SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi1 BABAR Status and Outlook Marcello A. Giorgi on behalf of BaBar Collaboration EPAC meeting - SLAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
MSSM Precision tests of the flavours in the SM Model Indep. Analysis in  B=2 MFV, mainly high tan  scenarios Achille Stocchi (LAL-IN2P3/CNRS)
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
.. Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration APS/DPF Meeting Philadelphia, April 5 - 8, 2003 Cracking.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Toru Iijima & Koji Ikado (Talk presented by T.I.) Nagoya University May 15, 2006 “Flavour in the LHC CERN The First Evidence of B   from Belle.
CHARM 2007, Cornell University, Aug. 5-8, 20071Steven Blusk, Syracuse University D Leptonic Decays near Production Threshold Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
1 Physics Case of L=10 36 e + e - B Factory Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Université Paris-Sud and IN2P3-CNRS.
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
Sergio Grancagnolo Activity Summary 9 Jan work in BaBar The apparatus Physics with BaBar Data analysis.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Moriond EW, 3 Mar 2008Tagir Aushev (EPFL, ITEP)1  B → K S  0  0  B → K S K S  B → K S  0  B → D *+ D *-  B → a 1 , a 1 K, b 1 , b 1 K...  
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Guglielmo De Nardo Napoli University and INFN 7th Meeting on B Physics, Orsay, France, October 4th 2010.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Wouter Verkerke, UCSB Limits on the Lifetime Difference  of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B 0 B 0 mixing Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
Andrzej Bożek nz11Highlights of the Belle Experiment SAB Review Selection of the most important Belle results since last SAB review (2005):  B 0.
Rare B Decays with “Missing Energy” Tom Browder (University of Hawaii) Will discuss experimental results from Belle on B   ν (BELLE-CONF-0671) and B.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
1 BaBar & Belle: Results and Prospects Claudio Campagnari University of California Santa Barbara.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
M.N MinardAspen Winter Meeting LHCb Physics Program On behalf of LHCb collaboration M.N Minard (LAPP) Status LHCb ( R.Jacobson) Single arm spectrometer.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.
Belle and Belle II Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
V.Tisserand, LAPP-Annecy (IN 2 P 3 /France), on behalf of the B A B AR collaboration. Aachen (Germany), July 17 th -23 rd Charmed B hadrons with.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Present status of Charm Measurements
David B. MacFarlane SLAC EPAC Meeting January 25, 2006
Physics Progress and Plans Adrian Bevan
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford/Fermilab) ICHEP 2006, 29 July 2006
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
CP Violation lectures Measurement of the time dependence of B0B0bar oscillation using inclusive dilepton events [BABAR-CONF-00/10] G. Cerminara.
Presentation transcript:

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi1 BABAR Status and Outlook Marcello A. Giorgi on behalf of BaBar Collaboration EPAC meeting - SLAC

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi2 BABAR DCH EMC DIRC COIL IFR SVT The B A B AR Collaboration 10 Countries 75 Institutions 579 Physicists Canada China France Germany Italy The Netherlands Norway Russia United Kingdom USA [4/18] [1/5] [5/55] [3/30] [11/101] [1/2] [1/3] [1/9] [10/66] [38/290]

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi3 New environment: high luminosity asymmetric collider 1)Search for CP violation in B meson decays largely predicted by the Standard Model 2)Test extensively at this low energy scale the Standard Model by measuring precisely enough quantities to impose constraints on the Standard Model parameters CP in b sector has been established by BaBar and Belle TRY to open windows on new Physics beyond Standard Model More precise CKM measurements, Rare B decays, Charm study, Tau rare decays. BaBar Physics GOALS

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi4 CP in Standard Model CKM quark mixing matrix b  ul B  (  ) l CP Violating phase B  D (*) l b  cl B  (  )  B 0 Mixing Unitarity

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi5 Experimental ingredients: BaBar optimized for time dependent CP asymmetries z   (4S) = 0.55 Coherent BB pair B0B0 B0B0   Start the Clock zz Tag vertex reconstruction Flavor Tagging Exclusive B Meson and Vertex Reconstruction     J/ 

