Ralf W. Gothe 1  Basic Tools: Experiment and Theory  Goals: Unveil the dynamics of the strong interaction  Connections: Not everything is difficult.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)
Advertisements

Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Target Fragmentation studies at JLab M.Osipenko in collaboration with L. Trentadue and F. Ceccopieri, May 20,SIR2005, JLab, Newport News, VA CLAS Collaboration.
1 Single  0 Electroproduction in the Resonance Region with CLAS Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut For the CLAS Collaboration N* 2009 Beijing, China.
Ralf W. Gothe EMIN Nucleon Transition Form Factors at JLab: Recent Results and Perspectives  Motivation: Why Nucleon Transition Form Factors? 
V.I.Mokeev NSTAR2007 at Bonn, September presented by V.I.Mokeev The studies of N* electrocouplings at various Q 2 elucidate relevant degrees of freedom.
The 12 GeV Upgrade of Jefferson Lab Volker Burkert Jefferson Lab.
Ralf W. Gothe GHP Nucleon Resonance Studies after the 12 GeV Upgrade at JLab  Motivation: Why Nucleon Transition Form Factors?  Consistency: N.
Space-time description of hadronization in DIS Taisiya Mineeva Jefferson Lab University of CT NNPS, 26 June 2008.
Experimental requirements for GPD measurements at JLab energies. Detector that ensures exclusivity of process, measurement of complete final state Measure.
Ralf W. Gothe N STAR Nucleon Transition Form Factors at JLab: Status and Outlook Beijing, April 19 – 22, 2009  Motivation: Why Nucleon Transition.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Ralf W. Gothe Nucleon Transition Form Factors Beijing Transition Form Factors at JLab: The Evolution of Baryonic Degrees of Freedom Ralf W. Gothe.
Highlights on hadron physics at CLAS K. Hicks JAEA Seminar May 18, 2012.
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Deeply Virtual Exclusive Reactions with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab ICHEP July 22, 2010, Paris, France.
 Nucleon spin structure and Imaging in the Valence quark region ➥ Inclusive measurements at large x; quark models tests and Lattice QCD tests ➥ Exclusive.
Spin Azimuthal Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive DIS at JLAB  Nucleon spin & transverse momentum of partons  Transverse-momentum dependent distributions.
UK Hadron Physics D. G. Ireland 10 October 2014 NuPECC Meeting, Edinburgh.
POETIC 2012 Indiana University R. D. McKeown 12 GeV CEBAF.
Hadronic Multi-particle Final State Measurements with CLAS at Jefferson Lab Laird Kramer Florida International University Neutrino Scattering, March 2003.
Spin-Flavor Decomposition J. P. Chen, Jefferson Lab PVSA Workshop, April 26-27, 2007, Brookhaven National Lab  Polarized Inclusive DIS,  u/u and  d/d.
Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries.
New results on SIDIS SSA from JLab  Physics Motivation  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries  Future measurements  Summary H. Avakian.
Nucleon resonance studies in π + π - electroproduction off protons at high photon virtualities E. Isupov, EMIN-2009.
Probe resolution (GeV) N π,  Q 2 =12 GeV 2 Q 2 =6 GeV 2 The study of nucleon resonance transitions provides a testing ground for our understanding.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility R. D. McKeown Slide 1 R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary The 12 GeV Science Program.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
Future Physics at JLab Andrew Puckett LANL medium energy physics internal review 12/14/
DVCS with Positron Beams at the JLab 12 GeV Upgrade
