1Updated April 2015 RUSLE2 Advanced Data Management Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 database manager) Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing the Environmental Risks of Pest Management Joseph K. Bagdon Pest Management Specialist NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Advertisements

A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
1 Technical Service Provider Training National Association of Independent Crop Consultants January 20-23, 2010 Wyndham Orlando Resort 8001 International.
New functionality in the model to report other selected results. Giulio Ferruzzi, WNTSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 science lead) Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Useful Tools for Predicting Erosion from Disturbed Rangelands: Disturbed WEPP for Rangelands The Water Erosion Prediction Project in the Forest Service.
October 5, 2005, The 4th IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics Field Observation and WEPP Application for Sediment Yield in an.
University of Maryland Extension Computer Training for Farm Businesses Jenny Rhodes Shannon Dill University of Maryland Extension Educators Agriculture.
 Over 25,000 crop management templates in 77 of 78 crop management zones in the Continental US, Caribbean, and Hawaii/Pacific Basin have been updated.
A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DWM AT LARGE SCALE MOHAMED A. YOUSSEF and R. WAYNE SKAGGS 1 By.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
What is RUSLE2 ? R evised U niversal S oil L oss E quation, Version 2 Estimates soil loss from rill and interrill erosion caused by rainfall and overland.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
1Updated February 2015 RUSLE 2 Database Management Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 database manager) Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2.
Accessing and Preparing Soils Data for Use in RUSLE2 Linda Scheffe Conservation Agronomist National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, NE.
Soil Conservation: Soil Conservation: towards sustainable agriculture.
Soil Erosion: Causes, Control & Estimation AGME Fundamentals of Agricultural Systems Technology Photos courtesy of NRCS of USDA.
WEPS Database Management Mike Sporcic, National Wind Erosion Specialist.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
NASIS NATIONAL SOIL INFORMATION SYSTEM -- AN OVERVIEW.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
1 RUSLE 2 Wisconsin Website da.gov/technical/cons plan/rusle Judy Derricks-WI RUSLE2 MANAGER.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
PREDICTION OF SOIL LOSSES. EMPIRICAL WATER EROSION FORMULAS A= k s 0,75 L 1,5 I 1,5 (Kornev,1937) A= k s 1,49 L 1,6 (Zingg,1940) A= k s 0,8 p I 1,2 (Neal,1938)
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Soil Conservation. Erosion Two billion tons of U.S. soil lost annually Improved from Five billion tons in 1982 Conservation programs and voluntary conservation.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
T18-1 Soil Science and Management, 4E Chapter 18 Soil Conservation.
Using the Soil Conditioning Index to Assess Management Effects on Soil Carbon USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Quality National Technology.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Estimating Soil Erosion From Water Using RUSLE By: Andrea King USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service.
Soil Quality Measurement Unit: Soil Science Lesson 7.
Soil conservation practices Contents Soil conservation practices Soil conservation practices Crop rotation Crop rotation Wind break Wind break Cover.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
New science to model perennial vegetation more accurately in response to haying and grazing Giulio Ferruzzi, WNTSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 science lead)
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
1 RUSLE2 Users Guide South Dakota September 2004.
New functionality in the model to report selected results based on Crop Intervals (i.e. the period of time from the harvest of the previous cash crop to.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
NRCS, CA 2011 DAN JOHNSON EQIP IWM Delivery. Overview of New Guidance Instructions and supporting tools and documents are going to reside in Section IV.
A Cyberinfrastructure for Drought Risk Assessment An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Corn Yield Comparison Between EPIC-View Simulated Yield And Observed Yield Monitor Data by Chad M. Boshart Oklahoma State University.
-gSSURGO- Using the Soil Data Management Toolbox Steve Peaslee USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, Nebraska March.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Let’s Begin! Writing Manure Management Plans!. Manure Management Manual DEP Manure Management Manual can be divided into 3 Parts: Part I Requirements/Guidelines.
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
N Leaching Index RUSLE2 instructions
ENVIROTHON SOILS STATION
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
NADSS Overview An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
Using RUSLE2 and the SCI in the Conservation Security Program
Presentation transcript:

1Updated April 2015 RUSLE2 Advanced Data Management Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 database manager) Linda Scheffe, NSSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 database manager) Giulio Ferruzzi, WNTSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 science lead) Giulio Ferruzzi, WNTSC Agronomist (NRCS RUSLE2 science lead) Steve Boetger, ENTSC Agronomist Steve Boetger, ENTSC Agronomist Steve Woodruff, ENTSC Agronomist/Forage Specialist Steve Woodruff, ENTSC Agronomist/Forage Specialist

Field Office User Selects – 1. Location (climate) 2. Soil map unit component 3. Slope length and steepness 4. Crop Management (Use Rotation Builder to develop rotation) 5. Supporting Practices

Crop Management Zones Map represents common crop management zones or areas where the same crops are grown under similar climatic conditions. Prepared in 2001 to 2004 by Dave Lightle, Agronomist at the NRCS National Soil Survey Center in Lincoln, Nebraska and was designed to be used to organize sets of crop management scenario templates for use in implementing the RUSLE2 and WEPS models. The CMZ map provided the basis for the creation of standard sets of crop management scenarios for use in areas where the agriculture is similar. Provides level of consistency between counties and field offices within the same crop management zone. 5

