1 SXC on SXG Aim: basic agreement about this SXC on SXG by the end of September (formalities may come later) Clarify key technological items Thermal environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Management 6e..
Advertisements

Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
DEVELOPING A TECHNOLOGY PROJECT IN STUDENT AFFAIRS A Guide to the Process Paul Schantz November, 2010.
ISIM Integration & Test Mike Drury JWST-PRES
TELESCOPE ANALOG CONTROL Martin Frericks, Frans Zwart.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
Project Management and Communication Represented by: Latifa Jaber Al-Ghafran.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
4 4 By: A. Shukr, M. Alnouri. Many new project managers have trouble looking at the “big picture” and want to focus on too many details. Project managers.
Project Management and Scheduling
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
1 Mirror subsystem: telescope structure Functions: Functions: Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Support mirrors subsystem to S/C Accommodate cryostat Accommodate.
Conceptual Design Review Design Requirements The Systems Perspective Rob Hubbard Systems Engineering.
4.2 Develop Project Management Plan
Defining the Project CHAPTER FOUR PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 PACS CRE1 PACS CRE development Ybe Creten, Patrick Merken, Jan Putzeys, Vic Fonderie, Chris Van Hoof IMEC.
PACS IBDR 27/ BOLC/BOLA1 BOLC / BOLA SAp/DAPNIA/DSM/CEA C. CARA WE Design Team: A. BOUERE - N. DEVIN - G. DHENAIN - E. DOUMAYROU M. SEYRANIAN -
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Initial considerations for the project start-up Joint Operational Programme “Black Sea Basin ” Bucharest, 18th of September 2013 Laura Bobârnac,
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
Preparing for the Launch Mohammed El- Affendi. Launch Major Tasks  The Launch is performed according to script “LAU1”, table 3.1 in the book (page 39),
System issues System decomposition / Product tree System specification: function, performance, interfaces, budget Work-breakdown structure.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
ERCOT and Utilicast Public Document February 17, 2009 Nodal Program Oversight Report 9 System Integration Assessment.
1 © The Delos Partnership 2004 Project Management Organisation and Structure.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
FIRST/Planck 12 December 2000PT The FIRST Mission Implementation Status and Schedule T. Passvogel The Promise of FIRST.
Apply Project Scope Management Techniques Project Scope Processes – Part 2 Certificate IV in Project Management Qualification Code BSB41507 Unit.
NIRSpec Status and PDR Results Jeff Valenti & Mike Regan 2006 March 16 TIPS/JIM.
CAPACITY Composition of the Atmosphere: Progress to Applications in the user CommunITY STUDY OVERVIEW AND LOGIC Michiel van Weele, KNMI Kick Off/ Negotiation.
Cormac Neeson Space Engineering and Technology GERB Project Status 22/03/2004.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 PACS PI Summary1 Where we are and where to go… A. Poglitsch MPE.
Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov Joël MICHAUD French expertise in SiC for large telescopes.
Lesson 1: Examining Professional Project Management Topic 1A: Identify Project Management Processes.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
eMerger Integration Planning
Detector Cooling CERN, September 28, 2006 Jaak Lippmaa HIP, University of Helsinki.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Project Organization Chart Roles & Responsibilities Matrix Add Project Name.
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
Number: TR/06/B/F/PP/ WASTE-TRAIN VOCATIONAL TRAINING, EDUCATION, CONVEYING INFORMATION ON UP-TO-DATE WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO DECISION MAKERS/STAFF.
Be a Team player… Science of Electronics 101 LACC.
Overview of Socio-cognitive Engineering General requirements Theory of Use Design Concept Contextual Studies Task model Design space System specification.
Apply Project Scope Management Techniques Project Scope Processes – Part 2 Week 4 Certificate IV in Project Management Qualification Code BSB41507.
PLATO Focal Plane Assemblies (FPA) Roser Urquí Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA)
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 9 EFW Overview and Status Keith Goetz University of Minnesota.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Systems Engineering Michael Ludlam Space Sciences.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Standard Design Process Overview
Instrument Construction Phase 1 and beyond Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer September, 2014.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Solar-B Science Working Group
CINEMA System Engineering
Double Star Progress Meeting #3 Beijing 2 July, 2002.
The European Contribution to eXTP
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Completed Verification Results Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2008.
1. Introduction and Overview
Systems Engineering Bob Goeke.
SLAC DOE Program Review
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Completed Verification Results Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
Composition of eXTP mission
Instrument Overview Larry Springer HMI Program Manager
Presentation transcript:

1 SXC on SXG Aim: basic agreement about this SXC on SXG by the end of September (formalities may come later) Clarify key technological items Thermal environment (platform temperature, heating power mirror) Thermal environment (platform temperature, heating power mirror) Mechanical interfaces to satellite (interface in mid-plane or at lower plane) Mechanical interfaces to satellite (interface in mid-plane or at lower plane) Electrical interfaces to the satellite (power switching, databus) Electrical interfaces to the satellite (power switching, databus) Clarify key programmatic items Role of IKI Role of IKI Top level schedule and deliveries Top level schedule and deliveries Project organization (PA/QA, documentation) Project organization (PA/QA, documentation) Funding Funding Next steps (and meetings) Next steps (and meetings)

2 Status at SRON Agreement with management to explore possibility for participation in SXG at a fair level with major tasks: Agreement with management to explore possibility for participation in SXG at a fair level with major tasks: Overall coordination Overall coordination System engineering System engineering Interface with IKI/LA Interface with IKI/LA Telescope assembly (using eROSITA mirrors) Telescope assembly (using eROSITA mirrors) Core team being formed, key people assigned: Core team being formed, key people assigned: Luc Dubbeldam project leader Luc Dubbeldam project leader Cor de Vries: instrument scientist Cor de Vries: instrument scientist Coen van Baren: lead mechanical engineer Coen van Baren: lead mechanical engineer Frans Zwart: lead electronics engineer Frans Zwart: lead electronics engineer Henri Aarts: system engineer/advisor Henri Aarts: system engineer/advisor In addition scientist (Kaastra, in’t Zand) or detector specialists (Takei, Gottardi) will be involved as necessary In addition scientist (Kaastra, in’t Zand) or detector specialists (Takei, Gottardi) will be involved as necessary

3 Activities Update on system overview Update on system overview Inventory of system engineering aspects Inventory of system engineering aspects Preliminary concepts for telescope (tube, TAC) Preliminary concepts for telescope (tube, TAC) Integration and test flow Integration and test flow

4 Overview: WBS

5 Block Diagram

6

7 Budgets Unit Power March Power July Mass March Mass July*) Mirror assembly < 90 (20% margin) 32 (improved modeling, 10% margin) (15% margin, 60 kg mirror) Detector (10% margin) Cooler (-60) 363 (20% margin) 332 (10% margin) Total ex system margin System margin 20% 5%5%5%5%20%5% total *) excludes harness, radiators and support structure for electronic boxes Radiator area needs to be specified (including electronic boxes?)

8 Organization Steering group (den Herder, Mitsuda, McGammon, Kelley, Predehl, Pavlinski) Steering group (den Herder, Mitsuda, McGammon, Kelley, Predehl, Pavlinski) Science team (tbd, larger group) Science team (tbd, larger group) Project management (SRON: PI + project leader)) Project management (SRON: PI + project leader)) Work Package managers (system engineering SRON, detector assembly (xx), mirror assembly (SRON), operations (xx) Work Package managers (system engineering SRON, detector assembly (xx), mirror assembly (SRON), operations (xx) Interfaces with IKI: via SRON system team Interfaces with IKI: via SRON system team Communication between partners within WP (direct, cc system team) Communication between partners within WP (direct, cc system team)

9 Next steps Update SRON-SRG using outcome of the meeting Update SRON-SRG using outcome of the meeting Agreement on baseline configuration Agreement on baseline configuration another meeting prior to IWG meeting in September to: another meeting prior to IWG meeting in September to: Clarify level of commitment at IWG Clarify level of commitment at IWG Sign off deliverables (authorize SRON-SRG ) Sign off deliverables (authorize SRON-SRG ) Agree on top level schedule Agree on top level schedule Clarify procedures for observing time Clarify procedures for observing time Clarify steps for formal agreement Clarify steps for formal agreement ITAR ITAR