Ani Aprahamian. Research Highlights - Examples NSF - External Home page NSF - Mathematical and Physics Sciences Directorate NSF -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restructuring of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) Program Creating New Opportunities for Collaborations and Partnerships in.
Advertisements

Nuclear Physics Peer Review Processes 1.Objectives 2.Types of activities and relevant processes 3.New project /major upgrade 4.Project R&D 5.Exploitation.
The Physics of Nuclei, Nuclear Matter and Nucleosynthesis Report of the Nuclear Physics Advisory Panel.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Electromagnetic Force QED Strong Force QCD Gravitational Force General Relativity galaxy m matter m crystal m atom m atomic nucleus.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
 Introductions  Webinar etiquette ◦ Please place your phone on MUTE if you are not asking a question or not responding to the presenters. ◦ If you encounter.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." Robert Oppenheimer after the first test of the atomic bomb.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
Nuclear Physics UConn Mentor Connection Mariel Tader.
1 ADVERTISEMENT Program Manager In Search of NSF EPP Rotator A year working in our Nation’s Capitol! (well, real close by) For 1 Year starting ~ 1 September.
Funding Opportunities NSF Division of Undergraduate Education North Dakota State University June 6, 2005.
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond Orbach February 25, 2003 Briefing for the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee FY04 Budget.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
J.5.1State what is meant by deep inelastic scattering. J.5.2Analyze the results of deep inelastic scattering. J.5.3Describe what is meant by asymptotic.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
The Future of US Accelerator Science – Comments from NSF Tony F. Chan Assistant Director MPS/NSF AAAS Chicago February 13, 2009.
Particle Physics Professor Kay Kinoshita University of Cincinnati.
LSC – Hanford, WA 11th November 2003 The View from NSF Funding: FY 03 (actual) & FY 04 (prospects) Funding Opportunities for GP Research Some Developments.
Research at Jefferson Lab – K. A. Aniol, M.B. Epstein, D.J. Margaziotis What ? 1)Investigate the structure of nucleons and nuclei. 2)Determine at what.
Nuclear Physics A Glimpse into the Quantum Universe Ramone Brown, Solomon Utain Mentor: Dr. Richard Jones Nuclear Physics 1.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Planning Divisional Town Meeting Mission Statement of your Division – What is or should be the mission statement of your division?
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
The FY 2009 Budget Thomas N. Cooley, NSF Council of Colleges of Arts and Sciences March 13, 2008.
My Chapter 30 Lecture.
Research at Jefferson Lab – K. A. Aniol, M.B. Epstein, D.J. Margaziotis What ? 1)Investigate the structure of nucleons and nuclei. 2)Determine at what.
Kyungseon Joo Program Director (IPA) for Nuclear Physics JLab Users Meeting June 4 - 6, 2012.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
th session of JINR SC 1 JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Recommendations of the JINR Directorate for the financing of projects and themes.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
1 Probing the Forces between Quarks with Photon Beams Ryan Roussel Nuclear Physics Mentor: Dr. Richard Jones.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
The New Physical Sciences Complex A state-of-the-art center for cutting-edge research in some of the most exciting & promising areas of science: Condensed.
CARRUTHERS LSC 3/20/06 1 LIGO-G M The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer National Science Foundation (703)
Overview of NSF and the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Overview of NSF and the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) Tom Brady Division.
Curtis A. Meyer Nuclear Science in the United States The Core of Matter The Fuel of Stars.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Workshop on Women in Science and Engineering Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab November 16, 2009.
LSC - Hanford, WA 19–22 August 2002 The View from NSF GP Funding FY 2002 NSF Funding Prospects FY 2003 Funding Opportunities for GWP Some Areas of Special.
May 27-30, 2008 Nuclear Physics at NSF Research and Education –200+ faculty –80+ postdocs –200+ graduate students –150+ undergraduates University facilities.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
The RIA Users Organization (RIAUO) Witold Nazarewicz (Tennessee) EURISOL Week, CERN, November 2006 History The Mission Organization Activities Perspectives.
May 15-16, 2003RHIC-AGS User Group Meeting NSF Nuclear Physics Budget Overview: FY2003, FY2004 NSF Initiatives Physics Division issues.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
June 1-5, 2009 June 8-10, 2009 Nuclear Physics at NSF NP Experiment –Structure –Heavy Ions –Symmetries –Hadrons and QCD NP Theory Particle and Nuclear.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
Particle Detectors January 18, 2011 Kevin Stenson.
Particle Physics Why do we build particle accelerators? The surface is flat Still flat Oh no its not Big balls cannot detect small bumps.
08/04/04 Renee Harton SULI Program Event Simulation using Monte Carlo Methods Renee Harton Massachusetts Institute of Technology SULI Program Supervisor:
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
DOE Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) Program
GlueX Collaboration Meeting
National Science Foundation Update
NSF CAREER TTVN Seminar February 3, 2009
Unit 7.3 Review.
DOE Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) Program
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Perspectives from DOE NP
Presentation transcript:

Ani Aprahamian

Research Highlights - Examples NSF - External Home page NSF - Mathematical and Physics Sciences Directorate NSF - Physics Division Budget (FY ) New Initiatives (???) DUSEL MRI DNDO Solicitation on PetaApps: NSF Solicitation on PFCs: NSF Normal Grants People - Invitation

Press Release The Kapok Connection: Study Explains Rainforest Similarities Research explains how ocean currents carried seeds from South America to Africa Kapok tree seeds traveled across the ocean from South America to Africa after continents split. Credit and Larger Version Credit and Larger Version Press Release The Kapok Connection: Study Explains Rainforest Similarities Research explains how ocean currents carried seeds from South America to Africa Kapok tree seeds traveled across the ocean from South America to Africa after continents split. Credit and Larger Version Credit and Larger Version June 15, NSF External Home Page

Press Release Magnetic Field Uses Sound Waves to Ignite Sun's Ring of Fire Research explains century-old mystery about the interior of the sun Jets of hot gas and sound waves escape sun's surface through magnetic "portals". Credit and Larger Version Credit and Larger Version May 29, 2007 Sound waves escaping the sun's interior create fountains of hot gas that shape and power a thin region of the sun's atmosphere which appears as a ruby red "ring of fire“ around the moon during a total solar eclipse, according to research funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and NASA.

Latest News See All NSF - Mathematical and Physics Sciences Directorate Finding the Charge In the Pion The strong "nuclear" force is believed to be mediated by the exchange of gluons between quarks, which represent the building blocks of protons, neutrons and nuclei, which in turn account for nearly all the visible matter in the universe. The "strong" label implies that the force has complex properties, and it is important to find relatively simple systems for which experiments can provide important tests of theoretical predictions. One such system is the pion - the lightest known strongly interacting particle, with about one seventh the mass of the proton. Study of the basic properties of the pion, such as its precise mass, its lifetime (less than one microsecond), and the spatial distribution of its charge have the potential to reveal important clues about the nature of the strong force. The pion is often pictured as built from one each of the lightest quarks and anti-quarks; in fact, quantum chromodynamics, the theory of the strong force, predicts that it exhibits precisely this structure in the limit of very-high-energy scattering experiments. However, much of the pion's mass comes, not from these two tiny contributors, but instead from a "sea" of additional quark-antiquark pairs, along with a large number of gluons, so the picture is indeed more complex at lower energies. One important question is to determine the energy region where the simple quark-antiquark picture of the pion emerges. Recently, determination of the pion's charge distribution has been pushed to the highest possible precision and the shortest distance scales presently accessible with modern techniques. A charge distribution is measured by observing the pattern of electrons that scatter from the desired object that is placed in front of an intense electron beam. Since pions have such a short lifetime, the experiment uses a container of hydrogen, whose nuclei (each consisting of a single proton) are continuously surrounded by a "cloud" of pions which in turn serve as the "target" for the beam. The new results from this experiment indicate that the short-distance scale studied in this experiment is still far from the region where the simple quark- antiquark picture of the pion emerges, but the information is still useful for understanding the more complex contributions from gluons and the quark- antiquark "sea." Plans are now underway to push these measurements closer to the transition region with the planned energy upgrade at Jefferson Lab. The experiment was carried out at the Department of Energy's Jefferson Lab in Newport News, Virginia, by an international collaboration including groups from Canada and the Netherlands, as well as several groups supported by the NSF Nuclear Physics Program, including the University of Maryland, Hampton University, James Madison University, the College of William and Mary, and California State University - Los Angeles. The experiment constituted the Ph.D. thesis of NSF-supported graduate student Tanja Horn from the University of Maryland. Primary Strategic Outcome Goal: Discovery: Foster research that will advance the frontiers of knowledge, emphasizing areas of greatest opportunity and potential benefit and establishing the nation as a global leader in fundamental and transformational science and engineering. Secondary Strategic Outcome Goals: Learning: Cultivate a world-class, broadly inclusive science and engineering workforce, and expand the scientific literacy of all citizens.

Researchers Observe Rare Light-emitting Decay of Neutrons The research was conducted by physicists at Tulane University, University of Michigan and University of Maryland (all supported by NSF) in collaboration with scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Physics Laboratory and the University of Sussex in the UK. Neutrons -- the tiny particles that match with protons to form the innards of nearly every atom in the universe – decay when left to fend for themselves outside an atomic nucleus. For decades, researchers have predicted but never proved that roughly 1 in 1,000 of those decays will produce light in the form of an energetic photon. Now, for the first time, researchers have caught the photons from that "radiative decay" in action. Reporting in the Dec. 21, 2006, issue of Nature, a team of researchers from the United States and Britain show results that may confirm neutron radiative decay.

Searching for New Forces with the Electron's Weak Charge Cartoon representing how two electrons will interact by the exchange of particles. The two known forces of electromagnetism and the weak force are described by the exchange of a photon and a Z boson, respectively. This experiment searched for the exchange of possible new particles, which would represent a new force. Permission Granted Credit: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Andy Rogers, doctoral student at the Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL), adjusts a detector that measures charge, mass and other properties of nuclear fragments. NSCL helps to train 10% of the nation’s nuclear physics PhDs.

