The WFPC2 WF4 Anomaly John Biretta 15 Dec 2005. 2 Overview Discovery of the Anomaly Historical Evolution Imaging Impacts GO Science Impacts Image Repair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A NEW CTE PHOTOMETRIC CORRECTION FORMULA FOR ACS Marco Chiaberge TIPS meeting 05/16/2012.
Advertisements

Return to Hubble: Servicing Mission 4 Dr. Frank Summers Space Telescope Science Institute April 2, 2009.
1 ACS Status Update STScI TIPS Meeting 19-October-2006 Ken Sembach.
Image reconstruction and analysis for X-ray computed microtomography Lucia Mancini 1, Francesco Montanari 2, Diego Dreossi 3 1 Elettra - Trieste 2 A.R.P.A.
STScI TIPS 19 January 2006 Removing SAA-Persistent Cosmic Ray Flux from NICMOS Anton Koekemoer (INS) 1 Removing SAA-Persistent Cosmic Ray Flux from NICMOS.
Albinoni (NICMOS) Analysis SCP Collaboration Meeting June Greg Aldering Vitaliy Fadeyev with help from Shane Burns Albinoni (1998eq) a SNIa at.
SDW Marco Sirianni Marco Sirianni (ESA/STScI) Max Mutchler (STSci) Radiation Damage in HST Detectors.
Astronomical Detectors
PRINCIPLES OF MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION EKT 112
CCDs. CCDs—the good (+)  Linear response  photometry is “simple” +High efficiency, compared to other detectors +Sensitive to many wavelengths +2-D arrays.
Introduction to Spitzer and some applications Data products Pipelines Preliminary work K. Nilsson, J.M. Castro Cerón, J.P.U. Fynbo, D.J. Watson, J. Hjorth.
Signal vs Noise: Image Calibration First… some terminology:  Light Frame: The individual pictures you take of your target.  Dark Frame: An image taken.
A Primer on Image Acquisition and Data Reduction Using TheSky6, CCDSoft V5 and Microsoft Excel Thomas C. Smith Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO)
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
We have the first, direct measure of photometric loss due to imperfect CTE on ACS.
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, K. S. Long, J. W. MacKenty, K. Noeske, J. Biretta, and the WFC3 team (STScI) WFC3 : Understanding and mitigating UVIS charge.
AST3 detector properties
HST Archival Studies of HH 30 WFPC2 Data Retrieval and Reduction Liu, Jimmy Chun-Fan Supervisor: Dr. Shang, Hsien August 23, 2002 Summer Student Program.
Pipeline calibrations of ACS data Max Mutchler Hubble Space Telescope Calibration Workshop October 2005.
Data Management Subsystem: Data Processing, Calibration and Archive Systems for JWST with implications for HST Gretchen Greene & Perry Greenfield.
NGC 6217 in DSI mode with F658N Mosaic before new superbias why we don’t release images until after SMOV! ACS CCD monitoring and pipeline calibration review.
TIPS presentation 19 July 2007Charles Proffitt COS-STIS TeamPage 1 STIS FUV MAMA Dark Current Charles Proffitt COS-STIS Team.
Printed by ACS 2 Gyro Mode Data Analysis Cheryl Pavlovsky, Marco Sirianni, Ken Sembach, ACS Instrument Team and the 2 Gyro Mode Team.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
CCDs in space: the effects of radiation on Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) Max Mutchler, David Golimowski (Space Telescope Science Institute),
Venus Observations HST Program Objectives v Explain Venus observing strategy. v Review areas of special concern with Venus observations and explain.
Page 1. Page 2 SMOV Status SMOV is proceeding on-track Key programs executed –ERO program –Geometric distortion program completed –ACS to FGS alignment.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
May 21, 2009John MacKenty, STScI1 WFC3 SM4 Events and Current Status.
Asteroids Image Calibration and Setup Making a Lightcurve What is a Lightcurve? Cole Cook  Physics and Astronomy  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
The Planet Pipeline (and Citizen Science) Data curation and mining of Solar System images from WFPC2 Hubble Cycle 18 Legacy Archival Research proposal.
