Multi-Institutional Data Predicting Transfer Student Success Denise Nadasen Anna Van Wie Institutional Research University of Maryland University College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Futures Project Policy Luncheon Austin, TX December 17, 2013.
Advertisements

Student Retention Tracking at UM. How to Define Student Success or Student Retention: First Year Retention (& Second, Third, etc. Year Persistence) Success.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
Lumina Urban Transfer Research Network Findings & Questions for Discussion.
Our Commitment to Student Completion & Success Elizabeth L. Bringsjord Interim Provost and Vice Chancellor University Faculty Senate October 25, 2013.
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Álvaro Marmolejo Davis, St. Cloud State University Stacy Griffey, St. Cloud Technical and Community College Partnering for Student Success: The Community.
INVESTIGATING MILESTONES AND COMPLETIONS AT A LOCAL INSTITUTION BASED ON ADELMAN’S STUDY, “THE TOOLBOX REVISITED.” What’s in YOUR toolbox? DANIEL MARTINEZ,
Examining pathways to the degree: what leads to student success? Kathi A. Ketcheson Ph.D. Portland State University EAIR Conference August 2008.
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team October 10, 2007.
BENJAMIN GAMBOA, RESEARCH ANALYST CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE RESEARCHING: ALPHA TO ZETA.
Toya Roberts-Conston African American Male Transfer Students’
The Differential Trajectories of High School Dropouts and Graduates By: Gregory P. Hickman, Ph.D. Mitchell Bartholomew Jennifer Mathwig Randy Heinrich,
The Creation of Two Comparison Groups to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision Making Prepared and Presented by Keith Wurtz Dean, Institutional Effectiveness,
An Academic Model for SEM Student Success in an Urban Commuter Institution Connie Kubo Della-Piana, Evaluation Director Benjamin Flores, MIE Project Director.
An Institutional Model for Student and Faculty Support Benjamin C. Flores, Ph.D. Principal Investigator and Project Director Model Institutions for Excellence.
1 Predicting Success and Risk: Multi-spell Analyses of Student Graduation, Departure and Return Roy Mathew Director Center for Institutional Evaluation.
Freshman Intensive Studies "A Unique Freshman Experience for Motivated Students!" Information Session Information Session
Program Review  Health Profession Advising  Key Communities  Orientation and Transition Programs  Outreach and Support  Undeclared Advising.
Effective Outreach Strategies to IT Students Lessons Learned by BATEC National Career Pathways Network Louisville, Kentucky October 10 –
AGC Update November Wyoming Public Schools’ Middle College is a collaboration between Wyoming Public Schools and Grand Rapids Community College.
1 Predicting Success in Math: The relationship between high school courses and remedial math in college Brandon Lagerquist Northshore School District Paul.
A Longitudinal Analysis of the College Transfer Pathway at McMaster Karen Menard Ying Liu Jin Zhang Marzena Kielar Office of Institutional Research and.
UPDATE ON PILOT PROJECTS FOR REMEDIAL EDUCATION AT IVY TECH Dr. Marnia Kennon, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Dr. Don Doucette, Provost.
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess.
Comparing the bachelor’s completion rates of native and transfer students using multiple informational sources Eric Lichtenberger National Institute for.
Achieving the Dream Dr. Jan Lyddon October What is Achieving the Dream?
Courageous Conversations about Equity at Century College Ron Anderson, President Linda Baughman-Terry, Counselor Nickyia Cogshell, Chief Diversity Officer.
Revisiting Retention: A Four Phase Retention Research Initiative 2012 SLOAN Conference October 10 th, 2012 Gary J. Burkholder, PhD Senior Research Scholar.
Marshall W. Garland Deborah L. Jonas. Ph.D. Chrys Dougherty, Ph.D. Anne Ware, Ph.D. Presentation at the 24th Annual Management Information Systems (MIS)
C ROSS I NSTITUTIONAL C OLLABORATIONS : B UILDING P ARTNERSHIPS FOR S TUDENT S UCCESS Montgomery College Prince George’s Community College University of.
Student Success Report Alison Carter November 10, 2014.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
Higher Education Conference on Enrollment Management February 29, 2008.
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures Annual Report to the Board of Trustees Academic Year
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
TETC-TYT Phase I Progress Presentation March 6, 2007.
Evan Picton, Research Analyst Wenatchee Valley College.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,
The University of Hawai ʻ i at Mānoa ACCESS TO SUCCESS: LEADING INDICATORS WORKGROUP.
© CCSR ccsr.uchicago.edu. © CCSR Early Warning Indicators of High School Graduation and Dropout Elaine Allensworth.
Graduation, Completion, and Transfer ATD Data Team Subcommittee report January 2011.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
Predicting Student Retention: Last Students in are Likely to be the First Students Out Jo Ann Hallawell, PhD November 19, th Annual Conference.
Identifying At-Risk Students With Two- Phased Regression Models Jing Wang-Dahlback, Director of Institutional Research Jonathan Shiveley, Research Analyst.
Strategic Planning in Driving Innovative Measures of Success Gregory W. LaPointe University of Maine at Augusta December 9, 2015.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity The University of Texas at El Paso April 2004 Evelyn Posey, Department of English Libby.
Ken Gonzalez, University of San Diego and Mary A. Millikin, Tulsa Community College 89th Annual AACC Convention April 5, 2009 Focus Groups: Putting the.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
Correlating Engagement and Student Success (Online version) Student Success Specialist Western Oregon University Jesse Poole.
Estimating Effects and Inferring Implications 2016 Academic Academy Sacramento, CA Terrence Willett Senior Consulting Researcher RP Group.
Undergraduate Student Persistence & Graduation advisor UI/WSU Advising Symposium September 9, 2011 Joel Michalski, Ph.D. Candidate & Karla Makus, Academic.
Working with Parents of First-Generation and Academically At-Risk Students Second Annual Georgia First-Year & Transition Studies Conference Friday, March.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
+. WHAT PAR IS:  Predictive modeling to determine student attrition risk  Visual presentation of commonly defined data to allow for benchmarking to.
Colleen Kibin, Assistant Director of Community College Relations, EMU
A Statistical Analysis Utilizing Detailed Institutional Data
Overview of Year One and Into Year Two November, 2016
The Impact of a Special Advising Program on Students’ Progress
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
The Impact, Costs, and Benefits of NC’s Early College Model
Sr. Vice President, Student Success
Civitas And Illume Sept. 21, 2014.
Dissertation RESULTS by Erin E. Cooper
SVC Students: Who are they
Toward a New Paradigm for Student Success
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Institutional Data Predicting Transfer Student Success Denise Nadasen Anna Van Wie Institutional Research University of Maryland University College

