Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Garmin SVT for Diamond DA40 April Crumlin Sideroad London ON N5V 1S2 KNOW NO BOUNDS Synthetic Vision – Real Safety Introducing.
Advertisements

Issues specific to general aviation and business jets Session 6 Presentation 3.
EVS Operational Rules1 Enhanced Vision Systems Terry Neale & Alex Hartland UK CAA.
Contact Maneuvers.
Go-Around.
Rasta – Mar 07 Straight-Ins Abeam VFR Entry “CS, Request Straight-In” Clear for Instrument Approaches “Below 150, Gear Clear” Lower Gear and Flaps Bunt.
Aerodynamic Theory Review 2
EFVS TGL meeting, C.J.A.A, Nov 2006, 3rd Marc JULIÉ EFVS certification aspects for operational credit C.J.A.A Amsterdam November 3rd, 2006.
T HE L AST 200 F EET William J. McDevitt III Advisor – Karen Schuckman, C.P., P.L.S., MGIS The Pennsylvania State University World Campus State College,
1 #4295. Which frequency should you expect to use for Regional Approach Control, control tower, and ground control respectively at DFW when coming from.
Downloaded from Approach and Landing Accidents Reducing the Risk Presented by Bryan W. Neville Aviation Safety Inspector.
Office of Aviation Safety American Airlines Flight 1400 St. Louis, Missouri Captain David Tew Operational Factors.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Normal Procedures Cirrus SR-22 Transition Training 8/16/04.
2 Miles/Initial 1 Mile Upwind Initial X wind 45 to Initial Downwind 53% pwr 200 KIAS 200 PCL 50-55% 1200’ Radar Initial N Cypress 36 PCL – Max till.
Approach Charts and Procedures
Pilot Guide to Preventing CFIT
Airport Approach Simulation
Localizer Approaches This presentation assumes you have reviewed the ILS presentation first.
Air Law 1.02 VFR Flight Conditions References: FTGU page 115
Advanced Radio and Radar Part 7 Types of Radar. Introduction We have already looked at the general principle of operation of both radio communication.
Just fly until 500’ AGL (700’ MSL) Then turn crosswind
Flight Profile Before Start (Do-List) Engine Start (Do-List) Before Taxi (Flow Pattern) Airport Diagram visible Taxi (Flow Pattern) Before Takeoff (Flow.
Flight Operations and Training © 2000, 2001 Flight Safety Foundation.
Understanding Visual Illusions
Vertical Profile Navigation
Lecture 12:Approach Lighting System
Rasta – Dec 05 Straight-Ins Abeam VFR Entry “CS, Request Straight-In” Clear for Instrument Approaches “Below 150, Gear Clear” Lower Gear and Flaps “Physically.
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
Emergency Procedures for Beech Bonanzas and Debonairs
ILS Instrument Landing System
NATOPS IC Mandatory Callouts Current as of February 2010.
A FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS GUIDE FOR SOLOING A STUDENT PILOT.
Office of Aviation Safety Delta Connection Flight 6448 Operated by Shuttle America Operational Issues.
B757 Review Questions. AutoFlight At what RA does flare mode engage? 45 feet RA.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
C182T Nav III GFC 700 Automatic Flight Control System Module I
© 2011 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Advisory Vertical Guidance (Advisory VNAV) A Useful and Flexible Safety Enhancement S.V. Massimini,
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
A Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Transport Aircraft Rudder Pedal Force/Feel Systems Eric C. Stewart NASA Langley Research Center 98 th Aerospace Control.
Office of Aviation Safety Response to Stick Shaker and Stall Human Performance presentation.
Presented to: By: Dennis H. Whitley Date: March 1, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration SOUTHERN REGION FAASTeam/Area 1 Approach and Landing Accidents.
Lecture 8: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Communications, Airspace and a bunch of other stuff ! Rick L. Crose Orlando International Tower.
Topic of the Month October The Stabilized Approach and Go Around
Chapter 15 Radio Altimeter RA. Radar Altimeter Overview The radar altimeter measures absolute altitude, the altitude the aircraft is above the ground,
Lecture 7: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Lecture 9 Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) Radio Aids & Navigational System.
1 Panel on New Air Traffic Control and Management Technology February 23, 2007 Regional Airport Planning Committee Panel on New Air Traffic Control and.
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter June, 2009 NASA LaRC | NC State University | APTIMA.
INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENT FLIGHT APPROACH RULES CHART APPROACH PROCEDURE
Review Chapter 4-8. Departure and Arrival Charts DPs, STARs and visual approaches are routinely assigned by ATC DPs and STARs are issued to simplify clearance.
Advanced Holding Patterns
Potential Safety Benefits of RNP Approach Procedures
Lecture 8: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Presented to: By: Dennis H. Whitley Date: April 12, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration SOUTHERN REGION FAASTeam/Area 1 Approach and Landing Accidents.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
Event Mission MPTS IJET FAM 2101 OFT FAMILIARIZATION EP SIMULATOR 1.5 HOURS/X.
REGULATIONS FOR ARMY AIRCRAFT CW2 ROBERT GOEBEL. Administrative Please turn off all: –Cell phones –Beepers –Palm Pilots –Gameboys –Stereos –Watch alarms.
Air Line Pilots Association, International IESALC Denver October19,2015 LED Lights In Runway And Approach Lighting Arrays A Pilot’s Perspective Captain.
99-11 UH-60 IPC IFR PUBLICATIONS & REGULATIONS WOPA.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: OSWG Presented by: Chris Hope Date: March 9, 2016 ILS Performance Classification OpSpec C061.
Final approach Instrument landing system
Non-radar Separation Longitudinal Vertical Lateral.
Kabul RNAV Visual & RNP-AR Process & Benefits
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter
Agenda • Classroom • Lab –System Configuration – Flight scenario 1
Presentation transcript:

Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter Pilot Equipment Familiarization and Scenario Overview Measures and Models of Aviation Display Clutter [ Year 2 Experiment ] June, 2008 NASA LaRC | NC State University | APTIMA

Experiment Setup - Aircraft Familiarization -

Simulator with Head-up Display Integration Flight Deck: No motion, ground-based Simulator Replicating forward Flight Deck of Boeing 757 HUD with new display features: Two instrumentation modes – PRIM (primary mode symbology) & IMC symbology Enhanced Vision System (EVS) Synthetic Vision System (SVS) Flight pathway guidance (TUNNEL) IFD Simulator

HUD Symbology

Tunnel “Crow’s feet” define vertical and horizontal extent of desired path 600 ft wide by 350 ft tall: +/- 1 “dot” on path deviation indicators “Linear” Deviation Segments every 0.2 nm Showing path 1 nm ahead

Flight Path Marker As speed increases relative to selected speed, “worm” increases in size Appears below flight path marker when decelerating

Path Deviation Indicators Vertical and lateral deviation path deviation indicators: Deviation scale Center, +/-2 Dots Pathway deviation indicator “Dogbones” Derived from navigation solution / “Synthetic Vision System” ILS deviation indicator Glideslope and localizer deviation No “Bends” No “Lies” “Raw Data” Full-Scale Localizer Deviation

Runway Outline (under 500 feet) Glideslope Reference Line (GSRL) Set at 3.1 degree Used for Flight Path Reference under 500 ft. Note: At 75 ft. above the runway, flare cues will emerge from the bottom of the display.

IMC HUD Configuration

IMC / Tunnel Configuration

IMC / Tunnel / SVS Configuration Wireframe rendering of terrain model (based on GPS database)

PRIM HUD Configuration

PRIM / EVS Configuration Shaded rendering of FLIR (Forward-looking Infra-Red Radar) When flying in clouds with the EVS “on”, FLIR returns on water vapor may create “ghost”-like images on HUD

PRIM / SVS / EVS Configuration

Experiment Setup - Scenario Familiarization -

Flight Scenario Overview KRNO ILS RWY 16R Final: Hand-flown with manual throttles Begins on localizer abeam PYRAM Ends with landing or missed approach decision Night/IMC: Weather near or below minimums Crosswinds with no gusts Go-around or landing performance will not actually be measured

Aircraft Configuration and Operation Autopilot and autothrottles inoperative PFDs and NDs inoperative All NAVAIDs set for approach FMC inoperative FD inoperative Landing and wing lights “off” in clouds. Can activate lights on breakout.

Roles and Responsibilities Captain Hand flying Verbalize all decisions at published minimums and EVS mins. Call for gear, flaps, etc. as desired. First Officer (FO) Handle ATC communication Actuate gear and flaps on command Set airspeed and altitude bugs Complete checklists Provide callouts as briefed (altitude) Will confirm objects in sight (visually) Will answer queries and confirm settings, procedures, etc.

Standard Approach Procedures Initial Approach 210 KIAS Gear and flaps retracted Below 210 KIAS Flaps 15 degrees Landing gear extended Below 162 KIAS Flaps 30 degrees Before landing checklist Approach Speed 138 KIAS for all landings

Approach Procedures (cont.) Standard Rules (without EVS) Runway must be visible with naked eye from published decision height EVS Rules Published decision height: Runway must be visible with EVS Continue to 100 HAT (Height Above Touch-down), if EVS shows approach lights, threshold, or touchdown zone. FAR 91.175c - For straight-in instrument approach procedures…the pilot [must] determine that the enhanced flight visibility observed by use of a certified enhanced flight vision system is not less than the visibility prescribed in the standard instrument approach procedure being used. 100 HAT Runway must be visible with naked eye Land only if threshold or touchdown zone visible