LSST and VOEvent VOEvent Workshop Pasadena, CA April 13-14, 2005 Tim Axelrod University of Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUCLID : From Dark Energy to Earth mass planets and beyond Jean-Philippe Beaulieu Institut dAstrophysique de Paris Dave Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Advertisements

OULE3 - Time Domain Implementation & Validation Phase Isobel Hook Jean-Philippe Beaulieu 1.
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
P.Tisserand Rencontres du Vietnam Final results on galactic dark matter from the EROS-2 microlensing survey ~ images processed - 55 million.
K2 Kepler’s Second Mission 1 K2 - a 2-wheel Kepler mission; The second highest peak in the world, a worthy ascent Steve B. Howell NASA Ames Research Center.
1 WFC3 UVIS Shutter Blade Kailash C. Sahu STScI STScI Calibration Workshop August 13, 2014 With thanks to Sylvia Baggett and Megan Sosey.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
Distance Ladder. Pre-class Problem You stand are looking at “famous local landmark” from two positions on either side of the “other famous local place”.
Pi of the Sky – preparation for GW Advance Detector Era Adam Zadrożny Wilga 2014.
Ultimate wide field Imaging: The Large Synoptic Sky Survey Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Why is Rotation Speed Proportional to Mass? mv 2 /R = GMm/R 2 ; centrifugal force = gravitational force due to the mass “M” within the radius “R.” =>
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Extra Solar Planets Geoff Bower.
The Gravitational Microlensing Planet Search Technique from Space David Bennett & Sun Hong Rhie (University of Notre Dame) Gravitational Lensing Time Series.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Optical I: Big Apertures Geoff Bower.
May stars be the actors and dark energy direct shoot a movie in the sky Chihway Chang Oct.8 ‘2008.
Pan-STARRS and TGBN Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
Detection of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets via Gravitational Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
1 HOT-WIRING THE TRANSIENT UNIVERSE | SANTA BARBARA, CA | MAY 12-15, 201 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master LSST Alert Production Pipelines.
LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, 2011 Analysis Overview Bhuv Jain and Jeff Newman.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Philip A. Pinto Steward Observatory University of Arizona for the LSST Collaboration Legacy Projects Workshop 17 May,
National Center for Supercomputing Applications Observational Astronomy NCSA projects radio astronomy: CARMA & SKA optical astronomy: DES & LSST access:
1 New Frontiers with LSST: leveraging world facilities Tony Tyson Director, LSST Project University of California, Davis Science with the 8-10 m telescopes.
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics Pune, India. 30 th June 2009 Imaging Characteristics of Ultra-Violet Imaging Telescope (UVIT) through.
1 Radio Astronomy in the LSST Era – NRAO, Charlottesville, VA – May 6-8 th LSST Survey Data Products Mario Juric LSST Data Management Project Scientist.
Effective Mirror Diameter6.5 m Field of view9.6 sq deg Exposure (‘Visit’) Time2x15 s /visit Survey length10 years Data rate~15 TB/night Sky coverage~18,000.
The Chinese SONG proposal: scientific concerns Jianning Fu (Beijing Normal University) and Chinese SONG team Beijing ─ March 29, 2010 The third workshop.
1 Hot-Wiring the Transient Universe Santa Barbara CA May 12, 2015 LSST + Tony Tyson UC Davis LSST Chief Scientist.
A goal of the LSST project is to capture the optical sky into a database so effectively that observing the database is a satisfactory, and even superior,
