ATLAS, 18-12-2009 1 ATLAS through first data Fabiola Gianotti (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
1 Japanese activities in LHC Takahiko Kondo, KEK November 28, 2005 KEK-DESY 1st Collaboration Meeting in Tokyo.
10/26/2005 ATLAS Visit Dr Pierre Coulombe President, National Research Council Canada Short introduction by Peter Jenni and Robert Orr.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
1 Beate Heinemann, UC Berkeley and LBNL Università di Pisa, February 2010 Particle Physics from Tevatron to LHC: what we know and what we hope to discover.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
ATLAS in the LHC collision era M.Bosman IFAE - Barcelona on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration IMFP 2010 – La Palma.
The performance of LHCf calorimeter was tested at CERN SPS in For electron of GeV, the energy resolution is < 5% and the position resolution.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
ATLAS detector commissioning with cosmics and first beam Alessandro Cerri on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Roger Jones: The ATLAS Experiment Ankara, Turkey - 2 May The ATLAS Experiment Roger Jones Lancaster University.
. APS meeting April 14 h, ATLAS Detector – status and plans David Lissauer Brookhaven National Lab. ATLAS Technical Coordination APS meeting April.
Japanese Commitment to the LHC experiments Katsuo Tokushuku (KEK) May 17, 2008 The KEK-CNRS/IN2P3-CEA/DSM/DAPNIA Collaboration Meeting at CRNS.
ATLAS status & physics overview Jon Butterworth (UCL ATLAS and ATLAS UK First look with a new detector First look in a new kinematic regime QCD plus…
1 ATLAS installation: Status about 3 years ago…. 2 ATLAS installation: Status half a years ago…
Andrea Ventura University of Salento & INFN Lecce on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration New Trends in High-Energy Physics Alushta, Crimea, Ukraine, September.
Taming the beast: Using Python To Control ATLAS Software David Quarrie NERSC Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 July 2006.
The Large Hadron Collider project is a global scientific adventure, combining the accelerator, a worldwide computing grid and the experiments, initiated.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Status of ATLAS and preparation for the Pb-Pb run QM 2009, Knoxville Jiří Dolejší Charles University Prague for the ATLAS collaboration.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
8/18/2004E. Monnier - CPPM - ICHEP04 - Beijing1 Atlas liquid argon calorimeter status E. Monnier on behalf of the Atlas liquid argon calorimeter group.
January 21, 2003 Transition from the Construction Project to Pre-Ops and Operations Howard Gordon.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics La Jolla, California Giovanna Lehmann - CERN EP/ATD The DataFlow of the ATLAS Trigger.
F.Gianotti, ATLAS RRB, Collaboration and Management matters First results from 900 GeV and 7 TeV collision data (in particular: first observation.
TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 1 ATLAS Tau Trigger Belanger-Champagne, C; Benslama, K; Bosman, M; Brenner, R; Casado, MP; Czyczula, Z;
ATLAS Tile Hadronic Calorimeter:
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Exploring QCD with Antiprotons PANDA at FAIR M. Hoek on behalf of the PANDA Collaboration IOP Nuclear and Particle Physics Divisional Conference 4-7 April.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
ITEP Physics Winter School, Moscow, 13-20/02/ D. Froidevaux, CERN Honorabilis et amplissimus rector, laudati conlegae Experimental prospects at the.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Test Beam Results on the ATLAS Electromagnetic Calorimeters Lucia Di Ciaccio – LAPP Annecy (on behalf of the ATLAS LAr Group) OUTLINE Description of the.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
First Measurement of Jets and Missing Transverse Energy with the ATLAS Calorimeter at and David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 13 May 2010.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
I nstrumentation of the F orward R egion Collaboration High precision design ECFA - Durham2004 University of Colorado AGH University, Cracow I nstitute.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Establishing large international research facilities: the HEP case 1st ASEPS Summit Tsukuba March 25, 2010 Sergio Bertolucci CERN LHC.
Searching for Compositeness with ATLAS Kaushik De University of Texas at Arlington For the ATLAS Collaboration DPF/JPS 2006, Hawaii November 1, 2006.
The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition System John Strong Royal Holloway, University of London.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
DOE/NSF Project Experience Key Ingredients to Success
ATLAS as an example of a large scientific collaboration
Depleted CMOS Pixel Detectors
ATLAS through first data
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
Status of ATLAS and CMS and prospects for the run
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS, ATLAS through first data Fabiola Gianotti (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration)

