ASDC Ingest Automation Efforts through Collaboratory for quAlity Metadata Preservation (CAMP) Presented by: Aubrey Beach (Booz Allen Hamilton, NASA ASDC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Strategic Plan Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to IDN Task Team, WGISS25.
Advertisements

Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval WP1. Project Management.
EOSDIS Common Metadata Repository (CMR) Unified Metadata Model for Collections (UMM-C) Meeting June 12, 2014.
NASA COMMON METADATA REPOSITORY (CMR) Update and Near Term Plans – CEOS WGISS 37 1 Andrew Mitchell Earth Science Data and Information Systems (ESDIS) National.
Sustainable Preservation Services for Archivists through Distributed Custody Caryn Wojcik State of Michigan Records Management Services.
Redesigning Technical Services By Reconceptualizing Staff University of Connecticut Libraries Francine M. DeFranco Living the Future VI April 7, 2006.
CSSE 375 Software Construction and Evolution: Configuration Management
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Data Ingest Automation GHRC Status and Plans Helen Conover GHRC DAAC Operations Manager Presented at ESIP Summer Meeting 2015.
WLIA Spring Regional June 5, 2014 DOA ENTERPRISE GEOPORTAL REPOSITORY PROJECT.
Data Governance Data & Metadata Standards Antonio Amorin © 2011.
Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS Presented by Randy Fischer, Programmer, Florida Center for Library Automation, University of Florida DigCCurr2007.
The HDF Group July 8, 2014HDF 2014 ESIP Summer Meeting HDF Product Designer Aleksandar Jelenak, H. Joe Lee, Ted Habermann The.
SharePoint and SharePoint Online: Today and what's next? Presented by Luke Abeling – IT Platforms.
Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) provides access to more than 3,000 types of Earth science data products and specialized services.
Working Group: Practical Policy Rainer Stotzka, Reagan Moore.
Updates from EOSDIS -- as they relate to LANCE Kevin Murphy LANCE UWG, 23rd September
GCMD/IDN STATUS AND PLANS Stephen Wharton CWIC Meeting February19, 2015.
Consumerconsumer producerproducer DELIVERY SIP DATA MGMT AIPDIP ARCHIVAL STORAGE ACCESSACCESS INGESTIONINGESTION OAIS REFERENCE MODEL Submission Info Pkg.
Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management ServicesSALT DCAPE.
Cyberinfrastructure - Collaborative Portal for the IOOS Super-Regional Modeling Testbed Sara Graves, Manil Maskey, Ken Keiser Information Technology &
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Consolidated Metadata Repository (CMR) Status and Look Ahead CWIC 2015 Annual Meeting, February 18-19, 2015 This work was supported by NASA/GSFC under.
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
Using the Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) to Promote and Discover ESIP Data, Services, and Climate Visualizations Presented by GCMD Staff January.
Using Portals and Registries: Publishing Metadata to GCMD Lola Olsen 1, Tyler Stevens 2, 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 2 Wyle.
Automated Assessment Management System. The Assessment Cycle Trainee | Learner Dashboard Trainer Dashboard Employer Dashboard Verifier Dashboard Assessor.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
DM_PPT_NP_v01 UTC Participant Survey Results Kathleen L Carr October 13, 2015.
Lesson 1: Examining Professional Project Management Topic 1A: Identify Project Management Processes.
1 Not So Strange Bedfellows: Information Standards For Librarians AND Publishers November 6, 2015.
Fedora and the Preservation of University Electronic Records Project NHPRC Electronic Records Research Grant Kevin L. Glick Manuscripts and Archives, Yale.
Kara Pharris Web Designer Site Improvements & the Usability Project Concepts for usable navigation, functionality and presentation.
KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member Mr. David Hancock, Science Software Development.
CIWQS Review Phase II: Evaluation and Final Recommendations March 14, 2008.
ECS Metadata Considerations for Preservation SiriJodha S. Khalsa National Snow and Ice Data Center.
NDSR Boston webinar: Provide module Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern December 2015.
More Information Working Group Composition End Users Data Modelers Data Analysts Airborne Measurement Scientists Airborne Instrument Scientists Data Management.
LPDAAC/USGS_EROS CMR Metadata Reconciliation Meeting March 4-5, 2015.
NSIDC CMR Metadata Reconciliation Meeting December 10-11, 2014.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Long Term Archival of ECS Data Held at the National Snow and Ice Data Center.
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Mission “To assist the scientific community in the discovery of Earth science data, related services, and ancillary.
Advertising your data Alecia Aleman 1, Ruth Duerr 2 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 2 National Snow and Ice Data Center, University.
Santi Thompson - Metadata Coordinator Annie Wu - Head, Metadata and Bibliographic Services 2013 TCDL Conference Austin, TX.
ESO and the CMR Life Cycle Process Winter ESIP, Jan 2015 ESDIS Standards Office (ESO) Yonsook Enloe Allan Doyle Helen Conover.
1 Raytheon EED Program | ECHO Technical Interchange 2013.
DM_PPT_NP_v01 Configuration Management of UMM Models January 2016.
Collection-Based Persistent Archives Arcot Rajasekar, Richard Marciano, Reagan Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center Presented by: Preetham A Gowda.
Overview of the BI Tools – Enterprise CoE Scope of Services
LP DAAC Overview – Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center Chris Doescher LP DAAC Project Manager (605) Chris Torbert.
Agenda Leads work – Track Status Admin / Upcoming / Next Steps – RFP Document review – Vendor Question Review – GL Preparation – Orals – Harris.
DAAC Roles with Common Metadata Repository (CMR) ESDIS System Engineering Technical Interchange November 2014 Copyright © 2014 Raytheon Company. All Rights.
ESDIS Standards Office Yonsook Enloe, CTSI 3/2/ FGDC Meeting1.
Introduction to the GEOSS Registries: Components, Services, and Standards Doug Nebert U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee June 2007.
Project Management PTM721S
Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS
NDMC NASA –JPL Project Activities Update: Objectives and Deliverables
Proposal for piloting the VIRTA publication information service at the European level Janne Pölönen, Hanna-Mari Puuska and Gunnar Sivertsen.
Big Earth Data Initiative (BEDI) Metadata Improvement: Case Studies
Persistent Identifiers Implementation in EOSDIS
AGU Paper Number: IN43B-1697 Evolving a NASA Digital Object Identifiers System with Community Engagement Lalit Wanchoo1 and Nathan.
Marie Waltz Center for Research Libraries
WGISS-45 International Directory Network (IDN) Report
Project Initiatives Identified by the CIA Project
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
Presentation transcript:

