Mapp vs. Ohio B. The Court decided that the Exclusionary Rule, excluding evidence taken illegally from a search, is not admissible in court. EXPANDS our.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

 Amendment VI  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.

Advertisements

The American Legal System

Chapter 4 – The Rule of Law

Welcome! In your team folders... “ELEMENTS OF DUE PROCESS”

The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution

Substantive vs. Procedural Law

Rights of the Accused th – Amendment Presumption of innocence Presumption of innocence Manzanar –one of our big failings Reasonable doubt Reasonable.

POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.

GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 20 Read the chapter and these notes, then answer each part of the 6 questions.

Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.

The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time

Breanne De Pino. 1.Type one: 2.Proposed by Congress 3.Must have a 2/3 majority vote in the House of Representatives and Notices are sent to the governors.

15.3 The American Legal System

The Bill of Rights.

Objective 29L Analyze he rights of the accused as set forth in the 4 th,5 th,6 th,8 th, and 14 th Amendments, including but no limited to such cases as.

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. I. OVERVIEW A. Due Process: The government, in whatever it does, must act fairly and follow established rules. 1.5 th Amendment:

Winning, until proven guilty …. Searches and Seizures The Fourth Amendment protects from unreasonable searches and seizures Searches must be conducted.

Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.

SUMMARY RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. Why would anyone be accused of or charged with a crime if they are not guilty? Discuss with talk partner? QUESTION.

5th/6th/7th Amendments (Due Process) By: Sam A Chris Koo Ethan Ng Paul Novak.

Call to Order These three officers were accused of taking two Baltimore teens out to the county, taking their shoes and cellphone batteries, and leaving.

By: Holden Luce.  Mapp was accused of harboring a criminal involved in a bombing case.  The Officers confronted Mapp at her home and demanded that she.

Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.

Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.

Unit The Bill of Rights n First ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. n Purpose is to prevent government from usurping the personal freedom of.

The Bill of Rights Chapter 4 Sections 1 and 2. Purpose Protect individual rights Protect individual rights Ex. Freedom of speech, right to bear arms Ex.

Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights 10 Amendments Created to ratify Constitution Written by Madison Personal rights Legal rights State rights.

Crime and Due Process. There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

Procedural Criminal Law What are the constitutional rights of the accused?

LS100 Eight Skills Prof. Jane McElligott.  A Miranda Warning is a statement police must read to a suspect prior to interrogation of the suspect once.

Chapter 22 Rights of the Accused. A. Protections 1.Nothing can protect you against being accused of a crime 2.5 th, 6 th and 8 th Amendments help protect.

 The police may search a lawfully arrested person and the area immediately around them for concealed weapons without a warrant.  A police officer who.

Criminal Procedure Arrest Arrest “First appearance” “First appearance” –Determine probable cause –Appoint lawyer –Set bail Preliminary hearing/information.

4 th 5 th and 6 th Amendments By: YOGI PATEL COLE DAURIZIO JASON TRAN STEPHANIE SCHRADER Nichelle Anderson Atia Harris Kathy Cooper Lucas Pincione.

Unit 4 Lesson 6: Due Process

Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

Criminal Trial Rights Tanner Powell and Eric Tate.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961).

Rights of Criminal Defendants

The Rule of Law & the Amendments They Protect. Two Types of Law: Criminal Law and Civil Law There are two types of law practiced in the United States:

The Warren Court ( ). Wordsplash Create one sentence per term using some clue words from below. DUE PROCESS Lawlegal principles No citizen may.

Essential Question How does the Constitution protect the rights of the accused?

Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.

Due Process 5th, 6th & 7th amendments. 5th Amendment Right to a Grand Jury Protection from double jeopardy Protection from self-incrimination.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

 Sobriety Checkpoints - Stop every car/ done as a safety factor/ ok to do, because they stop everyone  Border Crossing : Dealing with national safety.

The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.

DUE PROCESS. Procedural Due Process v. Substantive Due Process Procedural follows a set procedure, the same for all the accused Such as counsel, unreasonable.

Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.

Eliseo Lugo III. Two Types of Law: Criminal Law and Civil Law There are two types of law practiced in the United States: Criminal law Civil law.

“It is better to let 10 guilty people go free then that one innocent person be punished.” Innocent until proven guilty.

Crime and Due Process There is always a question as to how we should deal with “improper evidence” in the courtroom; different nations approach the question.

The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution

Supreme Court briefs.

CHAPTER 20: INDIVIDUAL FREEDOMS

Rights of Criminal Suspects

Constitutional Rights Before a trial

The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution

Rights of the Accused Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8.

Agenda- 1/25 Grab a chrome book and the worksheets!

Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.

The Courts, Constitution and the Bill of Rights: Due Process

The Warren Court AP US History.

Presentation transcript:

Mapp vs. Ohio B. The Court decided that the Exclusionary Rule, excluding evidence taken illegally from a search, is not admissible in court. EXPANDS our 4 th amendment protections against the police entering our home

Arizona vs. Gant B. Arrest ILLEGAL because police may only search an unoccupied vehicle with a warrant or probable cause EXPANDS our 4 th amendment right against random auto searches.

California vs. Stewart The Issue: Due Process C. Rights violated: Self-incrimination, due process and right to an attorney (6 th amendment) D. The Court Decided: Confession was coerced (forced/intimidated out of) and no lawyer was appointed, so it doesn’t count. E. Rights EXPANDED because police interrogation needs to be limited.

Stovall vs. Denno Issue: Due Process B. The Court Decided: Since she might not have lived, she couldn’t have made it to the police station, therefore, due process wasn’t denied. C. SHRINKS our rights because due process can be limited, depending on the circumstances.

6 th amendment Speedy trial –Trial ASAP Speedy trial Public trial – The public can view the trial by attending or through the media Public trial Impartial jury –fair, unbiased jury of your peers Impartial jury Notice of accusation –Know the charges against you Notice of accusation Confrontation –Confront witnesses against you Confrontation Compulsory Process: a person has to come to court to give evidence Counsel –Right to a lawyer. If you can’t afford one, a lawyer will be appointed by the state Counsel