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi6 Time dependent rate,flavor mixing and CP,T,CPT Time dependent rate: dN  exp(–|  t|/  B ) ( 1 ± D (S sin(  m  t) - Ccos(  m  t)) )  R CPV in Mixing -Decay CPV direct D is the mis-tag dilution R is the time resolution CP mixing decay z  0 CP & CPT violation CP and T Violation in mixing SM

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi7 Fit without the “usual assumptions”! Fit B  CP and B 0  flavor eigenstates (  / , q/p, z and CP left FREE) 90% C.L. The “usual assumptions” work!  Direct limit on   Test of CPT invariance  Indirect CP in mixing Preliminary

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi8 LOOK for N.P. in Loops? from charmonium channels Results are so far CKM compatible but… sssdsssd KSKS sssdsssd sin(2  ) = ± stat ± syst ?

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi9 B 0   +  -    sin2  eff With incomplete information on Penguin contamination: Measure S  and C  from both sin  m  t and cos  m  t terms. Compare with predicted S  and C  values for given , , |P/T|, and . Assume for instance: From sin2  eff to sin2  ? isospin analysis, needs B 0     cf. Gronau and Rosner, Phys. Rev. D65, (2002) BABAR Belle 1 Belle 2

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi10 B 0        )  the CP fit Time integrated direct CP: Time dependent CP: Asymmetry between rates: First step towards  in B  . Full Dalitz analysis in progress. Preliminary

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi11 Toward  : the B   D 0 CP K  approach sin2  from the triangles (Gronau-Wyler method): BaBar measurements: Preliminary

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi12 |V ub | from fully tagged SL decays Brecoil Breco D(*)D(*)  Y(4S) l XuXu Recoil of fully reconstruted B (~4KB /fb -1 ) b  ul signal: M X (< M D ) (  ~ 60-80%) S/B  1.7: good! Preliminary

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi13 Rare B decays b  u : tree, CKM suppressed b  s,d: Radiative (QCD, EM, EW) Penguins FCNC Leptonic decays: B 0  l + l -, B  , B  l +, … tree QCD penguin EM penguin EW penguin  probes b inside B Possible New Physics signatures: rates and phases from virtual particles in the loops

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi14 Not only B Physics in BABAR ! A new state decaying into D + s (1970) and  0 has been discovered by us and recently confirmed by CLEO! D + s  0 D + s  K + K -  + D + s  K + K -  +  0

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi15 An example: D mixing Very small in the S.M.  2  additional suppression  A window for new physics Charm, tau discovery potential lepton number is violated in many extensions of the S.M. (present limits, O (10 -6 ) are not far from some model predictions ) D0D0 c c u u d,s W-W- W+W+ V cd,cs V * cd,cs V * ud,us V ud,us D0D0 “long distance”  -iy “short distance”  x D0D0 D0D0 K-,K-, K+,+K+,+ Another example: lepton flavour violation S.M., extended to include mixing and mass:    BR(    O ( )

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi16 Luminosity: Present and Future FY2002 FY2003 Longer term So far in Run 3: On peak fb -1 Off peak 2.57 fb -1 By the end of the decade: 1  2 ab -1 Summer 2002 and Winter 2003: Run 1 + Run 2 On peak 83.9 fb -1 Off peak 9.6 fb M BB pairs Summer 2003: Run 3 add 40 fb -1 By end 2006: 500 fb -1

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi17 Next about sin2  Extrapolated statistical and systematic uncertainties Statistical uncertainty Golden modes (*) (*) This syst error of is dominated by DCS decays of charm in K tagged events. Lepton tag is not affected !

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi18 What next for Sin 2  Pure penguin process B  K s The present value with 80 /fb is: S=sin2  = stat.±0.09syst. With 2/ab  (S) goes down to 0.1 But also B  ’ K and B K K K NEW PHYSICS ? New quanta in the loop?