ATLAS, > 20 years of efforts of the worldwide ATLAS scientific community, supported by Funding Agencies and Governments Albany, Alberta, NIKHEF Amsterdam, Ankara, LAPP Annecy, Argonne NL, Arizona, UT Arlington, Athens, NTU Athens, Baku, IFAE Barcelona, Belgrade, Bergen, Berkeley LBL and UC, HU Berlin, Bern, Birmingham, UAN Bogota, Bologna, Bonn, Boston, Brandeis, Brasil Cluster, Bratislava/SAS Kosice, Brookhaven NL, Buenos Aires, Bucharest, Cambridge, Carleton, CERN, Chinese Cluster, Chicago, Chile, Clermont-Ferrand, Columbia, NBI Copenhagen, Cosenza, AGH UST Cracow, IFJ PAN Cracow, SMU Dallas, UT Dallas, DESY, Dortmund, TU Dresden, JINR Dubna, Duke, Edinburgh, Frascati, Freiburg, Geneva, Genoa, Giessen, Glasgow, Göttingen, LPSC Grenoble, Technion Haifa, Hampton, Harvard, Heidelberg, Hiroshima IT, Indiana, Innsbruck, Iowa SU, Iowa, UC Irvine, Istanbul Bogazici, KEK, Kobe, Kyoto, Kyoto UE, Lancaster, UN La Plata, Lecce, Lisbon LIP, Liverpool, Ljubljana, QMW London, RHBNC London, UC London, Lund, UA Madrid, Mainz, Manchester, CPPM Marseille, Massachusetts, MIT, Melbourne, Michigan, Michigan SU, Milano, Minsk NAS, Minsk NCPHEP, Montreal, McGill Montreal, RUPHE Morocco, FIAN Moscow, ITEP Moscow, MEPhI Moscow, MSU Moscow, Munich LMU, MPI Munich, Nagasaki IAS, Nagoya, Naples, New Mexico, New York, Nijmegen, BINP Novosibirsk, Ohio SU, Okayama, Oklahoma, Oklahoma SU, Olomouc, Oregon, LAL Orsay, Osaka, Oslo, Oxford, Paris VI and VII, Pavia, Pennsylvania, Pisa, Pittsburgh, CAS Prague, CU Prague, TU Prague, IHEP Protvino, Regina, Rome I, Rome II, Rome III, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, DAPNIA Saclay, Santa Cruz UC, Sheffield, Shinshu, Siegen, Simon Fraser Burnaby, SLAC, NPI Petersburg, Stockholm, KTH Stockholm, Stony Brook, Sydney, Sussex, AS Taipei, Tbilisi, Tel Aviv, Thessaloniki, Tokyo ICEPP, Tokyo MU, Tokyo Tech, Toronto, TRIUMF, Tsukuba, Tufts, Udine/ICTP, Uppsala, UI Urbana, Valencia, UBC Vancouver, Victoria, Waseda, Washington, Weizmann Rehovot, FH Wiener Neustadt, Wisconsin, Wuppertal, Würzburg, Yale, Yerevan ~ 2900 scientists (~1000 students), 172 Institutions, 37 countries

ATLAS, Since 20 November: a fantastic escalation of events ….

ATLAS, Monday 23 November: first collisions at √s = 900 GeV !  ATLAS records ~ 200 events (first one observed at 14:22)

ATLAS, Sunday 6 December: machine protection system commissioned  stable (safe) beams for first time  full tracker at nominal voltage  whole ATLAS operational

ATLAS,

7 Jet1: E T (EM scale)~ 16 GeV, η= -2.1 Jet2: E T (EM scale) ~ 6 GeV, η= 1.4 8, 14, 16 December: collisions at √s = 2.36 TeV (few hours total)  ATLAS records ~ events at flat-top

