1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Mapping Expansion and Growth Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 Mapping the History and Fate of the Universe DOE Science Colloquium Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Advertisements

Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
What Figure of Merit Should We Use to Evaluate Dark Energy Projects? Yun Wang Yun Wang STScI Dark Energy Symposium STScI Dark Energy Symposium May 6, 2008.
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
1 1 Hidden Dimensions, Warped Gravity, Dark Energy Eric Linder UC Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dynamics of the Universe Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
The Dark Side of the Universe Scott Watson Dept. of Physics Brown University
Cosmology Zhaoming Ma July 25, The standard model - not the one you’re thinking  Smooth, expanding universe (big bang).  General relativity controls.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
What is Dark Energy? Josh Frieman Fermilab and the University of Chicago.
CMB as a physics laboratory
Concluding Comments For the Course Cosmology Fascinating Past Highly accomplished present (for example, the material covered in this course). Really exciting.
Complementary Probes ofDark Energy Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Inflation, Expansion, Acceleration Two observed properties of the Universe, homogeneity and isotropy, constitute the Cosmological Principle Manifest in.
Quiz 4 Distribution of Grades: No Curve. The Big Bang Hubble expansion law depends on the amount of matter and energy (both are equivalent!) in the Universe;
1 1 Eric Linder 27 June 2012 Testing Dark Energy and Gravity with Cosmological Surveys UC Berkeley & Berkeley Lab Institute for the Early Universe, Korea.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
1 1 Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Seeing Darkness: The New Cosmology.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
1 1 Dark Energy: Illuminating the Dark Eric Linder University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Observational Probes of Dark Energy Timothy McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Observational cosmology: parameters (H 0,  0 ) => evolution.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Introduction to the modern observational cosmology Introduction/Overview.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Yun Wang, 3/2011 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and DE Figure of Merit Yun Wang Yun Wang WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 WFIRST SDT #2, March 2011 BAO as a robust.
Hubble’s galaxy classes Spheroid Dominates Disk Dominates.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Cosmology with Gravitaional Lensing
The measurement of q 0 If objects are observed at large distances of known brightness (standard candles), we can measure the amount of deceleration since.
Ignacy Sawicki Université de Genève Understanding Dark Energy.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: The Heart of Darkness Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Type Ia Supernovae and the Acceleration of the Universe: Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey Kevin Krisciunas, 5 April 2008.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
Prof Martin Hendry University of Glasgow. A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away…
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
Gravitational Lensing
1 1 Dark Energy with SNAP and other Next Generation Probes Eric Linder Berkeley Lab.
1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Acceleration and Deceleration Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The Planck Satellite Matthew Trimble 10/1/12. Useful Physics Observing at a redshift = looking at light from a very distant object that was emitted a.
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 25 Cosmology: The Origin and Evolution of the Universe Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Chapter 20 Cosmology. Hubble Ultra Deep Field Galaxies and Cosmology A galaxy’s age, its distance, and the age of the universe are all closely related.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Dark Energy From the perspective of an American theorist fresh from the recent Dark Energy Survey Collaboration Meeting Scott Dodelson.
University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Princeton University & APC
University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Cosmology with Supernovae
University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

1 1 The Darkness of the Universe: The Darkness of the Universe: Mapping Expansion and Growth Eric Linder Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

2 2 Discovery! Acceleration

3 3 Exploring Dark Energy First Principles of Cosmology E.V. Linder (Addison- Wesley 1997)

4 4 Fundamental Physics Astrophysics  Cosmology  Field Theory a(t)  Equation of state w(z)  V(  ) V (  ( a(t) ) ) SN CMB LSS Map the expansion history of the universe The subtle slowing and growth of scales with time – a(t) – map out the cosmic history like tree rings map out the Earth’s climate history. STScI

5 5 Standard Candles Brightness tells us distance away (lookback time) Redshift measured tells us expansion factor (average distance between galaxies)

6 6 Type Ia Supernovae Exploding star, briefly as bright as an entire galaxy Characterized by no Hydrogen, but with Silicon Gains mass from companion until undergoes thermonuclear runaway Standard explosion from nuclear physics Insensitive to initial conditions: “Stellar amnesia” Höflich, Gerardy, Linder, & Marion 2003

7 7 Standardized Candle Redshift tells us the expansion factor a Time after explosion Brightness Brightness tells us distance away (lookback time t)

8 8 Standardized Candle Wang et al. 2003, ApJ 590, 944 Color vs. Magnitude -- “HR” diagram CMAGIC New method: Physics based Less dispersion (4% in distance?) Less sensitive to systematics from dust extinction

9 9 Images Spectra Redshift & SN Properties dataanalysisphysics Nature of Dark Energy Each supernova is “sending” us a rich stream of information about itself. What makes SN measurement special? Control of systematic uncertainties

10 ~2000 SNe Ia 10 billion years Hubble Diagram redshift z  brightness (expansion)

11 Nearby Supernova Factory Understanding Supernovae Cleanly understood astrophysics leads to cosmology Supernova Properties Astrophysics G. Aldering (LBL)

12 Looking Back 10 Billion Years STScI

13 Looking Back 10 Billion Years STScI

14 Looking Back 10 Billion Years To see the most distant supernovae, we must observe from space. A Hubble Deep Field has scanned 1/25 millionth of the sky. This is like meeting 10 people and trying to understand the complexity of the entire population of the US! STScI

15 Dark Energy – The Next Generation SNAP: Supernova/Acceleration Probe Dedicated dark energy probe

16 Design a Space Mission colorfulcolorful wide GOODS HDF 9000  the Hubble Deep Field plus 1/2 Million  HDF deep Redshifts z=0-1.7 Exploring the last 10 billion years 70% of the age of the universe Both optical and infrared wavelengths to see thru dust.