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi19 Results (0.08 ab -1 ) for BFactories Extapolations for sin2  eff Extrapolated errors (BaBar)

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi20 r=0.2 (2ab -1 ), sin 2  fit: sin 2    from B -  D 0 (CP) K - : projections Recent experimental results (BaBar) Toy MC projections: (Fit unreliable for r = 0.1) r=0.3 (0.5 ab -1 ), sin 2  fit  sin 2   A CP =0.174  r=0.2  =60 o  =30 o (2ab -1 )

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi21 projected errors for |V ub | Selection: One B reconstructed in D ( * ) X Lepton momentum and neutrino mass Kaon veto, charge balance Fit M x with constraints M X distribution fit: b  ul, b  cl, background Errors: Statistical L(ab -1 ) =  stat (%) = Experim. Systematic ~5% (now)  2.5% (b  cl bkgd) Theoretical ~ 9% (  (m b )=90MeV)  5% ( b  ul  above cut) M x (GeV)

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi22 B beam method “B – beam” Breco D(*)D(*)  Y(4S) l h B factories present an unique peculiarity. Events are pure B B and a full reconstruction of one side allow to treat the other as a pseudo B-beam. The study of rare decays with neutrinos are becoming possible with very high integrated luminosity.

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi23 Integrated luminosity vs physics BaBar2006  2009 ? 2002 Continuous improvement

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi24 Some comments about comparison with Hadron machine expts. CKM parametersBABAR/Belle BTeV/LHC-B 2 ab s Sin  (charmonium) 0.015stat/0.018syst 0.025/0.014 Sin  (penguins b  sss) 0.10 stat ---- in  S  eff (B 0  0.06 stat 0.024/0.056  eff –  ( B 0     ) <10° ---- Sin(  ) (B 0  D*     )  (B  DK) 7° <10°/<19° |Vub| 1.4%+ Th. Unc.(now better 10%) ---- Of course Bs mixing and decay can be studied well at hadron machines (  and a lot of good physics from Bs)

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi25 Rare decays - Summary ChannelBF BTeV/LHC-B (10 7 s) BABAR/BELLE (2 ab -1 ) b  s  3.3± K 6.8K(Btagged) B  K*  K24.0K B   (  )  K b  s  ± K 1.2K b  se+e- 1.4K B  K*  ± K/4.5K 0.5K B  K*e+e- 0.6K b  s ± BK* B   B   35  Limit< Bfactory and hadron machine measurements are complementary ! Rates… Fully reconstructed B on the other side are used The so called B beam option Asymmetries!

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi26 What about Detector? SVT! BABAR is a VERY good detector: very difficult to improve it!! (On IFR barrel is the only major intervention needed) SVT is 98% efficient. No degradation due to irradiation has been observed so far SVT so far tested for rad hardness up to 4 Mrad (OK!) rad tests are going on. Partial SVT replacement is considered by Almost 50% of modules built as spare.

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi27 Instrumented Flux Return –2000 m2 –342 barrel RPCs –432 endcap RPCs –32 cylindrical RPCs Electronics –3300 Front end cards ~ 40 mV threshold 16 channels connected to alternate strips Gas –35% Freon 134a, 4.5% iso-butane, 60.5% Argon –1-3 volume changes/day High Voltage –> kV HV pods

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi28 BABAR RPC Operates in limited streamer mode Parallel high resistivity plates (Bakelite   cm ) Graphite ~100 k  /  RPCs were filled 3 times with a mixture of 70% linseed oil and 30% n-pentane and dried by air for several days. Changes from L3 RPCs –Polycarbonate buttons with lip replaced G10 cylindrical button –Thicker oil layer –Single layer with strips on both sides –No mechanical envelope –Nonflammable gas - low iso- butane %, CBrF 3 replaced by Freon 134a C 2 H 2 F 4 Efficiency of barrel RPCs after production ~97%

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi IFR complete May 99 RPC efficiencies good Warning signs –Some RPCs with > 100 mA were disconnected With collision data –HV current limitations force reduction in # of RPCs Average Efficiency low ~85% Barrel is about 50% of total IFR coverage Forward Endcap about 40% Decision was taken in 2000 to upgrade the Forward Endcap with new RPC (higher QA/QC level) and with more absorber.

