History/Social Studies State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 January 22 and 24.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Era of the Common Core Standards Network Meeting, January 11, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Assessment for Learning.
Advertisements

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Supporting Participating Teachers Through the CCSS Transition
Introduction: The Structure and Scope of the 3-5 Modules November 2012 Common Core Ambassadors.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Introduction Understanding “The Why”
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library Brian Huff September 3, 2014.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
State Standards Professional Learning Secondary Mathematics Cycle 2 January 13- February 7.
ELA/Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects ESUHSD CCSS Summer Institute June 8, 2012 Preparing for CCSS Assessments: Performance-based.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Two: November 2, 5, 6, 7, 2013.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 1 October 13- November 8.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 Science
Overview of English language arts (ELA) assessment Vaughn G. Rhudy, Ed.D., NBCT Assessment Coordinator Stacey Murrell, Ed.D. Interim.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.
CORE California Office to Reform Education C ALIFORNIA E DUCATION P ARTNERS Summer Design Institute June 18-20, 2012.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
May 13, 2011 Getting to Know the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS FALL MEETING -- OCTOBER 26, 2014 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 ELA January 13- February 7.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Boot Camp 2014 The 4 Cs in the Common Core. Marta Stirling School Library Coordinator, East River Joan Upell School Library Coordinator, West River.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 1 October 13 - November 8.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
Using SVMI & SDCOE Resources to Support Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium SBAC October/November 2013 Cider Mill School.
Good Morning Please get your materials from the back table Thank you for sitting in grade-level groups. Non-grade level staff please choose one of the.
Getting Started  Role  Experience with Common Core 1 – Novice 5 – Preparing to lead this work  Agenda  Materials on Wiki – 
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
What about the Assessment System?
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium SBAC
Presentation transcript:

History/Social Studies State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 January 22 and 24

As you arrive …  Sign in at the back tables.  Sit as an AC.  Coaches and District Support Staff please join site teams where there is space available.  Pick up the handouts.  We will begin at 8:30 a.m. Welcome Teachers! 2

Celebrations FUSD Teachers! 3

Professional Learning Design for the Year  Cycle 1: October/November 2014  Classroom Teachers Foundation Lead Teachers- December  Cycle 2: January/February 2015  Classroom Teachers Foundation Lead Teachers- February/March 4

Instructional Commitments  Engage students in complex talk, complex tasks and complex text to address reading, writing, listening and speaking standards.  Engage students in Common Core grade level standards.  Engage students in higher levels of thinking reaching levels 2, 3, and 4 using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK).  Engage students in assessments that are standards- based and SBAC aligned. 5

Outcomes for Cycle #2 By the end of the session, participants will…  Build common vocabulary on assessment and create an assessment for use in the next instructional unit in alignment with Smarter Balanced Assessment claims.  Identify technology embedded within the State Standards and design classroom opportunities to teach digital literacy. 6

Layers of Support Students Read, write, and speak grounded in evidence Teachers Commit to planning and implementing new learning that supports reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence Coaches Support teachers to plan and implement new learning Leaders Support teachers to take risks with new learning 7

Our Norms for Learning and Working Together  Be Present  Arrive On Time  Active Listener  Active Participant—Smile! Enjoy our learning.  Minimize Distractions  Technology at Break  Focus on Topics  Be Aware of the Larger Group’s Needs  Noise Levels  Site Specific Issues 8

Today’s Agenda  Welcome/Introduction  Setting Context/Building Background  Assessment Literacy  SBAC Common Vocabulary  Evidence Based Design  H/SS Assessments  Educational Technology  Digital Literacy  Resource Exploration  ABC-CLIO  Create AC Common Assessment for Quarter 3  Closure and iACHIEVE Survey 9

Setting the Context 10

1. Applying knowledge of the purposes, characteristics, and uses of different types of assessments 2. Collecting and analyzing assessment data from a variety of sources to inform instruction 3. Reviewing data, both individually and with colleagues, to monitor student learning 4. Using assessment data to establish learning goals and to plan, differentiate, and modify instruction 5. Involving all students in self-assessment, goal setting, and monitoring progress 6. Using available technologies to assist in assessment, analysis, and communication of student learning 7. Using assessment information to share timely and comprehensible feedback with students and their families 12 CSTP 5: Assessing Students for Learning

FUSD Continuum of Standards 13

Activator: 14

Activator- Assessment Terms  Assessment literacy is a broader topic than what we are focusing on today. 1. From the list of assessment terms, use the scale to rate your familiarity. 2. Use the notes column to write down definitions or examples of the terms you know 3. Fill any blank spaces in the notes column as you hear the presentation. 15

Assessment Literacy 16

The Assessment Challenge How do we get from here......to here? All students leave high school college and career ready Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness...and what can an assessment system do to help? 17

Two Dimensions of Assessment  Formative and Summative Formative and Summative  Embedded and Transfer of Learning 18

Formative or Summative?  Formative  Intention – inform next steps for teaching / learning  During an instructional sequence (lesson, module, unit)  Feedback is descriptive  Not for grading/ accountability  Summative  Intention - determines status of learning  After instructional sequence  Evaluative feedback  Ok for grading / accountability 19

Embedded or Transfer of Learning?  Embedded Within the unit/lesson A part of the teaching/ learning  Transfer of learning Can students transfer what is learned through teaching to a new context, without teaching support? 20

Scope and Sequence Vocabulary  District Common Assignment- A task charging students to engage in content and skills distinguished by a PROMPT, A PRODUCT, AND A RUBRIC  an assignment is intentionally taught and focused on student achievement. (FUSD Common Assignment includes the above definition for K-12)  Previously known as the Culminating Task  AC created using district provided frame 21

