1 Louise C. Speitel FAA, WJH Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ USA Materials Meeting, Niagara Falls, NY June 17, 2008 Development of Decomposition Product.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Monoxide Monitoring
Advertisements

EH Terminology Presented by QBE Loss Control Services.
Mine Gases Atmospheric Testing C.4. Contributed by: Richard Black Industrial Scientific Corp.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE - GASES, VAPORS, AND SOLVENTS UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON – DOWNTOWN FALL 2013.
MDPI/GOODWILL OIL AND GAS TRAINING
Hazardous Materials Section Five: Scene Safety, PPE and Scene Control
It’s not JUST Smoke! The Truth about Fire Smoke. Smoke: “An aerosol of solid or liquid particles usually resulting from incomplete combustion.” 2.
Chris Landau (Geologist) June 22, Broken Promises (BP) well spews the lethal and carcinogenic gases of hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide and benzene.
PERMIT REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE ENTRY.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
PROPERTIES OF FLAMMABLE MATERIALS. Flammability Flammable Flammable –Capable of being ignited and of burning –Synonymous with combustible.
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Basic Air Monitoring Concepts And Use Of The Altair 4 Gas Meter
What is a hydrocarbon? Why are alkanes considered to be saturated?
Part 2 - Dilution Ventilation (General Ventilation)
1 Toxicological effects - Irritants Irritation Inflammation or aggravation of tissue from contact Influenced by solubility Primary or secondary.
Department of Fire Services Training Division Carbon Monoxide Emergency Familiarization and Suggested Operational Guidelines T. Dustin Alward Massachusetts.
Confined Spaces in Construction: Applicable Standards Stan Liang, CIH, CSP, CET KTA-Tator, Inc.
Permit Required Confined Space Entry Permit Required Confined Space Entry.
Environmental Considerations Confined Space Rescue is inherently dangerous and requires performance of rigorous activities under adverse conditions. Regional.
Lab Safety.
Peter Koczanski, Marko Roslycky, Riley Barrett and Caelan Stephanson
EXAMPLE 2.1 Mass Ratios The gas methane (CH4), the main component of the fuel natural gas, can be decomposed to give carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) in a ratio.
WELCOME TO Gas Tester Training O2, LEL Monitoring
Hazard Communication. SAFETY The purpose of OSHA Hazard Communication Standard is to ensure that the hazards of all chemicals produced or imported are.
Modern Chemistry Chapter 9 Stoichiometry
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS)
SAFETY AND WHMIS PROCEDURES SYMBOLS.
Introduction to INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Reactions Conservation of Matter, Stoichiometry, and Moles.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Chapter 2-1.  A substance made up of two or more different types of atoms bonded together.  Elements are to compounds as letters are to words.  Elements.
Workplace Hazardous Materials
Health Hazards of Gases A review of the toxicities of substances that exist in the gaseous state under normal conditions of use.
Hazardous Materials Subpart H. Subpart H Standards Compressed Gases Acetylene Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrous Oxide Flammable.
Health Hazards Instructional Goal
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information Systems.
Carbon Monoxide Monitoring Presented by: Interscan Corporation.
Consequence Analysis Dr. AA Department of Chemical Engineering University Teknology Malaysia.
CBR Detection, Decontamination and Information Systems Branch 1 Issues with Use of Toxicity Values For Emergency Response by Timothy Bauer Naval Surface.
By Kate Hughes and Jess Hawke. Un-burnt Hydrocarbons  Cars cannot always fully combust the hydrocarbons, leaving un-burnt hydrocarbons in the exhaust.
Symbols & Dangers.  As you pursue more advanced science and chemistry, you will perform experiments and handle materials, equipment and chemicals. 
WHMIS Crystal Moules October 23, WHMIS W orkplace H azardous M aterials I nformation S ystem.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
2015 Hazmat Operation Refresher. Course Objectives We will be refreshing on: Detectors Detectors Hazmat Responses:Hazmat Responses:  Gas Leak – Natural.
MULTI-COMPONENT FUEL VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK C. E. Polymeropoulos Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.
Tim Marker FAA Technical Center Development of a Lab-Scale Test For Evaluating Toxic Gas Decomposition Products Generated Inside a Fuselage During a Postcrash.
TOXICOLOGY The study of chemical or physical agents and their interaction with biologic systems to produce a response in a organism. The dose makes the.
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System. This system provides workers and employers nationwide with vital information about hazardous materials.
1 LANDFILL GAS TRAINING. 2 INTRODUCTION  TYPE OF MONITORING -Screening -Specialized  GOALS.
Confined Space Rescue Level I Technical References: Mod 3.
Samuel Nii Tettey (Ergonomist). At the end of Session, participants should be able to: - Identify fire problems at the enterprise level and Conduct Fire.
Hazards of Confined Spaces. INSTRUCTIONAL GOAL The participant till understand the various hazards associated with confined space entries and the need.
Misuse of Combustible Gas Meters Supervisor Training 1/11/08.
What students need to know
Excavation & Trenching Awareness Plus
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System
Montrose Fire Department
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Unit 1 – Chemistry WHIMIS – MSDS
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System.
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System.
Principles of Natural Gas
Air Quality and Pollution
Carbon Monoxide Monitoring
TOXICOLOGY.
Dr. Patrick Seiniger BMVI, Section StV 22
Presentation transcript:

1 Louise C. Speitel FAA, WJH Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ USA Materials Meeting, Niagara Falls, NY June 17, 2008 Development of Decomposition Product Limits for Lab-Scale Tests of Burnthrough Compliant Insulation Systems

2 Purpose Toxicity Measures for 5 minute Exposures Toxicity References Other Hazard Measurements  Lower Explosive Limit as Propane  Temperature Allowable 5 Minute Box Toxicity Limits  Evaluate Full-Scale Toxicity of Material Systems  Determine Gases to Measure  Obtain Scaling factor to convert Full Scale Tox Limit to Lab Scale Tox Limits Setting Lab Scale Gas Concentration Limits.  Determine Mutiplication factor for Box Test Yields  Determine Maximum Allowable Concentration Guidance for Selected Gases Outline

3 For insulation constructions and innovations meeting the new burnthrough test requirements: To ensure survivability (including ability to escape) inside an intact fuselage when exposed to an external fuel fire. Purpose

4 Incapacitation Incapacitation is the best measure of the ability to escape and survive exposure to the narcotic gases such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and low oxygen. The incapacitation concentration is less than the LC50 for these gases. If a passenger were incapacitated, one can assume that subsequent death would occur by rapidly spreading fire or toxic gases. The FEDIs for each hazard are added to give the total FEDI as a function of time. Lethality LC50s An LC50 is the concentration for a given exposure duration which results in death or subsequent death of 50 percent of the animals. Exposure to high concentrations of these gases may not prevent escape but may result in subsequent death due to respiratory system damage. The LC50s are less than the incapacitation concentrations for these gases. Lethal concentration 50 percent is the concentration in which 50 percent of an exposed population is expected to die LC50s are the best measure of the ability to escape and survive for the irritant gases such as hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen bromide (HBr), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide Toxicity Measures for 5 Minute Exposures

5 FAA Combined Hazard Model The FAA’s Combined Hazard Survival Model was created using selected regression equations, obtained from animal modeling data, to be used as a predictive tool to gauge human survivability in full-scale aircraft cabin fire tests. This model uses incapacitation data to obtain fractional effective dose histories for incapacitation (FED I ) and lethality data to obtain fractional effective dose histories for lethality (FED L ). The time when either FED reaches 1 determines the exposure time available to escape from an aircraft cabin fire and survive postexposure VCO2, The enhanced uptake of other gases due to the presence of CO2 The effect of CO2 on increasing the uptake of other gases should be factored into the concentration term in the FED equation for all gases with the exception of CO2 and oxygen. Higher respiratory minute volumes due to CO2 exposure has been found to be an important factor in predicting the time to incapacitation or death. Toxicity Measures for 5 Minute Exposures

6 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines- Level 3 (ERPG 3) Maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing life threatening health effects (Based on 1 hour exposures) Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) Maximum concentration from which a worker could escape without injury or without irreversible health effects in the event of respiratory equipment failure (e.g. contaminant breakthrough) Based on 30 minute exposures IDLH is conservative: assumes repeated occupational exposure Toxicity Measures for 5 Minute Exposures

