D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Invariant mass plot for different geometry schemes using HSD generator Hemen Kalita*,B Bhattacharjee*, P Bhaduri and S Chattopadhyay * Dept of Physics,
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
Status & Plans of Segmentation Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)
Sergey Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow STS CAD model. GSI, STS mechanics: Conceptual CAD model development Sergey Belogurov ITEP, Moscow Engineer: Sergey.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Elastic Neural Net for standalone RICH ring finding Sergey Gorbunov Ivan Kisel DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg KIP.
Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Muon simulation for p+A system Preliminary studies with HSD Partha Pratim Bhaduri Subhasis Chattopadhyay VECC, Kolkata.
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
Simulations for CBM CBM-India Meeting, Jammu, 12 February 2008 V. Friese
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
Di-muon measurements in CBM experiment at FAIR Arun Prakash 1 Partha Pratim Bhadhuri 2 Subhasis Chattopadhyay 2 Bhartendu Kumar Singh 1 (On behalf of CBM.
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
PNPI, R&D MUCH related activity ● Segmentation ● Simulation of the neutral background influence ● R&D of the detectors for MUCH ● Preparation to the beam.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
STS Radiation Environment 11 th CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 2008 Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
J/psi trigger status Alla Maevskaya INR RAS 11 March 2009 CBM Collaboration meeting.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
13-jan-2014 Some results for a GEM-based central detector A.Zinchenko, V.Vasendina, M.Kapishin VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna, Russia.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Realistic detector layout for MUCH system M.Ryzhinskiy, SPbSPU CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28, 2007, Dresden, Germany.
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
Segmentation: Study of Shield & Absorber Materials Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)
1 - Onset of deconfinement NA60+ - Existence (or non existence) of QCD critical point - Chiral symmetry restoration  Measuring dimuons at different energies.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
Gloria Corti, LHCb LHCb background on detector. Gloria Corti Page 2 Evaluating impact on experiment Increasing the inner coverage of the TT detector will.
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik DEPFET Meeting Heidelberg Sept DEPFET Geometry for SuperBelle Sensor Geometry Pixel Pitch Constant/variable.
Simulation / reconstruction with GEMs at DAC A.Zinchenko, A.Kapishin, V.Vasendina for the collaboration VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna,
Feasibility of the detection of D 0 mesons in the NA61/SHINE experiment: Vertex detector for NA61/SHINE P. Staszel and Yasir Ali Jagiellonian University.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
NRC Kurchatov Institute, ITEP I. Korolko, M.Prokudin, Yu.Zaitsev
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
CBM beam pipe current status
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Feasibility of   γγ study with ECAL
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 2  Existing Segmentation Scheme (5% Occupancy)  Flexible Segmentation Scheme –Aim –Plan –Implementation –Examples –Improve coverage near beam pipe –Hit Production  Summary and Future Plan Outline

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 3 Muon Simulations  cbmroot release v.APR08  UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 AGeV  all strips STS  compact MuCh 5 iron absorber (125cm) 15 MuCh stations  MuCh hit producer without clusters  L1 (STS) and LiT (MuCh) tracking  cbmroot release v.APR08  UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 AGeV  all strips STS  compact MuCh 5 iron absorber (125cm) 15 MuCh stations  MuCh hit producer without clusters  L1 (STS) and LiT (MuCh) tracking

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 4 Existing Segmentation Scheme 5% Hit occupancy Central Au+Au 25 AGeV from UrQMD Compact Much Min Pad size 1.4 × 2.8 mm 2

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 5 Regio ns Hit Density hit/event/cm 2 PadW(cm)PadL(cm)SecW(cm)SecL(cm) 1> Existing Scheme: Sector and Pad Dimensions

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 6 1. Based on 5% Occupancy : governed by Hit Density 2. Define 9 Regions of different Sector sizes 3. Sector as well as pad dim. doubled seq. 4. Each Sector is having 128 channels 5. Start region number for each Station Triplet depends on the hit density 6. The radius vector of different regions is defined from HDensity histogram Existing Segmentation scheme Station 1 6 regions, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Rad: 13.7,20,28,36,44,52,62.3 Min Pad dimension: 1.4×2.8 mm 2 – unrealistic

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 7 Less Efficiency Less coverage near beam pipe Hit Production Efficiency Hit prod. Efficiency= N hits /N Mc. points ● MC Points ● Reco Hits

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 8  To study the realistic detector design by optimising pad layout  To make the detector design simple  To have flexibility of sector sizes and pad sizes  To get more coverage near the pipe Aim: Flexible Segmentation Scheme

