Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: 0137070578.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Advertisements

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Bilingual Special Education Interface Developing IEPs for Exceptional Language Minority Students.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Educational Psychology/ Special Education Class #2 Agenda 1. Ministry document: Education for All 2. Group work: Chapters 2 and 3 of Education for All.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
Labeling  Allows students with disabilities to receive services  Labels may be stigmatizing or result in discrimination  View children by their abilities.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Chapter 11 Referring and Evaluating for Special Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
+ Welcome! Agenda: 5:00-5:30 Influences discussion 5:30-6:30 Review of last week’s discussion NBPTS standards 6:30-6:45 Break 6:45-7:00 NAEA Standards.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Special Education is a service, not a place IDEA and NCLB have changed the focus on access to the general curriculum from WHERE to: WHAT, a focus on what.
Your Exceptional Child Kaily Osborne. We will cover… IDEA IEP Inclusion RTI.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Fostering Parent and Professional Collaboration: Partnership Strategies © PACER Center, 2008.
Assessment Of Exceptional Students Part One: Chapter Two.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Special Education Resources Hello, My name is Amy Mathews and I am studying to be a special education teacher. I am presenting some valuable information.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education,9th Edition ISBN X © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Planning.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Exceptionalities Guideline
Chapter 2 Planning and Providing Special Education Services
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-1 Chapter 9 Families as Partners in Evaluating a Student

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-2 Sharing Their Story The family profiled in this chapter is Maria, Eloisa and Henrique Hernandez. Maria Hernandez is entering 7 th grade and has special education eligibility. She reads below grade level, has a mild speech-language deficit, appears to lack confidence and does not socialize easily. Her parents do not see her academic progress as being as important as her teachers do. She is given an ”alternative assessment” under IDEA law. The school staff places high priority on students’ performance on the statewide assessments as required under the NCLB.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-3 Sharing Their Story School priorities seem to be ranking high in the state and nationally. Most of her teachers believe that Maria’s inclusion in regular education classes may impair their ability to teach other students and therefore reduce district’s scores and their reputation. One teacher concurs with Eloisa and Henrique. Together they raise concerns about the partnership that will be formed when Maria comes up for her three year reevaluation. Will they be successful in advocating for more inclusion and social skills training for Maria?

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-4 Think About It What does IDEA require as families and professionals evaluate a student to determine if the student has a disability and needs special education? How wide in scope must the evaluation be? What practices advance family and professional partnerships in a student’s nondiscriminatory evaluation, especially where there is a history of disagreement?

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-5 Identifying and Screening Students Referral/Evaluation Identifying and screening students Implementing pre- referral and RTI strategies Initiating and reviewing a referral Providing notice and obtaining consent Collecting evaluation information Analyze evaluation information Discussing evaluation results with families

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-6 Identifying and Screening Students IDEA lays the foundation for partnership that can yield a full understanding of what a student needs by way of special education. The referral process begins when a parent, teacher or other professional familiar with the student want to consider whether the student is eligible for special education services. “Referral” describes a formal request to conduct an evaluation. “Screening” may arise from analyzing tests results given to all student. These all-student tests screen students to determine who needs further evaluation.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-7 Implementing Pre-referral and Response to Intervention Strategies Implementing Pre-referral Interventions Pre-referral Intervention Pre-referral intervention occurs before professionals request a student’s parents to consent to a full, nondiscriminatory evaluation. Purpose of Pre-referral Intervention To analyze the student’s strengths and weaknesses and provide additional assistance to the student and the teacher so that student is able to achieve without needing a formal evaluation for special education services.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-8 Implementing Pre-referral and Response to Intervention Strategies Pre-referral Intervention Teams Pre-referral teams may be called intervention assistance team (IAT), teacher assistance teams (TAT) and instructional consultation teams(ICT). Team membership may include general and special educators, school psychologist, and other professionals. Although parents are not usually members of the pre-referral team they can provide valuable information.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9-9 Implementing Pre-referral and Response to Intervention Strategies Response to Interventions RTI involves multiple “tiers” of increasingly more intensive interventions for a student. Under an RTI approach only those students who do not adequately respond to research-validated interventions in general education are referred for a nondiscriminatory evaluation. IDEA gives local education agencies the option of using RTI procedures as part of the evaluation process related to a student who may have a specific learning disability.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Initiating and Reviewing a Referral Nature, Purpose, and Sources of a Referral A referral consists of a formal request made to the appropriate administrator, of the student’s school, to evaluate a student to determine whether he or she has a disability; and if so, to determine the student’s educational needs. A referral may be made by the student’s parents or anyone concerned about the student’s education.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Initiating and Reviewing a Referral Referral and Response to Intervention A referral may occur because educators or other professionals suspect that a student needs specifically designed instruction or services, that are not otherwise available to the general education students. A referral usually takes place after a pre-referral intervention. Schools that use RTI will determine a student’s eligibility for special education services after the student has failed to make adequate progress with interventions provided at the lower levels.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Initiating and Reviewing a Referral Parents and Referral IDEA does not require a child’s parent to consent for referral, but some states and local educational agencies do. Parents respond in different ways when they learn their child is referred. Some express relief and others may object. The partnership principles of communication, respect, and commitment are particularly important when you discuss referral with the child’s parents and other family members.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Initiating and Reviewing a Referral Parents’ Rights To be informed of the team’s decision to evaluate their child for special education services To provide or withhold consent from the school to evaluate their child.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Notifying and Obtaining Parents’ Consent Notifying Schools must provide written, timely notice to parents, in their native language, when the school proposes to initiate or change a student’s identification, evaluation, educational placement, or services. It is imperative that information is clear, accurate, and easily understood. The purpose of the notice is to inform the student’s parents why educators want to evaluate their child.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Notifying and Obtaining Parents’ Consent Obtaining Parents’ Consent IDEA requires educators to secure parents’ consent for each proposed evaluation, reevaluation, or special education placement. Informed consent is composed of three components: Parent knowledge Parent voluntariness Parent competence

