ReCAP: A Model for Shared Print Collections and Off-site Storage VALE Users/NJLA CUS/NJ ACRL Conference January 9, 2015. Rutgers University, Piscataway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICOLC October 4, 2001 OCLC Services. Purpose Libraries’ web-based information portal needs –Maximize consortia’s role in their members’ use of database.
Advertisements

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
ReCAP Discovery to Delivery Project Lizanne Payne June 2012.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Collaborative Technical Services Team Report GUGM May 15, 2014 Cathy Jeffrey.
Building a Digital Library with Fedora International Conference on Developing Digital Institutional Repositories Hong Kong December 9, 2004.
Stewarding NYPL’s Audio and Moving Image Collections into the Future Evelyn Frangakis, Bill Stingone, Ann Thornton OCLC Research Webinar April 21, 2015.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Print Archiving Network.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane, ReCAP Coordinator, Columbia University Libraries | Colleen Major, Networked E-Resources.
Library Annex. The Library Annex Opened in 1999 Facility’s design is based on the Harvard high-density storage model Additional storage units (modules)
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Cooperative Collection Management Survey ARL Membership Meeting October 19, 2006 Chip Nilges Vice President, New Services.
The world’s libraries. Connected. Print Management at ‘Mega’-scale NITLE Collections in a Mega-regional framework NITLE Shared Academics » Future of Libraries.
ReCAP Summary: East Asian Library Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator 7/12/2010.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Evergreen tools at IISH Mieke Stroo Evergreen Conference 2013.
TRENDS IN RESOURCE SHARING TECHNOLOGIES Marshall Breeding Independent Consultant, Author, and Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides
Why Open-Source? No Vendor-Locking In a proprietary software --- Your supports lock with it. freedom to customize and improvements in software needs,
OCLC Online Computer Library Center CONTENTdm ® Digital Collection Management Software Ron Gardner, OCLC Digital Services Consultant ICOLC Meeting April.
The Fundamentals of Preserving Knowledge Assets Pacific Neighborhood Consortium 2010 Catherine Quinlan, Dean of the USC Libraries USC's Dual Approach.
What’s New in VRS? GUGM May 15, 2008 Presenter: Kelly P. Robinson GIL Service Georgia State University
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2013 ReCAP Columbia University.
Merging the National Library and the National Archives LIBER General Annual Conference, Tartu, June 2012 Els van Eijck van Heslinga, Head Finance and Corporate.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 10, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) SC Department of Archives and History.
DEPARTMENTAL LIBRARIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Margarete Bower Chemistry Library.
Cataloging and Metadata at the University Library.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
Tommy Waters, Celia Daniel & Bethany McGowan from the Howard Libraries & : Louis Stokes Health Science Library.
Creating Synergies for Success February 12, 2013.
Let VRS Work for You! ELUNA Conference 2008 Presenter: Kelly P. Robinson GIL Service Georgia State University
Basic Catalog Searching Rich Edwards Innovative Coordinator Washington State Library.
Off-Site Storage : Value Added? R. Cecilia Knight Grinnell College.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator August 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator May 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
Prospector Director’s Meeting Rose Nelson-Assistant Director.
Technical Services Involvement with New Services: Are there Silos Within the Library? Sharon Wiles-Young Director of Library Access Services ALCTS- Heads.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator September, 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.
1 Strategic Plan for Digital Archives Programme DAP PROJECT SCOPE OVERVIEW STATUS.
9/26/2007OCLC Orientation & Services1 What is OCLC?
Columbia University and ReCAP July 24, 2008 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator (212)
Collections Under Stress: Developing a Coordinated Response to Ensuring Future Access to Print Holdings in New Jersey VALE 2005 Users Conference Panel.
Impact Theories: Trends in Off-site Shelving Facility Use Zack Lane and Colleen Major Columbia University 12/5/2008.
ReCAP Shelving Facility Research Collections and Preservation Consortium.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Records Storage and Accessibility John Montgomery Team Lead, Archives and Information Management.
Millman—Nov 04—1 An Update on Digital Libraries David Millman Director of Research & Development Academic Information Systems Columbia University
New Off-Site Storage Technologies Jacob Nadal, ReCAP Jeremy Suratt, Iron Mountain.
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator April 5, 2011 ReCAP Columbia University.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Benjamin Walker Assistant.
1 Documentation Progression Send To Standard Document Library Document Center – Drop Off Library – Rules Based on Content Type and Metadata routes files.
1 CS 430: Information Discovery Lecture 26 Architecture of Information Retrieval Systems 1.
Performing ISO ILL borrowing and lending requests on the same server Yoel Kortick 2008.
1 United States Agricultural Information Network (USAIN) Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Gainesville, Florida April 25, 2016.
HathiTrust--a GovDocs Repository? Brian Vetruba, Catalog Librarian/Germanic Studies Librarian Washington University in St. Louis Leveraging.
AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.
ReCAP Shared Collections: Off-site is in-the-center
Headline.
Jacob Nadal Executive Director, ReCAP
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator February 2012
ReCAP: A Model for Shared Print Collections and Off-site Storage
Tools and Techniques to Clean Up your Database
Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator June 21, 2010 rev. May 2, 2011
Headline.
ReCAP Data Part 5: Request Rate
ReCAP Shelving Facility
ReCAP Collections Analysis: East Asian Library
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: A Distributed Retrospective Library Assessment Conference, December 6, 2018 Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
Offsite Storage Relocation
Digitization Standards: Issues & Updates
Sound Preservation: First Steps
Preserving Access for the Future
Presentation transcript:

ReCAP: A Model for Shared Print Collections and Off-site Storage VALE Users/NJLA CUS/NJ ACRL Conference January 9, Rutgers University, Piscataway David Magier AUL for Collection Development, Princeton Jacob Nadal Exec. Director, ReCAP Richard Schulz AUL for Technical Services, Princeton

HISTORY OF ReCAP The Research Collections and Preservation Consortium was founded by three partner libraries: Columbia University The New York Public Library Princeton University ReCAP began as a way to share the costs of operating a high-bay high-density collections storage facility, for three distinct collections ReCAP is developing into a preservation center, providing safe storage, coordinating long-term care and ensuring access to a shared collection

ACCESSIONING Materials are sorted by size, in three-dimensions 14 different HxW groups in standard size trays, to control D 3:1 to 4:1 improvement in space utilization over call number order, open-stacks setups Unique item barcode is linked to a tray barcode Three counts (number of items in the tray) Two barcode scans (tray bc, then each item bc) Tray code is linked to a shelf barcode and position. 1 (rear left) -16 (front left), clockwise Allows for fast, reliable retrieval. 3-4 staff on retrieval; often <1 minute per item.

TRAYS AND SIZE CHART SizeMax WidthHeight AL AH BL BH CL CH DL DH EL EH EX SizeMax WidthHeight AL AH BL BH CL CH DL DH EL EH EX

THE OBLIGATORY GLAMOUR SHOT MODULE 2: AISLE 12

CONTENT AND SERVICES Princeton has 2.8 million items in ReCAP, NYPL: 4.8 million, Columbia: 4.7 million Total: 12.3 million items, including monographs and serials, archival collections, film, photography, audio and video media, and more, in over 400 languages. Estimate that 10% are duplicates; 1% triplicates Cold storage (TWPI 200+) with numerous loss control systems 4-5x slower rate of decay than convectional stacks Retrievals: 15-25,000 / month Includes EDD: 500-1,000 And ILL/BD: 1,500-2,000

RECAP AT PRESENT Three collections in a shared building Independent policies for selection, acquisition, circulation, and management of collections Partnership shares capital and operations costs: ActivitySpace Administrative Staff 50% Operational Staff 80%20% Cleaning 75%25% Repairs & Maintenance 50% Utilities 20%80% Roads, Grounds, & Security 75%25% Insurance 20%80% All Other Administrative 80%20% Princeton Mgmt Fee 60%40% Major Maintenance 20%80%

NEW DIRECTIONS With support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, ReCAP investigated: Shared collections among the partners Makes more resources available to each partner, more quickly Cooperative collection development Lowers cost per partner for access to comprehensive collections Long-term preservation commitments Ensures that the costs sunk into collections and the facility will create long-run value for the partners And the tools ( mostly software ) and services needed to realize those opportunities

OBSTACLES TO SHARING Three ILS installations, using different systems Adding millions of records to each ILS is prohibitive No common, pre-existing resource-sharing network Different circulation policies and different patrons Issues ReCAP faces locally, we all face globally We hope that ReCAP will be a valuable case study on the way to regional and national shared collections programs

OCLC Research, 2013 North American print book resource: 45.7 million distinct publications million total library holdings North American print book resource: 45.7 million distinct publications million total library holdings

POLICY SOLUTIONS Reframe existing ReCAP collections: Shared: Available to all partners and subject to a retention commitment and other agreed policies Open: Available to all partners but not subject to a retention commitment or other Shared Collection policies Restricted: Available only or primarily to the owning library (often special collections material) New accessions to be Shared by default. Open or Restricted status must be specifically set.

CodeCustomer NameTotal itemsRetr. FY14Retrieval % CU Columbia Standard (Columbia)2,966,08145, % EV East Asian Vernacular (Columbia)335,9504, % GC Government Documents (Columbia)39, % HS Health Science Library (Columbia)126,5611, % PAUnrestricted (Princeton)2,365,94926, % QK Mendel Sound & Video (Princeton)32, % GP Government Documents (Princeton)34, % NANYPL Standard3,749,91326, % TOTAL9,651,107105, %

TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Middleware development process initiated High-level architecture developed by HTC Global, Inc. RfP for Final System development issued January 2015! Connect three ILS for records discovery OAI-PMH; ResourceShare Harvest metadata (OAI-PMH; ResourceShare) for Bib and Item records Lucene/SOLR Create a searchable index (Lucene/SOLR) Connect to Inventory Management Systems IMS-API New SOAP API (IMS-API): Item Status & Queuing Connect three ILS for circulation NCIP Check-out to user and return to library (NCIP) NCIPIMS-API Recall Items (NCIP and IMS-API)