Comparison of HIRLAM data with Sodankylä soundings – tools and results Evgeny Atlaskin Russina State Hydrometeorological University Saint-Petersburg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GABLS workshop, Stockholm, June 2007 Simple but realistic cases from Cabauw for GABLS Fred Bosveld (KNMI) with contributions from: Peter Baas Gert.
Advertisements

A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
An Intercomparison of Surface Observations and High-Resolution Forecasting Model Output for the Lake Okeechobee Region By Kathryn Shontz July 19, 2006.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Outline of Talk Introduction Toolbox functionality Results Conclusions and future development.
Weather Station Models What do they mean? How do you translate them?
1 Variability of sea surface temperature diurnal warming Carol Anne Clayson Florida State University Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute SSTST Meeting.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 3.
Comparison of Eddy Covariance Results By Wendy Couch, Rob Aves and Larissa Reames.
Chapter 5 Soundings.
Are the results of PILPS or GSWP affected by the lack of land surface- atmosphere feedback? Is the use of offline land surface models in LDAS making optimal.
HWRF Model Sensitivity to Non-hydrostatic Effects Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop May 4, 2009 Katherine S. Maclay Colorado State University.
Peak Performance Technical Environment FMI NWP Activities.
Convective indexes calculated from HIRLAM output St.Petersburg The Russian State Hydrometeorological University Faculty of Meteorology Meteorological Forecasting.
THE EFFECT OF THE SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON THE DICE RESULTS SEEN BY THE MESONH MODEL M. A. Jiménez, P. Le Moigne and J. Cuxart DICE workshop, October.
Optical Measurements of Aerosols for MIRAGE-MEX University of Iowa Bill Eichinger John Prueger Piotr Lewandowski Heidi Holder.
Atmospheric Moisture Vapor pressure (e, Pa) The partial pressure exerted by the molecules of vapor in the air. Saturation vapor pressure (e s, Pa ) The.
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
SENSIBLE HEAT FLUX ESTIMATION USING SURFACE ENERGY BALANCE SYSTEM (SEBS), MODIS PRODUCTS, AND NCEP REANALYSIS DATA Yuanyuan Wang a, Xiang Li a,b a, National.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Objectives Review Vocabulary
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
The revised Diagnostics of 2m Values - Motivation, Method and Impact - M. Raschendorfer, FE14 Matthias Raschendorfer DWD COSMO Cracow 2008.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first.
1/26 APPLICATION OF THE URBAN VERSION OF MM5 FOR HOUSTON University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Sylvain Dupont Collaborators: Steve Burian, Jason.
Ground-based energy flux measurements for calibration of the Advanced Thermal and Land Application Sensor (ATLAS) Eric Harmsen, Associate Professor Dept.
Properties of the Atmosphere
Lecture 8 Evapotranspiration (1) Evaporation Processes General Comments Physical Characteristics Free Water Surface (the simplest case) Approaches to Evaporation.
USE THESE VALUES. e(T) = e s (T Dew ) PRACTICE WITH STABILITY.
The Linear and Non-linear Evolution Mechanism of Mesoscale Vortex Disturbances in Winter Over Western Japan Sea Yasumitsu MAEJIMA and Keita IGA (Ocean.
Large-Eddy Simulations of the Nocturnal Low-Level Jet M.A. Jiménez Universitat de les Illes Balears 4th Meso-NH user’s meeting, Toulouse April 2007.
Development of a one-dimensional version of the Hirlam-model in Sweden Background: This model has been run operationally for about nine years now. Mainly.
Bulk Parameterizations for Wind Stress and Heat Fluxes (Chou 1993; Chou et al. 2003) Outlines: Eddy correlation (covariance) method Eddy correlation (covariance)
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Project: Study of radiative and thermal physical properties of the snow-ice cover (drifting and land fast ice, glaciers) in the Spitsbergen archipelago.
Ground-based energy flux measurements for calibration of the Advanced Thermal and Land Application Sensor (ATLAS) Eric Harmsen, Associate Professor Dept.