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi30 Absorber Segmentation 7 layers 2 cm 1 layer 7 cm 2 layers 9 cm 2 layers 13 cm 2 layers 10cm total 85 cm New Forward EndCap from nov 2002 Terminology: 19 slots and 15 RPC layers RPC belt Slot18/19 5 brass layers (slot 8,10,12,14,16)

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi31 RPC problems (post mortem photo) Gas inlet Debris Whiskers Excess oil Opposite side Linseed oil – uncured oils move under HV and warm temperatures Graphite layer develops high resistance Internal debris and whiskers 5% of barrel has HV problems before New HV distribution ~50% of the barrel modules leak (many have normal efficiency) Front End electronics problems

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi32 IFR Barrel Upgrade Muon selectors losing efficiency A committee was setup in september 2002 to evaluate physics motivation for a IFR upgrade and technology. B.Ratcliff and C.Hearty were chairing the committee. After 3 months the committee Presented its recommendations to BaBar. Many RPCs die since Fraction effectively dead is now almost 40%

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi33 Committee proposes to increase the thickness of the absorber and to replace the bakelite RPC with a more robust detector (Limited StreamerTube). INSTALLATION in 2004 & 2005 We have submitted a proposal and ask for your approval. FINAL DOCUMENT May22,2003

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi34 Summary Babar apparatus is generally very robust and can cope with high luminosity environment above Decision has been taken to upgrade the IFR Barrel with a different technology well established and robust (LST). Preliminary measurements of pure penguin processes for sin2 , measurements of Vub, B->DK, B->  including  Dalitz plot analysis. FUTURE – In 2005 complete the installation of the IFR Barrel. Install the Spare modules of SVT, to replace the heavily irradiated modules on horizontal plane. Approach the precision measurement with 0.5/ab of integrated luminosity. Towards more than 1.0/ab explore possible openings for new physics. Study of CP asymmetries but also rare decays in b, c and tau sectors. Profit from full reconstruction of one B : “ Pseudo B beam”

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi35 BACKUP SLIDES

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi36 Flavour mixing and CP,T,CPT  m=m H -m L  2|M 12 |  0.5ps -1 1/  1.6 ps  =  H -  L  |M 12 |Re (  12 /M 12 )  SM CP and T Violation in mixing As in K sector where  k =(p-q)/(p+q)  ~O(10 -3 ) SM

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi37 Flavour mixing and CP,T,CPT CP an CPT conservation if H 11 =H 22 CP and CPT VIOLATION Assumptions made in the usual sin2  analysis:

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi38 Time Dependent CP asymmetries CP eigenvalue Amplitude ratio B 0 f cp /B 0 f cp B mixing Measured from data (Flavour sample)! D mis-tag dilution R time resolution CPV in mixing-decay interference direct CPV dN  exp(–|  t|/  B ) ( 1 ± D (S sin(  m  t) - C cos(  m  t)) )  R Flavour tag

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi39 Search for B +  + B  candidate Semileptonic tag D0D0  Y(4S) cos  B,Dl  for B  D 0  X tags  Total signal-side neutral energy Semileptonic tags : BF(B +  + ) < 4.9  (90% CL) Fully reco tags: BF(B +  + ) < 7.7  (90% CL) combined : < 4.1  Preliminary

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi40 RPC efficiency % /month -0.56%/month Gas change

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi41 Detector studies Realization that the RPC efficiencies did not recover after cooling spurred detector studies –Efficiency was computed as a function of position Limited tests were carried out during accesses or on a few chambers –Lowered barrel temp. to 17  C. –Reversed HV –Increased gas flow –Lowered discriminator threshold –Put weights over inefficient regions No effect Gas composition was regularly tested –No evidence of water vapor A wide spread of plateau curves were measured.

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi42 RPC radiography The RPC efficiency was mapped in 2D showing irregular regions of reduced efficiency. D. Piccolo

SLAC 06/12/03 EPAC meeting Marcello A. Giorgi43 Occupancy plots for run Brick shields ~.8 m from L 16