Jill Pinter, doctoral student at the Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL), works on the apparatus that measures magnetic properties of short-lived nuclei. NSCL is the nation’s largest university campus-based nuclear physics laboratory.

Chris Compton, research engineer at the Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL), inspects prototype superconducting radio frequency cavities. NSCL is making strategic investments in next-generation accelerator technology.

Through its participation in the Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics (JINA), the Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory fosters interdisciplinary work in nuclear astrophysics, including research on how elements are created in stellar explosions.

An NSF-supported community outreach program encourages students in communities surrounding the Michigan State University National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) to create science-inspired art – some of which is on display in the NSCL lobby.

Physics Division: up 6+% NSCL operations: +$1M Nuclear Theory up 5% –Continuing to implement NSAC theory recommendations Nuclear Experiment flat Joint NSF/DOE DUSEL R&D CAREER awards –Silas Beane (New Hampshire) –Harald Griesshammer (George Washington U) –Manuel Calderon de la Barca Sanchez (UC Davis) Nuclear Physics FY2007

FY2008 R&RA Budget Request ($M)

FY2008 MPS Budget Request ($M)

New Initiatives Computing – PetaApps Accelerating Discovery in Science and Engineering through petascale simulation and analysis. Deadline: July 23,2007 DUSEL R&D – Deadlines past for this year, will repeat next year deadline past NSF-DOE deadline past MRI – Deadlines past and award to be announced soon. DNDO – Panels to take place soon deadline past NSF and DHS deadline past Next year: April 2, 2008 Next year: April 2, 2008 Physics Frontier Centers Program Solicitation Program Solicitation NSF Preliminary Proposal Due Date(s) (required): August 29, 2007 Full Proposal Deadline(s) January 30, 2008 By Invitation Only

FY2008 Proposals Target Date for Physics Division* Wednesday September 26, 2007 *Must discuss/get permission if delayed

NSF and DUSEL #1 priority for new project start in NSF Physics Division

NSF People NSF Director: Arden Bement NSF Deputy Director: Kathie Olsen MPS Assistant Director: Anthony Chan Physics Division Director: Joe Dehmer Nuclear Physics (experiment): Bradley D. Keister Ani Aprahamian (also PNA) Nuclear Physics (theory): Bradley D. Keister Interested in joining us?

Backup Slides

NSF and DUSEL Well-matched to NSF mission: –Broad, multidisciplinary scientific program –New & unique opportunities for growth, diversity, interdisciplinary research –Intrinsically strong program for education, outreach DUSEL is a joint initiative within NSF between Physics (lead), Engineering, and Geosciences –Biology currently serving in advisory capacity

Status of DUSEL Process Solicitation 3 (S3): -S3 called for proposals consisting of formal Conceptual Design Reports, project plan for design phase -Proposal deadline 09 January Open competition -Single site will be selected for further development, based on panel review -Chosen site will receive up to $5M award per year for up to three years for development of technical design -S3 review is currently in process

Our current plan targets a FY2010 construction (MREFC) start This will be adjusted to optimally respond to budgets, project readiness, the approval process and other factors Conceptual Design Board approved Construction Readiness Stage

Searching for New Forces with the Electron's Weak Charge Cartoon representing how two electrons will interact by the exchange of particles. The two known forces of electromagnetism and the weak force are described by the exchange of a photon and a Z boson, respectively. This experiment searched for the exchange of possible new particles, which would represent a new force. Illustration by Juna Kurihara, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Permission Granted Credit: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

The Physics Frontiers Centers (PFC) program supports university-based centers and institutes where the collective efforts of a larger group of individuals can enable transformational advances in the most promising research areas. The program is designed to foster major breakthroughs at the intellectual frontiers of physics by providing needed resources such as combinations of talents, skills, disciplines, and/o r specialized infrastructure, not usually available to individual investigators or small groups, in an environment in which the collective efforts of the larger group can be shown to be seminal to promoting significant progress in the science and the e ducation of students. Activities supported through the program are in all sub-fields of physics within the purview of the Division of Physics: atomic, molecular, optical, plasma, elementary particle, nuclear, astro-, gravitational, and biological physics. Interdisciplinary projects at the interface between these physics areas and other disciplines and physics sub-fields, e.g. biology, quantum information science, mathematical physics, condensed matter physics, and emerging areas of physics are also included.

The Bigger Picture… Construction funds for projects of this size & scope are developed through the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) line at NSF MREFC projects are funded via separate congressional budget line items (New money) Construction start requires approval from the National Science Board (NSB) and, ultimately, Congress Additionally, projects must pass a readiness threshold (Preliminary Design Stage) before they can move forward to the NSB for consideration

Two New Precision Muon Measurements  gPgP MuLan MuCap Submitted to PRL 10-fold reduction coming Supports chiral prediction Nearly independent of OP Expect final error ~7% g P = 7.3 ± 1.1    MuLan  = (24)  s (11 ppm) G F = (6) x GeV -2 (5 ppm) Submitted to PRL

In 2006: events on tape additonal run planned MuLan at PSI ~600 ns after fill