ATLAS, Detector is fully operational ■ Pixels and Silicon strips (SCT) at nominal voltage only with stable beams ■ Solenoid and/or toroids off in some periods ■ Muon forward chambers (CSC) running in separate partition for rate tests Online detector control panel

ATLAS, Recorded data samples Number of Integrated luminosity events (< 30% uncertainty) Total ~ 920k ~ 20 μ b -1 With stable beams (  tracker fully on) ~ 540k ~ 12 μ b -1 At √s=2.36 TeV (flat top) ~ 34k ≈ 1 μ b -1 Average data-taking efficiency: ~ 90% Max peak luminosity seen by ATLAS : ~ 7 x cm -2 s -1

ATLAS,

ATLAS, Spot size ~ 250 μm Trigger Scintillators (Z~± 3.5 m): rate up to ~ 30 Hz Collision trigger (L1) Online determination of the primary vertex and beam spot using L2 trigger algorithms High-Level Trigger in rejection mode (in addition, running > 150 chains in pass-through)

ATLAS, WLCG 12 Worldwide data distribution and analysis MB/s per day Total data throughput through the Grid (Tier0, Tier-1s, Tier-2s) Beam splashes First collisions Nov.Dec. Cosmics End of data taking ■ ~ 0.2 PB of data stored since 20 th November ■ ~ 8h between Data Acquisition at the pit and data arrival at Tier2 (including reconstruction atTier0) ■ increasing usage of the Grid for analysis

ATLAS, Inner Detector p K π 180k tracks Pixels Silicon strips Transition Radiation Tracker Transition radiation intensity is proportional to particle relativistic factor γ =E/mc 2. Onset for γ ~ 1000

ATLAS, p T (track) > 100 MeV MC signal and background normalized independently K0SK0S Λ

ATLAS, γ  e + e - conversions e+e+ e-e- γ conversion point R ~ 30 cm (1 st SCT layer) p T (e + ) = 1.75 GeV, 11 TRT high-threshold hits p T (e - ) = 0.79 GeV, 3 TRT high-threshold hits

ATLAS, π 0  γγ ■ 2 photon candidates with E T ( γ ) > 300 MeV ■ E T ( γγ ) > 900 MeV ■ Shower shapes compatible with photons ■ No corrections for upstream material Data and MC normalised to the same area Note: soft photons are challenging because of material in front of EM calorimeter (cryostat, coil): ~ 2.5 X 0 at η =0

ATLAS, Jets √s=2.36 TeV √s=900 GeV

ATLAS, Uncalibrated EM scale Monte Carlo normalized to number of jets or events in data events with 2 jets p T > 7 GeV

ATLAS, Missing transverse energy ■ Sensitive to calorimeter performance (noise, coherent noise, dead cells, mis-calibrations, cracks, etc.) and backgrounds from cosmics, beams, … ■ Measurement over full calorimeter coverage (360 0 in φ, |η| < 5, ~ cells) METy METx / METy indicate x/y components of missing E T vector METx

ATLAS, Good agreement in the (challenging) low-E region indicates good description of material and shower physics in G4 simulation (thanks also to years of test-beam …) Shower width in strip units (4.5mm) Photon candidates: shower shape in the EM calorimeter | η| < 0.8, 0.5 < p T < 10 GeV Cluster energy at EM scale Electron candidates: transition radiation signal in TRT More comparisons data – simulation: fundamental milestone for solid physics measurements Monte Carlo and data normalized to same area

ATLAS, ■ ATLAS has successfully collected first LHC collision data. ■ The whole experiment operated efficiently and fast, from data taking at the pit, to data transfer worldwide, to the production of first results (on a very short time scale … few days). ■ First LHC data indicate that the performance of the detector, simulation and reconstruction (including the understanding of material and control of instrumental effects) is far better than expected at this (initial) stage of the experiment and in an energy regime ATLAS was not optimized for. ■ Years of test beam activities, increasingly realistic simulations, and commissioning with cosmics to understand and optimize the detector performance and validate the software tools were fundamental to achieve these results. ■ The enthusiasm and the team spirit in the Collaboration are extraordinary. Conclusions This is only the beginning of an exciting physics phase and a major achievement of the worldwide ATLAS Collaboration after > 20 years of efforts to build a detector of unprecedented technology, complexity and performance.

