OPERATIONS STEERING COMMITTEE Communications Team Kick-Off Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
29 May GNSO Improvements Top Level Plan 29 May 2009 Plan distributed 22 May by Avri.
Advertisements

Developing a Permanent Charter for the Commercial Stakeholder Group June 22, 2010 Sarah Deutsch, CSG Representative/BC.
STAFF Implement Proposed action STAFF – Assess (initial AND revisions based on feedback) Implementation change? Policy guidance needed? Admin/error update?
OPERATIONS STEERING COMMITTEE Constituency Operations Team Kick-Off Meeting February 28, 2009 Interim Chair: Olga Cavalli.
Report on Independent Review Schedule Update on GNSO Improvement Process December 2006 Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development.
GNSO/Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
SAP Jam Kickoff Meeting (your name here) April 11, 2013 © Copyright All rights reserved.
Public Involvement and Outreach Pinellas Planning Council September 14, 2006.
OPERATIONS STEERING COMMITTEE GNSO Operations Team Kick-Off Meeting March 1, 2009 Interim Chair: Ken Stubbs.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
Draft APRALO-ICANN APAC Hub Pilot Framework Kelvin Wong | ICANN 52 | 10 February 2015.
Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.
Monitoring Policy Implementation Michelle Murton, School Nutritionist.
CREATING THE ENTERPRISE SOCIAL MEDIA GAME PLAN September 2013.
AWARE PROJECT – AGEING WORKFORCE TOWARDS AN ACTIVE RETIREMENT Alberto Ferreras-Remesal Institute of Biomechanics of Valencia IFA 2012 – Prague – May 31th.
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Registrars SG Briefing- Vertical Integration Special Trademark Issues Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 8 March 2010.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
Update report on GNSO- requested Whois studies Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor 7–12 March 2010.
PDP Improvements Update & Discussion. | 2 Background  Ten proposed improvements aimed to streamline and enhance the GNSO PDP Ten proposed improvements.
Final Report on Improvements to the RAA Steve Metalitz 5 December 2010.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
NSDI Strategic Plan Overview NSDI Leaders Forum Meeting March 7, 2013.
PDP Team Introduction: Jeff Neuman PDP Team Introduction: Jeff Neuman Current GNSO PDP Overview Current GNSO PDP Overview Goals of PDP Work Team Goals.
School Improvement Plans & EESACs Charter Schools August 6, 2010 Charter Schools August 6, 2010.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting September 10, 2013.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.
Text. #ICANN49 Data & Metrics for Policy Making Working Group Thursday 27 March 2014 – 08:00.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
MarkeTrak Lessons Learned Summary Report Retail Market Subcommittee February 14, 2007 Adam Martinez & Scott Egger Market Operations Division Projects Organization.
Policy Development Process Committee Report to the Community, April 2011 Lee Howard, Committee Chair.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
3/17/2008AMATS: Anchorage Metropolitan Transportation Solutions AMATS Air Quality Advisory Committee Informational Update March18, 2008.
Text #ICANN51 GAC / GNSO Joint Meeting 12 October 2014.
Transfers Task Force Briefing ICANN Domain Names Council Meeting March 12, 2002 Registry Registrar BRegistrar A.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Meeting September 12, 2013.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
Initial Operating Capability Task Force (IOCTF) Status Briefing September 21, 2008.
IDN UPDATE Tina Dam ICANN Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Public Forum, Wellington 30 March 2006.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt October, 2009.
East Hudson Regional Trail Council August 10, 2015.
GNSO Public Council Meeting Wednesday, 17 July 2013.
Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 04 December 2015.
Eurostat 1 3.An overview of the SDMX implementation process Edward Cook Eurostat Unit B5: “Central data and metadata services” SDMX Basics course,
GNSO/Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
Work Prioritization Model (WPM) Team Status Update Olga Cavalli Chair – WPM Team 10 March 2010 Presented to: GNSO Council.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update August NSDI Strategic Plan – Purpose/Scope Purpose: Develop a concise, updated strategic plan to guide the Federal government’s.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
GNSO Council Operations Work Team Ray Fassett Work Team Chair October 2009.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
‘Thick’ Whois PDP Items for Review. Items for Review GNSO Policy Development Process ‘thick’ Whois Issue Report DT’s Mission WG Charter Template.
GNSO Council Restructure Enhance & Support SGs/Constituencies Improve Communications & Coordination Revise the Policy Development Process Adopt a WG Model.
Quantum Leap Project Management
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
ECO-RCC Steering Committee Meeting 16 February 2017, Ankara
CUCSA Workgroup Chair Orientation
Implementation Review Team Meeting
2017/8 NomCom Review: Status Update
2017 RSSAC Organizational Review – Overview
IT Governance Planning Overview
GAC Standards and Work Processes Overview
ECO-RCC Steering Committee Meeting 16 February 2017, Ankara
Presentation transcript:

OPERATIONS STEERING COMMITTEE Communications Team Kick-Off Meeting 1 March 2009 Interim Chair: Mason Cole

Communications Team: Who We Are Interim Chair: Mason Cole - Registrar Constituency Sedar Acir - Registrar contact for Turkish Registry Chris Chaplow - Commercial and Business Users Constituency Steve Holsten - Registries Constituency Zbynek Loebl - Intellectual Property Constituency Catherine Sigmar - Registries Constituency Nick Wood - Intellectual Property Constituency

Communications Team Kick-Off Meeting Draft Agenda Call to order and introductions Review agenda Background discussion: Context for our work (these slides) Review and discussion of Communications Work Team charter current problems desired outcomes deliverables timelines Discussion of / agreement to procedure for finalizing Communications Work Team charter, including proposed timeline Timeline for interim Communications Work Team chair and procedure for selecting permanent chair; vice-chair Agree to regular teleconference meeting times All other business 3

Why We’re Here Context for Our Work: Problems Identified (LSE Report) September 2006 review of GNSO by London School of Economics (LSE) said to the ICANN Board that, in part, communications problems hinder the work of the GNSO LSE found specific problems: Inconsistency among Constituency websites confuses both new and existing members. The ICANN website doesn’t showcase the GNSO properly. Too few people with a stake in GNSO work know what the GNSO is or how to contribute to the work. Documents are poorly and inconsistently organized, making progress and decisions difficult to track. 4

Why We’re Here Other Reasons It’s Hard to Communicate with the GNSO Unique language of ICANN Gap in understanding between “policy” and “market” sides Lack of context in communications: ICANN’s work will eventually achieve precisely what objective? Time lag in development of policy and contribution of affected parties 5

What We’re Supposed To Do Work Team Draft Charter Goals The Board endorsed the LSE recommendations(*), and based on these the CCT is to develop proposals for Council consideration. These should include, but aren’t limited to: - Revised / new GNSO website and online collaboration tools - Better document management capabilities - Revised / new ability to solicit public comments on its work - How to better coordinate with other ICANN structures - How to better communicate with Support Orgs and Advisory Cmtes - How to improve Board awareness of GNSO issues (*)As encapsulated in the Board Governance Committee Working Group's February 2008 Final Report on GNSO Improvements 6

More Specifics on Board Recommendations Develop new GNSO website requirements Collaboration tools: scheduling, discussions, templates, knowledge base, blogs / wikis, information sharing Portal services: create social networks, find teams / people, communication alerts / reminders Search capability: indexing, keywords, relevance, data types, enterprise extensions Content mgmt: authoring, versioning, workflows, check in / out, document security, multi-language support Business processes: web forms, online surveys, dashboards Shared services: common themes / interface, editing, navigation Relevant References in the Board Governance Committee (BGC) GNSO Review Working Group Report on GNSO Improvements   From: 5. Recommendations re: GNSO Council, 5.1 Steps to improve inclusiveness, p. 28, para. 5 to p. 29, para. 1: “We also note that each review of the GNSO Council and constituencies that has been conducted has documented shortcomings in the Council’s communication methods, which serve as a barrier to broader participation and inclusiveness. Improvements are needed in a number of areas. For example, GNSO Council and constituency documents should be more broadly accessible, informative, and understandable by the global community. Most importantly, the GNSO website and online public comment processes should be redesigned and (to the extend possible) made multi-lingual, along the following guidelines: The GNSO website should be simple for everyone to understand and to use; It should be easy to locate information about all current policy issues, and for each issue there should be a succinct summary, links to more detailed information, a status report, and next steps; There should be access to archives of all GNSO Council activity, including Council minutes; There should be links to all constituency websites; and There should be links to other relevant ICANN structures and activities.” 7