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 9 Steps: 1. Keep 9 Regions of Diff. Sector sizes 2. Make Flexible Radius for Diff. Regions 3. Flexible No. of Regions 4. Flexible Pad Dimension 5. Flexible Number of Channels 6. Improve coverage near beam pipe Plan: Flexible Segmentation Scheme

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 10 Implementation: Flexible Seg. Scheme  Introduced Option for Different Scheme (1) Option 0: Original Segmentation Scheme 5% Occupancy (2) Option 1: Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Dec08 Release)  Flexible radius of regions  Flexible no. of regions  Improved coverage near beam pipe (3) Option 2: Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Recent)   Option of variable Channel No. (1 → 128)  Option of variable pad dimension

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 11  Station: 10,11,12 (after 4 th absorber) Existing: Existing: Rad.of diff. regions (8,9) 42 cm Flexible: Flexible: Rad.of diff. regions (2,8,9) Rad [ ]={27,42} //cm Reg [ ]={2,8,9} R_int=26.2 cm R_ext=124.5 cm Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme (Option1 )

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 12 Station: 10,11,12 Station: 10,11,12 (after 4 th absorber) Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme (Option 1) ● MC Points ● Reconstructed Hits

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 13 Improved Coverage: Flexible Seg Scheme Allow Sectors inside the Beam Pipe To remove the efficiency loss due to less coverage near the beam pipe Implemented for optimization of pad size

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 14 Efficiency Improved – by improving the coverage Hit Prod. Efficiency with Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Improved coverage) Std. Seg. Hit Prod. Eff: ~90% Improved coverage: Hit Prod. Eff. ~98% DEC08 Release

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 15 No. of Ch. =128 No. of Ch. =64 No. of Ch. =32 Regi ons PadW (cm) PadL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Option 2) MinPadW =1.38mm MinPadL =2.77mm minPadW and minPadL and No. of Channel is input Additional Feature: Flexible No. of Channel and Flexible pad dimension

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 16 No. of channel/sec: 128 Sec. (3): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 (4): 4.43×8.87 cm 2 (5): 8.87×8.87 cm 2 No. of sec: 320 No. of channels: Sec. (3): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 (4): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 (5): 4.43×8.87 cm 2 No. of sec: 628 No. of channels: No. of channel/sec: 64 Sec. (3): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 (4): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 (5): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 No. of sec: 1196 No. of channels : No. of channel/sec: 32 Stations : 1, 2, 3 Reg: 3,4,5 Rad: 25,45 r_int=13.7, r_ext=62.3 cm Blue: Reg. 3, Pad: 2.77 × 5.54 mm 2 Yellow: Reg. 4, Pad: 5.54 × 5.54 mm 2 Magenta: Reg. 5, Pad: 5.54 × mm 2 Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Option 2)

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 17 Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Option 2) No. of channel/sec: 16 Sec. (3): 1.11×2.21 cm 2 (4): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 (5): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 No. of sec: 2316 No. of channels: Sec. (3):1.11×1.11 cm 2 (4):1.11×2.21 cm 2 (5): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 No. of sec: 4580 No. of channels: No. of channel/sec: 8 Sec. (3): 0.55×1.11 cm 2 (4): 1.11×1.11 cm 2 (5): 1.11×2.21 cm 2 No. of sec: 9060 No. of channels : No. of channel/sec: 4 Stations : 4, 5, 6 Reg: 3,4,5 Rad: 25, 45 Blue: Reg. 3, Pad: 2.77 × 5.54 mm 2 Yellow: Reg. 4, Pad: 5.54 × 5.54 mm 2 Magenta: Reg. 5, Pad: 5.54 × mm 2

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 18 Study of Hit Prod. Efficiency for different digi scheme S/B and Efficiency study required to optimize pad dimension

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 19 Hit Production Efficiency seems to be the Mimimum Pad dimensions in stations from Hit Efficiency Stat/per event: Mc. Points:2990 Rc. Hits :2941 Multihits :47 Outside :0.97 Min pad size: 2.8×5.6 mm 2 2.8×5.5 mm 2 5.5×5.5 mm ×11.1 mm 2 5.5×11.1 mm 2 6 times larger and Realistic

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 20  A Flexible Segmentation scheme for Much implemented – –Flexibility in radius of different region – –Flexibility in number of regions – –Flexibility in No. of Channels – –Flexibility in pad dimension   Improved coverage near beam pipe   Min. pad dimension 2.8×5.6 mm 2 shows good Hit efficiency (3 times larger and realistic pad dimension)   Flexible Segmentation works with hit production and upto reconstructionSummary

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 21  Study the realistic digitization with Clustering and Avalanche  Optimisation of detector layout for quarkonium *Thanks for input from A. Kiseleva for this study Thank you Future Plan