ATLAS, ATLAS cavern, October 2005

ATLAS, Hector Berlioz, “Les Troyens”, opera in five acts Valencia, Palau de les Arts Reina Sofia, 31 October -12 November 2009 Many thanks to the accelerator team for the excellent machine performance, for the impressive progress over a few days of operation, and for the very pleasant and constructive interactions with ATLAS

ATLAS, Back-up

ATLAS, Electron candidates EM clusters E T > 2.5 GeV matched to a track  783 candidates in 330k minimum-bias events Data and MC normalised to the same area According to MC: ■ Sample dominated by hadron fakes ■ Most electrons from γ -conversions E (cluster) / p (track) Good data-MC agreement for (soft !) electrons and hadrons E T spectrum Transition radiation hits in the TRT (transition radiation from electrons produces more high-threshold hits)

ATLAS, Inner Detector (|  |<2.5, B=2T): Si Pixels and strips (SCT) + Transition Radiation straws Precise tracking and vertexing, e/  separation (TRT). Momentum resolution:  /p T ~ 3.4x10 -4 p T (GeV)  Length : ~ 46 m Radius : ~ 12 m Weight : ~ 7000 tons ~10 8 electronic channels Muon Spectrometer (|  |<2.7) : air-core toroids with gas-based chambers Muon trigger and measurement with momentum resolution < 10% up to  E  ~ TeV EM calorimeter: Pb-LAr Accordion e/  trigger, identification and measurement E-resolution: ~ 1% at 100 GeV, 0.5% at 1 TeV HAD calorimetry (|  |<5): segmentation, hermeticity Tilecal Fe/scintillator (central), Cu/W-LAr (fwd) Trigger and measurement of jets and missing E T E-resolution:  /E ~ 50%/  E  level trigger reducing the rate from 40 MHz to ~200 Hz

ATLAS, LUCID at 17 m ZDC at 140 mALFA at 240 m Zero Degree Calorimeter (Data taking in 2009) ALFA: Absolute Luminosity for ATLAS (Installation in 2010) LoI for Forward Proton detectors at 220 and 420 m (AFP): ongoing ATLAS review Forward detectors Luminosity Cerenkov Integrating Detector (Phase 1 operational since 2008)

ATLAS, Jets Jet1: E T (EM scale)~ 16 GeV Jet2: E T (EM scale) ~ 6 GeV √s=2.36 TeV Jet1: E T (EM scale)~ 15 GeV Jet2: E T (EM scale) ~ 12.5 GeV √s=900 GeV Jet1: E T (EM scale)~ 37 GeV Jet2: E T (EM scale) ~ 37 GeV

ATLAS, Rejection factor of ~10 4 looking for space points in the Inner Detector at Level 2 trigger Beam injection, record collision events. HLT algos off. HLT active after LHC declares stable beam BPTX prescaled by x20 as input to L2 ~20

ATLAS, Dataflow EB High Level Trigger LVL2 ROS LVL1 Det. R/O TriggerDAQ 2.5  s ~40 ms Calo MuTrCh Other detectors L2P L2N RoI RoI data (~2%) RoI requests LVL2 accept (~ 3 kHz) SFO LVL1 accept (75 kHz) 40 MHz EF EFP ~4 sec EF accept (~0.2 kHz) ROD ROB SFI EBN EFN DFML2SVROIB 500 nodes 100 nodes 150 nodes 1800 nodes Infrastructure Control & Monitoring CommunicationDatabases ~100 nodes Architecture 140M Channels

ATLAS, charged particles The Transition Radiation detector (TRT) Transition radiation is emitted whenever a relativistic charged particle traverses the border between two media with different dielectric constants. TR intensity is proportional to the particle  -factor  for a given particle momentum p, electrons emit more TR than pions  TR detectors used for particle identification Radiator: Polypropylen foils (15  ) interleaved with straws Foil Anode wire Xe straw HV -  Energy of TR photons (proportional to  1 -  2 ): ~ keV (X-rays)  Many crossings of polypropylene foils (radiator) to increase TR photons  Xenon as active gas for high X-ray absorption

ATLAS,