Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number: 84.394.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
10 Components of School Improvement LEA School Support Team Technical Assistance Workshop Supplemental Information August 2010.
Advertisements

Principals Changing Schools Through Leadership and Advocacy 2009 NAESP-NASSP National Leaders’ Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education Incorporating new programs into EDFacts 25 th Annual MIS Conference.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
Presented by CCSSO and Penn Hill Group December 4, 2014
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SECRETARY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NOVEMBER 10, 2009 STRATEGIC PLANNING A MERICAN R ECOVERY AND R EINVESTMENT A CT.
T HE M ASTER S CHEDULE C OLLECTION November 12, 2013 presented by the Office of Educational Information Management.
FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW October 31, 2013.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) SIG Meeting July 26, 2011 Office of School Recovery Mississippi Department of Education.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
HEA 1388 Includes new reporting requirements based upon standards and benchmarks for teacher preparation programs and program completers.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
October 2009 ARRA and State Initiatives: User Perspectives Bethann Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department of Education.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Carmel Martin Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Tuesday, July 28, U.S. Department of Education Vision and Initiatives.
ARRA Education Grants ~ Virginia Barry, Commissioner Kathleen Murphy, Director Judy Fillion, Director Paul Leather, Director.
M ASTER S CHEDULE C OLLECTION Web Ex Presentation March 30, 2011.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
LCFF and LCAPs Presented to the 4 th District PTA March 18, 2014.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda Webinar Presentation Monday, July 27 th 2009.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
ANNUAL EVALUATION PLAN Schoolwide Programs. Annual Evaluation Plan.
1 Educator Evaluation Overview Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
1. ►The State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) is a new one- time appropriation of $48.6 billion to Governors to maintain support for public education.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education Tuesday, October 23, 2012 Michael Yudin and Deb Delisle.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act K-12 Agenda
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:

State Fiscal Stabilization Fund The State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) is a new one-time appropriation of $48.6 million to Governors to maintain support for public education and other State services. Phase I began in April – approximately $36.8 billion have been awarded to all 50 States, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia, including 100% of Government Services Funds. $11.5 billion to be awarded in Phase II. Governors will apply for their States in Phase II, as in Phase I.

Purpose of SFSF Phase II Application Transparency  Public reporting against the reform areas to which Governors attested to in Phase I  Reporting on States’ websites  Access to information for State and local stakeholders, parents, and all interested parties

SFSF Phase II Application Indicators and Descriptors (37 total) o Indicators require data-related responses. (34) o Descriptors request narrative information. (3) If a State cannot report the data requested by an Indicator or Descriptor, the State must create a plan to report the data as soon as possible and, generally, by September 30, 2011.

SFSF Phase II Application 10 “Confirm” elements and icons EDFacts data: indicators.html indicators.html Indicator (a)(2): index.htmlhttp:// index.html Indicator (c)(9): States to provide link to State Report Cards 7 “Race to the Top” icons

Confirm Example

Race to the Top Example

New Data Example

Application Information Due January 11, pdf Application can be found at phase2.doc phase2.doc. 3 Parts of the Application: 1) Cover Sheet (as in Phase I) 2) Update of Maintenance-of-Effort Data 3) Data Collection, Public Reporting, and Planning

Summary of Final Requirements Reform area (a): Achieving Equity in Teacher Distribution – 7 indicators, 2 descriptors – Reporting at State and District levels – Includes existing data, confirmation, and new information Topics: Distribution of teachers, Teacher and principal evaluation systems

Reform Area (a) Descriptor (a)(1) The systems used to evaluate the performance of teachers and the use of results from those systems in decisions regarding teacher development, compensation, promotion, retention, and removal Indicator (a)(3) Whether the systems used to evaluate the performance of teachers include student achievement outcomes or student growth data as an evaluation criterion

Summary of Final Requirements Reform area (b): Improving Collection and Use of Data – 3 indicators – Reporting at the State level – New information collection (yes/no responses) – (b) (2) and (b) (3) State Plan descriptions Topics: America COMPETES Act; Student growth and individual teacher impact data

Reform Area (b) Indicator (b)(2) Whether the State provides student growth data on their current students and the students they taught in the previous year to, at a minimum, teachers of reading/language arts and mathematics in grades in which the State administers assessments in those subjects in a manner that is timely and informs instructional programs Indicator (b)(3) Whether the State provides teachers of reading/language arts and mathematics in grades in which the State administers assessments in those subjects with reports of individual teacher impact on student achievement on those assessments

Summary of Final Requirements Reform area (c): Standards and Assessments – 12 indicators – Reporting at the State, district, and school by subgroup levels – Existing data, new data, new information (yes/no) Topics: Status/inclusion on current State assessment systems, High-school graduation rates, College enrollment, and College course completion

Reform Area (c) Indicator (c)(6) Whether the State has completed, within the last two years, an analysis of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the accommodations it provides limited English proficient students to ensure their meaningful participation in State assessments Indicator (c)(10) The number and percentage of students who graduate from high school using a four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate as required by 34 CFR (b)(1)(i)

Summary of Final Requirements Reform area (d): Supporting Struggling Schools – 12 indicators, 1 descriptor – State, district, and school-level data – Existing data, new data, and new information Topics: Identifying lowest-achieving schools, Use of school intervention models, and Charter school availability/student achievement progress in charter schools

Reform Area (d) Indicator (d)(1)&(2) The average statewide school gain in the “all students” category and the average statewide school gain for each student subgroup (as under section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v) of the ESEA) on the State assessments in reading/language arts & mathematics, and the number and percentage of Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that have made progress on State assessments in reading/language arts & mathematics, in the last year. Indicator (d)(9) & (10) The number and percentage of charter schools that have made progress on State assessments in reading/language arts & mathematics in the last year.

State Plans For Indicators in Reform Areas (a), ((c) except 11 and 12), and (d), States must provide a plan to fully report the required data/information. – Current status – Timeline for developing and implementing – Schedule of progress reports and plan to make progress public

State Plans For Indicators (b)(1) and (2) the State must describe the process and timeline for developing and implementing the respective plans no later than September 30, For Indicator (b)(3), the State must create a plan that describes the process and timeline for providing teachers with the required reports on individual teacher impact.

State Plans For Indicators (c)(11) and (c)(12): – If the State has the relevant data available to them. The State must describe how it will develop and implement the respective plans by September 30, – If the State does not have the relevant data available to them. The State must describe its plan to develop the capacity to collect and publically report the necessary data by September 30, 2011.

General Requirements In its plan, the State must describe the following: (1) The agency or agencies in the State responsible for the development, execution, and oversight of the plan, including the institutional infrastructure and capacity of the agency or agencies as they relate to each of those tasks; (2) The agency or agencies, institutions, or organizations, if any, providing technical assistance or other support in the development, execution, and oversight of the plan, and the nature of such technical assistance or other support;

General Requirements cont. (3) The overall budget for the development, execution, and oversight of the plan; (4) The processes the State employs to review and verify the required data and other information; and (5) The processes the State employs to ensure that, consistent with 34 CFR 99.31(b), the required data and other information are not made publicly available in a manner that personally identifies students, where applicable.

Additional Information For further information on SFSF Phase II, please see Requirements (Federal Register Notice) t.html Phone: (202)