A Brand-new Neutrino Detector “SciBar” (1) Status and prospects Masaya Hasegawa (Kyoto Univ.) for the K2K SciBar Group for the K2K SciBar Group Hakuba.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Kouji Narita Nagoya University, Japan CHORUS collaboration Study of charm production in neutrino interactions.
Prototype Performance in D0 test stand & fiber intrinsic performance with KEK test beam M.Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) Osaka.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
NuMI MINOS The MINOS Far Detector Cosmic Rays and their neutrinos are being collected now. How does this work, and of what use is this data? Alec Habig,
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
K2K 実験 SciBar 前置ニュートリノ検出器 久野研 田窪 洋介 読み出しシステムと時間情報の較正.
RECENT RESULTS IN K2K EXPERIMENT Shimpei YAMAMOTO (Kyoto Univ.) 10 th ICEPP 16-FEB-2004 Shimpei YAMAMOTO (Kyoto Univ.) 10 th ICEPP Symposium.
DE/dX measurement by OPERA film Tsutomu Fukuda (Nagoya Univ) Emulsion work shop (11/12,2005)
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment PD07 : Photosensor Workshop /6/28 (Thu) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama H.Kawamuko ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Measurements of neutrino charged current scattering in K2K Fine-Grained Detector Introduction Introduction K2K Near Detector K2K Near Detector CC interactions.
R&D status of the Scintillator- strip based ECAL for the ILD Oct LCWS14 Belgrade Satoru Uozumi (KNU) For the CALICE collaboration Scintillator strips.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
1 M. Yokoyama (Kyoto University) for K2K collaboration June 10 th, U.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Multipixel Geiger mode photo-sensors (MRS APD’s) Yury Kudenko ISS meeting, KEK, 25 January 2006 INR, Moscow.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
MINER A Main INjector ExpeRiment for v-A Active segmented scintillator detector: 5.87 tons Nuclear targets of C, Fe and Pb, Water, Helium.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Spring school “Bruno Touschek” (19 th May 2005) C. Mariani (INFN Rome) May 19 th, LNF Spring School “ Bruno Touschek ”
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
Monitoring and Commissioning the NOνA Far Detector M. Baird 1, J. Bian 2, J. Coelho 4, G. Davies 3, M. Messier 1, M. Muether 5, J. Musser 1 and D. Rocco.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Title : SciBooNE -- Experimental study of neutrino cross-sections for a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment and the development of the detectors.
Neutrino interaction measurements in K2K SciBar
R&D of MPPC in kyoto M.taguchi.
Presentation transcript:

A Brand-new Neutrino Detector “SciBar” (1) Status and prospects Masaya Hasegawa (Kyoto Univ.) for the K2K SciBar Group for the K2K SciBar Group Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb , 2004

K2K NDs status & Motivation for SciBar SciBar Detector Installation in last summer SciBar working status SummaryContents Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

B.G. from non-QE K2K current status Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Important ! K2K Oscillation analysis Oscillation max. E ~ 0.6GeV Null Oscillation probability < 1% Δm 2 = 1.5 ~ 3.9 ×10 -3 sin 2 2θ=1(90%CL) Need to study low energy νinteractions (Charged current Quasi-elastic, single π production) to maximize the sensitivity Flux (<1.0GeV) : ~10% Super-K : ~20% But !

What’s Needed ? Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 How to identify the CCQE Identify μ and P (No π ±/0 ) Observe all particle from ν interaction. (Full Active & Tracking) Identify the recoil Proton (from low momentum) PID (p/π) Large Volume

Motivation for SciBar Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 K2K Near Neutrino Detector 1kt water cherencov detector (25t fiducial) - detect both CCqe and nonQE as 1ring μevent (fraction ~ 50%) Scintillating fiber tracker (6t fiducial) - Low low energy - dead space around vertex (fraction ~60%) Need a new detector !

SciBar Detector Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Extruded scintillator (15t) Multi-anode PMT (64 ch.) Wave-length shifting fiber EM calorimeter 1.7m 3m Extruded scintillator with WLS fiber readout Neutrino target is scintillator itself 2.5 x 1.3 x 300 cm 3 cell ~15000 channels Detect from less than 10cm track Distinguish proton from pion by using dE/dx (fairly) large volume  High 2-track CC-QE efficiency  Identify ν interaction mode clearly Just constructed in last summer!

