McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview on the GHS REINER ARNDT, GERMANY Implementation of the GHS Stockholm Convention Side Event 3 May 2005.
Advertisements

Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues Marian Ford Erin Gonzales November 2, 2010.
Chemical Category Formation: Toxicology and REACH Dr Steven Enoch Liverpool John Moores University 14 th May 2009.
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Gijs Schaftenaar.
Value of in vitro assays in your REACH dossier Frédérique van Acker 18 November 2014.
The Research Process. Purposes of Research  Exploration gaining some familiarity with a topic, discovering some of its main dimensions, and possibly.
Nano-Safety: Some Future Perspectives Conference on Nano-Safety April, Slovenia, Ljubljana Bjorn G. Hansen dHoU Chemicals, DG ENV, European Commission.
~ Science for Life not for Grades!. Why choose Cambridge IGCSE Co-ordinated Sciences ? IGCSE Co-ordinated Sciences gives you the opportunity to study.
Nanotechnology Summary. Potential Worker Exposures.
Assessment Strategies and Decision Making Tools Draft Report 4´2002 Martin Wirts Kooperationsstelle Hamburg.
What is the GLP?.
1 European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct 2001 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment HERA in the global chemical management scene Lothar Kistenbrügger.
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency October 25, 2005 Region 2 Emerging Chemicals Workshop.
U.S. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics December 12, 2006.
Mike Comber Consulting TIMES-SS Assessment of skin sensitisation hazard Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia.
The Conclusion and The Defense CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12 CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12.
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics Irene Kouskoumvekaki Associate Professor December 12th, 2012 Biological Sequence Analysis course.
New or increasing occupational exposure to chemical and biological agents Gérard Lasfargues Deputy Director General, Anses.
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
Paola Gramatica, Elena Bonfanti, Manuela Pavan and Federica Consolaro QSAR Research Unit, Department of Structural and Functional Biology, University of.
Mike Comber TIMES-SS Application of Reactivity Principles in Screening for Skin Sensitisers Presented on behalf of the TIMES-SS consortia & International.
December 2006Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce 1 Using the EPA HPVIS to Form Chemical Categories for Hazard Assessment Sandra Reiss Murphy, PhD Arkema.
Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October File Note : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October 2006S. Vanhiesbecq.
Nano to go Raising awareness in material science and startup enterprises Dr. Rolf Packroff, Dr. Aart Rouw, Dr. Aline Reichow Federal Institute for Occupational.
The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) for Skin Sensitisation (SS): How We Got Here and Where We are Going 1 T. W. Schultz Professor Emeritus The University.
Fatigue Management as part of Safety Management
T. W. Schultz Presented at the McKim Conference September 17, 2008.
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 108 (2014) 203–209 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS WE THANK THE EC PROJECT NANOPUZZLES (PROJECT REFERENCE: ) Optimal descriptor.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
Barcelona April, 2008 Overview of the QSAR Application Toolbox Gilman Veith International QSAR Foundation Duluth, Minnesota.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Narcosis as a Reference Gilman Veith.
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 16-18, 2008 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
THE PRAGMATICS OF CORRELATION OR HOW MODELS RESHAPE THE GOVERNMENT OF TECHNICAL OBJECTS BRICE LAURENT & FRANÇOIS THOREAU CENTRE DE SOCIOLOGIE DE L’INNOVATION,
Use of Machine Learning in Chemoinformatics
McKim Workshop on Strategic Approaches for Reducing Data Redundancy in Cancer Assessment Duluth, MN, USA 19 May, 2010.
Material Safety Data Sheet
McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007 Toxicity Pathways as an Organizing Concept Gilman.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
Quality Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Meeting Users ’ Requirements for Internet Quality of Service Anna Bouch, Allan Kuchinsky, Nina Bhatti HP Labs Technical.
Expert Sub-Group on EQSs –1. EQS Methodology Setting –2. Prioritization ? DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCES FOR WORKING GROUP E ON PRIORITY SUBSTANCES (Collaboration.
Linking LRI AMBIT Chemoinformatic system with the IUCLID Substance database to Support Read-across of Substance endpoint data and Category formation N.
Nanosafety ISO TC 229 Nanotechnologies Standardization in the field of nanotechnologies that includes either or both of the following:  1. Understanding.
QSAR Application Toolbox: First Steps - Data Gap Filling (Read-Across by Analogue Approach)
REACH 2018 Assess hazards and risks of your chemicals.
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
Communication: Safety Summary
Forming Chemical Categories..
QSAR Application Toolbox: Step 12: Building a QSAR model
Towards Good Read Across Practice
General Concepts in QSAR for Using the QSAR Application Toolbox
Background This is a step-by-step presentation designed to take the first time user of the Toolbox through the workflow of a data filling exercise.
Hierarchical Classification of Calculated Molecular Descriptors
OECD work on manufactured nanomaterials
Category elements for assessing category consistency
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research Method Issues
Chapter 1 Section 1 What is Science?
P. Gramatica1, F. Consolaro1, M. Vighi2, A. Finizio2 and M. Faust3
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
Presentation transcript:

McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology QSAR in Predictive Toxicology Gilman Veith McKim Conference on Predictive Toxicology The Inn of Lake Superior Duluth, Minnesota September 25-27, 2007

QSAR and Predictive Toxicology QSAR is intended to focus attention and resources on chemicals most likely to have a specific behavior. In predictive toxicology, QSAR provides the initial hypotheses before any testing is conducted Proper integration with other alternative methods will: -eliminate testing of chemicals with low hazards -eliminate testing of chemicals similar to tested surrogates -identify potential hazards of a chemical most relevant to safety -integrate toxicology into virtual systems models

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship QSAR is an approach for understanding complex phenomena in chemical behavior There are simple rules to this approach choose well-defined activity endpoints choose plausible molecular descriptors explore the data with statistics test hypotheses with new data (ie. iterate) These rules are ignored in 90% of QSAR papers)

Initial EU Interpretation Select a defined endpoint Select available descriptors for modeling Gather training sets and create models Emphasis on validation of statistical models instead of mechanisms

Flaws in Initial Efforts Ignored the importance that QSAR models require two predictions: predicting the intrinsic behavior (mechanism) predicting the intensity factor (potency) QSAR models focused on endpoint-training data regardless of mechanisms QSAR models without clear logic for the domains are not accepted by regulators

What do we mean by Chemical Categories? A group of chemicals that have some features that are common Structurally similar e.g. common substructure Property e.g. similar physicochemical, topological, geometrical, or surface properties Behaviour e.g. (eco)toxicological response underpinned by a common Mechanism of Action Functionality e.g. preservatives, flavourings, detergents, fragrances

Annex IX of REACH Substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity may be considered as a group, or “category” of substances. Application of the group concept requires that physicochemical properties, human health effects and environmental effects or environmental fate may be predicted from data for a reference substance within the group by interpolation to other substances in the group (read-across approach). This avoids the need to test every substance for every endpoint.

OECD Definition of Category A chemical category is a group of chemicals whose physicochemical and toxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity These structural similarities may create a predictable pattern in any or all of the following parameters: physicochemical properties, environmental fate and environmental effects, and human health effects >1000 tonnes in at least 1 Member Country OECD Manual for Investigation of High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals.

The Chemical Category Solution Forming chemical categories shifted emphasis to intrinsic chemical activity Entire categories of chemicals can be assessed when only a few are tested Filling data gaps involves read-across & trend analysis, not just QSAR models Enables defensible hazard assessment with elaborate QSAR models