Vancouver Charter Section 396F “Exemptions for Not-Profit Corporations” Standing Committee on City Services & Budgets September 22, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
William H. Bowen School of Law. service – learning program of two schools UALR Bowen School of Law University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service.
Advertisements

Seekonk Board of Assessors
September 5, 2014 CCRESA Strategy Session © Confidential © Allen, Pinnix & Nichols, P.A. September 5, 2014 Central Carolina RESA Organization Formalization.
Washtenaw County Strategic Space Plan Recommendations November 1, 2006.
School Community Council Overview & Orientation Hawaii Department of Education For Training Use Only Office of Curriculum Instruction and Student Support.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Australian Council of Social Service Charity Law and the NFP Reforms ACOSS Charity Law Briefing Sydney, 10 August 2012 Supported by NAB Dr Tessa Boyd-Caine,
NON-PROFIT ORGANISATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA. Introduction Recognised under South African Law for more than a century Role in society has now become very.
United Way of Northern Arizona 2013 Community Impact Forum.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Regional Governance: Lessons from Alberta and Elsewhere Subhead Goes Here Bullet points or copy goes here Bullet points or copy goes here Bullet points.
INCORPORATING AND REGISTERING A CHARITY MAY 2014 PART 1: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REGISTERED CHARITY AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION CA COMMUNITY AMBASSADORS.
SOCIAL HOUSING. New governance and accountability arrangements for Local Aboriginal Land Councils (LALCs); Introduced the requirement for formal community.
Convention Center Community Coalition 1. Time Line 2008: Feasibility Study by CS&L May 2009: Follow-Up Data April 2010: Appleton Council/Mayor Appoint.
P. Gurstein & A. Lesnikowski, UBC Vancouver Presented At ACSP 2014 Conference.
The Brownfield Opportunity Area Program OER-NPCR Capacity Building Workshop November 23, 2010.
Financial Management in Not-for-Profit Businesses
LIVING WELL FOUNDATION  Living Well Foundation was established to receive, invest and administer tax- deductible contributions for the benevolent support.
Association of Indiana Counties Tax Caps Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy? Tax caps are a good policy but is 3, 2, 1 a good policy?
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Community Benefit Sharing Responsibility, Improving Community Health Kristin D. Wilson, PhD, MHA Department of Health Management and Policy Saint Louis.
Alliance Management Group Tax Year 2012 Update 1.
Wakulla County 2 nd Budget Workshop for FY2009/2010.
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION NOVEMBER 4, 2014 Alternative Veterans Tax Exemption Summary.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA 1 The Government of Canada and the Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector: Moving Forward Together Presentation to Civil Society Excellence:
May 1, 2012 HOT TOPICS IN REAL ESTATE Presented by Alexander Fane and Olga Rivkin.
1 A Framework for Comprehensive Planning City of Sunset Valley.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
HOUSING INCENTIVE POLICY February 20, 2010 Presentation to Area Banks.
Annual COSCDA Training Conference CDBG Disaster Recovery: Renovation, Reconstruction, and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods A. Elizabeth.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Changes in the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the Municipal Statute Law Amendment Act, 2006 for Business Improvement Areas April 3, 2007.
Developing new national partnership approaches between Credit Unions and Social Housing Providers CfRC Conference 2013 Gareth Evans Associate Research.
Revising the Corporations Act A Brief to the Sector.
 Identify current issues in both IL and AL  Review benefits of IL and AL and interaction with home support/care services  Recommend actions to support,
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Redevelopment of the Georgia-Pacific Mill Site, Fort Bragg, CA. Options and Alternatives for Public Participation in the Planning Process Neil Peacock.
1 Proposed amendments to the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (NEMA) July 2007 Presentation by Joanne Yawitch.
Rates Policy Review Presentation 2013 CITY OF JOHANNESBURG.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Revision to the Historic Preservation Tax Exemptions and Economic Development Incentives.
September 8, 2015 Update Housing Committee September 8, 2015 Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for Dallas.
CITY OF NANAIMO Revenue Policy Update October 26, 2015.
Understanding Cultural Planning Considering a Cultural Plan for Erie and Niagara Counties Impact and Issues Presented to the Greater Buffalo Cultural Alliance.
North Vancouver Recreation Commission Needs Assessment/Facility Plan Presentation to FONVCA.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
University of Wyoming Financial Reporting Initiative Update April 2016.
Surplus City Property – Request for Proposals Administration & Finance Committee February 1, 2012.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Department of Municipal Affairs Community Sustainability Partnership.
Municipal Delivery of Seniors Housing: MUNICIPAL HOUSING CORPORATIONS September 22, 2015.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Open Door Program Presentation to Affordable Housing Committee Sean Gadon, Director Affordable Housing Office June 20, 2016.
A TOUR OF FLORIDA’S BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
5/26/2018 Community Hall Review Community Services.
Property Tax 101 Web: Direct:
6/12/2018 Grant Programs Review.
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Affordable Housing in Pittsburgh
Administration and Corporate Services
GATEWAY CITIES Gateway Cities agenda CONFERENCE Draft recommendations
Setting up a Charitable Company
2019 BUDGET SUMMARY March 12, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Vancouver Charter Section 396F “Exemptions for Not-Profit Corporations” Standing Committee on City Services & Budgets September 22, 2011