Outcomes for this Session You will learn about the: –Goals for this grant and the research project –Process for integrating a multi-institutional data base –Research questions, methods, and findings –Lessons learned and next steps 2

Goals of the grant Collaborate with the community colleges Define research questions and variables Build a dataset for transfer students Explore predictor/outcome variables Predict student success Report the results at national conferences Use the results to inform policy and practice to better serve transfer students 3

Collaborative Partners UMUC is an online institution that enrolls over 90,000 diverse students each year worldwide Prince George’s Community College is located within two miles of UMUC’s Academic Center and enrolls over 37,000 diverse students. Montgomery College is located within 10 miles of UMUC’s largest regional center, and enrolls over 35,000 diverse students. 4

The Team PI– President, Provost Sponsor – Institutional Research Partners –Montgomery College and Prince George’s Community College –Undergraduate retention and data mining specialist –External evaluators Researchers: –Cheoleon Lee, Jing Gao, Futoshi Yumoto, Husein Abduhl-Hamid Data Mining Specialists –Stephen Penn, The Two Crows 5

The Student Population Students enrolled at UMUC between 2005 and 2011 PG and MC transfer students –Direct compare (32,000) –National Student Clearinghouse (12,000) –UMUC records (8,000) 6

Merging Multi-Institutional Data Protect this data! Balance institutional-specific protocols with research-based definitions Address data anomalies Distinguish student level vs. course level Define LMS data –Limits on data extract 7

KDM Integrates student data –Community College and UMUC SIS –Demographic –Courses –Performance –Classroom behavior (LMS) 300 source and derived variables Gather from disparate sources One time snapshot 8

WT Online Classroom PeopleSoft Live SIS with UMUC students PGCC students and class data MC-PGCC-UMUC Transfers UMUC students who transferred from MC or PGCC and were matched in the BASE file Base Extract UMUC undergrad students enrolled between Spring 2005 and Spring 2011 Data Warehouse UMUC students from PeopleSoft Daily Update MC students and class data WT extract Classroom activity Prior Work derived data for transfer students

Question What barriers would your institution face in merging multi-institutional data? 10

Research Goals Define outcome variables Define predictor variables Model the student lifecycle Determine the success and failure factors Develop and implement interventions Impact outcomes 11

Outcome Variables Successful course completion (percent) First term GPA (dichotomized) Reenrollment in next term (Y/N) Retention (12 month window – Y/N) Student Classification (Slackers, Splitters, Strivers, and Stars) 12

Transfer Student Progressions 13 cc First Semester Semester 2 Last Semester Four-Year Institution Demog and Other Academic Work Transfer Graduate School

Research Studies 14

Which variables contribute to the prediction of online course success? The data: 4,558 new, undergraduate, first bachelor- degree seeking enrollments in 15 UMUC online gateway courses in Spring Transfer data on students from partner institutions, Montgomery College (MC) and Prince George's Community College (PGCC).

