentals of Nursing: Standards & Practices, 2E.
This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry.
BY TEAM BOLD AND BEAUTIFUL: JENN JOHNSON, MARISA ROSENBERGER, MONICA LEE, AND STEPH GUYRE FEMALE BODY IMAGE IN LATE ADULTHOOD.
Families and the impact of Substance abuse/ Dependence Family Systems Angela Hahn November 26, 2013.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Health Vocabulary ► Overall Health = physical, emotional and social health of a person ► Wellness = Quality of life that results from a persons health.
AVVAIS, RBC/IHDPC, RRP +, UNAIDS SAHARA CONFERENCE Port-Elisabeth, South Africa HIV Stigma Index 2009 Rwanda November 28 to December 2, 2011.
Observed Autonomy And Connection With Parents And Peers As Predictors Of Early Adolescent Sexual Adaptation Joseph P. Allen Felicia Hall University of.
Relationships Types of Relationships Benefits of Relationships Healthy vs. Unhealthy Dating.
Body Image and Intimacy Staying in the Circle of Life Session 5.
Vocabulary Unit Assessment: evaluating something. For example, a test in math class is an “assessment” of your understanding of the subject. Formal.
Reliability and validity of the adapted Spanish version of the Early Onset Scoliosis-24 questionnaire María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD Hiroko Matsumoto PhD.
Quality of Life and Functional Results Following Pelvic Exenteration Erin Kennedy September 19, 2015.
The Lived Experiences of Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients and Their Partners Alison G. Wong, MA University of Connecticut Stephanie Trudeau-Hern, MS.
When eating healthy is not healthy: orthorexia nervosa and its measurement with the ORTO-15 in Hungary Presented by: Lauren Walker, Andrews Dietetic Intern.
Janet H. Van Cleave PhD, RN1 Brian Egleston PhD2
Summer Sunburn and Sun Exposure Among US Youths Ages 11 to 18: National Prevalence and Associated Factors Ashley Roberts February 2, 2010.
Psychosocial difficulties in head and neck cancer; the development of an evidence based measurement instrument Lucy Ziegler Rob Newell.
The Effects of a Child’s Illness on a Family Austin Hayes Pediatric Surgery Rotation.
PROMOTING THE HEALTH OF MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN WORLDWIDE A training curriculum for providers.
SRE in Upper School 8 th – 12 th June The National Curriculum framework document states that: ‘All schools should make provision for personal, social,
Health & Happiness Survey Disability Data May 2016.
D ETERMINATION OF D ISABILITY. Over 7 million disability assessments are made annually in the United States. Many of which are made by physicians in the.
Macmillan Next Steps Cancer Rehabilitation
TEXILA AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
Quality Of Life, Enjoyment And Satisfaction Among Clients Attending Day Care At Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services, NIMHANS, Bangalore: A Pilot Study.
Chapter Eleven: Management of Chronic Illness
The Centre for Community-Driven Research
Mr David Harris Consultant Plastic Surgeon Derriford Hospital Plymouth
Suicide & Self-Injury Mr. Beerbower Health Education.
Teen Health Perspective Results
And how they affect the family
Teen Health Perspective Results
Presentation transcript:

Quality of Life and Influencing Factors in Ostomates Less Than 24 Months Post Surgery Thom Nichols Principal Clinical Research Statistician Hollister Incorporated November 15, 2008

Hollister Ostomy Comprehensive Health and Life Assessment N=2,988 adult colostomates, ileostomates, and urostomates Geographically dispersed throughout North America and the UK Late 2004, and continues Valid and reliable instrument containing 115 questions assessing pre and post surgical health and life status Crohnbach’s alpha, not less than 0.82 The Data Source Subset of the data: Colostomates, Ileostomates, and Urostomates Those 24 months or less post surgery n=663

The Ostomy Comprehensive Health and Life Assessment A self reported assessment of health status, marital status, occupational status, sexual and social well being, emotional status, family life, and overall contentment with life. Incorporates 3 validated instruments –SF 36 –MOS Measures of Quality of Life Social Support Survey –Hawthorne’s Index of Social Isolation

Distribution UK: n= % NA: n= % Colostomates; n= % Ileostomates; n= % Urostomates; n= % Approximately 20 percent have temporary stomas 305 males; 46.1% 356 females; 53.9%

Age Median age of colostomates; 61 years Median age of ileostomates; 53 years Median age of urostomates; 64.5 years

The Ostomate: 24 months or less post surgery dx Coping, Adapting Accepting Premise: Who the ostomate is, is a function of the life forces that impact them. Who they are is a matter of how well they can control life forces.