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Sub-Nucleon Physics Programme Current Status & Outlook for Hadron Physics D G Ireland.
Hadron Spectroscopy with high momentum beam line at J-PARC K. Ozawa (KEK) Contents Charmed baryon spectroscopy New experiment at J-PARC.
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
Jump to first page Quark-Hadron Duality Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade Cynthia Keppel for Jefferson Lab PAC 23.
The Quark Structure of the Nucleon Inti Lehmann & Ralf Kaiser University of Glasgow Cosener’s House Meeting 23/05/2007 Nucleon Structure Generalised Parton.
N* analysis at the Excited Baryon Analysis Center of JLab Hiroyuki Kamano (EBAC, Jefferson Lab) CLAS12 2 nd European Workshop, March 7-11, Paris, France.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
1 Harut Avakian Studies on transverse spin effects at Jlab QCD Structure of the Nucleon June 12-16, 2006, Rome Physics motivation k T -effects from unpolarized.
Daniel S. Carman Page 1 Hadron Sep , 2015 Daniel S. Carman Jefferson Laboratory N* Spectrum & Structure Analysis of CLAS Data  CLAS12 N*
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
Harut Avakian (Jlab) DVCS results with unpolarized and polarized target Introduction Event selection MC simulations and radiative corrections DVCS with.
Baryon Resonance Analysis from MAID D. Drechsel, S. Kamalov, L. Tiator.
Probing Generalized Parton Distributions
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Anthony.
Overview of Jefferson Lab’s Spin Physics Programme Stephen Bültmann - ODU RHIC/AGS Users Meeting, June 2007 Introduction Experimental Setup Asymmetry Measurement.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
PAC37 Charge 1 1.) Review new proposals, previously conditionally approved proposals, and letters of intent † † for experiments that will utilize the 12.
Time-like Compton Scattering with CLAS12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB) CLAS12 European Workshop February 25-28, 2009, Genova, Italy.
Deeply virtual  0 electroproduction measured with CLAS.
Ralf W. Gothe PAC 25 Mini-Workshop Nucleon Excited States Ralf W. Gothe University of South Carolina Mini-Workshop on Nucleon Excited States PAC25.
N* Transition Form Factors with CLAS12 Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut For the CLAS Collaboration Exclusive Reactions at High Momentum Transfer.
Moments and Structure Functions at Low Q 2 Rolf Ent, DIS Formalism - F 2 Moments: Old Analysis (R “Guess”…) - E L/T Separation  F 2, F 1,
Overview of recent photon beam runs at CLAS CLAS12 European Workshop, Feb , Genoa, Italy Ken Livingston, University of Glasgow Tagged photons.
Prospects for GPD and TMD studies at the JLab Upgrade Volker D. Burkert Jefferson Lab QCDN’06 Workshop, June 12-16, 2006, Rome  Introduction  JLab Upgrade.
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
1.More than 98% of dress quark masses as well as dynamical structure are generated non-perturbatively through DCSB (higgs mech.
1 CLAS-eg1 pol.-proton analysis H.Avakian (JLab) semi-SANE Collaboration Meeting April 21, 2005.
Single Target Spin Asymmetries and GPDs Jian-ping Chen, Jefferson Lab, Virginia, USA SSA Workshop, BNL, June 1-3, 2005 Nucleon structure and GPDs DVCS.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Studying GPDs at Jefferson Lab
PAC38 Charge 1.) Review new proposals, previously conditionally approved proposals, and letters of intent† for experiments that will utilize the 12 GeV.
Measurement of GPDs at JLab and in Future at Colliders
Transverse distributions of polarized quarks
Update of RG-A Hadron Structure Analyses
Presentation transcript:

