UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT RESULTS & ANALYSIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Advertisements

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Using the 2005 National Survey of Student Engagement in Student Affairs Indiana State University.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
National Survey of Student Engagement University of Minnesota, Morris NSSE 2004.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
SURVEY OF RECENT GRADUATES AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSISTING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Teresa Ward Ms. Beth Katz Office of Institutional.
Assessment of Student Learning Faculty In-service June 5, 2006.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
An Equal Opportunity University Third Annual Meeting of the Provost’s Committee on Undergraduate Student Success October 22, 2009.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
6/4/2007Admissions General Education At Widener Scott Van Bramer – A&S Sue Greenberg - SBA.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
CARL-N Mini-conference Students and Faculty Perspectives: Are We Engaged Yet? Presented by Yuhfen Diana Wu Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library San Jose.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
NSSE Results for Faculty
The University of Texas-Pan American
The University of Texas-Pan American
GGC and Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
Presentation transcript:

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT RESULTS & ANALYSIS

REPORT ORGANIZATION INTRODUCTION RESULTS WHAT ARE OUR STRENGTHS? WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? ANALYSIS & COMMENTS

NSSE INTRODUCTION NSSE UWP N ATIONAL S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT (NSSE) ADMINISTERED ONLINE TO 1,745 UWP FRESHMEN & SENIORS IN FEBRUARY & MARCH 2004 PARTICIPANTS SELF- SELECTED

NSSE INTRODUCTION UWP UWP : 41% RESPONSE RATE UWP PARTICIPANTS’ GENDER DISTRIBUTION MATCHED UWP SENIOR POPULATION. HIGHLY RELIABLE RESULTS UWP UW SYSTEM ABLE TO COMPARE UWP WITH UW SYSTEM SCHOOLS, “MASTER’S CLUSTER” & NATIONAL DATA

NSSE INTRODUCTION NSSE DATA ARE “NOMINAL,” I.E., CATEGORICAL. AVERAGES ARE “LESS MEANINGFUL.” STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE ASKS, “WHAT’S THE POSSIBILITY THIS AVERAGE WAS CAUSED BY ‘RANDOM CHANCE’ ALONE?”

NSSE RESULTS UWP WHAT IS UWP “GOOD AT?” WHAT ARE OUR HIGHEST AVERAGES? UW SYSTEM WHAT ARE OUR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES OVER OTHER UW SYSTEM SCHOOLS? WHAT CONTRIBUTES TO OUR STRENGTHS?

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWPUWP STUDENTS WORK WELL WITH COMPUTERS & INFO TECHNOLOGIES. UW SYSTEMHIGHEST AVERAGE … STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT AT.001 LEVEL, COMPARED TO UW SYSTEM SCHOOLS STRENGTH OF ENGINEERING, MATH & SCIENCE PROGRAMS

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWPUWP STUDENTS WORK EFFECTIVELY WITH OTHERS. TEAM WORKEMPHASIS ON TEAM WORK WILL SERVE OUR GRADS WELL IN ‘THE REAL WORLD.’ CRITICAL IN PROGRAMS LIKE ENGINEERING, BUSINESS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ETC.

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWPUWP STUDENTS ARE GOOD AT APPLYING THEORIES OR CONCEPTS TO PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OR IN NEW SITUATIONS … AND GOOD AT CRITICAL THINKING & ANALYSIS. UWSWHILE OTHER UWS SCHOOLS SEEM TO STRESS MORE ROTE MEMORIZING OF FACTS, IDEAS AND METHODS.

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWPUWP STUDENTS ARE GOOD AT IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF BASIC ELEMENTS OF AN IDEA, EXPERIENCE, OR THEORY … AND THEN INTEGRATING IDEAS OR INFORMATION FROM VARIOUS SOURCES INTO PAPERS & PROJECTS.

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWP UWSUWP STUDENTS ARE MORE ENGAGED THAN ARE OTHER UWS STUDENTS … IN PREPARING FOR CLASS (STUDYING, READING, DOING HOMEWORK OR LAB WORK, WRITING, ANALYZING DATA, REHEARSING, AND ACTIVITIES RELATED TO ACADEMICS). STATISTICALLY

UWP NSSE UWP STRENGTHS UWP UWSUWP STUDENTS ARE MORE ENGAGED THAN ARE OTHER UWS STUDENTS … IN PARTICIPATING IN CO- CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES (ORGANIZATIONS, STUDENT GOVERNMENT, SPORTS, CAMPUS PUBLICATIONS, ETC). STATISTICALLY

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWPUWP STUDENTS DON’T WRITE AS MUCH AS WE’D LIKE (ALTHOUGH NOT SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN DO STUDENTS AT OTHER SCHOOLS). UWPUWP STUDENTS DON’T ATTEND AS MANY THEATRE PERFORMANCES, DANCES, PLAYS, OR ART EXHIBITS AS WE’D LIKE.