The Ostomate dx Coping, Adapting Accepting …and control over the life forces that impact them is a function of this.

Survey derived Index: Satisfaction with Life How much do you think having a stoma affects your life: 5 pt Likert Scale. Social Life Family Life Leisure Time Financial status Overall contentment

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life Has had a negative affect on my life

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=6, 8.2%N=30, 16.7%N=157, 48.8% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8%N=150, 83.3% N=165, 51.2%

Categorizing the permanent stomas Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=6, 8.2% 11.1% N=30, 16.7% 20.0% N=157, 48.8% 50.2% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8% 88.9% N=150, 83.3% 80.0% N=165, 51.2% 49.8%

Time effect?

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=6, 8.2% N=30, 16.7%N=157, 48.8% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8%N=150, 83.3% N=165, 51.2%

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=6, 8.2%N=30, 16.7%N=157, 48.8% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8%N=150, 83.3% N=165, 51.2%

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=6, 8.2%N=30, 16.7%N=157, 48.8% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8%N=150, 83.3% N=165, 51.2%

Categorizing the ostomates Negative life satisfaction index, n=73 Neutral life satisfaction index, n=180 Positive life satisfaction index, n=322 Has had a positive affect on my life N=157, 48.8% Has had a negative affect on my life N=67, 91.8%N=165, 51.2% Group 1 Group 2Group 3

Questions Why are some people in one group, and some in others? Are there factors other than the permanence of the stoma that influence this? Can these factors be identified? –Family life –Social support –Body image –Occupational stability –Personal relationships –Continued health problems –Peristomal skin issues

What do we know? Normalizing tasks undertaken by the patient, in the presence of life altering surgery, is intimately associated with the capacity to balance post-surgical expectations with the reality of the situation. » Nichols& Riemer JWOCN, V35, 2008

Items for discussion Health Status Body Image Social support / Social isolation Spouse/Partner relationships –Affection/Intimacy/Intercourse Peristomal skin conditions Occupational stability Overall demographics Your role

Health Status Good health prior to surgery Good health after surgery Group 1 +/+ 35.0%82.2%Improvement Group 2 -/- 46.2%38.5%No change Group 3 -/+ 70.3%78.8%No change

Diagnosis of Cancer Group 1 +/+: 29.9% have originating DX of cancer. Group 2 -/-: 46.3% have originating DX of cancer. Group 3 -/+: 69.1% have originating DX of cancer.

What does this suggest? Group 1 +/+Group 2 -/- Group 3 -/+ Colo41.3%69.7%60.2% Ileo49.0%22.7%25.5% Uro7.1%6.1%14.3% Other2.6%1.5%--

Body Image Question: When I stand in front of a mirror –I like the way I look –I do not like the way I look –What I see I am OK with I think my stoma has –Changed my appearance –Disfigured me –No effect on the way I look

Body Image, n=2,686 I think my stoma has….. Changed my appearance Disfigured me Had no effect on the way I look When I stand in front of a mirror I like the way I look 1.2%---4.1% I do not like the way I look 20.9%17.2%6.9% What I see, I am OK with 15.1%3.1%31.5% 38.1%

Body Image, Group 1 +/+ I think my stoma has….. Changed my appearance Disfigured me Had no effect on the way I look When I stand in front of a mirror I like the way I look 5.1%---4.5% I do not like the way I look 21.2%8.3%5.1% What I see, I am OK with 21.2%1.3%33.3% 29.5%

Body Image, Group 2 -/- I think my stoma has….. Changed my appearance Disfigured me Had no effect on the way I look When I stand in front of a mirror I like the way I look --- I do not like the way I look 30.3%60.6%1.5% What I see, I am OK with 3.0% 1.5% 90.9%

Body Image, Group 3 -/+ I think my stoma has….. Changed my appearance Disfigured me Had no effect on the way I look When I stand in front of a mirror I like the way I look 1.2%---4.8% I do not like the way I look 20.5%9.7%4.2% What I see, I am OK with 17.0%1.2%41.2% 30.2%

Social Isolation Hawthorne Index of Social Isolation During the past four weeks –I felt alone and friendless –I had someone to share my feelings with –It has been easy for me to relate to others –I felt isolated from other people –I found it easy to get in touch with others when I needed to –When with other people I felt separate from them The correlation between social isolation and life satisfaction is r=0.705.