Methodology Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to identify key covariates. Logistic regression was used to predict course success.

Findings Total number of transferred credits is the best predictor of course success –pseudo R 2 value around.12 GPA from transferred credits is the second best predictor of course success –pseudo R 2 around.11 Semester course load contributes less to course success than other covariates.

Findings Four of five predictors derived from online student behavior show a strong contribution to successful course completion.

Final Predictive Model Significant Variables Total number of transfer credits Summary of students’ week 0 behavior prior to the first day GPA from transferred credits Semester course load Amount of time since students attended the last institution Significant Online behaviors Read a conference note Entering a class Created a conference note Created a response note

Which variables predict retention in an online environment? The same data set for the prediction of course success Add in retention status from Summer 2011, Fall 2011, and Spring 2012.

Methodology Logistic regression Preliminary analysis focused on the evaluation of covariates (as identified in the previous analysis) predictors based on the students’ coursework behavior, and course success.

Findings The covariates and student behavior variables made less of a contribution to this model than the prediction of course success. These results indicate that course success may be a good predictor of retention.

What is the relationship between prior academic coursework and UMUC first semester gateway course on re- enrollment? The population: Students new to UMUC in Fall 2008 to Fall 2010 Took ACCT220, BMGT110, CMIS102, GVPT170, or PSYC100 in their first semester.

Methodology Association algorithm Apriori to determine relationships between courses in previous academic work and re-enrollment rates. The algorithm indicates when a certain condition is found another condition can be expected.

Findings Significant Course Relationships Community College Course Disciplines First UMUC Course Math or BusinessACCT 220 Math or BusinessCMIS 102 Business or ScienceBMGT 110 Science or communicationGVPT 170 Math or communicationPSYC 100 We cannot assume causality

Current Studies 26

Examine CC Courses Explore relationship between CC courses and first term GPA Identify courses of interest Developmental Ed sequencing Successful completion of CC course Mixing course level and student level data 27

Predicting First Term GPA What CC variables predict first term GPA of 2.0 or higher? Course Efficiency CC courses –English, Math, Speech, Computer, Honors, On- line Course, Remedial Demographics –Age, Gender, Race, Marital Status, Cohort, Community College Origin, Terms skipped 28

The Population 9,063 students from MC and PGCC Mostly Single, African-American, and female Most do not skip terms Most get A’s and B’s at CC Most have >2.0 at UMUC Only PGCC offered online courses 29

Predictors of Success Race Gender Math Computer On-line Age Speech Course Efficiency English UMUC Marital Status C.C. Courses Honors Remedial Logistic Regression 30

Question What CC variables do you think are good predictors? 31

Findings Predictive variables: –Age, marital status, and under-represented minorities have predictive power –Math and Honors courses have positive effects –Remedial and Online have a negative effect –Course efficiency has a positive effect 32

Predicting Student Clusters Dataset includes all PGCC and MC students who transferred Student level derived variables Cluster students based on retention and first term GPA at UMUC Predict clusters from prior CC work and demographic variables 33

34 StriversStarsSlackersSplitters Success Quadrants Retention Yes Retention No GPA > 2.0 GPA < 2.0

Stay Tuned …. Data mining continues –So far, Stars appears to have distinguishing features Focus on top 50 CC courses and combinations of courses as predictors Focus on performance in gateway courses at UMUC as outcomes 35

Summary of Findings Positive effects –Transfer credit, prior GPA, math, honors, course efficiency, online activity, age, marital status –Course success can predict retention Negative effects –remedial, online, minority status 36

Interventions Identify areas of risk Collaborate with CC Develop intervention strategies –Advising –Messaging –Learning community –Course development 37

3 Projects Synergizing Kresge PAR Civitas 38

Next Steps Examine course success at the CC Implement/evaluate interventions Update KDM with more data Develop, understand, and explain predictive models to identify at risk students at the CC 39

Lessons Learned Long term plan for data up front Get a project manager Manage expectations Communicate progress far and wide 40

Questions Anna Denise 41