SciBar Component Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, charge info. 2 timing info. VME board Extruded Scintillator (1.3×2.5×300cm 3 ) ・ made by FNAL (same as MINOS) Wave length shifting fiber (1.5mmΦ) ・ Long attenuation length (~350cm)  Light Yield : 16.5p.e./cm/MIP Multi-Anode PMT ・ 2×2mm 2 pixel (3% cross ・ Gain Uniformity (20% RMS) ・ Good linearity 5 ) Readout electronics  Takubo’s talk Top View

Expected Performance Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 PID (p/π) Momentum reconstruction Using dE/dx Info. Result from Beamtest 2001 (only using 10cm dE/dx info) p/π missID probability : ~ 1% P_eff=95% Momentum (for proton) : less than 10% ( below 1.0GeV/c) High Efficiency in finding/identifying low energy CCQE events

SciBar Installation Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 S.Aoki, J.Arygyriades, S.S.Choi, M.Hasegawa, Hiraide, K.Hayashi, A.K.Ichikawa, Iinuma, Eric J., E.J.Jeon, K.K.Joo, D.Kerr, K.Kobayasi, A.Kohara, J.Kubota, M.J.Lee, I.T.Lim, H.Maesaka, O.Mineev, T.Morita, Y.Nakanishi, K.Nishikawa, K.Nitta, P.Rovegno, T.Nakaya, T.Sasaki, A.Suzuki, K.K.Shiraishi, Y.Takubo, R.Terri, M.Tuchscher, S.Yamamoto, M.Yokoyama, M.Yoshida, Z.Nawang (and more?) Almost no change from this schedule! ( 体育会系的がんばり!)

SciBar Installation (1) Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

SciBar Installation (2) Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

SciBar Installation – complete ! Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

SciBar in the News Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Nikkei News KEK News KEK News

SciBar started νdata taking from Oct.10 and working well. - few dead channel (6/14336 = 0.04%) - collect ~7000 νint./10ton/5E18POT(1month) - collect calibration data (cosmic,LED) with beam We have already done - checking the basic hardware performance - calibration (energy,timing),detector alignment - comparing with MC and other detectors using Muon sample (very preliminary) Current Status Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 beampedestalLEDCosmic ray 0.6s 35  s 100ns, 1take 1  s,1take Suppression mode

SciBar Shot ! Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 p  CCQE candidate 3track event

SciBar Shot ! Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 NC pi0 candidate vertex (ν + N  ν + N + π 0)

SciBar Shot ! Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Nu_e event candidate Large energy deposit in Electron Catcher ν e Flux measurement  Estimation of Beam BG for ν e search at Super-K Short Baseline Oscillation  ν e appearance for LSND Region (Δm 2 : 1 ~ 10)

SciBar Shot ! Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 NC elastic scattering Nucleon spin crisis What carries the proton spin? - valence quarks,sea quarks or gluons? σ( NCE )/σ(CCQE) ratio probes Strange sea contribution to nucleon spin (Nuclear Physics B 105 (2002) 62) (ν + N  ν + N)

Cosmic Ray Data Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 We use penetrating cosmic-ray muon as a (strip to strip) relative energy calibration source. Mean ~ 140 count (design value) response is very stable Top view Side view   Typical ADC distribution This fluctuation come from PMT Gain variation ADC count

Gain Monitor (1) Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 High Accuracy gain monitoring SystEm (HASE moni) Event Display Injected Light is uniform ( ~ 12%) Feature ・ Monitoring all channels at once with only 4 LEDs. ・ Very uniform light (No PMT saturation)

Gain Monitor (2) Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Relative Gain +5% -5% (Run Number) Nov.1Dec.1 Dec.24 Oct.7 Jan.16 Feb (99.85 %) channels are stable for 4 months. Gain drift can be corrected within 1% level precision ! Corrected ADC count

Muon Track Analysis (1) Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Top View Vertex As a first step, we checked and compared the basic distribution (vertex,momentum) with MC on the clean muon sample. (p μ >0.5GeV/c, ~35% eff all νint.) Timing distribution No BackGround

Vertex Distribution Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Data agree with MC well Z (beam) cm X Y Data MC CCQE

Momentum Distribution Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Data MC CCQE Good agreement  Track Length & Energy scale are OK! The threshold can be lowered

We installed a brand new neutrino detector “SciBar” to the K2K near detectors. - measurement of the νspectrum precisely - studying ν interactions (and more physics) SciBar is working very well from Oct. 7,2003. And observed many good neutrino events. Basic distributions reasonably agree with MC.Summary Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 More to come !

