Evaluating 1:1 Initiatives and Other Technology Initiatives The MassCUE Evaluators Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2011
Phase Four: Process Improvement. “The beauty of using PTR in the implementation of programs of study is its focus on using data to analyze problems and.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Lessons Learned from District Tech Audits Sun Associates
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Evaluating Your Technology Initiative How do you know it’s working? The MassCUE Evaluators Program Let us know you’re here!
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Needs Assessment Presented By Ernest D. Pérez Capacity Building Assistance Trainer BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION Tucson, Arizona CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Crown Point Schools Systems Accreditation November 24, 2014.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment Documenting the Impact of Instructional Technology Initiatives.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
PROGRAM Perkins III Accountability and Continuous Improvement “Work in Progress” at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Mary Jacquart Minnesota State.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Slide number 1 Annex H Review Of Nursing In The Community Proposed Activities to End March 2007 Kevin Martin Eugenio Grandi.
MassCUE4You Individual Technology Evaluation for Districts Let us know you’re here!
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
Data for Decision-Making Assessing the impact of technology implementation and professional development.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Project Description FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Vision, Goals and Outcomes  Vision, Goals.
Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating 1:1 Initiatives and Other Technology Initiatives The MassCUE Evaluators Program

zSun Associates yProgram evaluators yState and local initiatives ywww.sun-associates.com/masscuewww.sun-associates.com/masscue zOur take on evaluation yEvaluation is a part of a strategic approach to project planning and implementation yLinks vision to goals to actions to measures

MassCUE Evaluators zA professional development project that helps districts integrate evaluation within projects: yClearly articulate goals yPlan and coordinate activities strategically yDevelop performance measures zThe majority of the districts currently in the program are focusing on designing evaluations for iPad and 1:1 initiatives.

zBedford zBurlington zConcord zNeedham zReading zWayland zDanvers zDuxbury zHopkinton zHudson zWinchester

zIn our experience, most projects need to answer the “What’s the value?” question. zParticularly, the educational – teaching and learning – value. zPreparing for this in advance can insure a smooth progression for your project.

A Strategic Approach zIt starts with a central claim yHow will this initiative positively impact teaching and learning? yWhat issues does this initiative address, and what solutions does it propose? yYour claim should connect to core values of teaching and learning…not just the need for technology.

zThe claim will be supported by data on how your project goals are addressed, and ultimately through evaluation, how well your project is meeting the claim. yCurrent status – documenting the situation before your implementation yFormative assessment – documenting the impact your project is having

Indicators and Outcomes

zIndicators are developed by a committee of stakeholders to your project … the MassCUE Evaluators team! yTeachers, administrators, technology staff, and others yThis also generates broad buy-in to the project and its perceived value…which is helpful in terms of sustainability

Gathering Data zThe next task is to develop data collection tools and to collect data based on the indicators yTeachers yStudents yParents/Community yTechnical

zObservations zSurveys zFocus Groups zRelevant Technical and Cost Information MassCUE Evaluators learn how to create and use these data collection tools

Analysis zWith data in-hand, the task is to analyze the collected data against the indicators yThe indicators serve as performance benchmarks zFindings provide the answer to the basic question of yIs the project accomplishing what it set out to do? yIn sum, this is what the evaluation addresses.

zReporting yThe whole point of the evaluation is to communicate the progress – formative and summative – of your project yReporting should be to your school or district community yRemember, you can report on your current status…and this establishes the baseline for the gains and benefits that your project will bring.

Other Benefits of the Process zThe evaluation provides data that can guide the scaling up of initiatives yWhat’s working in the pilot? yWhat needs to be tweaked in the next round of the project implementation?

Summary Points zCentral Claim – what are you aiming for? zIndicators – what domains does your project address? zBaseline Data Collection – establishes “readiness” and identifies strategic priorities for your project to address zOn-Going Data Collection – Observations, surveys, focus groups, etc. zFormative/Summative Reporting – communicating success and engaging your community in the project’s implementation

How to Join zThe next cohort starts in January zwww.masscue.org zwww.sun-associates.com/masscuewww.sun-associates.com/masscue