The Justified True Belief Theory of Knowledge Today’s objectives: 1)To be able to explain the Justified True Belief theory of knowledge. 2)To learn the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Advertisements

Improving Grades at A-level. What makes History difficult? It requires students to write on blank paper and construct answers without any help from the.
The Teaching of RI 8.8 By Joseph Schmith.
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Introduction to A2 Philosophy Homework: Background reading – ‘Questions about God.’ – Chapter 4 – God and Language, by Patrick J. Clarke.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
RATIONALISM AND EMPIRICISM: KNOWLEDGE EMPIRICISM Epistemology.
The tripartite theory of knowledge
Princeton Review SAT Book
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
Structuring an essay. Structuring an Essay: Steps 1. Understand the task 2.Plan and prepare 3.Write the first draft 4.Review the first draft – and if.
TIPS FOR WRITING EXAMINATION ESSAYS
How to Write the Five Paragraph Essay
Main Idea Topic Sentence Supporting Details
Argument and Persuasion
2 + 2 = 4 Your mother loves you. Death is a part of life. The sky is blue.
Source Based Question Reliability. Source-Based Questions When analysing sources, look at provenance, tone, purpose, content Be open-minded, sometimes.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. A BASIC INTRODUCTION. THIS MUST BE USED AS A STARTING POINT : OTHER SHEETS, TEXT BOOK AND INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED TO HAVE.
Understand About Essays What exactly is an essay? Why do we write them? What is the basic essay structure?
Chapter 9 Getting the Grade. Part 1 The Essay What is the Essay The TOK essay is a word essay written on one of 10 prescribed topics The TOK.
To focus on the structure of (a) and (c) type questions and to use peer marking to improve your exam technique.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
Learning objective: To be able to explain the claim that the mind is ontologically distinct from the body; To understand Descartes’ conceivability argument.
The Sixth Period Reading & Listening. Questionnaire (3m) Step 1: In your group, think of four situations among friends. Design four questions accordingly.
How do I tackle a 15 mark equation?!. Identify the key words in the question Decide which of the central 3 themes/questions it is dealing with WRITE Write.
Principles of Criminal Liability Exam Q Practice.
A Priori vs. A Posteriori If I know something, I must have justification. If justification essentially relies on sensory experience, then it is a posteriori.
Learning objective: To understand what is meant by epiphenomenalism and issues with it. epiphenomenalist dualism Causal redundancy.
The History Exam Germany 1 hour and 15 minutes 4 questions.
Feedback from 5 mark question: Outline and explain the argument from perceptual variation as an objection to direct realism. Point to consider: DR = objects.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
Need worksheet from yellow folder – arg from perceptual variation.
Re-cap… Fill in the blanks with either ‘necessary’, ‘sufficient’ or ‘necessary and sufficient’: Having four sides is _________ for being a square. Being.
5 mark question feedback... JTB account is only a definition of propositional knowledge. Explain precisely what it is about the JTB account that Gettier.
Knowledge rationalism Michael Lacewing
Writing a paragraph.
Learning objective: To understand what Ryle thinks is a ‘category mistake’ To understand how he defends logical behaviourism.
Lesson objective: to prepare for Paper 1 Section A of the English Language exam by understanding the terms purpose & audience and being able to answer.
More objections to DR LO:
NO KNOW The man behind Naomi in Starbucks dropped his rabbit keyring, and she passed it back to him. The following day, she saw a bus screech to a halt,
GREEK PHILOSOPHERS I can explain the importance of the Greek philosophers; Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.
DRAWING CONCLUSION S Annie Carrier.  Content Area: English/ Language Arts  Grade Level: 3 rd Grade  Summary: The purpose of this instructional PowerPoint.
Homework Feedback 1)Are there any particular areas you feel confused about? 2)How have you begun to plan this 15 mark question?: Is the Tripartite account.
Knowledge LO: To understand the distinction between three different types of knowledge. To learn some basic epistemological distinctions. To understand.
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Some topics and historical issues of the 20 th century.
Daily Warm-up: What points would you make if you were presenting an argument against the uniforms to Ms. Rains and Ms. Roach? Homework: Reading Plus due.
ATTACKING THE (SAR) OPEN ENDED RESPONSE. Get out a sheet of paper(or 2?)! Your responses to the questions on this power point will be your SAR test grade.
How to write 12M Questions AO1 - FACTS AND THEORIES Get marks by describing and recalling psychological knowledge and understanding. AO2 - APPLICATION.
Lesson 5-7 Use the Pythagorean Thm 1 Identify the Pythagorean triples 2 Use the Pythagorean inequalities to classify ∆s 3.
Technician’s list Argument planner Worksheet: Did we land on the moon? Phases of the moon scissors glue sticks 07:33.
GCSE COMPUTING Answering 6 mark questions. Extended Questions Every exam paper has two extended questions, both worth six marks each. The question will.
Topic 2: Mind-brain type identity theory
Zeno Vendler and Traditional Epistemology
The Tripartite Definition of Knowledge
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
In-Service Teacher Training
Feedback Read through my comments on your 9 mark question
Level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Comparative Method I Comparative methods deal primarily with finding and/or eliminating necessary and/or sufficient conditions that produce a given outcome.
Quick Test (Bullet Point)
What are the key parts of each theory you need to remember for Applied Ethics questions? Utilitarianism Deontology Virtue Ethics.
Quick Test (Whiteboards)
Exam Skills Question 1 – Multiple choice question Worth 1 mark
Connection between body + mind
What can you remember? Why did we say Justification is necessary for knowledge? What did we say some of the issues with saying truth is necessary for.
What is good / bad about this answer?
Y540 Pure Core Annotated sample assessment materials
Recap – NO NOTES! What key ideas / terms / arguments can you remember from the two theories we’ve covered so far: Direct Realism Indirect Realism.
Starter: Self-Report Describe the words on the cards without using the words. Note any terms of which you are unsure.
Presentation transcript:

The Justified True Belief Theory of Knowledge Today’s objectives: 1)To be able to explain the Justified True Belief theory of knowledge. 2)To learn the meaning of the terms ‘necessary’ and ‘sufficient’. 3)To begin to analyse whether the tripartite conditions for knowledge are individually necessary.