Overview The FSU 1-Dimensional Planetary Boundary Layer Model was utilized courtesy of Dr. Paul Ruscher, to examine the changes that in soil moisture content.
Variational Approach to Improve Computation of Sensible Heat Flux over Lake Superior Zuohao Cao 1, Murray D. Mackay 1, Christopher Spence 2 and Vincent.
Results Time Study Site Measured data Alfalfa Numerical Analysis of Water and Heat Transport in Vegetated Soils Using HYDRUS-1D Masaru Sakai 1), Jirka.
Ship-board Flux Measurements made during CalNex 2010 C.W. Fairall, D.E. Wolfe, S. Pezoa, L. Bariteau, B. Blomquist, C. Sweeney Air-Sea flux measurements.
The nature of rain events in summer vs. winter at the SGP ARM Facility MPO 581 Class Project Emily Riley, Siwon Song, & Brian Mapes.
WMO RTC-Turkey facilities, Alanya, Turkey Templates and Regulations
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
Processes in the Planetary Boundary Layer
Height Matters. Wind, Temperature, and Humidity.
A Case Study of Decoupling in Stratocumulus Xue Zheng MPO, RSMAS 03/26/2008.
Properties of the Atmosphere. Heat vs. Temperature  Temperature – measure of how rapidly or slowly molecules move around.  Higher the temperature =
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading for today: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 Reading.
HIRLAM coupled to the ocean wave model WAM. Verification and improvements in forecast skill. Morten Ødegaard Køltzow, Øyvind Sætra and Ana Carrasco. The.
Cloud Formation  Ten Basic Types of Clouds (Genera): l High: Ci, Cs, Cc l Middle: As, Ac l Low: St, Ns, Sc l Clouds of Great Vertical Extent: Cu, Cb 
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Meteorological Variables 1. Local right-hand Cartesian coordinate 2. Polar coordinate x y U V W O O East North Up Dynamic variable: Wind.
Hydrologic Losses - Evaporation Learning Objectives Be able to calculate Evaporation from a lake or reservoir using the following methods – Energy Balance.
Hydrologic Losses - Evaporation
Timo Vihma, Evgeni Atlaskin, and Laura Rontu
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
Lecture 8 Evapotranspiration (1)
Properties of the Atmosphere
Dan Harnos, Jessica Colberg, Joseph Ching, Michelle Pitcel
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
By Cécile Renaudie (Météo France/SHOM)
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
Hydrologic Losses - Evaporation
Comparison of Aircraft Observations With Surface Observations from
A Comparison of In-Situ Data with Meso-Scale Forecasts
Compare and Contrast of cloud base height data
The Scale (Size) of Weather Systems
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of HIRLAM data with Sodankylä soundings – tools and results Evgeny Atlaskin Russina State Hydrometeorological University Saint-Petersburg

HIRLAM data  Vertical scale is determined by parameters A and B that are given for additional model levels  P k±1/2 = A k±1/2 + B k±1/2 P s  and for main model levels  P k = A k + B k P s

Sounding data  12 hour measurements at different heights: -temperature -relative humidity -wind speed -some synoptic masurements  Vertical scale is not fixed, i.e. there are no constant levels

Comparison of temperature and dew point temperature  Sounding data are calculated at the HIRLAM model levels determined by the same expression as for HIRLAM  P k±1/2 = A k±1/2 + B k±1/2 P s_obs P s_obs is an observational surface pressure  Linear interpolation of (dew point) temperature with respect to logarithmic pressure is applied for those levels

Determination of sounding temperatures at main model levels  Method of trapezes is applied - case when one or more sounding points are inside a model layer

- case of absence of souding points within the model layer

Ground based comparisons  Mast data available for comparison: Temperature Radiation fluxes Sensible heat flux Latent heatflux Momentum flux

Conclusions  Tools for comparisons of HIRLAM data with soundings are prepared and are available to use in boundary layer  Temperature time series at Sodankylä mast (surface 3m, 32m) could be plotted for comparison with HIRLAM T2m  Flux measurements are also prepared in appropriate format for further usage