Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems Charles E. Fisher New York City, June 2009 National Park Service, Technical.
Advertisements

The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Georgia Department of Community Affairs CDBG Economic Development REDEVELOPMENT FUND.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
2010 DCA CDBG Applicants’ Workshop New for 2010 & Important Reminders.
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 3, 2014.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2013 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE LITE.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.
Section 106 Clearance Application Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the Application for Section 106 Clearance.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
W E L C O M E to the SB 1022 Real Estate Due Diligence Training SB 1022 Real Estate Due Diligence Training.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Ohio EPA Targeted Brownfield Assessment and Technical Assistance Programs.
Rural Development Water and Waste Projects: Environmental Requirements John Helgren, P.E. – State Environmental Coordinator Madeline Crowe – Assistant.
CDBG 2015 Technical Compliance. Sections 4.4 – 4.7 Handbook & Application 4.4 – 4.6: Projects 4.7: Residential Rehab Programs.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Transportation Enhancement Funds Workshop April 19, 2004 MAG Saguaro Room.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Proposed DRAFT New City Ordinance for Water Use in Landscaped Areas Public Meeting September 15, 2009.
Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey means a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. It includes.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
Transportation Enhancements Application Workshop Welcome!! October 3 & 4, 2012.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
CDBG-CHIP Beginning to Write Your Application. Mission and Vision Statement Vision—every Georgia community offers a quality of life where people and businesses.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014.
2009 DCA CDBG/CHIP Applicants’ Workshop 2009 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE.
State Historic Preservation Office Tami Koontz
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
2009 DCA CDBG/CHIP Applicants’ Workshop Introduction to CDBG/CHIP Boot Camp.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Cultural Resources and Your Conservation Plan USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service What Are Cultural Resources? Do you enjoy looking at your family’s.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 2, 2015.
Methods of Documenting Need and Proposed Solutions 2016 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop December 2-4, 2015.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
LET’S PLAY JEOPARDY!! IDEA ADA 504/508 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final JeopardyJeopardy Differences.
2010 DCA CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2010 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
City of New Bedford HOUSING REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING,
Rob Pierce, Planning & Development Director
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Port of Portland properties and facilities
Presentation transcript:

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects December 2, 2009Betsy Shirk

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 2 Our mission is to promote the preservation and use of historic places for a better Georgia. Mission Statement

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 3 CDBG/CHIP Application Form Applicant’s priority: To demonstrate a need for the proposed project Georgia State Historic Preservation Office’s priority: To review the application for potential effects to historic structures and/or archaeological sites

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 4 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Federal law that requires all projects with federal involvement be reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) of the state in which the project is located DCA cannot release any HUD funds until Section 106 review and compliance is complete

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 5 CDBG/CHIP Projects of Primary Concern to the Georgia SHPO Rehabilitation/alteration of any buildings 50 years old or older, such as schools, housing, and community buildings, that are not covered under the 1997 Programmatic Agreement New construction (buildings, water tanks, etc.) Demolition or relocation of historic resources

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 6 CDBG/CHIP Projects of Secondary Concern to the Georgia SHPO Installation of water and sewer lines Road paving and drainage improvements Construction of sidewalks

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 7 Primary Types of Effects Considered Under Section 106 Physical effects: Demolition, addition, alteration, relocation, ground disturbance (archaeology) Visual effects: Introduction of incompatible buildings/objects into the viewshed of a historic building, district, or landscape

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 8 Documentation Required to Complete Most Section 106 Project Reviews Completion of HPD’s Environmental Review (ER) Form (in Applicant’s Manual) Attach ER form to DCA-9 form in the CDBG/CHIP application package and new ER form

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 9 Environmental Review Form I.General Information Project Name Federal Agency – HUD Agency ’ s Involvement – Funding Project Type Level of Review – Section 106

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 10 Environmental Review Form F. Project Description G. Contact information H. Attach a map – Location maps (preferably USGS topographic), for example from topozone.com or other sites and city map I. Reviewed before? If yes, attach copy of SHPO letter

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 11 Environmental Review Form II. Information Defining Area of Potential Effect (A.P.E.) A.Describe A.P.E. B.Attach map showing extent of A.P.E. C.Provide clear, color photographs of all historic structures (50 years old or older) that are in, adjacent to, and/or within view of the project area

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 12 Environmental Review Form All photographs should be keyed to a site plan or map to show their location and direction of view.

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 13 Environmental Review Form III. (Archaeological) Site Information A.Past Archaeological investigations (if known) B.Available information on sites C.Past Use D.What is on property today E.Land-disturbing activities F.Details of area of land disturbance

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 14 Environmental Review Form IV. Building & Structure Information A.Project in or adjacent to a National Register- listed District? B.Are there buildings in A.P.E. 50 years of age or older? C.If yes, are any listed or eligible for listing on the National Register? D.If yes, does project include rehabilitation, relocation, demolition or additions to these buildings?

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 15 Environmental Review Form V.Additional Information A. Changes within setting B. Changes outside setting C. Changes to Noise/Air levels D. Changes in ownership

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 16 Environmental Review Form Additional Consideration: If renovating/altering a historic structure (such as a vacant school into a Boys & Girls Club), plans and drawings of the proposed changes should be enclosed in the application package (or provided later when available).

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 17 Final Points to Remember Submit photographs of all historic structures. All photographs should be keyed to a site plan or map to show their location and direction of view. The presence of historic structures in the project area does not automatically mean that the project cannot be funded.

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 18 Final Points to Remember Include all necessary documentation in the application to facilitate a timely review. For complex projects or projects that may have adverse effects to historic structures and/or archaeological sites, hire a qualified historic preservation professional. See for a list of qualified consultants.

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 19 Elizabeth (Betsy) Shirk Environmental Review Coordinator (404) Michelle Volkema Environmental Review Historian (404) Contact Information

Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 20