TIPS COS Overview - Keyes : 18 May 2000 COS Overview v CDR: April 2000 v FUV delivery: January 2001 v Environmental (Thermal-Vac): spring 2002 v Launch:
First On-orbit Calibration of WFC3-IR Count Rate-Dependent Non-Linearity Adam Riess WFC3 ISR Count-rate non-linearity (a.k.a. the Bohlin Effect,
D. Golimowski2010 STScI Calibration Workshop1 ACS after SM4: New Life for an Old Workhorse David Golimowski Space Telescope Science Institute 22 July 2010.
WFPC2 UPDATE TIPS : August 15, 2002 L.M. Lubin New WFPC2 Documentation 1.Cycle 12 Instrument Handbook (V7.0, Biretta et al.)  Updated information on the.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA TIPS: STIS Report Paul Goudfrooij 1.Unusual Target ACQ Failures: Update & Resolution 2.Calibration.
UPDATED CTE CORRECTION FORMULAE FOR ACS Marco Chiaberge Pey Lian Lim, Vera Kozhurina-Platais, Marco Sirianni Ron Gilliland, Jennifer Mack.
1 ACS Press Releases Science  Grism spectroscopy of UDF galaxies  Mass of the MACHO-LMC-5 lens  Earliest star-forming galaxies in UDF  Kepler’s SNR.
NIRISS Calibration Working Group Activities NIRISS Science Team Meeting Montréal, 2015 October 20/21 Kevin Volk STScI / HIA.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Jan 15, 2004WFC3 TIPS – John W. MacKenty1 WFC3 TIPS Presentation January 15, 2004 Optical Stimulus.
Practical applications: CCD spectroscopy Tracing path of 2-d spectrum across detector –Measuring position of spectrum on detector –Fitting a polynomial.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
HLA WFPC2 Source List Photometric Quality Checks Version: August 25, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Introduction 2.Comparison with Ground-based Stetson Photometry.
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
NIC3 FOM Dithered Observations of the Orion Nebula Eddie Bergeron, STScI.
STScI 2010 Calibration Workshop The NICMOS Legacy Archival Recalibration Project Anton M. Koekemoer and the STScI NICMOS Team (E. Barker, E. Bergeron,
WFC3 SMOV Report for TIPS 16 July 2009 John MacKenty This presentation contains material that is embargoed until after the SM4 ERO press conference. Images/spectra.
Installation of the ACS Guido De Marchi – TIPS meeting – Guido De Marchi - ESA/STScI - ACS Group The ACS was installed on board the HST on the.
New NICMOS Readout Sequences Chun Xu Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract On 12 June 2005, four new NICMOS multi-accum sequences (SPARS4, SPARS16,
ACS WFC Flat-Field Changes Temperature change from -77 C to -81 C on July 4, 2006 leads to expected changes for flat fields. Are L-flat measures stable.
Marco Sirianni TIPS 12/18/2003 Anomalous scattered light in ACS/WFC Data Marco Sirianni D. Van Orsow, A. Welty, T. Wheeler R. Gilliland, R. van der Marel.
STIS Status TIPS, September 17, 2009 Charles Proffitt for the STIS team.
26th October 2005 HST Calibration Workshop 1 The New GSC-II and it’s Use for HST Brian McLean Archive Sciences Branch.
Application of a Charge Transfer Model to Space Telescope Data Paul Bristow Dec’03
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, J. MacKenty, J. Biretta, K. Noeske, and the WFC3 team (STScI) HST/WFC3 UVIS Detectors: Radiation Damage Effects and Mitigation.
LSST CCD Chip Calibration Tiarra Stout. LSST Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Camera – 1.6 m by 3 m. 3.2 billion pixels kg (~6173 lbs) 10 square.
Validation of HLA Source Lists Feb. 4, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Overview 2.Plots 3.Summary.
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
CCD Image Processing …okay, I’ve got a bunch of .fits files, now what?
WFC3 STUC 18 November 2004 Optical Stimulus.
A “Field Guide” to WFPC2 HLA Image Anomalies
Pixel Non-Uniformity Study
Presentation transcript:

The WFPC2 WF4 Anomaly John Biretta 15 Dec 2005

2 Overview Discovery of the Anomaly Historical Evolution Imaging Impacts GO Science Impacts Image Repair Cause / Possible Mitigation Strategy