More Specifics on Board Recommendations Improve GNSO’s ability to solicit meaningful feedback Prepare a revised process for gathering and addressing public comment on policy issues Take into account developments in technology that facilitate community interaction Prepare a translation plan for documents associated with policy development Recommend ways to monitor and improve effectiveness Relevant References in the Board Governance Committee (BGC) GNSO Review Working Group Report on GNSO Improvements From: 5. Recommendations re: GNSO Council, 5.1 Steps to improve inclusiveness, p. 29, para. 2: “We also recommend that the Council work with Staff to improve the GNSO Council’s document management system and to develop an improved means to solicit meaningful public comments, and to use project management methodologies to implement these improvements and to better support policy development activities. The use of such methodologies was suggested by LSE Rec. #14 and GNSO Self Review Rec. #10.2.7. ICANN is already applying project management methodologies and practices to its policy support activities, and staff should work with the Council and GNSO constituencies to further incorporate these methodologies in the GNSO’s work, as appropriate. The goals is to achieve consistent and predictable ways of organizing and managing activities to improve their quality, transparency, and accountability.” From: 5. Recommendations re: GNSO Council, 5.4 Conclusions, p. 37, para. 8 and p. 38, para. 1 and 2: “Proposed Action Item: The Board Requests (iv) The Council to work with the staff to prepare a revised process for gathering and addressing public comment on policy issues. The revised process should take into account the needs of stakeholders who prefer to work in languages other than English. It should also take into account developments in technology that facilitate community interaction. The revised process should be presented to the Board within six months. ICANN staff should monitor and report on the effectiveness of the changes that have been implemented; and “(v) The Council to work with Staff to prepare a plan translation of documents associated with policy development. The plan should be consistent with other policies and processes being developed for translation within ICANN. The plan, including budget estimates, should be developed within six months.” 8

More Specifics on Board Recommendations Improve GNSO’s coordination with other ICANN structures Recommend ways to enhance contact between: GNSO Council and constituencies Members of Board elected from GNSO Chairs of the GNSO Other SOs and ACs Recommend ways to increase communications within the GNSO among individuals participating in constituencies, working groups and other processes Consider a “GNSO Discussion List” where participants from constituencies, working groups and other GNSO processes have posting rights and contents can be publicly accessed Relevant References in the Board Governance Committee (BGC) GNSO Review Working Group Report on GNSO Improvements From: 7. Recommendations re: Relationships with Other ICANN Bodies, 7.3 Conclusions, p. 48, para. 2-5: “The Council should propose specific ways in which it can improve communications between it and Board Members elected from the GNSO. “Proposed Action Item: The Board requests the Council to report to the Board within six months on the mechanisms that will be put in place to improve communications between the Council and the Board members elected from the GNSO. “There should be more frequent contact and communication among the Chairs of the GNSO, GNSO constituencies, other Supporting Organizations (SOs) and Advisory Committees (ACs), especially in advance of each ICANN Meeting. The Council should also consider other ways in which it can further enhance coordination with other ICANN structures, and report to the Board within six months on such steps. “Proposed Action Item: Staff should propose, within six months, specific ways in which the GNSO can improve coordination with, and among, ICANN’s other SOs and ACs, in consultation with those bodies. Staff should work with all SOs and ACs to develop a communications plan to address this issue more generally.” From: 6. Recommendations re: Constituency Structure, 6.2 Steps to Improve Effectiveness, p. 44, para. 3: Additionally, communication within the GNSO – among individuals participating in its constituencies, working groups and other processes – should be improved. A “GNSO-discussion list” should be created where participants from constituencies, working groups and other GNSO processes have posting rights, and emails are publicly posted. This list can serve as a much-needed “cross-functional” discussion area, enabling members of constituencies, in particular those who are grappling with the same policy questions, to discuss their positions and perspectives with each other. This list also can serve as an informal mechanism for working groups to keep the GNSO community apprised of discussions and developments.” 9

What the CCT Should Do First Hold kick-off meeting in Mexico City Inventory team skills, interest and expertise Review, discuss and finalize work team charter Discuss scope, goals and begin formulating tasks Identify positions and select team leaders Establish time and meeting frequency 10

Communications Team Wiki https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_communications_team 11

GSNO Communications Team Sample Project Checklist 12

GSNO Constituency Survey http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/gnso-constituency-survey-report-28jan09-en.pdf 13

REFERENCES: For Information about OSC Work Teams: Operations Steering Committee: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi OSC Constituency Operations Team: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team OSC GNSO Operations Team: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team OSC Communications Team: https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_communications_team For Information About GNSO Improvements: GNSO Improvements: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ Background: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/background-en.htm Overview: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/overview-en.htm Reviews: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/reviews-en.htm Council Organization: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/structure-en.htm New Constituencies: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm Stakeholder Groups: http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/stakeholder-process-en.htm News & Events: htp://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/current-events-en.htm 14

Policy Staff Resources Thank You! Policy Staff Resources Policy-staff@icann.org Operations Steering Committee: Rob Hoggarth, Sr. Policy Director GNSO Operations Team: Julie Hedlund, Policy Consultant Constituency Operations Team: Julie Hedlund Communications Team: Ken Bour (Consultant) Policy Process Steering Committee: Liz Gasster, Sr. Policy Counselor New PDP Team: Margie Milam, Sr. Policy Counselor Working Group Team: Ken Bour (Consultant)