Delete box & place your logo here 2 CoV has had a longstanding, unique provision - s396(1) - that provides statutory exemptions to a range of eligible charities & NPOs Similar statutory provision is not available in the Community Charter; other BC municipalities rely solely on the permissive provision to exempt charities & NPOs The Province enacted s396F in July 2010; the City did not request this addition s396F provides Council expanded permissive authority to exempt a broader range of NPOs above and beyond the existing statutory exemptions available under s396(1) Addition of s396F to Vancouver Charter

Delete box & place your logo here 3 Statutory Exemptions (s396(1)) prescriptive; eligibility requirements set by legislation, not Council administered by BC Assessment application defined and refined by Property Assessment Appeal Board and court decisions, not Council Permissive Exemptions (s396A, s396C, s396E) “optional”, discretionary tax relief –Heritage Property (s396A), Riparian Property (s396C), and Revitalization (s396E) eligibility requirements set by Council application approved by Council by 2/3 votes maximum term up to 10 years Statutory & Permissive Exemptions Available in Vancouver Charter prior to s396F

Delete box & place your logo here 4 It has been Council policy to rely on the statutory property tax exemptions available under s396(1) and limit the use of permissive property tax exemptions to heritage properties only (s396A). It has been longstanding Council policy to not extend any property tax exemptions to tenants. Property taxes and any exemptions, if eligible, are applicable to property owners, not tenants. How property owners share these costs with their tenants is beyond the City’s jurisdiction. Council Policies on Property Tax Exemptions

Delete box & place your logo here 5 PRE-CHARTER AMENDMENT… statutory exemptions under s396(1) charitable institutions are exempt if… –an incorporated charitable institution is the registered owner or owner under agreement, of the real property, and –the real property is in actual occupation by the incorporated charitable institution and is wholly in use for charitable purposes administered by BC Assessment; Council approval not required application defined and refined by Property Assessment Appeal Board and court decisions, not Council Statutory Exemptions s396(1) - Charitable & Not-for-Profit Corporations

Delete box & place your logo here 6 CHARTER AMENDMENT… permissive exemptions under s396F provides Council expanded authority to exempt “not for profit corporations” which would not otherwise qualify for statutory exemptions under s396(1) –"not for profit corporation" means a charitable, philanthropic or other not for profit corporation –“eligible not for profit property” means property of which a not for profit corporation is the registered owner or owner under agreement, or that is held by a not for profit corporation, and that Council considers are used for a purpose that is directly related to the purposes of the not for profit corporation Permissive Exemptions s396F - Charitable & Not-for-Profit Corporations

Delete box & place your logo here 7 CHARTER AMENDMENT… Council has full authority over this process –set program objectives –define eligibility requirements, terms and conditions –approve individual exemptions (full or partial) maximum term of exemption is 10 years by-law enactment by Oct 31 to be effective the following tax year Permissive Exemptions s396F - Charitable & Not-for-Profit Corporations

Delete box & place your logo here 8 Eligibility Requirements: s396(1) vs. s396F Statutory Exemptions (s396(1))Permissive Exemptions (s396F) ScopeIncorporated charitable institutions A much broader scope of NPOs including charitable, philanthropic and other NPOs not eligible for statutory exemptions under s396(1) Nature of work Must be charitable in natureMay operate for any purpose other than profit Does not need to be charitable in nature May not align with Council priorities Form of property occupancy Property must be owned and occupied by an incorporated charitable institution, and wholly in use for charitable purposes Not limited to owned property Applicable to any form of occupancy Given such broad definition, it is up to Council to limit application through policy.

Delete box & place your logo here 9 Given the existing statutory exemptions available under s396(1), is there a need for an alternative mechanism to support NPOs that do not qualify for exemptions? Staff approach: review and assess effectiveness of CoV’s approach to supporting charities & NPOs quantify CoV’s financial and in-kind support for charities & NPOs benchmark with neighboring municipalities make recommendation on an effective, targeted support framework Addition of s396F to Vancouver Charter - Permissive Exemptions for NPOs?