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWPUWP STUDENTS DON’T HAVE AS MUCH EXPOSURE TO ETHNIC & RACIAL DIVERSITY AS WE’D LIKE. FEWER CONVERSATIONS WITH STUDENTS OF OTHER RACES OR ETHNICITIES LESS CONTACT, LESS APPRECIATION & LESS UNDERSTANDING

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWPUWP STUDENTS HAVE NOT RECEIVED ‘PROMPT FEEDBACK’ ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FROM FACULTY … AS PROMPTLY AS THEY’D LIKE (SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION). MAY BE A FUNCTION OF THIS GENERATION’S NEED FOR INSTANT GRATIFICATION

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWPUWP STUDENTS HAVE NOT PARTICIPATED IN MANY COMMUNITY-BASED PROJECTS AS PART OF A REGULAR COURSE. UWS“VERY LITTLE” TO “SOME” IS IDENTICAL TO UWS, BUT LOWER THAN NAT’L AVERAGE (BUT NOT STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT) … C-U-PUWPDESPITE ON-GOING EFFORTS OF C-U-P AND UWP FACULTY.

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWPUWP STUDENTS DON’T SEEM TO APPRECIATE OUR GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAM AS MUCH AS WE’D HOPED. UWSSTATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT AT.001 LEVEL BELOW UWS SCHOOLS, BUT … UWPBOTH FRESHMEN & SENIORS SAY THEIR UWP EXPERIENCE HAS CONTRIBUTED TO A BROAD GENERAL EDUCATION “QUITE A BIT” (3 ON A SCALE OF 1-4).

WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? NSSE WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION? UWP ACTRECENT UWP ALUMS (2001~03) PARTICIPATED IN ACT STUDY ASSESSING QUALITY OF COLLEGE EXPERIENCE PERHAPS TOO RECENT TO APPRECIATE THE VALUE OF GENERAL EDUCATION NSSESOME CONSISTENCIES WITH NSSE RESULTS …

ACT ACT STRENGTHS EFFECTIVE VERBAL SKILLS EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP SKILLS DEFINING & SOLVING PROBLEMS WORKING COOPERATIVELY WITH OTHERS IN GROUPS EFFECTIVE WRITTEN SKILLS

ACT ACT WEAKNESSES UNDERSTANDING & APPRECIATING ART, MUSIC, LITERATURE … AND CULTURAL DIFFERENCES AMONG PEOPLE UNDERSTANDING INTERNATIONAL ISSUES UNDERSTANDING INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS & THE ENVIRONMENT APPRECIATING / EXERCISING RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES & PRIVILEGES AS A CITIZEN

ANALYSIS & COMMENTS NSSE ANALYSIS & COMMENTS STUDENT PERCEPTIONS ARE NOT THE SAME AS REALITY. NSSENSSE ’S NOMINAL DATA STRUCTURES MAKE COMPARISONS OF MEANS SOMEWHAT AWKWARD … AND “STAT’L SIGNIFICANCE” MAY BE LESS VALUABLE.

ANALYSIS & COMMENTS NSSE ANALYSIS & COMMENTS EXAMPLE SECT. 4: READING & WRITING … ITEMS C, D & E ASK ABOUT WRITING C: 20 PAGES OR MORE … D: 5~19 PAGES … E: FEWER THAN 5 PAGES IN OTHER WORDS, A 5-PAGE PAPER IS MORE LIKE A 19-PAGE PAPER THAN LIKE A 4-PAGE PAPER.

ANALYSIS & COMMENTS NSSE ANALYSIS & COMMENTS WE ARE “LOCKED INTO” SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN … LIMITED OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMMUNITY-BASED PROJECTS … FOR ETHNIC EXPERIENCES & CULTURAL DIVERSITY … FOR THEATRE, MUSIC, DANCE, ART, AND OTHER CULTURAL EXPERIENCES.

ANALYSIS & COMMENTS NSSE ANALYSIS & COMMENTS UWPUWP DOES PRETTY WELL, CONSIDERING GEOGRAPHIC & CULTURAL CONSTRAINTS. STUDY ABROAD EXCHANGE PROGRAMS C-U-PON-GOING EFFORTS LIKE STUDY ABROAD & EXCHANGE PROGRAMS, C-U-P & FINE ARTS’ PERFORMANCES MAKE OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE.

ANALYSIS & COMMENTS NSSE ANALYSIS & COMMENTS UWPUWP ACADEMIC INITIATIVES LIKE “WRITING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM” & GENERAL EDUCATION REVISIONS ATTEMPT TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PREPARATION … EVEN IF STUDENTS MAY NOT APPRECIATE IT AT THE TIME.

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT RESULTS & ANALYSIS

QUESTIONS NSSE 1.SHOULD WE “REFERENCE” SPECIFIC NSSE ITEMS? 2.SHOULD WE “TAILOR” THIS CONTENT FOR SPECIFIC AUDIENCES (E.G., DEANS, STUDENT AFFAIRS, ETC.)? 3.SHOULD WRITTEN SUMMARIES BE PREPARED FOR SUCH AUDIENCES? HLC 4.WHAT ROLE FOR HLC ?