11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 1 Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Tuesday, April 14, 2015 Southeast Florida Status of Model Developments Model Coordinators D4: Min-Tang Li D6: Phil Steinmiller.
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
Chapter 14: Basic Freeway Segments and Multilane Highways
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
13 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada The Corradino Group, Inc. May 12, th TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
Planning Applications: A City- wide Microsimulation Model for Virginia Beach Craig Jordan, Old Dominion University Mecit Cetin, Old Dominion University.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Davie Road/S.R. 84 Transit Facility Demand Estimation Presented by Jeff Weidner & Jeremy Mullings Florida Department of Transportation Yongqiang Wu & Kasey.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Investigation of Speed-Flow Relations and Estimation of Volume Delay Functions for Travel Demand Models in Virginia TRB Planning Applications Conference.
Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Working Group Core Team Meeting II February 14, 2008.
Increasing Precision in Highway Volume through Adjustment of Stopping Criteria in Traffic Assignment and Number of Feedbacks Behruz Paschai, Kathy Yu,
Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004 Knoxville Regional Travel Demand Model Upgrade Program May 6, 2004.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Southeast Florida Model Users Group presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Analysis of Time of Day Models from Various Urban Areas William G. Allen, Jr. Transportation Planning Consultant Windsor, SC TRB Transportation Planning.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
December 12, 2006 Florida Model Task Force CORRADINO 1 Treasure Coast Southeast Florida Regional Planning Models In Cube Voyager.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
May 9, th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Session 18 1 IMPROVING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRANSIT PATH- BUILDING AND MODE.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Network Attributes Calculator
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
WIFI Data Collection and the Effectiveness of Various Survey Expansion Techniques- A Case Study on I-95 Corridor in Palm Beach County, FL Presented to.
SERPM 8 NPMRDS SPEED DATA
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Presentation transcript:

11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast Regional Planning Model – 6 Florida Department of Transportation District IV

2 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Consultant Team SERPM 6 Corradino AECOM Consult With thanks to … FDOT Districts 4, 6 & Turnpike MPO staffs of Palm Beach, Broward 7 & Miami-Dade Counties SFRTA

3 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 Palm Beach, Broward and Miami- Dade Counties 4,134 TAZs (ZONESA) 3 Time periods (AM 6:30-9:30, PM 3:30 – 6:30, Off-peak) 10 Transit modes 22 – 28 hours run time on 3.4 GHZ computer

4 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 - Transit Nets #PT Mode (applicable county)TRNBUILD Mode (applicable county) 1Walk Access 2Drive Access 3Sidewalk/Transfer connector 4Bus (Palm Beach & Broward)Bus (Palm Beach) 5Bus (Miami-Dade)Bus (Dade) 6Express Bus (all)Express Bus (Broward) 7Metro-Rail 8Tri-Rail 9Metromover 10New Mode (all)New Mode (Broward) 11Project Mode (all) 12Tri-Rail Shuttle (all) 13Limited Stop Bus (all)Limited Stop Bus (Miami-Dade) 14n/aBus (Broward) 15n/aExpress Bus (Miami-Dade) 16n/aExpress Bus (Palm Beach) 17n/aNew Mode (Miami-Dade) 18n/aLimited Stop Bus (Broward) 19n/aLimited Stop Bus (Palm Beach) 20n/aNew Mode (Palm Beach)

5 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Model Flow 1.Setup controls and file names 2.External – EE by period 3.Trip Gen – LSGEN by auto ownership and TOD 4.Highway – Including speed and capacity calculators 5.Distribution – Including equilibration of peak period highway speeds 6.Transit Nets – PT  Trnbuild and connectors, paths, skims and fares 7.Mode Choice 8.Transit Assignment by access path and TOD 9.Highway Trip Tables – Combines trip tables for assignment 10.Highway Assignment – by TOD (use most computer time) 11.Highway Evaluation – HEVAL and RMSE by TOD and county

6 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 THE ISSUE FTA/FHWA emphasis on correct speeds and travel times in models, especially for New Starts So, we must: Match traffic counts and transit ridership in the base year. Match traffic counts and transit ridership in the base year. Match observed highway travel times Match observed highway travel times Match observed transit travel times Match observed transit travel times

7 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Old Practice Assign uncongested speeds and capacities to links from a lookup table indexed by area type (AT), facility type (FT) and number of lanes. Default lookup table developed by examining practice throughout the state. Adjust the lookup table to obtain a better match of final assigned 24-hour volumes. Most adjustments made to speeds. Care taken to ensure “logical” relationships, e.g., freeways faster than arterials, rural faster than residential. Transit speeds derived from highway using “INET” functions based on mode, AT and FT.