Common Assignments 22

Quarterly Design One Example 23 Quarterly Focus: Themes Projects Units Common Assignment Assignment Lessons Activities Assessments Lessons Activities Assessments Assignment

Shifts in Summative Assessment  Each state procured their own assessments  Measured proficiency against state, not agreed upon standards  Results often delivered months after the test  Most administered on paper  Common, comparable scores across states measuring college and career readiness  Providing achievement and growth information for educational decisions and professional development  Administered online, with timely results From: To: 24

A Balanced Assessment System- Smarter Balanced Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness All students leave high school college and career ready Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction 25

SMARTER BALANCED Digital Library Resource For Formative Assessment 26

Taught Curriculum The Aligned Instructional System Written Curriculum Assessed Curriculum CCSS Content Standards ELA Anchor Standards Mathematical Practices Instructional Shifts Materials/resources Depth of Knowledge In Addition to classroom formative and summative assessments: SMARTER Balanced Assessment Blueprints 27

Evidence-Centered Design 28 Traditional Item Development versus Evidence-Centered Design Task Models Claims Assessment Targets Evidence Identify standard, create a multiple-choice question, an answer, and three distractors

SMARTER Balanced Test Blueprints Components include:  Claim  Content Category (Cluster)  Assessment Target  Item Type  DOK level 29

Understanding the SBAC Blueprints Overarching Claims 3-8 and High School Targets Standards Assessment Claims 30

Overarching Claims for English Language Arts/Literacy () Total English language arts / literacy (Grades 3-8) “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” Total English language arts / literacy (High School) “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” 31

Claims for ELA & Literacy 32 Claim #1 Reading: Students can read closely and analytically to comprehend a range of increasingly complex literary and informational texts. Claim #2 Writing: Students can produce effective and well- grounded writing for a range of purposes and audiences. Claim #3 Speaking/Listening: Students can employ effective speaking and listening skills for a range of purposes and audiences. Claim #4 Research: Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics, and to analyze, integrate, and present information.

The SBAC Blueprint- ELA 33

The SBAC Blueprint- ELA 34 The Common Core Standards Feed into the Targets

Getting to Know Task Models (Formats)  Selected Response  Multiple Choice  Multiple Answer  Binary Options (T/F)  Constructed Response  Short Response  Extended Response  Performance Task 35

Information Processing/ Constructed Response Items Short Answer Increasing Rigor Information Processing/ Constructed Response Items Short Answer Increasing Rigor SBAC-Aligned Performance Task Cognitive Ramp Performance Task/Product Analytic Essay Prompt Quantitative Problem Scoring Rubric Performance Task/Product Analytic Essay Prompt Quantitative Problem Scoring Rubric Cognitive Demand Student Performance Level Item “Stimulus” Text Data Set Analytic Tools “Stimulus” Text Data Set Analytic Tools Low Mid High Annotated Student Work Exemplars Annotated Student Work Exemplars Teacher Directions 36

Creating a Grade Level Assessment  Determine whether this assessment is to be embedded or transfer of knowledge  Determine whether this assessment is to be formative or summative  Identify the Standards to be addressed  Identify the range of complexity (DOK)  Determine which item type(s) support the standard(s) to be assessed 37

Billy Sunday and Rev. Wasson Item Written for C3 Framework and CA H/SS Standards Compared to an Item Written for CCSS Literacy Standards 38

H/SS Summative Assessments Test a student’s ability to think historically within the context of the chosen H/SS CA standards and C3 indicators that are called out in the appendix of the Scope and Sequence. 39

Accountable Community Teamwork 1. Each grade level will be given a piece of text tied to a CA H/SS Standard from the Quarter 3 Scope and Sequence. 2. Choose a C3 Indicator from the Quarter 3 Scope and Sequence. 3. Write a summative assessment item. 40

Gallery Walk 41 Walk around the room with your AC and take a look at the work of others Discuss what you observe, take pictures, get contact information.

Summarizer: Revisiting the Vocabulary 42

60 Minutes LUNCH 43

Educational Technology 44

Educational Technology 45  Technology, used effectively, can help all students meet and exceed the rigorous learning goals embedded in the Common Core State Standards  Focus on developing the necessary technology integration skills for mastery of content, development of College and Career Ready skills, and performing well on the Smarter Balanced Assessments  Will promote students who are engaged and empowered to be inquisitive, creative, and resourceful problem-solvers who discover, collaborate and interact in meaningful ways

Digital Literacy Instructional Technology  Prerequisite computer skills  Online Assessment Literacy  Common Core standards enhanced and supported by technology Educational Technology: Areas of Focus 46

Digital Literacy Instructional Technology  Students are explicitly taught the skill of how to input numbers and create a spreadsheet on the tablet  During a math lesson, students create a spreadsheet to demonstrate understanding of information from a data set pulled from math text Mathematics Example 47

 Prerequisite Computer skills  Scope & Sequence  Modules Digital Literacy 48

Digital Literacy- Quick Survey  How are you embedding digital literacy skills into your instruction?  Keyboarding Skills?  Linked to writing?  Using classroom tablets? 49

Challenges  As a table write down some of your continued challenges.  Listen to the sorting categories. 50

Technology Scope & Sequence 51

Embedded in State Standards 52

Technology Scope & Sequence Resources 53 Coming Soon!

ABC-CLIO 54 Teachers: fresnostaff Students: fresnousd (Username and Password are the same)

Searching Databases 55

World History: The Modern Era 56

Topics 57

The Reformation 58

Martin Luther: Ninety-Five Thesis 59 0

Quarter 3 Common Assessment 1. Choose a CA H/SS Standard 2. Choose a C3 Indicator 3. Find text from ABC-CLIO to use 4. Write a summative assessment item 60

iACHIEVE Survey 61

Closure  Report out any interesting resources or features of a resource that your grade level found. 62