Ralf W. Gothe 1  Basic Tools: Experiment and Theory  Goals: Unveil the dynamics of the strong interaction  Connections: Not everything is difficult that sounds difficult Ralf W. Gothe Users Group Workshop and Annual Meeting June 8-10, 2009 Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA Roadmap to the CLAS12 Physics Program

Ralf W. Gothe 2 A B C Jefferson Lab Today Two high-resolution 4 GeV spectrometers Large acceptance spectrometer electron/photon beams 7 GeV spectrometer 1.8 GeV spectrometer Hall A Hall B Hall C

Ralf W. Gothe 3 6 GeV CEBAF 11CHL-2 12 Upgrade magnets and power supplies Two 0.6 GeV linacs 1.1 Enhanced capabilities in existing Halls 1.1

Ralf W. Gothe 4 Overview of Upgrade Technical Performance Requirements Hall DHall BHall CHall A 4  hermetic detector GlueEx luminosity CLAS12 High Momentum Spectrometer SHRS High Resolution Spectrometer HRS polarized photonshermeticityprecisionspace E  ~  GeV 11 GeV beamline 10 8 photons/starget flexibility good momentum/angle resolutionexcellent momentum resolution high multiplicity reconstructionluminosity up to

Ralf W. Gothe 5 CLAS12  Luminosity > cm -2 s -1  Baryon Spectroscopy  N and N* Form Factors  GPDs and TMDs  DIS and SIDIS  Nucleon Spin Structure  Color Transpareny  … Central Detector Forward Detector 1m CLAS12

Ralf W. Gothe 6 CLAS12 Approved Experiments ProposalContact PersonPhysicsEnergy (GeV) PAC daysParallel Running Run Group daysComment E Gothe, MokeevN* at high Q E (a)SabatieDVCS pol. beam1180 E Avakian ep→eπ +/-/0 X1160 E StolerDVMP in π 0,η prod L/T separation E (b)SabatieDVCS pol. target Assume polarized experiments run 50% of time w/ reversed field E KuhnLong. Spin Str.1182 E AvakianTMD SSA11103 E (b)HafidiPartonic SIDIS11103 E AvakianSpin-Orbit Corr E HafidiColor Trans. ρ E BrooksQuark Hadronizat.1160 E BültmanNeutron Str. Fn.1140 cond. appr. E GilfoyleNeutron mag. FF /008 need 26d reversed field E (a)HafidiPartonic SIDIS1156 E ContalbrigoBoer-Mulders w/ Kaons1156 Total

Ralf W. Gothe 7 quark mass (GeV) Quark mass extrapolated to the chiral limit, where q is the momentum variable of the tree-level quark propagator using the Asqtad action.  … resolution low high q e.m. probe LQCD (Bowman et al.) Physics Goals N,N *,  * … 3q-core+MB-cloud 3q-core pQCD LQCD, DSE and …  Study the structure of the nucleon spectrum in the domain where dressed quarks are the major active degree of freedom.  Explore the formation of excited nucleon states in interactions of dressed quarks and their emergence from QCD.

Ralf W. Gothe 8 Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes vv N  p   p 

Ralf W. Gothe 9 Hadron Structure with Electromagnetic Probes

Ralf W. Gothe 10 Cross Section Decomposition

Ralf W. Gothe 11 Multipole Expansion of the CGLN Amplitudes

Ralf W. Gothe 12

Ralf W. Gothe 13 What do we really know? Spectroscopy

Ralf W. Gothe 14 Quark Model Classification of N*  (1232) D 13 (1520) S 11 (1535) Roper P 11 (1440) + q³g + q³qq + N-Meson + …

Ralf W. Gothe 15 N and  Excited States …  Orbital excitations (two distinct kinds)  Radial excitations (also two kinds)

Ralf W. Gothe 16 “Missing” Resonances? fewer degrees-of-freedom open question: mechanism for q 2 formation? Problem: symmetric CQM predicts many more states than observed (in  N scattering) Possible solutions: 1. di-quark model 2. not all states have been found possible reason: decouple from  N-channel model calculations: missing states couple to N , N , N , KY 3. coupled channel dynamics all baryonic and mesonic excitations beyond the groundstate octets and decuplet are generated by coupled channel dynamics (not only  (1405),  (1520), S 11 (1535) or f 0 (980)) old but always young new

Ralf W. Gothe 17  Process described by 4 complex, parity conserving amplitudes  7 well-chosen measurements are needed to determine amplitude.  For hyperon finals state 16 observables will be measured in CLAS ➠ huge redundancy in determining the photo- production amplitudes ➠ allows many cross checks.  7 observables measured in reactions without recoil polarization.  weak decay has large analyzing power γp→K + Λ FROST/HD  N  N’,  N, K , K , N 

Ralf W. Gothe 18

Ralf W. Gothe 19 Quasi-Real Electroproduction Meson spectroscopy: exotic, high t, coherent, J/  Baryon spectroscopy: heavy mass N*, hyperons Time-like Compton scattering: GPDs, …

Ralf W. Gothe 20 Quasi-Real Electroproduction Meson spectroscopy: exotic, high t, coherent, J/  Baryon spectroscopy: heavy mass N*, hyperons Time-like Compton scattering: GPDs, … DDVCS? Missing momentum analysis of all final state particles Double Deep Virtual Compton scattering