Delete box & place your logo here 10 ~25,000 incorporated non-profit organizations (NPOs) in BC –some are registered charities with Canada Revenue Agency ~2,500 in Vancouver (in good standing) must operate exclusively for charitable purposes –relief of poverty –advancement of education –advancement of religion –purposes beneficial to the community –some NPOs focus on services that align with Council priorities housing, childcare, cultural, community service –include veteran groups Quick Facts on NPOs

Delete box & place your logo here 11 statutory property tax exemptions under s396(1) tax relief for Class 3 - Supportive Housing designated by the Province operating and capital grants for NPOs that provide specific Council defined community benefits –Infrastructure-related –Program-based –Neighborhood-based –Capacity development –Childcare –Sustainability-related access to City-owned space at reduced or nominal rents DCL relief for non-market housing projects Current CoV Support Programs for NPOs

Delete box & place your logo here 12 CoV Financial & In-kind Support for NPOs (2009) Benchmark with neighboring municipalities based on available information Note: In 2011, there are 68 Class 3 “Supportive Housing” properties in Vancouver resulting in total forgone tax of $0.7M.

Delete box & place your logo here 13 Over the years, Vancouver has been a leader in supporting community partners through tax exemptions and grants. Regional Benchmarking (2009) Support for NPOs – Tax Exemptions & Grants Municipalities: Burnaby, Coquitlam, North Vancouver (District), Richmond, Saanich, Surrey, and Victoria

Delete box & place your logo here 14 NPOs in Vancouver Benefiting from Statutory Property Tax Exemptions - 2,500 registered charities in Vancouver - housing - childcare - cultural - community service - 12% owner/occupiers - 94% of property owned are fully/partially exempt from property tax - 6% of property owned are taxable - 88% tenants - 20% of rented property are fully/partially exempt from property tax - 80% of rented property are taxable

Delete box & place your logo here 15 Statutory Exemptions under s396(1) (2009) - $12B (7%) of non-CoV property is exempt from tax on the Assessment Roll under s396(1) - If taxable, these properties would have generated $120M tax - incl. 210 NPO properties ($5.7M forgone tax) - incl. 300 church properties ($1.9M forgone tax)

Delete box & place your logo here 16 Effectiveness of Tax Exemptions vs. Grants as a Tool to Support NPOs Tax ExemptionsGrants EquityApplicable to owner/occupier type NPOs only Applicable to owner/occupier and tenant type NPOs FairnessAssessment-based – support ties to property value, not public benefits of programs and services Program-based – support ties to public benefits of programs and services FlexibilityCan be effected only once a year at prescribed assessment schedules Can be adjusted anytime to align with Council priorities and fiscal capacity AdministrationStatutory – BC Assessment Permissive – labor-intensive, additional CoV staff required Existing resource within grant programs

Delete box & place your logo here 17 There are 2 primary veteran organizations: –The Royal Canadian Legion (8 branches) –The Army, Navy & Air Force Veterans (5 units) Together, these groups occupy 12 taxable properties –9 owned & 3 leased –2011 general purpose tax $236,000 Historically, these organizations have not met the eligibility requirements for statutory exemptions under s396(1) –the ones in Vancouver are not registered charities –from an assessment perspective, they seem to operate primarily as social clubs and have not been able to demonstrate that their properties are designated for charitable use Quick Facts on Veteran Organizations

Delete box & place your logo here 18 Tax Exemptions Given the limited use of their facility for dedicated charitable purposes, providing permissive exemption would not be consistent with Council policy. Most neighboring municipalities share this view –some provide partial exemptions which exclude pub business –others do not provide exemptions at all –most have only 1 veteran property within their jurisdiction Staff do not support providing permissive exemptions to these properties. Support for Veteran Organizations

Delete box & place your logo here 19 Other Financial Support Discussion is underway between BC Assessment and the veteran organizations to determine whether or how they qualify for statutory exemptions under s396(1). Should Council wish to provide any financial support to these organizations, staff recommend that such support be program- based (grants) rather than assessment-based (permissive exemptions) to ensure alignment with Council priorities and community needs. Support for Veteran Organizations

Delete box & place your logo here 20 Many of the properties are potentially valuable sites with redevelopment potential, some in neighborhoods where demand for housing, childcare and other social infrastructure needs are critical. Staff could further explore strategic partnership opportunities with these organizations which would serve to advance Council priorities and provide opportunity to continue their community work. Other Opportunities for Veteran Organizations

Delete box & place your logo here 21 CoV support for NPOs is substantial & the highest in the region –2009 financial & in-kind contribution $37.4M ($59.5 per capita) Grants are the best option for supporting NPOs –more accountability and transparency –more flexible and can be adjusted to align with Council priorities & community needs –closely align with benefits for Vancouver residents –regularly reviewed for alignment with strategic goals Summary

Delete box & place your logo here 22 Recommendation THAT Council continue to support not-for-profit organizations through the existing range of statutory property tax exemptions available under Section 396(1) of the Vancouver Charter and the City’s grant programs; and THAT no further permissive property tax exemptions be considered at this time. Property Tax Exemptions

Delete box & place your logo here 23 Advisory:Corporate Management Team Work Team:Financial Planning & Analysis Revenue Services Cultural Services Housing Policy Social Infrastructure Social Policy External:BC Assessment Neighboring municipalities which participated in the survey Project Team