PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SJC - 109/29/05IRAC Calibration Workshop Status of IRAC Artifact Corrector Sean Carey.
Advertisements

The PACS Status Herschel PV Mid-Term Review ESAC, September 1, Herschel Performance Verification Mid-Term Review PACS Status: Overview Markus Nielbock.
Bruno Altieri Jan # 1 Pointing calibration plan Bruno Altieri (HSC) PACS PV phase.
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Heidelberg PACS SVR 22./23. June 2006 MPE Garching J. Stegmaier, U. Grözinger, D. Lemke, O. Krause, H. Dannerbauer,
Bernhard Schulz, Rene Laureijs, ISO Data Centre, ESA 1 Instrument Design in the Light of the ISOPHOT Experience Bernhard Schulz, Rene Laureijs ISO Data.
PLATO kick-off meeting 09-Nov-2010 PLATO Payload overall architecture.
A Preliminary Cycle 1 Calibration Plan for the JWST Science Instruments James Muzerolle.
CEA DSM IRFU SAp PACS Commissioning phase, Pointing Verification and Performance Verification Phase Planning Review (PVPhot) Koryo Okumura / Marc Sauvage.
Bruno Altieri September # 1 PACS photometer pipeline overview Bruno Altieri (ESA/HSC)
PACS CoP & PV Review 21/22 Jan 2009 PVSpecWave1 Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration XHSPOT Proposal: PVSpecWave H. Feuchtgruber.
PACS IQR 13 Jan 2005 AVM/CQM ILT – test results1 PACS CQM/AVM ILT Results of functional/performance/ calibration tests.
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
AST3 detector properties
PACS SOVT-2 (SIMS) and CAPs development MPIA PACS ICC Meeting #32 1 st – 3 rd April 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock (MPIA)
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Photometer AORs How to Prepare an Observation with HSpot: 2 Science Use.
CEA / PACS SVR phase 2 Photometer results from the first part of the FM ILT CEA - MPE - NHSC.
PACS NHSC SPIRE Point Source Spectroscopy Webinar 21 March 2012 David Shupe, Bernhard Schulz, Kevin Xu on behalf of the SPIRE ICC Extracting Photometry.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Sept 10-14, 2012 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – SPIRE FTS Pipeline Trevor Fulton Blue Sky Spectroscopy, Lethbridge, Canada.
PACS FM-ILT SPECTROMETER SPATIAL CALIBRATION A. Contursi (H. Feuchtgruber) PACS Science Verification Review – 8/9 November 2007 MPE-Garching.
FM-ILT Results: Mechanisms FM1 Chopper and Calibration Sources Markus Nielbock (MPIA) Babar Ali (IPAC) Jeroen Bouwman (MPIA) Helmut Dannerbauer (MPIA)
Herschel Space ObservatoryPACS Science Verification ReviewMPE 22/23 June 2006 GJ / MPE 1 PACS Test Facility Capabilities – Cryogenics and OGSE Gerd Jakob.
Page 1 PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 26 th - 30 th Aug 2013 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Pipeline Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE.
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 Roger Hunter (Ames Research Center) & Kepler Team March 26, 2010.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 PACS FPU Subunits1 FM FPU Subunits A. Poglitsch.
PACS SOVT-2 and CAPs development MPIA PACS ICC Meeting #31 12 th – 13 th January 2009, Vienna (A) Markus Nielbock (MPIA)
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
PACS SVR-II 18 January 2007 FM ILT overview1 The PACS FM ILT Phase I overview on actual test execution and analysis Eckhard Sturm MPE.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
Telescopes and Instrumentation October 24. Calendar Next class: Friday November 7 Field trips! – Visit the 61” on Mount Bigelow Afternoon of Saturday.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Instrument Performance Prediction1 PACS Instrument Model and Performance Prediction A. Poglitsch.
Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements at the Pierre Auger Observatory The Pierre Auger Observatory operates an array of monitoring devices to record the atmospheric.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-402 (for Hipe 12.0) Level 1 to Level 2 processing: The JScanam pipeline Prepared.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 Measuring Photometry from SPIRE Observations Presenter: David Shupe (NHSC/IPAC) on.