7 Speitel Louise C. (1995) Toxicity assessment of combustion gases and development of a survival model, US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington D.C. Report DOT/FAA/AR-95/5. Speitel, Louise C. (1996) Fractional effective dose model for post-crash aircraft survivability” Toxicology 115, Documentation of Threshold Limits and Biological Exposure Indices, Sixth Edition, Volumes 2 and 3, 1993, American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists. mhttp:// m American Industrial Hygiene Association Web Site for Emergency Response Planning Guidelines ERPGs National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) web site containing documentation for Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) concentrations Toxicity References

8 Lower Explosive Limit as Propane: LEL as Propane: 2.1% Propane Heat: Measure Temperature and convert to FED Heat Other Hazards

9 Evaluate the thermal decomposition products of existing burnthrough compliant insulation and structural systems in full-scale B-707 and box burnthrough tests. Assess the toxicity of the 3 material systems  Determine the maximum full-scale and box test yields for each gas for the three material systems tested.  Select appropriate toxic gas limit for each gas. Obtain toxic gas limit for lab-scale using the gas scaling factors.  Determine FEDs for each gas. Base FED on 5 minute observed concentration. Assume 5 minute exposure duration at that concentration.  FEDs should agree for full scale and lab scale.  Determine if the total FEDs are acceptable  Select which gases should be measured for future lab tests Set pass criteria for small-scale tests Development of Lab-Scale Decomposition Product Limits

10 Determine Toxicity of Lab-Scale Decomposition Products Use ERPG3 LC 50 C Incapacitation Tox Limit Selection: (for 5 min exposure) C I Or LC 50 Data Available ERPG3 Availabl e Select Lowest Yes No Yes No Use IDLH Gas Tox Limit Highest Full- Scale Test Gas Scaling Factor Box Test Gas Conc. at 5 minutes (for particular gas) Avg.Gas Scaling Factor (for 3 material systems) Lab-Scale Tox Limit Multiply

11 Determine Toxicity of Lab-Scale Decomposition Products

12 Next * Obtain Scaling Factors for each Gas and Check resultant Box Test FEDs

13 Lab-Scale Decomposition Product Limits for Material Systems Similar To The 3 Systems Tested Highest Box Test Concentration (for 3 material systems) For each gas (CO, HCN, and SO2) at 5 minutes: Box Test Concentration Limit X 0.4 =

14 Gas Full-Scale Yields at 5 min (ppm) Lab-Scale Yields at 5 min (ppm)Scaling Factor PAN/Met PVF FG/Ceramic Barrier/Met PVF (260 Sec) Structural Composite PAN/Met PVF FG/Cer amic Barrier/ Met PVF Structur al Compos ite PAN/M et PVF FG/ Ceramic Barrier/Me t PVF (260 Sec) Struct ural Comp osite Mid at 5'6" Fwd at 5'6" Mid at 5'6" Fwd at 5'6" Mid at 5'6" Fwd at 5'6" C6H5NH C6H5OH C6H CH2CHCHO #DIV/0! ND COCl ND#DIV/0!ND COF ND #DIV/0! COS >40ND1.6 HBr ND HCl ND 7.0 HCN #DIV/0!ND HCN (peak) HF #DIV/0! ND NH NO ND NO ND SO ND11.1 SO2 (peak) CO CO THC as C3H Oxygen Deplet

15 Set Decomposition Product Limits for Lab-Scale Tests

16 Determine Toxicity of Lab-Scale Decomposition Products

17 Gases Measured By FTIR Flammable Gases C2H2C2H2 Acetylene C2H4C2H4 Ethylene C2H6C2H6 Ethane C3H8C3H8 Propane C 6 H 5 NH 2 Aniline C 6 H 5 OHPhenol C6H6C6H6 Benzene CH 2 CHCHOAcrolein CH 4 Methane Other Gases CO 2 Carbon Dioxide H2OH2OWater N2ON2ONitrous Oxide Toxic Gases C 6 H 5 NH 2 Aniline C 6 H 5 OHPhenol C6H6C6H6 Benzene CH 2 CHCHOAcrolein CH 4 Methane COCarbon Monoxide CO 2 Carbon Dioxide COCl 2 Phosgene COF 2 Carbonyl Fluoride COSCarbonyl Sulfide HBrHydrogen Bromide HCLHydrogen Chloride HCNHydrogen Cyanide HFHydrofluoric Acid NH 3 Ammonia NONitrogen Oxide NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide

18 Material Systems Tested

19 Spectra at 5 Minutes SO2