Astronomical Spectroscopy and the Virtual Observatory ESAC, March 2007 VO tools and cross-calibration Pedro García-Lario European Space Astronomy.
LSST Alert Management VOEvent Meeting Tucson, AZ December 5-6, 2005 Robyn Allsman,LSSTC/NOAO Maria Nieto-Santisteban, JHU Ray Plante, NCSA Tim Axelrod,
Astrometry & the Yale/WIYN ODI Survey. Potential astrometric projects Local luminosity function (van Altena, et al.) obtain  ≤ 0.10 parallaxes to 150.
Discussion - Survey Design Survey product equation: #fields = fld/nt x useable x (%xnights/yr) x years = 4 x 0.5 x (0.75 x 13 x 18) x 3 = 4 x 0.5 x 175.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
EScience May 2007 From Photons to Petabytes: Astronomy in the Era of Large Scale Surveys and Virtual Observatories R. Chris Smith NOAO/CTIO, LSST.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
Quality Assurance Benchmark Datasets and Processing David Nidever SQuaRE Science Lead.
Korean Astronomical Society Meeting, April 22, 2005 Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics & Topics in the Search for Extrasolar Planets.
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
1 CORE DATA PROCESSING SOFTWARE PLAN REVIEW | SEATTLE, WA | SEPTEMBER 19-20, 2013 Name of Meeting Location Date - Change in Slide Master Data Release Processing.
The Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey (TAOS) Matthew Lehner ASIAA.
The Transient Sky Eran Ofek CALTECH Shri Kulkarni Arne Rau Mansi Kasliwal Brian Cameron Avishay Gal-Yam Dale Frail Collaborators:
Wide Field Astronomy from Space Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute January 9, 2002.
1 Imaging Surveys: Goals/Challenges May 12, 2005 Luiz da Costa European Southern Observatory.
Precision Studies of Dark Energy with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope David L. Burke SLAC for the LSST Collaboration Rencontres de Moriond Contents.
Pan-STARRS and SNe Paul Price Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii.
The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Project Bob Mann LSST:UK Project Leader Wide-Field Astronomy Unit, Edinburgh.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
MMT Observation Database for Light Curve Analysis Vladimir Agapov Presentation for the WG1 session 33rd IADC meeting, Houston.
Jovan Aleksić Serbia Level 1 Transient events (variable and moving objects) Level 2 Static objects (catalogs, images) Level 3 User services.
IPHAS Early Data Release E. A. Gonzalez-Solares IPHAS Consortium AstroGrid National Astronomy Meeting, 2007.
The LSST Data Processing Software Stack Tim Jenness (LSST Tucson) for the LSST Data Management Team Abstract The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)
1 LSST Town Hall 227 th meeting of the AAS 1/7/2016 LSST Town Hall 227 th meeting of the AAS 1/7/16 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Town Hall Beth Willman.
Spotting the life of stars „Pi of the Sky” Project Katarzyna Kwiecińska UKSW-SNŚ on behalf of the Pi of the Sky collaboration.
2010 – Ji-Beom Ham OUTBURST EVENT WITH LSST Giant Telescope Science 2011 Spring.
Gina Moraila University of Arizona April 21, 2012.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
1 GMT Community Science Meeting Monterey, CA October 1 – 3, 2015 LSST – A Discovery Machine for ELT Era Science Beth Willman LSST Deputy Director GMT Community.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
DEEP LENS SURVEY Long term dual hemisphere campaign
Transfer Learning in Astronomy: A New Machine Learning Paradigm
First results from BEST at OHP
LSST : Follow-up des SN proches
Overview of Science Verification Plan Keith Bechtol and Zeljko Ivezic LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