Social Isolation Hawthorne Index of Social Isolation Index rating Group 1 +/+Group 2 -/- Group 3 -/+ Negative0.6%28.4%0% Neutral4.5%50.8%0.6% Positive94.9%20.9%99.4% The correlation between social isolation and life satisfaction is r=0.705.

There is some to listen to me when I need to talk There is someone to confide in or talk about my problems There is someone to share my most private worries and fears with There is someone who understands my problems. Social Support MOS: Measures of QoL Soc Sup Survey

Index rating Group 1 +/+Group 2 -/- Group 3 -/+ Negative5.8%37.3%3.0% Neutral9.0%29.8%6.7% Positive85.3%32.8%90.3% The correlation between social support and life satisfaction is r=0.460.

Is Group 2 a group that is not socially connected (for whatever reason)? Spouse /life partner affection –Within the year prior to your surgery, were you and your spouse/partner…. –Are you and your spouse/life partner now…

Spouse/Life Partner Affection Does this manifest itself anywhere else?

Spouse/Life Partner Affection Normal/strong desire for sexual intimacy pre-surgerycurrentlychange Group 158.6%51.3%12.5% Group 257.8%30.3%47.6% Group 366.4%50.6%23.7% Do you and your spouse/partner avoid intercourse Occasionally my stoma No causes problems YesImpotent NA Group % 11.9% 14.6% 8.0%25.8% Group % 6.2% 37.5% 12.5%31.2% Group % 6.2% 19.2% 18.0%26.7%

Spouse/Life Partner Affection Normal/strong desire for sexual intimacy pre-surgerycurrentlychange Group 158.6%51.3%12.5% Group 257.8%30.3%47.6% Group 366.4%50.6%23.7% Do you and your spouse/partner avoid intercourse Yes Group % Group % Group %

Skin Irritation The very last time you changed your pouch/barrier and looked at the skin around your stoma would you say it was ….. yes yes yes normal healthy Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 appearing skin? 51.3% 25.8% 57.7%

Change work habits Because of your ostomy surgery did you need to change how you go about working (work habits)? yesno does not apply Group 126.3%41.0%32.7% Group 262.1% 6.1%31.8% Group 325.6%40.8%33.5%

Change work habits Because of your ostomy surgery did you need to change occupations? yesno does not apply Group 1 3.2%52.6%44.2% Group 222.7%33.3%43.9% Group 3 3.0%56.1%40.8% Removing “does not apply” and looking at those that answered yes to both questions we find: Group 1 = 2.4% Group 2 = 41.7% Group 3 = 5.4%

Who are these people? Group 1: –42% are male, 58 % are female –Median age of 55 years Group 2: –49% are male, 51 % are female –Median age of 56 years Group 3: –56% are male, 44 % are female –Median age of 63 years

Who are these people? Planned/expected surgery? –Group 1: Yes 66.0% –Group 2: Yes 45.4% –Group 3: Yes 59.4% Adapted to living with a stoma? –Group 1: No 0% –Group 2: No 23.9% –Group 3: No 1.2% Disabled (stoma related)? –Group 1: Yes 7.7% –Group 2: Yes 48.5% –Group 3: Yes 8.5%

Who are these people? Continue to undergo treatment of the disease or injury that caused the stoma surgery? –Group 1: Yes 33.8% –Group 2: Yes 43.3% –Group 3: Yes 31.7%

Who are these people? Those is Group 1 and Group 3 are twice as likely to have had the assistance of a ET pre and post surgery than those in Group 2 (odds ratios: 2.0 and 2.1 respectively).

Summary Identifying factors: –Type of stoma –Originating DX of cancer –No change in health status –Poor body image –Peristomal skin trauma –Lack of occupational stability

Summary Identifying factors: –Surgery (planned/unplanned) –Adapted? –Disabled related to stoma –Continued treatment –ET assistance

Summary Manifestations –A lack of social support and social isolation –Decreased spouse/life partner affection –Decreased desire for sexual intimacy –Sexual intercourse avoidance

Conclusions That factors exist that influence the post surgical return to a “quality of life” The factors are recognizable (identifiable). The factors can be part of a prophylactic regimen of treatment The identification of the factors may be incorporated into post surgical health intervention regimens.

Thank you