Ralf W. Gothe 21 Photoproduction of Lepton Pairs    ’e+e-’e+e- M ee > 1.2 GeV for TCS analysis CLAS/E1-6 CLAS/G7

Ralf W. Gothe 22 Color Transparency  Color Transparency is a spectacular prediction of QCD: under the right conditions, nuclear matter will allow the transmission of hadrons with reduced attenuation.  Unexpected in a hadronic picture of strongly interacting matter, but straightforward in quark gluon basis.  Small effects observed at lower energy. Expect significant effects at higher energy. CLAS12 projected A e+e+ e-e-

Ralf W. Gothe 23 Dynamical Mass of Light Dressed Quarks DSE and LQCD predict the dynamical generation of the momentum dependent dressed quark mass that comes from the gluon dressing of the current quark propagator. These dynamical contributions account for more than 98% of the dressed light quark mass. The data on N* electrocouplings at 0<Q 2 <12 GeV 2 will allow us to chart the momentum evolution of dressed quark mass, and in particular, to explore the transition from dressed to almost bare current quarks as shown above. Q 2 = 12 GeV 2 = (p times number of quarks) 2 = 12 GeV 2 p = 1.15 GeV per dressed quark DSE: lines and LQCD: triangles

Ralf W. Gothe 24 S 11 Q 3 A 1/2 F 15 Q 5 A 3/2 P 11 Q 3 A 1/2 D 13 Q 5 A 3/2 F 15 Q 3 A 1/2 D 13 Q 3 A 1/2 Constituent Counting Rule  A 1/2  1/Q 3  A 3/2  1/Q 5  G M  1/Q 4 *

Ralf W. Gothe 25 N →  Multipole Ratios R EM, R SM  New trend towards pQCD behavior does not show up.  CLAS12 can measure R EM and R SM up to Q² ~ 12 GeV².  R EM +1 M. Ungaro  G M 1/Q 4 * G D = 1 (1+Q 2 /0.71) 2

Ralf W. Gothe 26 Electrocouplings of N(1440)P 11 from CLAS Data N  (UIM, DR) PDG estimation N , N  combined analysis N  (JM) The good agreement on extracting the N* electrocouplings between the two exclusive channels (1  /2  ) – having fundamentally different mechanisms for the nonresonant background – provides evidence for the reliable extraction of N* electrocouplings.

Ralf W. Gothe 27 Electrocouplings of N(1520)D 13 from the CLAS 1  /2  data world data GeV -1/2 N  (UIM, DR) PDG estimation N , N  combined analysis N  (JM) A hel = A 1/2 2 – A 3/2 2 A 1/2 2 + A 3/2 2 A 1/2 A 3/2 L. Tiator

Ralf W. Gothe 28  CLAS N  world N  world Q 2 =0  (1700)D 33 N(1720)P 13 Higher Lying Resonances form the 2  JM Analysis of CLAS Data preliminary The A 1/2 electrocoupling of P 13 (1720) decreases rapidly with Q 2. At Q 2 >0.9 GeV 2 |A 3/2 |>|A 1/2 |. Will we able to access the Q 2 region where the A 1/2 amplitude of P 13 (1720) dominates?

Ralf W. Gothe 29 Kinematic Coverage of CLAS12 60 days L= cm -2 sec -1,  W = GeV,  Q 2 = 0.5 GeV 2 Genova-EG (e ’, p     ) detected W GeV Q 2 GeV 2 2  limit >1  limit > 2  limit >1  limit > 1  limit >

Ralf W. Gothe 30 Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors green : Rosenbluth data (SLAC, JLab) Pun05 Gay02 JLab/HallA recoil polarization data

Ralf W. Gothe 31 Quark Transverse Charge Densities in Nucleons longitudinally polarized nucleon q + = q 0 + q 3 = 0 photon only couples to forward moving quarks quark charge density operator p’p z Light-Front Formalism Miller (2007)

Ralf W. Gothe 32 transversely polarized nucleon transverse spin e.g. along x-axis : dipole field pattern Carlson, Vanderhaegen (2007) Quark Transverse Charge Densities in Nucleons

