National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Writing A Research Grant Proposal The basics Knowledge Formal training in a specific scientific discipline Up to date information regarding the latest.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Jackson Heart Study Graduate Training and Education Center
Ten Fatal Flaws of NIH Grant Submissions (and how to avoid them) Steffanie A. Strathdee, PhD Thomas L. Patterson, PhD.
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
Specific Aims or Selling your Science in One Page Pedro Fernandez-Funez Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neuroscience
NIH Writing Your Specifics Aims CHIP Grant Workshop 2014 Amy Gorin, Ph.D. Listen Up! This is a critical section of your application.
Science Grant/Proposal: Development and Writing Michael Hadjiargyrou Department of Biomedical Engineering Fall 2011.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
RGC Grant Applications in Biology & Medicine Formulating and Writing winning proposals Kathy Cheah, 2003.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 3 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Preparing Grant Applications
(from 2003 workshop presentation on NSF funding mechanisms & proposal strategies)
Writing Research Proposals in the Natural and Biomedical Sciences
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
How to get that first NIH grant
What makes a good grant? A good idea A good approach Good writing.
Min Du Department of Animal Science How to develop a successful grant proposal.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Writing A Research Grant Proposal AJG Abboud J. Ghalayini, Ph.D.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
DEVELOPING YOUR PROPOSAL
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
Prof Wong Tien Yin Group Director, Research SingHealth Preparing the CSA Application.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
“ A well written application creates a tale that appeals to the reader. The plot is revealed in the “Background and Significance” section, laying out a.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
You Had Me at “Hello” Specific Aims Workshop Michael R. Blackburn, PhD Dean, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston John P. McGovern Distinguished.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS: TOP 10 REVIEWER CONCERNS AND GOOD/BAD GRANTS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian,
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
OCTOBER 18, 2011 SESSION 9 OF AAPLS – SELECTED SUPPORTING COMPONENTS OF SF424 (R&R) APPLICATION APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module.
NIH Grant Application Writing Workshop Significance and Innovation S.P. Sugrue Feb
Response to Prior Review and Resubmission Strategies Yuqing Li, Ph.D Division of Movement Disorders Department of Neurology Center for Movement Disorders.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Down the Road to Funding: Getting That First NIH Grant Dr. Ann M. Schreihofer Department of Physiology Medical College of Georgia
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Grant Writing for Success
An Analysis of D&I Applications
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Connecting the Sections and Incorporating Feedback
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Writing Workshop Specific Aims
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal
CRC Grant writing basics
BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 3, Approach
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Grant Writing – Approach What if you don’t get anticipated results
Presentation transcript:

National Institutes of Health AREA PROGRAM (R15) Thomas J. Wenzel Bates College, Lewiston, Maine

NIH AREA Program  $300K direct support (1-3 years)  Match with institute or center within NIH  Meritorious research  Significant novel question or hypothesis  Significant impact

Review Criteria  Significance – quality of research  Approach – experimental method  Innovation – novelty of work  Investigator – expertise/record in field  Environment – infrastructure to support work

Components of Proposal  Specific Aims (1 page)  Research Strategy (12 pages)

Research Strategy  Significance  Innovation  Approach – divide by each specific aim  Introductory paragraph  Justification and feasibility  Review relevant literature  Preliminary studies  Research design  Expected outcomes  Potential problems/Alternative strategies  Timetable  Future Directions

Common Problems Significance or Innovations  Not significant, or exciting, or new research  Lack of compelling rationale for experiments  Incremental or low-impact research  Weak or little biological, biomedical, or behavioral relevance

Common Problems Experimental Approach  Lack of clear, strong hypotheses, questions, or models  Too ambitious; too many aims proposed  Unfocused or unrelated aims; unclear or unintegrated goals  Limited or narrow aims; not addressing the important questions  Unnecessary experimental details for standard methods

 Not enough detail on novel methods, assays, or reagents  Insufficient on unconvincing preliminary data  Lack of appropriate controls; data difficult to interpret  Not directly testing hypothesis – more confirmatory data  Correlative or descriptive data – fishing expedition  Experiments not directed toward mechanisms  No discussion of alternative models or hypotheses  No discussion of potential pitfalls  No discussion of data interpretation or future directions

Common Problems Investigator  No/little demonstration of expertise or publications on proposed approaches  Low productivity; few recent or few primary author papers  Required collaborators not recruited – letters from collaborators missing

Specific Aims  One-page summary of questions, goals, or hypotheses  Includes methods and how they will address and answer the hypotheses  Need to prioritize aims  Integrate specific aim with proposed approach

Scientific Expertise  Publications in research area  Preliminary data  Collaborations when appropriate  Include letters of support  Include biographical sketch  Must be clear that PI is in charge of the project and collaborator only assisting

Renewal Applications  Plan for renewal immediately upon receipt of grant  Fix renewal submission date in your head  Start short-term projects  Start long-term projects