The Tripartite Definition of Knowledge/ The Justified True Belief Definition of Knowledge. Knowledge as justified, true belief. If someone knows a proposition then three conditions must be satisfied: the person must believe the proposition, it must be true, and it must be justified. S knows that p if and only if: (e.g. Sharon knows that Paris is the capital of France if and only if...) 1)S believes that p (the belief condition; e.g. Sharon believes Paris is the capital of France) 2)p is true (the truth condition; e.g. Paris is indeed the Capital of France) 3)S has adequate or sufficient evidence for p, or is justified in believing p (The evidence condition; e.g. Sharon read that Paris is the capital of France in an encyclopaedia). For Plato, what is the difference between true belief and knowledge?

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions The proposition ‘S knows that p’ is true if and only if S believes that p, p is true and S has adequate justification for her belief. These three conditions are said to be individually necessary AND jointly sufficient for saying that ‘S knows that p’. Necessary = you need each condition to have knowledge. Sufficient = if you have all three conditions then you definitely have knowledge. Lacewing Read pp to work out what the terms ‘necessary’ and ‘sufficient’ mean.  A necessary condition for some state of affairs X is a condition that must be satisfied in order for X to obtain. e.g. A necessary condition for John to be a bachelor is that he is male.  A sufficient condition for some state of affairs X is a condition that, if satisfied, guarantees that S obtains. e.g. The sufficient conditions for John to be a bachelor are that he is male, that he is unmarried and that he is an adult.

Outline the tripartite definition of knowledge (5 marks) AQA: The examiner is looking for: -‘A full, clear and precise explanation’. - ‘The student makes logical links between precisely identified points, with no redundancy’. Redundancy = unnecessary/irrelevant detail. Make sure you include the terminology necessary and sufficient. 5 marks – A full, clear and precise explanation. – The student makes logical links between precisely identified points, with no redundancy. 4 marks – A clear explanation, with logical links, but some imprecision/redundancy. 3 marks – The substantive content of the explanation is present and there is an attempt at logical thinking, but the explanation is not full and/or precise. 2 marks – One or two relevant points made, but not precisely. The logic is unclear. 1 mark – Fragmented points with no logical structure. 0 marks – Nothing written worthy of credit.

1) Read the scenarios in pairs and check to see whether: (a)The person believes the fact (the belief condition) (b)The fact is true (the truth condition) (c)The person would be justified in believing it (the evidence condition). 2) Did using the three conditions match your own intuitions in each of the cases? (i) Davina thinks that monkeys are more intelligent than humans because her mate told her so. (ii) Ravi reckons the sun will set at 19:02 on Sunday having read as much in the paper. And it does. (iii) The forecast says there is a chance of rain tomorrow. Looking at the sky, farmer Pete is convinced it will be dry. It stays dry the whole day. (iv) Having been told by his parents and having read books and watched videos on the subject, young Victor is convinced that Santa Claus exists. (v) Hamid is convinced that earth is the 3 rd planet from the sun because Mickey Mouse told him so in a dream. (vi) Tamsin learns from a texbook that Hamlet is Shakespeare’s longest play (which it is). (vii) Will watches five videos of Shakespeare plays and concludes by their length that Hamlet must be Shakespeare’s longest play. (viii) Colin is going out with Simone. However at a party he kisses Fiona. No one sees a thing. Back at college Nigel is secretly in love with Simone. To try to get them to split up he makes up a rumour, telling Brian that Colin and Fiona got off at the party. Later Charlie hears this rumour and believes it. We are now going to assess whether each of the conditions for knowledge (according to the tripartite view) are individually necessary...

Are the JTB conditions individually necessary? In small groups, read the information in the blue book (pp ) and answer the questions on the sheet, in order to assess whether the conditions are necessary for knowledge. It is up to you which one you start with – discuss the answers as you work through.

Homework (due next lesson) 1)Finish completing the questions in order to analyse whether they are necessary for knowledge. 2)Outline the argument that the belief condition is not necessary for knowledge. (9 marks) AQA Examiner looking for: o The answer is set out in a clear, integrated and logical form. The content of the answer is correct. The material is clearly relevant and points are made clearly and precisely. o There may be some redundancy or lack of clarity in particular points, but not sufficient to detract from the answer. o Technical philosophical language is used appropriately and consistently.

Today’s objectives: 1)To be able to explain the Justified True Belief theory of knowledge. 2)To learn the meaning of the terms ‘necessary’ and ‘sufficient’. 3)To begin to analyse whether the tripartite conditions for knowledge are individually necessary. Fill in the blanks with either ‘necessary’, ‘sufficient’ or ‘necessary and sufficient’: 1)Having four sides is _________ for being a square. 2)Being a square is __________ for having four sides. 3)Having three straight sides is ___________ for being a triangle. Do you think that the justification condition is necessary for knowledge? necessary sufficient Necessary and sufficient

How confident do you feel with analysing the conditions of knowledge for their necessity? Not at all confident Very confident