Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC 202-393-1200.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market Support Generation Workshop October 2, 2000.
Advertisements

Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
What is the Duty of Disclosure? If a barrister is retained by the solicitor, not directly by the client, then the primary duty of disclosure to the client.
Completion Outstanding work and Remedying Defects In order that the Works and Contractor's Documents, and each Section, shall be in the condition required.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Low Load Process David L. Plant March Objectives Describe the three stages of the Low Load Process and their time requirements Describe the three.
WHAT’S NEW IN HOTEL CONTRACTS
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Public Exchange Clarification Briefing June 2009.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
GENFLEX TARIFF AND INCOPORATION OF THE MEC INTO THE NMD RULES
Introductory to the “Basics” of Contract Types and Their Impact in the Management of Government Property Presented by: Fay K. Schulte, CPPM.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
CH1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE CONTRACTS
1 I. General Rules and Definition Article 1 Application of UCP Article 2 Definitions Article 3 Interpretations Article 4 Credits v. Contracts Article 5.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
WSPP REC Webinar Discussion Outline September 7, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
Copyright© JSE Limited ROLLING OF SETTLEMENT AND FAILED TRADE PROCEDURES Brett Kotze Clearing & Settlement Division 05 August 2008.
Arnold Podgorsky Wright & Talisman PC February 3, 2011.
WSPP Operating Committee Spring 2008 LEGAL UPDATE Arnie Podgorsky Wright & Talisman, PC This educational presentation states no legal opinion of WSPP or.
Formation of the Contract ----How the UCC changes the common law.
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Updated (corrected) Version 9/5/2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
Contract of Sale of Goods. Sale of Goods Act Definition of Contract of Sale Section 4(1) of the Sale of Goods Act defines a contract of sale of goods.
Transfer Service Meeting, October 19, 2005 Bonneville Power Administration Long-Term Transfer Service (GTA and OATT) Customer Kick-Off Meeting Garry Thompson.
WSPP Contract Subcommittee February 3, 2011 Meeting Notes These notes are to facilitate discussions of a WSPP REC Service Schedule, are subject to revision,
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Simplified & Reorganized Tariff Docket No. ER FERC Technical Conference December 7, 2005 Sidney M. Davies Assistant General Counsel-Tariff David.
Western Energy Markets Working Group Form of California ISO Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade (MRTU) Contract Amendment Panelist: Jeremy D. Weinstein.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
Explanation of Latest Changes to Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
S PIEGEL & M C D IARMID APPA EEI Contract Project Update APPA Legal Seminar Cambridge, Massachusetts October 10, 2006 Robert C. McDiarmid.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015 Ashley Brown Executive Director, Harvard Electricity Policy.
Long-Term Solution for Negative Generation Entergy Transmission AFC Stakeholder Meeting August 22, 2006.
Resource Cost Working Group December 2, 2015 WMS Update.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N June 2011 Non-Treaty Storage Agreement non-Binding Terms for Storage Accounts.
RPS Bidders Workshop May 11, RPS Bidders Workshop Guidance for Inputs to PPA May 11, 2007.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets.
WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.
NPRRs NPRR649 Lost Opportunity Payments for HDL Manual Overrides. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes two options for a lost opportunity.
Proposed Schedules: Reserves (D) and Intra-Hour Firming (E) October 13, 2009.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Energy Export Scheme? Contractual and Commercial Elements of Hydrocarbon Exports-What Can Be Taken Over to a Renewable Renewable Energy Workshop, Casablanca,
Confidential & Proprietary Mark-to-Market Accounting Enron Global Markets November 2000.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Explanation of Revised Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
DRAFT- April 3, 2001 Restructuring Proposal to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. April 6, 2001 This Information is CONFIDENTIAL Per Section 5 of.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Resource Cost Working Group
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
What is Contract Financing?
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt Version 2
Part B Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
LABELING MACHINE Youth & Beauty Oy is a manufacturer of cosmetics products. Six months ago they bought a labeling machine from Inssi Oyj. Youth and Beauty.
Second Avenue Subway Project Execution Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC

2 The Proposed Schedule - general  Product: intra-hour capacity and energy, on either scheduled or dynamic basis, as/when feasible under applicable NERC etc. criteria.  Purchaser may be intermittent generator, BA, or other market participant capable of deploying intra-hour capacity/energy.  Price may have capacity (demand) and energy components