LSST and VOEvent VOEvent Workshop Pasadena, CA April 13-14, 2005 Tim Axelrod University of Arizona

2 Overview of Talk Science drivers Quick look at LSST Data pipeline Characteristics of LSST transients LSST and VOEvent

3 LSST Science Drivers Characterize dark energy through –Weak lensing –Supernovae –Galaxy cluster statistics Explore transient and variable objects Census of solar system objects, especially PHO's 3D structure of the Milky Way

4 A Quick Look at LSST Aperture diameter: 8.4m Effective aperture: 6.7m FOV: 3.5 deg Filters: u(?), g, r, i, z, y Observing mode: pairs of 15 sec exposures, separated by 5 sec slew Single exposure depth: 24.5 Site: Baja or Chile On sky: 2013

5 LSST Optics

LSST Focalplane 3.5 gigapixel, 2 sec readout

Data Acquisition Image Processing Pipeline Detection Pipeline Association Pipeline Image Archive Source Catalog Object Catalog Alerts Deep Detection Pipeline Deep Object Catalog VO Compliant Interface LSST Data Pipeline

Data Pipeline Functions Image Processing Pipeline is responsible for producing –Calibrated science images Astrometric calibration (WCS) Photometric calibration –Subtracted images –Stacked images Detection Pipeline is responsible for producing –The Source Catalog, which contains parameters of all sources found in an image: location, brightness, shape Association Pipeline is responsible for associating sources found at different times and (sometimes) locations, producing –The Object Catalog, which contains parameters of all astronomical objects: lightcurves, colors, proper motions, … Object Classifier, design TBD, is responsible for periodically (re)classifying all objects in the Object Catalog

Spatial Sampling Output of LSST observing simulator Cerro Pachon, 475 days, real weather Weak lensing + supernovae + NEA search

Time Sampling 3 day peak from SN

Time Sampling – cont

Detectable Astrophysical Transients We are limited mostly by –Time sampling –Photometric accuracy (goal is 1%) We will not see (for example) –Low amplitude pulsating WD's (photometry) –Exoplanet transits (photometry and time sampling) –Microlensing caustic crossing events (time sampling) We will see –Many classes of periodic variables with amplitude > 1% –Many microlensing events –Novae –SNe, QSO's, … –As well as “middle of nowhere” transients (eg transients found by DLS)

LSST and VOEvent LSST brings up nothing new regarding the “who”, “when”, or “where” aspects of VOEvent Areas of interest: –Making the “what” useful –Limiting “false alarm” rates –Quantifying “importance” (related to false alarm probability?) –Partitioning of responsibility

Classification of Events The LSST data pipeline will attempt to classify variable objects based on –Position in CMD –Lightcurve shape –Motion, and orbital elements, if applicable The classifier will play a key role in identifying “events” –If the object is already in the catalog, an event occurs relative to the object's previous behavior (an event is not simply a change in flux) –Not so useful for new objects, but still possible to locate in CMD

How can a customer specify an interesting class of event? An “Event” is more than a change in flux –“Notify me of all Cepheids that change period by more than 5%” –“Notify me of all transients > 5σ with no corresponding catalogued object” –“Notify me of any newly discovered solar system object with a > 15AU and confidence > 0.9” We need a flexible semantics for event filters –SQL query on the object catalog is not quite enough(?) –Need to include temporal logic so that past behavior can be referenced(?)

Transient Rates Astrophysical rates - stars –Roughly 5% of stars are variable at the 1% level or more –A typical LSST image contains roughly 2.5e5 stars –Rate from typical images are 1e7 per night –An exceptional LSST image (LMC, bulge) contains up to 4e6 stars Astrophysical rates – extragalactic supernovae –SN rate about 1 / 200 yr / galaxy –Changing flux from each visible for at least 30 d –A typical LSST (unstacked) image contains roughly 4e5 galaxies –Rate is about 1e5 per night

Transient Rates - cont Noise rates –Every PSF patch is a potential transient location – about 8e8 of these –Each is measured once every 35 sec (2 * 15 sec exposures; 5 sec slew) –Assuming gaussian noise About 3e4 / sec at 3σ About 8 / sec at 5σ (3e5 / night) Rate reduced by significant factor if detection required in each 15 sec exposure separately

Dealing With High Event Rates LSST will detect transients at rate of O(1e5 – 1e6 / night) –No group of humans can look at these individually –No followup facility can look at more than a negligible fraction –We need to filter these by a large factor to make them useful Excluding known variable objects results in the biggest reduction – but still leaves large noise rate Noise rates can be reduced by simply increasing the detection threshold – but at the cost of missing real information We need to carefully consider use cases, and make use of simulations, to find a way forward

VOEvent Processing Architecture LSST Data Pipeline VOEvent DB Event Filter Event Filter Event Filter System Boundary?

Unresolved Issues Who will implement the VOEvent DB into which LSST feeds? What latency is needed in generating VOEvents? How best to incorporate links to extra information into VOEvents – eg object lightcurve or image postage stamp How can we incorporate concepts like “classification change” or “period change” into VOEvent? –This type of event depends on a baseline, which somehow must be part of the data How can we assign “importance” in a quantitative way?