17 Controlling Systematics Same SN, Different z  Cosmology Same z, Different SN  Systematics Control

18 Our Tools Expansion rate of the universe a(t) ds 2 =  dt 2 +a 2 (t)[dr 2 /(1-kr 2 )+r 2 d  2 ] Einstein equation (å/a) 2 = H 2 = (8  /3)  m +  H 2 (z) = (8  /3)  m + C exp{  dlna [1+w(z)]} Growth rate of density fluctuations g(z) = (  m /  m )/a Poisson equation  2  (a)=4  Ga 2  m = 4  G  m (0) g(a)

19 Cosmic Background Radiation Hot and cold spots simultaneously the smallest and largest objects in the universe: single quantum fluctuations in early universe, spanning the universe at the time of decoupling. Snapshot of universe at 380,000 years old, when 1/1100 size now Planck satellite (2007) WMAP/ NASA

20 Complementarity SN+CMB have excellent complementarity, equal to a prior  (  M )  Frieman, Huterer, Linder, & Turner 2003 SN+CMB can detect time variation w´ at 99% cl (e.g. SUGRA). Supernovae tightly constrain dark energy models… And play well with others. =w a /2 Present value of “negativity” Time variation

21 Deceleration and Acceleration CMB power spectrum measures n-1 and inflation. Nonzero ISW measures breakdown of matter domination: at early times (radiation) and late times (dark energy). Large scales (low l) not precisely measurable due to cosmic variance. So look for better way to probe decay of gravitational potentials.

22 Gravitational Lensing Gravity bends light… - we can detect dark matter through its gravity, - objects are magnified and distorted, - we can view “CAT scans” of growth of structure

23 Gravitational Lensing “Galaxy wallpaper” Lensing by (dark) matter along the line of sight N. Kaiser

24 Gravitational Lensing Lensing measures the mass of clusters of galaxies. By looking at lensing of sources at different distances (times), we measure the growth of mass. Clusters grow by swallowing more and more galaxies, more mass. Acceleration - stretching space - shuts off growth, by keeping galaxies apart. So by measuring the growth history, lensing can detect the level of acceleration, the amount of dark energy.

25 Weak Lensing - Shear More area, less source density, shallower sources, e.g Ground Less area, more source density, deeper sources, e.g. Space  Large scalesSmall scales  Error in shear estimation statistics only! Unique suitability of space for weak lensing: ◊ Control of systematics -- Small, stable, isotropic PSF; accurate photo-z ◊ Deep survey, area just grows with time, access to nonlinear mass spectrum (high l) adapted from C. Vale systematics

26 Weak Lensing - Cosmography Identify foreground structures, cross-correlate with background slices at various redshifts. Removes some systematics: - Uncorrected PSF shapes average to zero when cross- correlated with foreground - Non-linear power spectrum form irrelevant so information from all scales is useful But requires very accurate photometric redshifts Jain and Taylor 2003, Bernstein and Jain 2004, Zheng, Hui, & Stebbins 2004, Hu and Jain 2004

27 Supernovae + Weak Lensing Comprehensive: no external priors required! Independent test of flatness to 1-2% Complementary: w 0 to 5%, w to 0.11 (with systematics) Flexible: if systematics allow, can cover deg 2 √ Bernstein, Huterer, Linder, & Takada

28 Linear Structure: Baryon Oscillations The same primordial imprints in the photon field show up in matter density fluctuations. Eisenstein 2002 Galaxy cluster size Hubble horizon today Matter Power Spectrum Since the photons and baryons are tightly coupled until z<1100, there are baryon “acoustic oscillations”, submerged amid dark matter.

29 Structure Growth: Linear Baryon oscillations: - Standard ruler: we know the sound horizon by measuring the CMB; we measure the “wiggle” scale  geometric distance - Just like CMB – simple, linear physics - But, only works while mass perturbations linear, so need to look on very large scales, at z=1-2 - Require large, deep, accurate galaxy redshift surveys (millions of galaxies, thousand(s) of square degrees) - Possibly KAOS+SNAP or SNAP H  survey - Complementary with SN if dark energy dynamic

30

31

32 Exploring the Unknown Complementary probes give crosschecks, synergy, reduced influence of systematics, robust answers. Space observatory gives multiwavelength and high redshift measurements, high resolution and lower systematics. This gives us the ability to test the framework. Next: The Darkness of the Universe 4: The Heart of Darkness When you have a mystery ailment, you want a diagnosis with blood tests, EKG, MRI,...