3 Discovery of New Anomaly First noticed during study of dark current trends Anomalous low dark current for CCD WF4 on 9/23/ of 5 input images were blank in WF4 Bias levels were zero in the 2 frames

4 Low Dark Current on 9/23/2005 ??

5 Historical Development Earliest evidence ~ SM3B (March 2002) -- sporadic images begin appearing with bias level few DN below normal 311 DN Late 2004 images with very low bias begin to appear Feb first zero bias (blank) images Currently ~all images have low-bias and ~30% have zero bias in WF4 Other three CCDs are OK

6

7 Low Bias Zero Bias

8

9

10 Imaging Impacts Two classes of WF4 image anomaly: Low-Bias Images Background streaks Corrupted photometry Images probably fixable Zero-Bias Images Mostly blank Images cannot be fixed

11 Low Bias Images Bias level ~5 to ~290 DN Pipeline corrects for low level, but… Faint horizontal streaks +/- 0.5 DN Photometry up to 70% low for faint targets at very low bias ~1800 science images impacted so far Images probably fixable

12 Low Bias Image Example 8/25/2005 F439W, 700s Stripes in WF4. +/- 0.5 DN WF2WF3 WF4 PC1

13 Low Bias Image Example 8/25/2005 F439W, 700s Stripes along CCD rows +/- 0.5 DN

14 Normal bias Faint pixels ~15 DN Bright pixels ~1000 DN

15 Normal bias Faint pixels ~15 DN Bright pixels ~1000 DN

16 Zero Bias Images Bias level falls below A-to-D zero point Image is mostly zero (blank) Faint images & targets lost Only cosmic rays, bright targets visible Data unusable for most purposes ~200 science images impacted so far

17 WF4 Zero Bias Example 8/25/2005 F336W, 900s Mostly zero. Bright targets, cosmic rays. Negative imprint of cal files.

18 Science Impact Modest impact since most targets placed on PC1 or WF3 CCDs Large targets / surveys needing entire field-of-view lose 1/3 of area GOs notified via STAN, HST website, WFPC2 website, notice with APT release ISR on WFPC2 website

19 Science Impact (cont.) Pending observations reviewed for risk; attempting to move observations early where possible WF4 low-bias images probably fixable – preliminary scripts exist to fix images

20 Repair of Low-Bias Images: Streak Removal Iterative filtering of background very successful in removing streaks Preliminary IRAF script being tested

21 BeforeAfter

22 Repair of Low-Bias Images: Photometry Correction for non-linearity at low bias c’ = c + f(bias level) Correction for anomalous gain c’’ = c’ / gain(bias level) Can correct existing test data to +/-1%... Need testing on broader range of data -- cal proposal submitted

23 Normal bias Faint pixels ~15 DN Bright pixels ~1000 DN Before correction…

24 Linearity correction brings all count levels to single curve….

25 … then simple gain correction applied as function of bias level.

26 Cause of Anomaly Exact cause not yet known Possibly instability / failure of signal amplifier Bias variations appear driven by temperature peaks associated with cycling of the WFPC2 “Replacement Heater” Tight correlation between WF4 camera head temperature and bias level suggests problem is located in WF4 camera head electronics

27

28

29 Potential Mitigation Strategy Reduce temperatures in WFPC2 camera heads / electronic bays by few deg C “Replacement Heater” controlled by WFPC2 Bay 1 temp and software set points at 11 and 15 deg C Test planned for January – reduce upper set point from 15 to 12 deg C for 24 hrs and take many internal images

30 Mitigation Strategy (cont.) 2 nd test planned later – reduce both set points – from 11 & 15 deg C to (e.g.) 9 & 10 deg C Seen as relatively safe. Some potential for change in optical alignment (temp of optical bench).

31

32

33

34 Anomaly Review Board Ed Cheng (chair), Jim Ries, Renee Taylor, Lisa Mazzuca, Ben Reed, Jeff Travis, Augustyn Waczynski, Mal Niedner, Randy Kimble, Ken Carpenter (GSFC), Tom Bickler, Tom Elliot (JPL), Ed Cheung (J&T), John Bacinski (LMTO), John Biretta (STScI) Report due end of January