Parking Barriers to Smart Growth ABAG Technical Session: Smart Growth Strategies and Techniques for Parking February 25, 2004 Jeffrey Tumlin Nelson\Nygaard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

The Housing Crisis: There is an Alternative Birkbeck College Duncan Bowie University of Westminster 18 th November 2011.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
Smart Growth Makes Money: Transit Oriented Development.
GIS and Transportation Planning
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
The Smart Growth Transportation Model New Partners for Smart Growth January 25, 2002 Jeffrey Tumlin.
Economic Development Benefit/Cost Transit Slides.
1 “Metropolitan Structures Around the World” What is common? What is different? What relevance to Marikina in the context of Metro Manila? Marikina, May.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.
The Transit Metropolis. What is a Transit Metropolis? Transit metropolis is a region where a ‘workable fit’ exists between transit services and urban.
Overcoming Barriers to Smart Growth: Surprisingly Large Role of Better Transportation Modeling based on a paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study August.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Multimodal Concurrency: Response to 2005 Legislative Session Briefing for House Local Government Committee November 30, 2006 King Cushman Puget Sound Regional.
Associating David Levinson Questions How do people find jobs? Does land use pattern matter? How should JH Balance be measured? Jobs Housing Balance does.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Transportation’s share of our carbon footprint Transportation is growing faster than other sectors, accounted for half the growth in emissions from
Module 6 BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Less Traffic, Better Places Rethinking Parking Policy Patrick Siegman Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
Land Use Benefit/Cost Transit Slides. Development – Sprawl – Traffic – Roads An Important Local Issue In America  “What do you think is the most important.
USDOT-ECMT Workshop on Sustainable Travel November 5, 2003 Steve Heminger Executive Director Housing Incentive Program.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
© Cornerstone Partnership 2013 Best Practices in Inclusionary Housing Policy Design.
Effective Transportation Planning City of Seattle, WA.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Estimating Residential Infill Capacity: A Bay Area Application John D. Landis Department of City & Regional Planning UC Berkeley for Caltrans Horizons.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
1 Regional Parking Strategies for Focused Growth and Climate Protection Jeffrey Tumlin, Principal.
Rebecca Long November 9, Why is MTC interested in parking policies? 1.Land Use Impacts 2.Transportation Impacts 3.Other Regional Impacts.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
February 6, 2007 Steve Heminger Executive Director Smart Growth in the Bay Area: Carrots or Sticks Painted Orange? Carrots or Sticks Painted Orange?
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Resolution 3434 Transit-Oriented Development Policy Interim Evaluation September 7, 2006 MTC Elderly and Disabled Advisory Committee.
Peak Oil, Petrol Prices and Climate Change: Impact on Rural Communities Andrew Wear Manager Transport Connections.
1 VPP Regional Parking Project June 2nd, Key Policy Areas (11 Project Policy Questions) 2 1.Supply & Demand in the Bay Area 2.Parking Requirements.
TDM - Vancouver Experiences Strategic Transportation Planning, Sustainability Group TDM - Vancouver Experience October 21 st ACT TDM Summit 2008 Jo Yee.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
© ARRB Group Ltd Presented by Larry Schneider Principal Consultant Monday 29 th February 2016 City of Swan GUILDFORD PARKING.
Nothing But the Facts About Green Building, Density, and Climate Change.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Key Trends Shaping Transportation System Management Operations Timothy Papandreou CIO, Director Office of Innovation San Francisco Municipal Transportation.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transportation For Livable Communities Program.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Regional Transit Framework Study Regional Council September 24, 2008.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO October 19, 2017.
Options for TDR in Puyallup
Planning for automated travel
Presentation transcript:

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth ABAG Technical Session: Smart Growth Strategies and Techniques for Parking February 25, 2004 Jeffrey Tumlin Nelson\Nygaard

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Why is Parking Important? Parking supply and management is the difference between smart growth and sprawl: We need to manage and supply parking in line with broader goals  Parking consumes land  Parking is expensive Stuart Cohen, Transportation and Land Use Coalition

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin How is Parking Regulated?  Most local jurisdictions levy minimum parking requirements  Key aim: avoid spillover  Usually based on standards in neighboring jurisdictions, or derived from ITE Parking Generation

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Effects of Minimum Parking Requirements  Cost Makes Smart Growth less financially feasible Housing less affordable  Land unavailable for other uses  Impacts on design and pedestrian friendliness  Generates traffic  Ample, free parking provides little incentive to use alternative modes

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin How Much is Enough?  No right answer  No such thing as set “demand” for parking: Pricing Availability Transportation choices  Supply is a value judgment based on wider community goals  Don’t confuse supply and availability

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Parking Barriers to Smart Growth 1.Developers forced to provide more parking than unconstrained demand, due to: High minimum parking requirements Inflexible parking requirements 2.No incentives/requirements for developers to manage parking to support Smart Growth goals Two Scenarios Where Parking Hinders Smart Growth

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Three Broad Approaches for Local Jurisdictions 1.Tailor minimum parking requirements to match demand 2.Incentivize or require parking strategies to reduce vehicle trips and promote smart growth 3.Abolish parking requirements – let the market decide Choice depends on local context and planning goals

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Tailor Minimum Parking Requirements  Parking demand varies with geographic factors: Density Transit Access Income Household size  Cities can tailor parking requirements to meet demand, based on these factors

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Local Examples  Mountain View and San Jose – parking reductions for transit oriented development  San Rafael – reduced parking requirements downtown  Menlo Park and Milpitas – reduced parking requirements for high-density housing  Palo Alto and Marin County – studies to tailor parking requirements to meet demand Tailor Minimum Parking Requirements

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Advantages:  Avoids spillover problems  Reduces impacts of minimum parking requirements Disadvantages:  Complex to introduce effectively  Does not constrain parking demand  Sees parking requirements as a technical exercise, not a policy decision Tailor Minimum Parking Requirements

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Constrain Supply  Overall principle: encourage less auto-oriented development  Promotes self-selection – residents with fewer cars live close to transit  Different approaches: Parking maximums Requirements/incentives for demand management  Needs to be complemented with Residential Permit Parking or other strategies to stop overspill Catherine Preston, City of Cambridge

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Parking Maximums  Promote alternatives to the private automobile  Can tackle congestion if related to roadway capacity or mode shift goals  Maximize land area for other uses  Appropriate in areas with strong real estate market where priority is to minimize auto dependence  Examples: downtown San Francisco, Portland, Cambridge

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Parking Management Strategies  Strategies to reduce parking demand: Pricing Unbundling Car-Sharing Other demand management (e.g. EcoPasses)  Strategies to reduce parking impacts: Shared parking Structured parking Stacked parking/parking lifts Design requirements (e.g. wrap parking in active uses) Can be mandated or incentivized

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Abolish Parking Requirements  Let developers, the public and the market decide  Create a level playing field  Needs complementary Residential Permit Parking strategy to combat overspill Adam Millard-Ball, Nelson\Nygaard

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Role of Transit Agencies  Revise joint development policies – particularly parking replacement  Consider the total ridership potential of the project  Housing and commercial development generate more ridership per acre than surface commuter parking  Encourage projects that minimize parking and focus on the transit resources

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin Role of Regional Agencies  Promote best practices  Follow up studies of parking demand at completed developments  Condition major transportation investments on supportive land uses policies – particularly parking  Direct TLC/HIP funds to projects that minimize parking

Parking Barriers to Smart Growth Jeffrey Tumlin For More Information Jeffrey Tumlin Nelson\Nygaard Transportation Planning for Livable Communities 833 Market Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA Adam Millard-Ball, Nelson\Nygaard