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Collecting Evaluation Information The student’s evaluation for special education services is designed to determine whether the child has a disability, has an exceptionality (gifted or talented) and, if so, what the student’s special education and related services will be. The evaluation data also informs educators and the student’s parents about the student’s placement in the least restrictive environment (the general curriculum).

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Collecting Evaluation Information Partnership Practices in Evaluation Involve parents and other family members in decisions Enhance the partnership principles of equality and respect by honoring the family’s cultural diversity Allow family’s preferences and concerns to guide decisions about the evaluation process

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Collecting Evaluation Information Parents’ and Other Family Members’ Participation in Collecting Evaluation Information To create partnerships with families, invite them to: Share their family story Express preferences and great expectations and describe their child’s strengths and needs Help professionals evaluate and administer evaluations Collaborate with professionals to construct portfolio assessments Work with professionals to conduct a transdisciplinary evaluation

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Collecting Evaluation Information Incorporating Person-Centered Planning A team-based approach to identify and meet the wants, needs, and great expectations of a person with a disability. The individual with a disability determines the goals to be achieved; Support in achieving the goals is typically provided by family members, friends, community members, and professionals.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Collecting Evaluation Information Right of Parents to Obtain Independent Evaluations IDEA provides parents the right to an independent evaluation and requires schools to take the evaluation into account as it carries out the entire evaluation process.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Analyzing Evaluation Information The evaluation team is responsible for scoring, analyzing, interpreting, synthesizing and evaluating the results of each assessment procedure. Scoring and analysis is usually done individually, while synthesis of the findings is usually done in the team setting. Families vary in the degree to which they desire participation in analyzing data; however a genuine invitation should always be extended.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Discussing Evaluation Results Notifying Parents Option 1: Hold a conference with the parents prior to the IFSP/IEP meeting Particularly important when sharing results of an initial evaluation Option 2: Review the evaluation during the IFSP/IEP meeting

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Discussing Evaluation Results Taking the Family’s Perspective Parents will vary in their responses to learning that their child has a disability. Present information in an optimistic manner to enhance hope and motivation. Engage in partnership practices of sensitivity, availability, accessibility, respect, and honesty when sharing evaluation information. Parents’ perspectives are likely to reflect their culture and beliefs.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Discussing Evaluation Results Considering the Student’s Role in Discussing Evaluation Results Parents may opt to share the evaluation results and recommendations with their child. Student may participate at the end of the conference that parents attended initially. One or more members of the team may hold a separate conference with the student.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Discussing Evaluation Results Sharing the Evaluation Results with Parents: Ensure families have a clear understanding of the student’s strengths and preferences. Support parents in adjusting emotionally to the evaluation information. Interpret and communicate information to lay the foundation for the student’s education and partnerships.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Fostering Trust Opportunities within the evaluation process that build trust may include: Communicating by responding to parents’ questions honestly and clearly Demonstrating your professional competence by describing and giving concrete examples of their child’s performance Proving your commitment to the child by talking about outcomes. Respecting the family and child

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Revisiting Eloisa, Henrique, and Maria Hernandez IDEA requires educators to evaluate each child fairly but using a whole person approach IDEA requires the team to “gather relevant, functional, developmental, academic information including information provided by the parent, that may assist in determining the content of the child’s individual education program, including ….information related to enabling a child to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum.” Regular education is defined as academic, extracurricular, and other non-academic activities.

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Revisiting Eloisa, Henrique, and Maria Hernandez When Maria was in elementary school, she was included in academics and the rest of the school life. She made friends, and was happy. She has made two moves to different middle schools. Her network of friends has dissolved and her social skills are not growing (they appear to be deteriorating). The Hernandez family will need to bring several principles of partnership to bear at the reevaluation meeting. When faced with objections, what will they do? What should the educators do?

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Summary Referral/Evaluation Identifying and screening students Implementing pre- referral and RTI strategies Initiating and reviewing of referral Providing notice and obtaining consent Collecting evaluation information Analyze evaluation information Discussing evaluation results with the family

Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN: © 2011, 2006, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Linking Content To Your Life Reflect on practices that you will use to promote partnerships in student evaluation, potentially using the questions found in this section on page 207.