Crop Management Zones Information sources included: USLE EI-distribution data and Figure 9 from Agriculture Handbook 537, the C-factor zone map previously used in implementing RUSLE1, National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) data on major crops grown and the Usual Planting and Harvest dates for these crops within the crop reporting regions. In addition, Land Resource Regions, Major Land Resource Areas and the USDA Plant Hardiness Zones were also considered in establishing the CMZ zone boundaries. 6

Crop Management Zones Input and concurrence was received from all NRCS State Agronomists and Regional RUSLE2 coordinators during the process in establishing the boundaries, and normalizing the boundaries to county boundaries and to major topographic features in order to aid in the implementation of RUSLE2 and WEPS in NRCS field offices. 7

Crop Management Zones Over 30,000 crop management templates in 78 crop management zones in the Continental US, Caribbean, and Hawaii/Pacific Basin have been updated for representative cropping and management systems, including energy use 8

RUSLE2 CMZ Map

CMZ Lead Responsibilities Maintenance of CMZ a: and b: management records Maintenance of CMZ a: and b: management records Work with state agronomists in Zone to achieve input and consensus for CMZ content Work with state agronomists in Zone to achieve input and consensus for CMZ content Request from state agronomists yearly to provide updated CMZ templates Request from state agronomists yearly to provide updated CMZ templates

CMZ Lead Responsibilities CMZ lead provides updated a, b, c and d folders to regional agronomist and RUSLE2 database manager for review and processing (into Land Management Operations Database and official website) CMZ lead provides updated a, b, c and d folders to regional agronomist and RUSLE2 database manager for review and processing (into Land Management Operations Database and official website)

CMZ Lead Responsibilities CMZ lead provides updated a, b, c and d folders to regional agronomist and RUSLE2 database manager for review and processing (into Land Management Operations Database and official website) CMZ lead provides updated a, b, c and d folders to regional agronomist and RUSLE2 database manager for review and processing (into Land Management Operations Database and official website)

State Agronomist Responsibilities Maintenance of CMZ a and b folders with CMZ lead (includes new managements with new vegetations) Maintenance of CMZ a and b folders with CMZ lead (includes new managements with new vegetations) State agronomists request most representative and utilized c: management records from field offices and then make into a or b records and forward to CMZ lead State agronomists request most representative and utilized c: management records from field offices and then make into a or b records and forward to CMZ lead Maintain soils data for each soil survey area Maintain soils data for each soil survey area

State Agronomist Responsibilities Request new vegetations/operations to be built through regional agronomist and db manager. Request new vegetations/operations to be built through regional agronomist and db manager. Provide area/field office databases and instructions on how to archive/update Provide area/field office databases and instructions on how to archive/update Should build statewide moses database containing climate, soils, management templates of entire state (for state agronomist use)to enable troubleshooting and overall quality control Should build statewide moses database containing climate, soils, management templates of entire state (for state agronomist use)to enable troubleshooting and overall quality control

State Agronomist Responsibilities Provide area/field office training Provide area/field office training Provide ongoing input for changing needs for integrated erosion prediction technology, resources, tools, training Provide ongoing input for changing needs for integrated erosion prediction technology, resources, tools, training State agronomist RUSLE2 access allows higher access than field office access (should only be one person in state with state agronomist access unless requested in writing) State agronomist RUSLE2 access allows higher access than field office access (should only be one person in state with state agronomist access unless requested in writing) Access only works for version you were provided access for Access only works for version you were provided access for

3084 Climate records in the 40 eastern states 7408 Climate records in the 11 western states plus Hawaii, PAC Basin and Caribbean area 594 Support Practice choices 29,310 Crop Management Scenario Templates in 78 CMZ’s (so far) 611 Tillage and Field operations records 1,048,659 Soil Component records in 649,032 map units in 3100 Soil Surveys 1360 Crop and vegetation records 140 Different plant residue records

Database Manager Sets Access & Permissions Management Templates State Action: * CMZ leader coordinates and develops templates, then creates RUSLE2 export by CMZ and sends export file to database managerCMZ leader coordinates and develops templates, then creates RUSLE2 export by CMZ and sends export file to database manager Operations Data Vegetation Data Residue Data Practices Developed by: Database Manager: Linda Scheffe Science Lead: Giulio Ferruzzi RUSLE2 Website RUSLE2 Download (Install file) RUSLE2 Download (Install file) Base NRCS Database (No soils, climate or management) Base NRCS Database (No soils, climate or management) Soils by County /- files Soils by County /- files Climate Data - 50 State files Climate Data - 50 State files Management Templates - 78 CMZ files Management Templates - 78 CMZ files (Will eventually migrate to Data Warehouse ) Field Office Computer or private RUSLE2 user Install RUSLE2 Program Install RUSLE2 Program Customize the Base NRCS Database Customize the Base NRCS Database Copy the necessary files and import into base databaseCopy the necessary files and import into base database - xyz County Soils * - State Climate * - CMZ Templates** a: Single Year ** b: Multi-Year ** c: FO created Management “Records” (RWCD permissions at FO level); possibly use State policy to manage development at the FO level RUSLE2 Data Flow * State Agronomist can read, copy, and delete (R-CD) Read only at the FO Level (R---), RWCD for State Agronomist ** State Agron RWCD, Read only at the FO Level (R---) Soils Data State Action: * NASIS SSURGO Downloads created for each countyNASIS SSURGO Downloads created for each county State agronomist does RUSLE2 Import for each county from the SSURGO download filesState agronomist does RUSLE2 Import for each county from the SSURGO download files State agronomist creates RUSLE2 Export file for each county and sends to database managerState agronomist creates RUSLE2 Export file for each county and sends to database manager Climate Data Developed and Exported Portland NWCC Action