Observational Astrophysics I
Optimisation of the PACS Chopper Markus Nielbock Ulrich Klaas Jeroen Bouwman Helmut Dannerbauer Jürgen Schreiber Ulrich Grözinger.
Spectroscopy with PACS M82 PACS line imaging from the SHINING team (Contursi et al First Results workshop talk) Phil Appleton and Dario Fadda for.
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
CEA DSM Dapnia SAp Readout mode of the Photometer Koryo Okumura, Marc Sauvage, Nicolas Billot, Bertrand Morin DSM/DAPNIA/SAp.
PACS SVR 2 18 Jan 2007 FM ILT: Spectrometer1 Spectrometer Performance H. Feuchtgruber, T. Müller, A. Poglitsch.
IRAM 08/02/12 – Run 3 Cryostat New Pulse-Tube (helium-free). Laboratory performances : Cooling-down time  30-48h Number of cooling cycles so far12 Base.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Jan 21/22, 2009PACS PV Review Photometer Spatial Cal1 PACS Photometer Spatial Calibration PVPhotSpatial D.Lutz PACS PV Review Jan 21/ , MPE.
NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PAC S prepared by Nicolas BILLOT
PACS ICC Readiness Review MPE, July 3/ PACS Photometer PV Phase Plan 1 Status Report M. Nielbock: PACS PHOT PV Phase Plan Markus Nielbock (MPIA)
CEA DSM Dapnia SAp Flux calibration of the Photometer Koryo Okumura, Marc Sauvage, Nicolas Billot, Bertrand Morin DSM/DAPNIA/Sap.
Overview, Spectrometer Products and Processing Philosophy Phil Appleton on Behalf of PACS Team PACS IFU Spectrometer.
Herschel EQM – Results and Lessons Learnt6/7 Feb 2006 PACS Overall Analysis1 Overall PACS EQM IMT Analysis Contributions by PACS ICC.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Aug 26-30, 2013 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-402 (for Hipe 13.0) Level 1 to Level 2.5 processing: The JScanam pipeline Prepared.
PACS page 1 NHSC SPIRE Data Processing Webinars 8 th Feb 2012 PACS page 1 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Pipeline C. Kevin Xu (NHSC/IPAC)
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Spectrometer AORs Phil Appleton 1Roberta Paladini.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Workshop on HSA Data Oct 6-10, 2014 SPIRE Spectrometer: Pipeline Calibration Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (on behalf of the SPIRE ICC, HSC & NHSC)
- page 1 PACS Phil Appleton on behalf of the NHSC/HSC and the PACS ICC ; especially Bart Vandenbussche and Pierre Royer (KUL Belgium) Instrument Performance.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – Herschel Pointing PACS ICC Meeting #38 Herschel Pointing Summary and Recent Developments Markus Nielbock (MPIA Heidelberg) with.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th – 10 th Oct 2014 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Data Reduction Pipeline Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – PACS Photometer Flux Calibration Herschel Calibration Workshop PACS Photometer Flux Calibration: Update Markus Nielbock (MPIA.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – PACS Calibration Status Report Herschel Calibration Steering Group Meeting #24 PACS Calibration Status Report Markus Nielbock.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – PACS Photometer Flux Calibration EPOS Meeting PACS Photometer Flux Calibration Current Plans Markus Nielbock MPIA, 22 th February.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – PACS Point Source AOT Pipeline Herschel Science Demonstration Phase Data Processing Workshop PACS Point Source AOT Pipeline Tutorial.
Herschel Calibration Workshop
PACS Calibration Status Report
PACS ICC Meeting #41 PACS Photometer
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
Markus Nielbock (MPIA Heidelberg)
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Presentation transcript:

PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock (MPIA) Marc Sauvage (CEA/SAp)

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux Instrumental background PACS photometer (PHOT) two bolometer arrays – blue detectors: 4 x 2 matrices of 16 x 16 pixels – red detectors: 2 matrices of 16 x 16 pixels additional optical elements – filter wheel – mirrors (external and internal) – chopper

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PHOT photometric calibration topics PACS Calibration Document (PCD) requirements 3.2 mainly covered by observations of PVPhotFlux proposal partly fulfilled by interdependent PCD requirements partly covered by related observations of other PV PHOT proposals

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Determination of detector responsivity establish relation between voltage output and absolute sky brightness internal calibration sources (CS), celestial standards measure irradiation power vs. detector signal fully covered by PVPhotBol (PHOT detector characterisation)

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Monitor stability of detector responsivity identify amplitude and timescales of responsivity drifts possible significantly contributing sources: – internal stray light (incl. self-emission) – temperature changes between individual cooling cycles – variation in efficiency of cryo pumping – bias voltage supply – thermal conductance – particle irradiation – interference by other satellite components calibration targets used: – internal CS – stable celestial flux standard (S/N ≥ 20), repeatedly during PV phase

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Monitor stability of detector responsivity Implementation: – internal CS ◦ calibration block during slew to target prior to AOR execution ◦ chopping between two CSs having different temperatures ◦ minimised or no down time for satellite – celestial flux standard ◦ point-source AOR on ε Car (5 repetitions, always visible, ~10 Jy) ◦ estimated time required: 0.5 h Status: fully defined and implemented Analysis: SPG (pipeline), additional work based on SOVT-2 results

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Calibrate non-linearity characterise the non-linear range of PHOT detectors non-linearity for very bright sources calibration targets: very bright flux standards (e.g. bright stars, asteroids) Implementation: – point-source photometry with reduced gain (avoid electronic saturation) – flux grid of celestial flux standards (2, 10, 50, 200, 500, 1000 Jy) – measure all three filters (simultaneous coverage where possible) – accuracy goal: S/N ≥ 30 – caveat: difficult to find bright and non-variable sources – estimated time required: 1.3 h Status: fully defined and implemented (some discussion on target selection) Analysis: SPG (pipeline), additional work based on SOVT-2 results

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Establish full system linearity calibrate the linear approximation verify valid flux range of linear approximation of detector response calibration targets: celestial flux standards Implementation: (similar to PCD req ) – point-source photometry with default gain setting – flux grid of celestial flux standards (20 mJy to 200 Jy) – measure all three filters (simultaneous coverage where possible) – accuracy goal: S/N ≥ 30 – estimated time required: 5.0 h Status: fully defined and implemented Analysis: SPG (pipeline), additional work based on SOVT-2 results

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Noise and minimum detectable flux establish NEP depending on detector biasing internal calibration sources fully covered by PVPhotBol (PHOT characterisation) independent confirmation of minimum flux may be desirable – not only depends on detector properties – easy to implement (standard point-source AOT) – easy to analyse (SPG, pipeline) – suitable weak calibration targets from ISO GBPP / ISOPHOT Cohen – observe set of targets to minimise impact of flux uncertainties – estimated time required: approx. 10 h

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Full system flat field determine (in)homogeneity of PHOT FOV and temporal variation detector and optical flat field indistinguishable calibration targets: internal CS, point source or small extended source Implementation: – internal CS ◦ calibration block during slew to target prior to AOR execution ◦ chopping between two CSs having different brightness (temperatures) ◦ minimised or no down time for satellite ◦ individual CS illumination pattern available from FOV scans

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Full system flat field Status: fully defined and implemented – celestial flux standard ◦ scan map AOR all three filters on NGC 6543 and Arp 220 ◦ covering all detector pixels redundantly ◦ estimated time required: 2.9 h Implementation: Analysis: SPG (pipeline), additional work based on SOVT-2 results

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux PCD req Telescope background and stability telescope will be major flux source determine spatial and temporal stability of telescope contribution assessed by frequent field-of-view scans with chopper fully covered by PVPhotSpatial fulfilled by PCD req (FOV characterisation)

M. Nielbock, M. Sauvage – PVPhotFlux Summary PV plan regarding the photometric calibration of the PACS photometer is fully prepared as it is currently defined. All relevant calibration requirements (PCD) are met. required observation time in total: 9.6 h Interdependent requirements are partly covered by different calibration programmes (PVPhotBol, PVPhotSpatial). Optional additional observations (lower flux limit check) are easy to implement and may add another 10 hours.