3 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E  To better relate nature of product, this draft renames it “Intra-Hour Supplemental Power.”  Name remains subject to discussion/other suggestions.  Scheduled and dynamic service options are retained.  Section E-2 – Terms of Service o Terms are generally the same as in initial draft, but this version includes some terminology changes and some reorganization to create more logical flow and to clarify certain terms in accordance with Subcommittee comments: o Terminology is changed to refer to rate of flow of energy, per Subcommittee comments. o Section E-2.1 describes Scheduled and Dynamic service options. o Section E-2.2 places on Purchaser all risk (as between Seller and Purchaser) of availability of transmission as needed to utilize Intra- Hour Supplemental Power.

4 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d) оSection E-2.3 provides Purchaser an option to return energy to Seller within 168 hours. оIssues to be considered: оHow to define when return period starts, e.g., separate return period for each hour Purchaser takes energy? Must energy taken in on- peak hours be returned in on-peak hours? If not, must return larger quantity? оWhether/how to adjust billing and payment to reflect possibility that energy could be returned in the month following month of delivery to Purchaser? оSection E-2.4 states that each Party warrants to the other that its communications and control systems are capable of executing instructions for dispatch, delivery and receipt of Intra-Hour Supplemental Power in accordance with Service Schedule E and in conformance with applicable RRO and/or BA communications protocols.

5 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d)  Section E-2.5 – Pricing оProvisions are substantively unchanged, but are reorganized to reflect Subcommittee comments, including clarification of when and to whom FERC-imposed price caps apply.  Generally applicable energy charge term (E-2.5.2) now incorporates peak/off-peak pricing per Subcommittee’s discussion, subject to Parties’ ability to apply a different pricing scheme in Confirmation.  The new terms “On-Peak” and “Off-Peak” are NERC-defined terms.  Confirmations will have to identify applicable price indices or other means of establishing hourly and peak/off-peak prices.  Section E describes the elements of monthly charges for Intra- Hour Supplemental Power and states that Purchaser shall pay capacity charge and any applicable transmission charge except to the extent excused in event of Seller non-performance (in which case damages will be owed under Section E-3, discussed later).

6 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d)  Section E-2.5 – Pricing (cont’d) оSection E now provides that monthly energy charge will be determined by value of energy delivered by Seller netted against value of any energy returned by Purchaser. оConsider issue noted above concerning potentially adjusting billing and payment to reflect possibility that energy could be returned in the month following month of delivery to Purchaser. оFERC Price caps are incorporated in Section E-2.5.4; substance is the same as in draft Service Schedule D (and other WSPP Service Schedules), but language is revised to try to make clearer, per Subcommittee comments, when and to whom the price caps will apply. оNote revised language here is the same as in the August draft of Service Schedule D.

7 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d)  Section E-3 - Damages o Damages provisions are modified from the previous draft to reflect Subcommittee’s direction to develop objective damages measures while avoiding penalties. o Section E-3.2 provides prefatory legal language stating that damages calculated in accordance with the service schedule are not a penalty. o Section E-3.3 provides that damages imposed under the service schedule will not exceed three times the agreed monthly capacity charge.

8 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d)  Section E-3 - Damages (cont’d) o Section E-3.4 provides that damages for Seller’s non-performance will be a pro rata share of the capacity charge and any transmission reservation charge based on duration of non-performance, plus the smallest of the following three alternative amounts (but not less than zero): o The quantity of energy Seller failed to deliver multiplied by an Hourly Index Price (which is yet to be determined/defined), OR o Replacement Price less Contract Price, plus any net increase in transmission charges incurred to acquire replacement energy, OR o Quantity Seller failed to deliver multiplied by 120% of Parties’ agreed energy charge. o In addition, Seller will be liable to Purchaser for any NERC or other penalties or fines imposed on Purchaser to the extent such amounts are attributable to Seller’s failure to perform. o Consider whether this is appropriate for this service/product?

9 August Revisions to Proposed Schedule E (cont’d) оPrevious draft’s Section 3.3, stating Parties’ mutual duty to use commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate damages is removed because it is redundant of WSPP Agreement Section 21.3(c).

10 Let’s Discuss  Reactions to the modified provisions we have discussed.