Supplement Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

Readout Electronics VA/TA chip (Analog ASIC) –32 inputs  shaping  sample & hold  serial analog output  comparator  OR  trigger output multiplexer sample&hold slow shaper preamp. fast shaper discri. CH1 CH2 CH32 VA serial output TA (32ch OR) hold PMT signal ∝ charge 1.2  s VA/TA chip

S.Aoki, J.Arygyriades, S.S.Choi, M.Hasegawa, Hiraide, K.Hayashi, A.K.Ichikawa, Iinuma, Eric J., E.J.Jeon, K.K.Joo, D.Kerr, K.Kobayasi, A.Kohara, J.Kubota, M.J.Lee, I.T.Lim, H.Maesaka, O.Mineev, T.Morita, Y.Nakanishi, K.Nishikawa, K.Nitta, P.Rovegno, T.Nakaya, T.Sasaki, A.Suzuki, K.K.Shiraishi, Y.Takubo, R.Terri, M.Tuchscher, S.Yamamoto, M.Yokoyama, M.Yoshida, Z.Nawang (and more?) CNU, KEK, Hiroshima, Kobe, Kyoto, Saclay, SNU, StonyBrook, INR, Washington, Osaka, UCI (and more?) List of shift takers in this summer

beampedestalLEDCosmic ray 0.6s 35  s 100ns, 1take 1  s,1take Suppression mode Read out : ~100ms/event Data ADC for all channels TDC for all TA’s -> each 32channel -> 2 TDC for each PMT Suppression mode : ADC only for TA hit channel For EC, ADC for all channels, no TDC Data Taking modes

4 cm 8 cm 262 cm Readout Cell Beam Fibers “spaghetti” calorimeter re-used from CHORUS 1mm diameter fibers in the grooves of lead foils 4x4cm 2 cell read out from both ends 2 planes ( 11X 0 ) Horizontal: 30 modules Vertical : 32 modules Expected resolution 14%√E Linearity: better than 10% Electron Catcher

SciBar Detector Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004

For comparing the event rate with other Detector 2627 events / 6.216x10 18 POT / 9.38t Event rate & N SK Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Efficiency ν flux Target volume No official number ( not finishing sys. error estimation & near/far calculation yet) But Consistent with other detectors

Fiber Attenuation Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, cm ± 7.77cm Semi-Auto Attenuation Measurement System We measured all(~15,000) Fiber’s attenuation length before installation within 2% precision.  We can correct the attenuation effect ~1.4% precision.

Energy Calibration Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Attenuation Correction Pass Length Correction Use Cosmic Ray Muon for strip to strip relative energy scale calibration All samples can be used by correction of Attenuation and Pass length in strip (100 Hits/strip/hour  Less than 1% precision can be possible for 5days) After correction Before correction After correction Before correction

Timing Resolution Kyoto Univ Masaya Hasegawa Hakuba 10 th Symposium Feb. 15 – 18, 2004 Timing resolution: 1.34ns Difference of timing between two TDC channels In cosmic ray event TDC channel √2*resolution (ns) 0 2

dE/dx proton >  (~1GeV/c) ~ 0.1 GeV/c  ~ 1.0 GeV/c proton  dE/dx 1 cell ADC  p 0.9 GeV Pion confidence level (using only 10 hits along the track) Miss ID probability : < 20 % (1.2 GeV/c proton) < 5 % (< 1.0 GeV/c proton) With 95 % proton efficiency proton pion Particle ID (Results From Beam Test)

Polystylene with PPO 1% and POPOP 0.3% –Usual plastic scintillator component –Peak of emission spectrum : 420nm TiO 2 reflector (white) (0.25mm-thick) –Increase light yield –Optical isolation –Extruded together Cheep : ~$20 / kg Made by Fermilab 2.5cm 1.3cm 300cm 1.8mmφ Extruded Scintillator