Ralf W. Gothe 33 data : Arrington, Melnitchouk, Tjon (2007) densities : Miller (2007); Carlson, Vdh (2007) induced EDM : d y = F 2p (0). e / (2 M N ) ρ0ρ0 ρTρT Quark Transverse Charge Densities in the Proton

Ralf W. Gothe 34 p n p ->  + (1232) p -> N * (1440) quadrupole pattern Tiator, Vdh (2008) Carlson, Vdh (2007) Transverse Transition Densities

Ralf W. Gothe 35 p -> D 13 (1520) Tiator, Vdh (2009) ρ0ρ0 ρTρT Transverse Transition Densities

Ralf W. Gothe 36 Elastic Scattering transverse quark distribution in coordinate space DIS longitudinal quark distribution in momentum space DES (GPDs) fully-correlated quark distribution in both coordinate and momentum space 3-dim quark structure of nucleon Burkardt (2000,2003) Belitsky,Ji,Yuan (2004) Generalized Parton Distributions

Ralf W. Gothe 37 Fourier transform of GPDs gives simultaneous distributions of quarks w.r.t. longitudinal momentum x P and transverse position b P + Δ /2 * Q 2 >> x + ξ x - ξ P - Δ /2 t = Δ 2 ξ = 0 Generalized Parton Distributions H,H,E,E (x, ξ,t) ~ ~ GPDs

Ralf W. Gothe 38 DVCS Kinematics Coverage of the 12 GeV Upgrade H1, ZEUS JLab Upgrade 11 GeV H1, ZEUS 12 GeV 11 GeV 27 GeV 200 GeV W = 2 GeV Study of high x B domain requires high luminosity HERMES COMPASS

Ralf W. Gothe 39 Unpolarized beam, longitudinal target:  UL  ~ sin  {F 1 H + ξ (F 1 +F 2 )( H + ξ /(1+ ξ ) E) -… }d  ~ Kinematically suppressed H(ξ,t) ~ A =           =  ~ x B /(2-x B ) k = t/4M 2 Unpolarized beam, transverse target:  UT  ~ cos sin( s -) {k(F 2 H – F 1 E) + … }d  Kinematically suppressed E(ξ,t) How to Extract GPDs ? H(ξ,t) Polarized beam, unpolarized target:  LU  ~ sin  {F 1 H + ξ (F 1 +F 2 ) H + kF E) }d   LU  ~ sin  {F 1 H + ξ (F 1 +F 2 ) H + kF 2 E) }d  ~ Kinematically suppressed

Ralf W. Gothe 40 DVCS Polarized Beam Asymmetry2/25/0940 Volker Burkert, CLAS12 Workshop, Genoa e p ep  A =           =  LU ~sin  {F 1 H +…}d  Extract H(ξ,t)

Ralf W. Gothe 41 DVCS Longitudinal Target Asymmetry e p ep   UL ~sin  Im{F 1 H +  (F 1 +F 2 ) H... }d  ~ Extract H(ξ,t) ~ 2/25/0941 Volker Burkert, CLAS12 Workshop, Genoa e p ep  A =           =

Ralf W. Gothe 42 Transverse Momentum Distributions  TMDs are complementary to GPDs in that they allow to construct of the nucleon in space  TMDs are complementary to GPDs in that they allow to construct 3-D images of the nucleon in momentum space  TMDs can be studied in SIDIS experiments measuring azimuthal asymmetries or moments. Semi Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering

Ralf W. Gothe 43 TMDs in SIDIS Land Many spin asymmetries

Ralf W. Gothe 44 TMDs in SIDIS Land

Ralf W. Gothe 45 The cos2  moment of the azimuthal asymmetry gives access to the Boer-Mulders function, which measures the momentum distribution of transversely polarized quarks in unpolarized nucleons.. 4 <Q 2 < 5 GeV 2 TMDs in SIDIS Land

Ralf W. Gothe 46 The sin2  moment gives access to the Kotzinian- Mulders function, which measures the momentum distribution of transversely polarized quarks in the longitudinally polarized nucleon. TMDs in SIDIS Land

Ralf W. Gothe 47 per dressed quark Summary and Outlook