How do the access and permissions work in RUSLE2? Provides a mechanism to limit user access to certain critical parts of the databases. Provides a mechanism to limit user access to certain critical parts of the databases.

Permissions Table edited by Database Manager

RUSLE2 Screen View Hierarchy Plan Plan Worksheet field 1 Worksheet field 1 Profile Profile Management Management Profile Profile Management Management Worksheet field 2 Worksheet field 2 Profile Profile Management Management Profile Profile Management Management

Plan* Climate is constant. Houses worksheets for each field or treatment unit. Each field worksheet has constant soil, and slope but contains multiple profiles with different management and support practice alternatives. RUSLE2 Hierarchy of Screen Views All components housed within the moses.gdb database file. Profile* Contains one erosion calculation for one slope. Combines climate, soil, slope, management and structural practice inputs. Management A crop and tillage system scenario. Contains crop and yield information, all tillage, planting, and harvest operations with dates, but is not a soil loss calculation. Worksheet* Soil, slope and climate information are constant. Compares multiple profiles (alternatives) for one field. *Contain actual soil loss calculations

RUSLE2 Features Provides for Provides for Single soil loss runs in the Profile view. Single soil loss runs in the Profile view.

Comparing SHMSs in Worksheet View

RUSLE2 Features Provides for Provides for Single soil loss runs in the Profile view. Single soil loss runs in the Profile view. Comparison of alternative soil loss runs on the same slope in the Worksheet view. Comparison of alternative soil loss runs on the same slope in the Worksheet view.

Comparing SHMSs or Alternatives in Worksheet View

RUSLE2 Features Provides for Provides for Single soil loss runs in the Profile view. Single soil loss runs in the Profile view. Comparison of alternative soil loss runs on the same slope in the Worksheet view. Comparison of alternative soil loss runs on the same slope in the Worksheet view. A report of alternatives for each field for all fields on a farm in the Plan view. A report of alternatives for each field for all fields on a farm in the Plan view.

RUSLE2 Data When building managements, select appropriate operations and vegetations; When building managements, select appropriate operations and vegetations; Read information boxes Read information boxes View in profile, graph canopy cover, etc. to make sure site specific scenario is represented well View in profile, graph canopy cover, etc. to make sure site specific scenario is represented well Request new vegetation/operations to meet changing needs Request new vegetation/operations to meet changing needs

Rotation Builder

year3 year2 year1 Corn fall chiseled Soybeans Fall Chiseled Oats spring chiseled

Current Agronomic Models Each model currently contains it own databases Each model currently contains it own databases Most utilize similar data Most utilize similar data Soil map unit and component data Soil map unit and component data Climate location data on temperature, precipitation and wind energy Climate location data on temperature, precipitation and wind energy Crop and plant data Crop and plant data Tillage, pesticide, nutrient and manure application, planting and harvest operations Tillage, pesticide, nutrient and manure application, planting and harvest operations Crop Management Scenarios Crop Management Scenarios NRCS is currently developing, trying to maintain and serve up separate databases for each model NRCS is currently developing, trying to maintain and serve up separate databases for each model

Water Erosion Model Wind Erosion Model SCI and STIR WinPST AnnAGNPS Manure Management Program NLEAP Phosphorus Index Climate generator sub module Residue Decomposition Sub module Advanced PRISM Climate Data NASIS/SSURGO Soils data Field operations database Vegetation and Crop Database Residue Database Crop Management Scenarios Database On-site Field and Landscape Information Random Roughness Degradation sub module Crop Rotation Builder sub module Residue Burial sub module Sheet and Rill Erosion Rate Wind Erosion Rate Particulate Emission Concentration Sediment Delivery Detached Particle Information Nitrate Leaching Phosphorus Runoff Carbon Sequestration / Losses Pesticide Leaching Nutrient Loading Organic Matter Trends Soil Tillage Intensity Ratings Support Practices Database Common User Interface

Future Plans to Reduce Time Spent on Database Development/Maintenance Land Management Operations Database Land Management Operations Database Obtain Database from Area of Interest Obtain Database from Area of Interest Access Soils Directly from Soil Data Access Facility Access Soils Directly from Soil Data Access Facility