ASDC Ingest Automation Efforts through Collaboratory for quAlity Metadata Preservation (CAMP) Presented by: Aubrey Beach (Booz Allen Hamilton, NASA ASDC) Tiffany Mathews (SSAI, NASA ASDC) Emily Northup (SSAI, NASA ASDC)

Ingest Process Redesign ●Metadata Consistency ●Redundant metadata capture/dissemination o DSR, Operations Agreement, Interface Control Document, Digital Object Identifiers ●Limited knowledge amongst DAAC staff of ingest processes ●No User Working Group feedback ●No Change Management Board review ●No centralized portal for science team and data providers to review metadata ●No transparent process for data providers Original Driving Factors:

Collaboratory for quAlity Metadata Preservation (CAMP) will address the need to effectively collect and maintain collection level metadata for data products archived at the ASDC. CAMP will provide: Metadata consistency across alike data collections An interactive user interface to o Allow ASDC data product managers to maintain and validate metadata o Allow outside science teams to create, update, and/or modify metadata An expedited process for data discovery, delivery, metrics, and reporting for new products Diminished data input redundancy (ICD, OA, GCMD DIF, ECHO, CMR, etc.) Ingest Process Redesign

●Met with ASDC Product Managers to document the current process ●Researched the ingest process of other DAAC’s; most notably NSIDC ●Evaluated ASDC requirements and recommendations ●Created an ingest process workflow Ingest Process Redesign Goal: To create a formalized and transparent procedure that new/existing data providers can follow to ingest new data products. Completed:

Ingest Process Redesign Goal: To create a formalized and transparent procedure that new/existing data providers can follow to ingest new data products. In Progress: ●Database schema set up ○Participated in review cycles for UMM to maintain consistency across NASA DAACs ●Ingest Global Master Change Directory (GCMD) products into the CAMP database ○Using the DIF-10 schema ●2015 Big Earth Data Initiative (BEDI) ○Using CAMP database for BEDI Reconciliation effort

Ingest Process Redesign Goal: To create a formalized and transparent procedure that new/existing data providers can follow to ingest new data products. Next Steps: ●Design and development of an intuitive user interface to streamline the addition and review of new products ●Ability to export metadata to required DAAC documentation ●Integration with additional internal DAAC systems ●Implement user roles for reviewing and updating metadata ○General User ○Affiliated User ○Account Manager ○Product Reviewer ○Product Administrator

BACK UP

Ingest Process Redesign Data Submission Request (DSR) Goal: Collect basic requirements needed for an initial determination if ASDC will ingest new data product ●Require data providers to complete DSR for cursory Integrated Product Team (IPT) review ○IPT – cross-cutting teams involved in the Ingest process ○IPT adds DSR to upcoming CMB agenda for review ○If denied, a rejection justification is sent to the data provider ■The provider may correct issues with DSR and re-submit to IPT for consideration Example Questions: ●Have the data products undergone user product evaluations and/or independent quality review processes? ●Storage volume/frequency, etc. ●How is this expected to be funded? ●Identify what services the data center can provide to distribute the data

Assembled development team Reviewed existing data ingest process Identification of fields in the GCMD DIF, EMS, DSR, ICD, OA, DOI, & CMR (in progress) Mapped fields in documents (identified redundancies) Identified a need for a new data ingest form Completed Operations Concept for the User Interface Set up production environment Creating Project Schedule Complete tasks identified in project schedule Present a working metadata interface Suggested fields for CAMP with examples Each row is a different metadata field and each column is a different form, cells containing content are across all columns reflects metadata redundancy. Ingest Process Redesign