8 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Well, What’s Wrong With That? Lookup table probably better than adjusting individual links to get better loads (not dead yet – what speed does a new link get?). While lookup tables are systematic, their contents can become arbitrary and skewed. Seldom checked to verify they have any relationship to reality.

9 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 New Approach Base Capacities on Florida Quality/Level of Service Manual, derived from HCM. Capacities and speeds determined from roadway characteristics, not a subjective determination of AT, FT. Speeds begin with POSTED SPEED, modified by studies of driver behavior. If signal controlled, add estimated delays at intersections, but not microsimulation (somewhat of a slippery slope). Some concessions were made to better match counts.

10 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Initial Speed Estimation Estimates uninterrupted flow initial speed from an equation. Begin with NCHRP 387 Begin with NCHRP 387 Modify to make more consistent (remove discontinuity at 50 mph). Modify to make more consistent (remove discontinuity at 50 mph). Adds delays from traffic control devices Later, speeds are changed in the user equilibrium assignment and equilibration of travel times.

11 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Speed Relationships FWY= *Postspd *Postspd^2 Surface= *Postspd *Postspd^2

12 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 CAPACITIES New with SERPM-6. Replaces the lookup tables. Allows an OVERIDE coded on the link. Based on the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Manual. Script calculates LOS “C” and “E”. Calculated as PCE’s.

13 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Capacity Calculation Variables/Attributes

14 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Time of Day FSUTMS uses auto speeds from 24-hour assignment as for HBW mode choice HBO & NHB use free-flow speeds HBO & NHB use free-flow speeds SERPM6 uses time of day Peak period trips use AM congested speeds Peak period trips use AM congested speeds Off-peak period trips use free-flow speeds Off-peak period trips use free-flow speeds Standard FSUTMS design expected for most models Standard FSUTMS Models Purpose & Period Auto Impedances HBW all Congested HBO all Free-flow NHB all Free-flow Time-of-day Models Purpose & Period Auto Impedances HBW peak HBO peak NHB peak AM congested HBW off-peak HBO off-peak NHB off-peak Free-flow

15 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Equilibration Peak speeds and time modified from user equilibrium assignment. Run twice to conserve model running time. Speeds found to be stable. Produces distribution and mode choice travel times for highway and transit that are close to the times after the final assignment. Times are stable for UB calculations.

16 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Mode Choice Applied for Peak and Off-peak

17 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Highway Assignment By Time-of-Day AM Peak AM Peak Off-Peak Off-Peak PM Peak PM Peak Composite 24 Hours (add preceding) Composite 24 Hours (add preceding)

18 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Volume-Delay Curves Southeast Regional Planning Model VI

19 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Highway Evaluation SUMMARIES BY: SERPM 6 Region by Time-of-Day SERPM 6 Region by Time-of-Day Each County for 24 hours Each County for 24 hours Trucks alone – each County for 24 hours Trucks alone – each County for 24 hours

20 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 - Validation Standard FSUTMS Plus Speed Validation Speed compromises made in favor of Volume/Count Good Volume/Count ratios Very good RMSE Good transit assignment results

21 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Highway Sections of Observed Speed Study (from several sources)

22 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Highway Speeds

23 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Speed Validation Average Weighted Speed (mph) ModelObserved Facility TypeAMPM Off Peak All Periods AMPM Off Peak All Periods Freeway Surface Streets HOV Lanes Toll Facility All Facilities:

24 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 AM Period Speed Validation

25 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 PM Period Speed Validation

26 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Off-Peak Speed Validation

27 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – Systemwide Comparison

28 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 SERPM 6 – RMSE Validation

29 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Highway Screenline Accuracy

30 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Screenline Locations

31 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Volume/Count Ratios of Screenlines

32 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Conclusions Assigning speeds to network links based on posted speeds and traffic control produces good results in terms of speeds and travel times. The Florida Quality/Level of Service Manual is useful for estimating model capacities. Speed and capacity calculators appear to work at least as well as lookup tables and are less arbitrary. It is possible to validate speeds and volumes in a time-of-day model.

33 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Recommendations for Future Study Need consistent travel time data. Need more travel time data. Consider estimating delays at intersections dynamically using software intersection or junction modeling. Better way of estimating the impacts of freeway merge/diverge/weaves on model travel times.

34 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, 2007 Questions ? Please use the Microphone.